Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic D2 Gastrectomy in Combination with Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in Patients with Gastric Cancer at High Risk of Recurrence-The PIPAC-OPC4 Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) are at high risk of peritoneal recurrence despite perioperative chemotherapy and radical resection. This study evaluated feasibility and safety of laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy in combination with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). METHODS: This was a prospective, controlled bi-institutional study in patients with GAC at high risk of recurrence treated with PIPAC with cisplatin and doxorubicin (PIPAC C/D) after laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy. High risk was defined as a poorly cohesive subtype with predominance of signet-ring cells, clinical stage ≥ T3 and/or ≥ N2, or positive peritoneal cytology. Peritoneal lavage fluid was collected before and after resection. Cisplatin (10.5 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (2.1 mg/m2) were aerosolized after anastomosis (flow 0.5-0.8 ml/s, maximum pressure 300 PSI). Treatment was feasible and safe if ≤ 20% had Dindo-Clavien ≥ 3b surgical complications or CTCAE ≥ 4 medical adverse events within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), peritoneal lavage cytology, and completion of postoperative systemic chemotherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated with a D2 gastrectomy and PIPAC C/D. The median age was 61 years (range 24-76), there were eleven female patients, and 20 patients had preoperative chemotherapy. There was no mortality. Two patients had grade 3b complications that were potentially related to PIPAC C/D (one anastomotic leakage, and one late duodenal blow-out). One patient had severe neutropenia, and nine patients had moderate pain. The LOS was 6 days (4-26). One patient had positive peritoneal lavage cytology before resection, and none were positive after. Fifteen patients had postoperative chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy in combination with PIPAC C/D is feasible and safe.

Quantitative assessment of the subepithelial collagen band does not increase the accuracy of diagnosis of collagenous colitis.

The thickness of eosinophilic band in collagenous colitis (CC) was assessed by 3 methods: histologic estimates (22 observers), conventional measurements using a calibrated micrometric scale (1 observer), and semiautomatic micrometric measurements (1 observer). By the histologic estimate technique, 7.4% of the results failed to diagnose CC; by calibrated micrometry, the failure was 6% and by semiautomatic micrometry, 6%. The main difficulty in measuring the thickness of the CC band is that the deeper border of the band appears fuzzy and hairy-irregular. CC should be defined not exclusively on the basis of the thickness of the collagen table, but as a microscopic constellation characterized by a distorted superficial cell arrangement, with areas of epithelial denudation and inflammatory cells in the superficial epithelium and the lamina propria. In agreement with Lazenby's statement: "Focusing solely on the collagen band can result in both over- and underdiagnosis"

Immunopathology of metastases in patients of colorectal carcinoma treated with monoclonal antibody 17-1A and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Twenty patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma were treated with a single infusion (400 mg) of a mouse monoclonal antibody (IgG2a) against the tumor-associated antigen CO 17-1A and with a daily injection of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for 10 days. The cycle was repeated every month. Metastases from 5 of the 20 patients biopsied on days 1 and 10 of the first two treatment cycles were studied by immunohistochemistry. During treatment, neutrophils, monocytes, and T lymphocytes increased concordantly in the tumor as in the blood of the individual patient. Macrophages (CD68) and CD8+ T cells infiltrated the tumor glands and displayed TIA-1-reactive cytotoxic granules. Neutrophils were seen mainly in areas of necrosis. Activated (HLA-DR+) CD4+ T cells were usually abundant in the stroma. During treatment, few natural killer cells were found in the tumor, contrary to the marked increase seen in blood. Our observations indicate that GM-CSF markedly recruited activated, tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, possibly representing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and cytotoxic T effector cells. The notion that combined antibody and GM-CSF therapy may also promote a T-cell antitumor response is further supported and advocated by our findings. The study lends further support to combining GM-CSF with monoclonal antibody-based therapy.

