[Elesclomol-Cu Induces Cuproptosis in Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of elesclomol-Cu (ES-Cu) on the proliferation and cuproptosis of human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells. METHODS: The effects of ES-Cu on the proliferation of AML cells and the AML cells pre-treated with ammonium tetrathiomolybdate (TTM) were examined by CCK-8 assay. The Calcein/PI kit was used to detected the changes in activity and cytotoxicity of AML cells induced by ES-Cu. Flow cytometry and Cytation3 fully automated cell imaging multifunctional detection system were used to analyze DCFH-DA fluorescence intensity, so as to determine the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The GSH and GSSG detection kits were used to measure the intracellular GSH content. Western blot was used to detected the expression of cuproptosis-related proteins ATP7B, FDX1, DLAT and DPYD. RESULTS: ES-Cu inhibited the proliferation of Kasumi-1 and HL-60 cells in a concentration-dependent manner (r Kasumi-1=-0.99， r HL-60=-0.98). As the concentration of ES-Cu increased, the level of intracellular ROS also increased (P <0.01-0.001). TTM could significantly reverse the inhibitory effect of ES-Cu on cell proliferation and its promoting effect on ROS. With the increase of ES-Cu concentration, the content of GSH was decreased (r =-0.98), and Western blot showed that the protein expressions of ATP7B, FDX1, DLAT and DPYD were significantly reduced (P <0.05). CONCLUSION: ES-Cu can induce cuproptosis in AML cells, which provides a new idea for the treatment of AML.

Bioequivalence of two tablet formulations of cefpodoxime proxetil in beagle dogs.

The pharmacokinetic profiles and bioequivalence of two cefpodoxime proxetil tablets were investigated in Beagle dogs. A single-dose, four-way complete replication and crossover design was used in the present study. A total of 28 healthy Beagle dogs (half male and female) with an average body weight of 11.1 kg were randomly allocated to this study. A whole reference or test tablet containing the equivalent of 100 mg of cefpodoxime was administered orally to each dog. Serial plasma samples were collected, and cefpodoxime concentrations were determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Then a non-compartmental method was used to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters of both tablet formulations. The average bioequivalence (ABE) or reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) methods were used to determine the 90% confidence interval (CI) of AUCINF_obs and Cmax. No significant differences were observed for both parameters between both tablets. The test formulation was bioequivalent to the reference one because the 90% CI ranges of Cmax and AUCINF_obs were all between 80 and 125%.