Asunto(s)
Antígenos CD20/biosíntesis , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Linfoma de Células T Asociado a Enteropatía/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Linfoma de Células T Asociado a Enteropatía/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células T Asociado a Enteropatía/metabolismo , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: In diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), sarcopenia is associated with increased side-effects of chemotherapy and poor survival, especially in elderly patients. Anemia, a complex condition resulting from cancer itself and inflammation, might have a correlation with loss of muscle mass and might also indicate a worse outcome. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of the skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) with hemoglobin (Hb) levels and its predictive value for the outcome of DLBCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included patients, aged 70 or older, newly diagnosed with DLBCL who received immunochemotherapy. Sex-specific L3-SMI was measured by computed tomography, and Hb levels before treatment were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were used to analyze survival and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Anemia was correlated with a low SMI. The presence of either low L3-SMI or anemia (Hb <10.5 g/l) indicated a poor prognosis for both progression-free and overall survival. A novel score combining L3-SMI, and Hb and lactate dehydrogenase levels as independent predictive factors was proposed for treatment response, progression-free and overall survival after adjusting for International Prognostic Index. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of sarcopenia and anemia in patients with DLBCL, particularly in the elderly population. The proposed novel score combining L3-SMI, Hb, and lactate dehydrogenase may provide additional prognostic information for patients with DLBCL, aiding in treatment decisions and management.
Asunto(s)
Anemia , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Sarcopenia , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Sarcopenia/complicaciones , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico , Músculo Esquelético/patología , Pronóstico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/complicaciones , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Anemia/complicaciones , Lactato Deshidrogenasas , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Background: A combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is considered the standard treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, no standard treatment has been established for older patients (age ≥ 75 years). This study retrospectively analyzed different treatment strategies in older patients with DLBCL with different chemotherapy regimens and compared the survival rate of patients using oral or intravenous form cyclophosphamide and etoposide in a single center. Methods: We reviewed the records of older patients with DLBCL, aged ≥ 75 years, from January 2010 to August 2019. The different treatment combinations, clinical characteristics, response rates, and toxicity profiles were analyzed. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. Cox regression model was used to identify the risk factors. Results: Eighty-four patients were included. One-quarter of the patients received cytoreduction treatment because of their poor medical condition at the time of diagnosis. Twenty-six percent of the patients were aged ≥ 85 at the time of diagnosis and 46.7% completed the treatment course. Patients receiving non-anthracycline-containing (non-ACR) treatment had worse Charlson comorbidity index, worse PFS, lower body mass index, or were older. The mean anthracycline accumulative dose in the anthracycline-containing (ACR) group was 134 mg/m2. The median OS was 17.2 months and median PFS was 7.7 months. The PFS of R-CHOP is better than R-mini-CHOP and R-CVOP without statistical significance, but OS of R-CHOP is not better than the other regimens. Conclusion: The toxicity, efficacy, and KM curve for OS and PFS in the non-ACR group were lower compared to ACR group, without statistical significance. R-CVOP had similar OS with R-mini-CHOP in our study. The result does not mean etoposide could totally substitute for anthracycline, but etoposide did have lower early progression rate (12.5%), and it may be an option for frail patients with comorbidity. Oral form cyclophosphamide and etoposide could be considered as a substitute for intravenous administration because of the similar effect and toxic profile.