Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Immunol ; 10: 1589, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31354728

RESUMEN

Live attenuated vaccines play a key role in the control of many human and animal pathogens. Their rational development is usually helped by identification of the reservoir of infection, the lymphoid subpopulations associated with protective immunity as well as the virulence genes involved in pathogen persistence. Here, we compared the course of Brucella melitensis infection in C57BL/6 mice infected via intraperitoneal (i.p.), intranasal (i.n.) and intradermal (i.d.) route and demonstrated that the route of infection strongly impacts all of these parameters. Following i.p. and i.n. infection, most infected cells observed in the spleen or lung were F4/80+ myeloid cells. In striking contrast, infected Ly6G+ neutrophils and CD140a+ fibroblasts were also observed in the skin after i.d. infection. The virB operon encoding for the type IV secretion system is considered essential to deflecting vacuolar trafficking in phagocytic cells and allows Brucella to multiply and persist. Unexpectedly, the ΔvirB Brucella strain, which does not persist in the lung after i.n. infection, persists longer in skin tissues than the wild strain after i.d. infection. While the CD4+ T cell-mediated Th1 response is indispensable to controlling the Brucella challenge in the i.p. model, it is dispensable for the control of Brucella in the i.d. and i.n. models. Similarly, B cells are indispensable in the i.p. and i.d. models but dispensable in the i.n. model. γδ+ T cells appear able to compensate for the absence of αß+ T cells in the i.d. model but not in the other models. Taken together, our results demonstrate the crucial importance of the route of infection for the host pathogen relationship.


Asunto(s)
Brucella melitensis/inmunología , Brucelosis/inmunología , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno/inmunología , Animales , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Linfocitos Intraepiteliales/inmunología , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Células TH1/inmunología , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología , Virulencia/inmunología
2.
Trends Parasitol ; 34(10): 881-890, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30131210

RESUMEN

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a life-threatening outcome of Leishmania infantum or Leishmania donovani infection. Dogs are the primary domestic reservoir of L. infantum parasites, and ownership of infected dogs increases the risk of human VL. Controlling infection within dog populations is regarded as critical to VL management in endemic countries, both preventing progression of canine disease and limiting parasite transmission to humans and dogs. Here we discuss various strategies that are used to diagnose canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) and the possibilities of adapting these for use within population screening and control programs. In addition, given the variable transmissibility of L. infantum to the sand fly vector, we outline some possibilities for the preferential identification of 'super-spreader' dogs among the overall infected population.


Asunto(s)
Leishmaniasis Visceral/diagnóstico , Leishmaniasis Visceral/prevención & control , Zoonosis/diagnóstico , Zoonosis/prevención & control , Animales , Enfermedades de los Perros/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Enfermedades de los Perros/transmisión , Perros , Humanos , Leishmania infantum/fisiología , Leishmaniasis Visceral/transmisión , Psychodidae/parasitología , Zoonosis/transmisión
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA