A Missed Opportunity? Meal Provision in Early Childhood Education and Care Services in the Context of Socioeconomic Disadvantage.

OBJECTIVES: Early childhood education and care (ECEC) services are attended by most children before school entry, reaching many living in circumstances of poverty and providing opportunity to support their nutrition. In this study, we examine the extent to which this opportunity is being met, comparing two common types of service provision: centre- versus family- provided food. METHODS: Intensive in-situ observations were undertaken across 10 ECEC services in highly disadvantaged Australian communities. All meals provided to children aged 3.5-5 years across an ECEC day (N = 48), of which 11% were experiencing severe food insecurity, were photographed and analysed to assess nutritional adequacy with reference to national dietary standards. RESULTS: Meals provided did not meet national dietary recommendations for quality or quantity. Nutrition was least adequate in services with policies of family-provided food. These services were also those that served families experiencing the highest levels of severe food insecurity (29%). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of policies for the provision of food in ECEC, services are not realising their potential to support child nutrition in the context of poverty presenting increased risk to lifetime trajectories of health and wellbeing. System level policy interventions are required to facilitate equitable access to nutritious food and attendant life chances.

Exploring the long-term sustainability of school-based nutrition and food programs: What works, where and why?

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Most food and nutrition programs cease within 2 years. Understanding the determinants of program sustainability is crucial to maximise output from funding, whilst allowing sufficient time for program benefits to be achieved. This study applied the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to map the barriers and enablers of successful long-term implementation of school-based nutrition and food programs. METHODS: Qualitative methods with purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit experts who were identified as being influential in implementing and sustaining long-term (>2 years) school-based food and nutrition programs. Semi-structured interviews with global experts were conducted, transcribed verbatim and coded deductively (by applying the CFIR constructs) and inductively when required. Thematic analysis informed the development of themes. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 11 experts including researchers, government employees, and a consultant of an international agency, from seven countries. Forty-eight deductive codes and eight inductive codes identified six main themes: (1) funding and integrity of its source; (2) political landscape; (3) nutrition policies and their monitoring; (4) involvement of community actors; (5) adaptability of the program and (6) effective program evaluation. Themes related mainly to the 'outer setting' domain of the CFIR. CONCLUSIONS: The CFIR highlighted pertinent factors that influence the successful long-term implementation of school-based food and nutrition programs. SO WHAT?: The findings suggest that to sustain program implementation beyond its initial funding, relationships across government departments, local organisations and communities, need to be nurtured and prioritised from the outset.

Applying the Integrated Sustainability Framework to explore the long-term sustainability of nutrition education programmes in schools: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to identify and synthesise the enablers and barriers that influence the long-term (≥ 2 years) sustainment of school-based nutrition programmes. DESIGN: Four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Scopus) were searched to identify studies reporting on the international literature relating to food and nutrition programmes aimed at school-age (5-14 years) children that had been running for ≥ 2 years (combined intervention and follow-up period). Eligible studies were analysed using the Integrated Sustainability Framework (ISF), which involved deductive coding of programme enablers and barriers. A quality assessment was completed, using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. SETTING: International school-based nutrition programmes. SUBJECTS: Individuals involved with the implementation of school-based nutrition programmes. RESULTS: From the 7366 articles identified, thirteen studies (seven qualitative, five mixed methods and one quantitative descriptive) were included, from which the enablers and barriers of eleven different nutrition-related programmes were analysed. Thirty-four factors across the five domains of the ISF were identified that influenced the sustained implementation of programmes. The most common barrier was a lack of organisational readiness and resources, whereas the most common enabler was having adequate external partnerships and a supportive environment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have application during the initiation and implementation phases of school-based nutrition programmes. Paying attention to the 'outer contextual factors' of the ISF including the establishment and maintenance of robust relationships across whole of government systems, local institutions and funding bodies are crucial for programme sustainment.

Mealtimes in the context of poverty: Comparison of ECEC services providing food and those requiring food provided from home.

BACKGROUND: In developed economies, most children attend Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) services before school entry, many from early life and across long days. For this reason, ECEC services present significant potential to provide food environments that positively influence eating behaviours and food preferences with attendant effect on life course trajectories of health and wellbeing. Yet there is evidence that feeding practices that limit optimal ongoing nutrition, such as pressure and restriction, are amplified in ECEC services serving disadvantaged communities. We sought to identify underlying explanatory mechanisms through observation of children's feeding experiences and educator explanations comparing, family-provided and service-provided meals. METHOD: This study used qualitative analyses of educator interviews and observation records from 55 mealtimes in 10 ECEC services: 5 providing food and 5 requiring family food provision. RESULTS: High levels of concern drove educator's controlling feeding practices at mealtimes but presented differently across meal provision modes. In centres that provided food, educators' concern focused on food variety, manifesting in pressure to 'try' foods. In centres requiring family-provided food, concern focused on nutrition quantity and quality and manifested as control of order of food consumption and pacing of intake to ensure food lasted across the day. Interview data suggested that conflict aversion limited optimal nutrition. In centres providing food, this was seen in menus that prioritized child food preferences. In centres requiring family meal provision, conflict aversion was seen as reticence to discuss lunchbox contents with families. CONCLUSION: The findings direct attention to public health intervention. Currently, ECEC face significant barriers to realizing their potential to support child nutrition and establish positive life course trajectories of nutrition. To do so requires targeted supports that enable sufficient supply and quality of food in the context of poverty.