Ga733/EpCAM as a target for passive and active specific immunotherapy in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

GA733/EpCAM is an oncofetal antigen abundantly expressed in colorectal carcinoma. This antigen can spontaneously induce a humoral and cellular antitumor immunity and may therefore be a suitable target structure for immunotherapy. Patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma have been treated with monoclonal antibodies (MAb17-1A) against this structure. The data indicate that the chimeric variant was not superior to the original mouse MAb. Addition of cytokines and chemotherapeutics may improve the therapeutic effect of the MAb. A particularly interesting regimen is a combination of MAb17-1A/GM-CSF/alpha-IFN/5-Fu. The GA733 protein antigen can also be used as a vaccine. Patients with colorectal carcinoma stages B and C were vaccinated with this protein antigen in combination with GM-CSF as an adjuvant cytokine. A strong type I T cell response was induced that seemed to be MHC class I as well as class II restricted. No systemic side effects were noted.

Humoral anti-idiotypic and anti-anti-idiotypic immune response in cancer patients treated with monoclonal antibody 17-1A.

A group of 96 patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma were treated with the mouse (m) or chimeric (c) (mouse variable regions x human IgG1 constant regions) monoclonal antibody (mAb) 17-1A recognizing the tumour-associated antigen GA733-2. Eighty-two of the 83 patients treated with mmAb 17-1A and 69% of the patients given cmAb17-1A (n = 13) developed anti-idiotypic antibodies (ab2). Auto-antibodies binding to tumour cells expressing GA733-2 were found in 7% of the patients. In a further 38 patients (40%) antitumour-cell antibodies, i.e. anti-anti-idiotypic antibodies (ab3), were induced by the mAb17-1A therapy. Patients with detectable ab3 after treatment had significantly higher ab2 levels than those not developing ab3. Addition of granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to mmAb17-1A significantly enhanced the induction of ab2 as well as induction of anti-anti-idiotypic antibodies (ab3) compared to mmAb17-1A alone. Patients with a high increase in antitumour-cell antibodies (ab3) induced by the therapy lived significantly longer than patients with no or a low level of induction of ab3 (P = 0.016). The results indicate that induction of an idiotypic network response might be an important effector mechanism in mAb therapy.

Augmentation of the immune response with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and other hematopoietic growth factors.

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor is by far the most widely used hematopoietic growth factor to augment immune responses. At present, the best secured effect is as an adjuvant cytokine for vaccination. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor can be delivered as gene-transduced tumor cells, as plasmid DNA, or as the soluble free granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor protein. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor must be present at the same site as the vaccine component. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor may also augment the effect of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by enhancing various effector functions such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and amplifying an idiotypic network response (i.e., antitumor immunity). It may also be advantageous to combine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with monoclonal antibodies (neutrophil and monocyte antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity) for tumor therapy. However, these growth factors might also induce immune suppression, which may hamper the contemplated effect of the growth factor. It is urgently warranted to better understand these dual effects on the immune system so that we can find optimal uses for the growth factors in various clinical settings.

Clinical effects of monoclonal antibody 17-1A combined with granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-2 for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has previously been indicated to enhance the therapeutic effect of the anti-colorectal carcinoma mAb17-1A as well as to augment in vivo immune effector functions. In vitro interleukin-2 (IL-2) augmented GM-CSF-induced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, a mechanism considered to be of significance for the therapeutic effect of mAb. A treatment regimen was elaborated that combined mAb17-1A (400 mg at day 3 of a 10-day treatment cycle) with the simultaneous administration of GM-CSF (250 microgram/m(2) once daily) and IL-2 (2.4 x 10(6) U/m(2) twice daily) for 10 days. The treatment cycle was repeated once a month. Twenty patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma were included in the study. One patient obtained a partial remission and 2 patients stable disease for 7 and 4 months respectively. The median survival time from the start of mAb therapy was 8 months. Owing to allergic reactions, the planned mAb17-1A dose had to be reduced by repeated infusions. At the fourth treatment cycle only 25% received the planned mAb dose. In 3 patients the GM-CSF and IL-2 dose was reduced because of side-effects. The subjective tolerability of the treatment was considered good or acceptable in more than 80% of the patients. The increment in white blood cell subsets induced by the cytokines decreased by increasing number of courses. This particular regimen did not augment the therapeutic effect of mAb17-1A anticipated from in vitro data but rather hampered the clinical effect of the antibody. The reason for this is not clear but a possibility might be the induction of immune suppression in vivo resulting from an impaired human anti-(mouse Ab) and anti-idiotypic antibody response as well as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, on the basis of a comparison of mAb17-1A/GM-CSF/IL-2- and mAb17-1A/GM-CSF-treated patients.