Outcomes using the extensor digitorum communis splitting approach for the treatment of radial head fractures.

BACKGROUND: Surgery on the radial head is usually performed via the Kocher interval. Iatrogenic injury to the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) and lateral ligamentous complex are known complications of lateral elbow approaches. The extensor digitorum communis (EDC) splitting approach for lateral elbow exposure is known to provide better access to the anterior half of the radial head while reducing the risk of injury to the lateral ligaments. The aim of this study was to provide clinical outcome data for the EDC splitting approach. METHODS: Thirteen patients with closed radial head fractures underwent internal fixation or replacement via the EDC splitting approach. Patients were evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores. Clinical assessments of the elbows were also performed. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation of their radial heads, and 3 underwent radial head replacements. At final follow-up, all patients achieved good to excellent Mayo Elbow Performance scores, with a mean score of 90 (range 80-100). They had a mean ASES elbow score of 89.6 (range 77-97) and a mean Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score of 12.8 (range 6.67-25.8). Patients reported a mean overall ASES satisfaction score of 8.5 (range 6-10). There were no significant surgical complications, including iatrogenic damage to the PIN or the lateral ligaments. CONCLUSION: The EDC splitting approach is a feasible method of exposing the lateral elbow, providing safe and reliable access to the radial head.

Appropriateness of blood culture: A comparison of practices between the emergency department and general wards.

BACKGROUND: The decision to perform a blood culture is influenced by factors, such as the pretest probability of bacteremia, resource availability and individual clinician's preference. The lack of formal guidelines results in inconsistencies in practices and an inappropriate or overuse of blood cultures. The primary aim of this study is to compare the rate of positive blood cultures in the emergency department (ED) and general ward. The secondary aim of this study is to analyze factors associated with a positive blood culture. METHODS: We compared 200 consecutive patients in the ED with 200 consecutive patients with first blood cultures done within 24 h of admission from ED to the general ward. We analyzed the clinical characteristics, proportion of positive blood cultures, and variables associated with a positive blood culture. RESULTS: The percentage of positive blood cultures was 13.5% (n = 27) in the ED group, compared with 6.0% (n = 12) in the general ward group. Contamination rates were higher in the ED compared to general ward (4% vs 0.5%). Heart rate and rigors were independently associated with a positive blood culture in a multivariate logistic regression model. CONCLUSION: There was a lower rate of positive blood cultures in the general ward group. Reasons may include a lower threshold for performing blood cultures in the general ward, and prior antibiotics in the ED reducing the sensitivity of blood cultures taken in the general ward. Adherence to clinical decision rules and education of junior staff are needed to improve the efficiency of blood culture taking practices.