Evaluation of Opioid Overdose Reports in Patients Treated with Extended-Release Naltrexone: Postmarketing Data from 2006 to 2018.

INTRODUCTION: After treatment with naltrexone extended-release injectable suspension (XR-NTX), a µ-opioid receptor antagonist, opioid tolerance is reduced from pretreatment baseline. Patients may be vulnerable to opioid overdose if they attempt to override the blockade during treatment, at the end of a dosing interval, after missing a dose, or after discontinuing treatment. OBJECTIVE: We analyzed postmarketing data to characterize reporting rates of opioid overdose during treatment with and after discontinuation of XR-NTX. METHODS: Postmarketing adverse event reports within the XR-NTX safety database, received 2006-2018, for patients treated with XR-NTX for any indication were reviewed for opioid overdose cases. Assessable cases were categorized by timing of the event from the last dose of XR-NTX (latency): ≤28 days (on treatment), 29-56 days, and >56 days from last dose of XR-NTX. Within each latency group, cases were further classified as serious and, of those, cases that had a fatal outcome. RESULTS: During the 12-year period, an estimated 495,602 patients received XR-NTX. Opioid overdose was reported in 161 cases; of these, 66 contained sufficient information to determine latency. Reporting rates of opioid overdose per 10,000 patients treated were similar among latency groups: 0.54 for ≤28 days (0.24 fatal), 0.34 for 29-56 days (0.16 fatal), and 0.44 for >56 days (0.40 fatal) from the last dose of XR-NTX. CONCLUSIONS: Over the 12-year period, the reporting rates of opioid overdose were similar during treatment with or after discontinuation of XR-NTX and <10/10,000 patients exposed. Our findings are limited by the nature of spontaneously reported safety data.

Evaluation of dystonia in children and adolescents treated with atomoxetine within the Truven MarketScan database: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Atomoxetine is a non-stimulant drug indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children aged ≥6 years, adolescents, and adults. In this retrospective cohort study, the incidence and risk of dystonia in children and adolescents treated with atomoxetine was compared to a propensity score-matched cohort of stimulant users. METHODS: Data between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2014 from patients aged 6-17 years in the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan database were used to generate two cohorts of patients: (1) atomoxetine users and (2) stimulant (methylphenidates or amphetamines) users. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to compare incidence of dystonia across propensity score-matched cohorts. RESULTS: Of the 70,657 atomoxetine users, 70,655 users were propensity score-matched to a stimulant user. In the atomoxetine- and stimulant-treated cohorts, the crude incidence rates of dystonia were 54.9 (95% CI: 27.1-82.7) and 77.9 (95% CI: 49.1-106.8) per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The hazard ratio for occurrence of dystonia with atomoxetine use relative to stimulant use was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.36 - 1.28; P = 0.23). CONCLUSION: In this large retrospective cohort study, there was no significant difference in incidence or risk of dystonia among patients treated with atomoxetine compared to stimulants.