Efficacy and Safety of Ultrafiltration in Patients with Heart Failure: A Single-Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of literature on the efficacy and safety of ultrafiltration in Chinese patients with heart failure (HF). Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrafiltration with diuretics and provide information and evidence as to the best approach for patients with HF. METHODS: In this single-center, non-randomized interventional study patients with HF either received diuretics or ultrafiltration. The efficacy outcomes included changes in the weight, dyspnea score, and 6-min walk distance from baseline to 48 h after treatment. Safety outcomes were evaluated in both the groups with respect to changes in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, blood potassium ion concentration, and blood sodium ion concentration. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients with HF (diuretics, 73; ultrafiltration, 76) were included. At 48 h, patients in the ultrafiltration group showed significantly greater weight loss and better improvement in dyspnea score and 6-min walk distance compared to patients in the control group (P < 0.05). However, the two groups showed no statistically significant difference in terms of safety outcomes such as systolic blood pressure, heart rate, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, blood potassium ion concentration, and blood sodium ion concentration, suggesting similar safety profiles of both the groups. CONCLUSION: Ultrafiltration was associated with greater weight loss and better dyspnea score and 6-min walk distance with similar safety profiles as compared with diuretics. Ultrafiltration can be considered as an optimal option for Chinese patients with HF.

Effect of levosimendan combined with recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide on diuretic resistance.

Levosimendan is a calcium sensitizer used for managing heart failure (HF) because of its inotropic and vasodilatory effects. As many patients do not respond to levosimendan as a monotherapy, it may be necessary to combine it with other diuretic agents such as recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide (rhBNc P). The aim of this study was to investigate efficacy of levosimendan when combined with rhBNP in patients with diuretic resistance and low ejection fraction (EF) rate.The study included HF patients with diuretic resistance and low EF. Before grouping, patients with a 24-hour urine volume of <0.5 mL/kg/h were administered with furosemide injection. Treatment group was administered levosimendan injection based on the original diuretic and rhBNP.One hundred twenty-eight patients were included, with 64 patients each in the control and treatment arms. 24-hour urine volume of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group. Moreover, dyspnea score of the treatment group significantly improved compared with control group. In the treatment group, 12.5% of patients had no significant changes in the urine volume, weight, and dyspnea score before and after the treatment, indicating poor curative effect of the treatment, whereas in the control group, 23.4% of patients had poor curative effect (P < .05). No significant change was observed in the systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and serum creatinine level before and after treatment in both groups.Levosimendan in combination with rhBNP can effectively relieve diuretic resistance, reduce body weight, improve dyspnea, and ensure safety in the treatment process.