Development and evaluation of a multimodal marker of major depressive disorder.

This study aimed to identify biomarkers of major depressive disorder (MDD), by relating neuroimage-derived measures to binary (MDD/control), ordinal (severe MDD/mild MDD/control), or continuous (depression severity) outcomes. To address MDD heterogeneity, factors (severity of psychic depression, motivation, anxiety, psychosis, and sleep disturbance) were also used as outcomes. A multisite, multimodal imaging (diffusion MRI [dMRI] and structural MRI [sMRI]) cohort (52 controls and 147 MDD patients) and several modeling techniques-penalized logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machine (SVM)-were used. An additional cohort (25 controls and 83 MDD patients) was used for validation. The optimally performing classifier (SVM) had a 26.0% misclassification rate (binary), 52.2 ± 1.69% accuracy (ordinal) and r = .36 correlation coefficient (p < .001, continuous). Using SVM, R2 values for prediction of any MDD factors were <10%. Binary classification in the external data set resulted in 87.95% sensitivity and 32.00% specificity. Though observed classification rates are too low for clinical utility, four image-based features contributed to accuracy across all models and analyses-two dMRI-based measures (average fractional anisotropy in the right cuneus and left insula) and two sMRI-based measures (asymmetry in the volume of the pars triangularis and the cerebellum) and may serve as a priori regions for future analyses. The poor accuracy of classification and predictive results found here reflects current equivocal findings and sheds light on challenges of using these modalities for MDD biomarker identification. Further, this study suggests a paradigm (e.g., multiple classifier evaluation with external validation) for future studies to avoid nongeneralizable results.

Lumbar Spinal Canal Segmentation in Cases with Lumbar Stenosis Using Deep-U-Net Ensembles.

BACKGROUND: Narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal, or lumbar stenosis (LS), may cause debilitating radicular pain or muscle weakness. It is the most frequent indication for spinal surgery in the elderly population. Modern diagnosis relies on magnetic resonance imaging and its inherently subjective interpretation. Diagnostic rigor, accuracy, and speed may be improved by automation. In this work, we aimed to determine whether a deep-U-Net ensemble trained to segment spinal canals on a heterogeneous mix of clinical data is comparable to radiologists' segmentation of these canals in patients with LS. METHODS: The deep U-nets were trained on spinal canals segmented by physicians on 100 axial T2 lumbar magnetic resonance imaging selected randomly from our institutional database. Test data included a total of 279 elderly patients with LS that were separate from the training set. RESULTS: Machine-generated segmentations (MA) were qualitatively similar to expert-generated segmentations (ME1, ME2). Machine- and expert-generated segmentations were quantitatively similar, as evidenced by Dice scores (MA vs. ME1: 0.88 ± 0.04, MA vs. ME2: 0.89 ± 0.04), the Hausdorff distance (MA vs. ME1: 11.7 mm ± 13.8, MA vs. ME2: 13.1 mm ± 16.3), and average surface distance (MAvs. ME1: 0.18 mm ± 0.13, MA vs. ME2 0.18 mm ± 0.16) metrics. These metrics are comparable to inter-rater variation (ME1 vs. ME2 Dice scores: 0.94 ± 0.02, the Hausdorff distances: 9.3 mm ± 15.6, average surface distances: 0.08 mm ± 0.09). CONCLUSION: We conclude that machine learning algorithms can segment lumbar spinal canals in LS patients, and automatic delineations are both qualitatively and quantitatively comparable to expert-generated segmentations.

Structural Changes in the Cervicomedullary Junction in Adult Chiari Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess volumetric changes in the spinal cord at the cervicomedullary junction, diameter of the cervicomedullary cord, and width of the brainstem following posterior fossa decompression (PFD). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of adult patients with Chiari malformation who underwent PFD was performed. Segmentations were done on clinical quality T2-weighted cervical magnetic resonance images obtained before and after decompression using ITK-SNAP. Volumes of neural tissue within the cervicomedullary junction were evaluated from 10 mm cranial to the medullary beak to the cervical spinal cord at the level of the caudal endplate of the second cervical vertebra. The diameter of the cervicomedullary cord was calculated perpendicular to the spinal cord. The width of the brainstem was measured perpendicular to the clivus at the level of the basion. RESULTS: Twenty adult patients, a mean age of 49.55 years, were included. The cervical cord increased in volume by 13 mm3 to 338 mm3, with an average increase of 155 mm3 (P-value of 0.00002). The diameter of the cervicomedullary cord increased 10.30% 7 mm superior to the beak (P-value of 0.00074), 11.49% at the apex of the beak (P-value of 0.00082), 8.29% 7 mm inferior to the beak (P-value of 0.00075), and the brainstem increased 14.46% perpendicular to the clivus (P-value of 0.00109). The spinal cord at the inferior aspect of the C3 vertebra changed insignificantly (P-value of 0.10580). CONCLUSION: The volume of the cervical cord at the cervical-medullary junction, width of the cervicomedullary cord, and diameter of the brainstem increase following PFD.

Predicting Spinal Surgery Candidacy From Imaging Data Using Machine Learning.

BACKGROUND: The referral process for consultation with a spine surgeon remains inefficient, given a substantial proportion of referrals to spine surgeons are nonoperative. OBJECTIVE: To develop a machine-learning-based algorithm which accurately identifies patients as candidates for consultation with a spine surgeon, using only magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: We trained a deep U-Net machine learning model to delineate spinal canals on axial slices of 100 normal lumbar MRI scans which were previously delineated by expert radiologists and neurosurgeons. We then tested the model against lumbar MRI scans for 140 patients who had undergone lumbar spine MRI at our institution (60 of whom ultimately underwent surgery, and 80 of whom did not). The model generated automated segmentations of the lumbar spinal canals and calculated a maximum degree of spinal stenosis for each patient, which served as our biomarker for surgical pathology warranting expert consultation. RESULTS: The machine learning model correctly predicted surgical candidacy (ie, whether patients ultimately underwent lumbar spinal decompression) with high accuracy (area under the curve = 0.88), using only imaging data from lumbar MRI scans. CONCLUSION: Automated interpretation of lumbar MRI scans was sufficient to correctly determine surgical candidacy in nearly 90% of cases. Given that a significant proportion of referrals placed for spine surgery evaluation fail to meet criteria for surgical intervention, our model could serve as a valuable tool for patient triage and thereby address some of the inefficiencies within the outpatient surgical referral process.