"We'd be really motivated to do something about it": A qualitative study of parent and clinician attitudes towards predicting childhood obesity in practice.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: In Australia, one in four (24.9%) children live with overweight or obesity (OW/OB). Identifying infants at risk of developing childhood OW/OB is a potential preventive pathway, but its acceptability is yet to be investigated in Australia. This study aimed to (1) investigate the acceptability of predicting childhood OW/OB with parents of infants (aged 0-2 years) and clinicians and (2) explore key language to address stigma and maximise the acceptability of predicting childhood OW/OB in practice. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional and qualitative design, comprising individual semi-structured interviews. Participants were multidisciplinary paediatric clinicians (n = 18) and parents (n = 13) recruited across public hospitals and health services in Queensland, Australia. Data were analysed under the Framework Method using an inductive, thematic approach. RESULTS: Five main themes were identified: (1) Optimism for prevention and childhood obesity prediction, (2) parent dedication to child's health, (3) adverse parent response to risk for childhood obesity, (4) language and phrasing for discussing weight and risk and (5) clinical delivery. Most participants were supportive of using a childhood OW/OB prediction tool in practice. Parents expressed dedication to their child's health that superseded potential feelings of judgement or blame. When discussing weight in a clinical setting, the use of sensitive (ie, "overweight", "above average", "growth" versus "obesity") and positive, health-focused language was mostly supported. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary paediatric clinicians and parents generally accept the concept of predicting childhood OW/OB in practice in Queensland, Australia. SO WHAT?: Clinicians, public health and health promotion professionals and policymakers can act now to implement sensitive communication strategies concerning weight and obesity risk.

Healthier Together: Implementation and evaluation of a co-designed, culturally tailored childhood obesity community prevention program for Maori and Pacific Islander children and families.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Co-designed and culturally tailored preventive initiatives delivered in childhood have high potential to close the cross-cultural gap in health outcomes of priority populations. Maori and Pacific Islander people living in Australia exhibit a higher prevalence of overweight and obesity and higher rates of multimorbidity, including heart disease, cancer and diabetes. METHODS: This mixed-methods, pilot implementation and evaluation study, aimed to evaluate the implementation of a community-based, co-designed and culturally tailored childhood obesity prevention program, using quantitative (pre-post anthropometric measurement, pre-post health behaviour questionnaire) and qualitative (semi-structured interview) methods. Sessions relating to healthy eating, physical activity and positive parenting practices were delivered to families residing in Brisbane (Australia) over 8-weeks. RESULTS: Data were collected from a total of 66 children (mean age 11, SD 4) and 38 parents (mean age 40, SD 8) of Maori and Pacific Islander background, from July 2018 to November 2019. Anthropometric changes included a reduction in Body Mass Index (BMI) z-score among 59% of children (median change -0.02, n = 38, p = 0.17) and BMI among 47% of adults (median change +0.06 kg/m2 , n = 18, p = 0.64). Significant improvements (p < 0.05) in self-reported health behaviours from pre- to post-program included increased vegetable consumption among children, decreased discretionary food intake of children, decreased discretionary drink consumption among both children and adults, increased minutes of daily physical activity among adults and increased parental confidence in the healthy diets of their children. Qualitative data revealed participants valued the inclusion of all family members, learning of practical skills and cultural tailoring delivered by the Multicultural Health Coaches. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence that the Healthier Together program improved self-reported health behaviours and physical activity levels among Maori and Pacific Islander children and their families in the short-term; however, due to the small sample size, these results must be interpreted carefully. The program empowered change via cultural tailoring and accessibility; however, long-term implementation and evaluation with a larger cohort is needed to validate the observed health behaviour improvements and their sustainability. SO WHAT?: The co-design framework that informed program development and key learnings of implementation will provide guidance to health practitioners, health workers, public health professionals and policy makers to develop inclusive and pragmatic co-design solutions for priority cultural populations in Australia. Health outcomes will improve as a result, promoting health equity for future generations.

Associations between food provision and feeding practices in socially disadvantaged childcare centres.

Preschool children consume a large proportion of their daily food intake in their childcare settings. These settings, therefore, provide important opportunities for children to experience food socialisation, and related positive nutrition. Yet, the extent to which these opportunities are taken, particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas where risk of poor nutrition is high, is not well documented. This study focused on 10 childcare centres in socially disadvantaged locations and examined daily feeding practices via direct in-situ observation (n = 189 children observed). Centres were randomly selected based on type of food provision: centre-provided (n = 5 centres) or family-provided (n = 5 centres). Analyses showed that where food was family-provided, educators were significantly more likely to use controlling feeding practices, including pressuring children to eat, restricting food choices and rushing children into finishing meals. These practices were particularly evident during mid-morning meals, where pressuring children to eat healthy foods first, was more often observed. Further research and interventions that target feeding practices in childcare are indicated and should consider how source of food provision impacts upon these practices.

Addressing childhood obesity in Queensland: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Worker perspectives and practices.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Obesity disproportionately impacts Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children compared to non-Indigenous children. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Workers (AHWs) in Queensland support the health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. However, little is known about their perspectives and practices on addressing childhood obesity. The aim of this study was to investigate AHW perspectives and clinical practice behaviours with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and their families. METHODS: In a cross-sectional mixed-methods approach, a purpose-developed online survey (25 items) was distributed to the AHW workforce in Queensland (~100 AHWs). The survey explored [1] role characteristics, [2] current attitudes and beliefs about childhood obesity, [3] barriers to discussing weight management, [4] clinical practice behaviours and [5] demographic characteristics. Eight AHWs responding to the survey also participated in semi-structured telephone interviews to discuss their survey responses. RESULTS: Fifty-five AHWs responded and 45 completed the survey. While the majority of respondents (91%) agreed that addressing childhood obesity was an important part of their role, fewer (67%) agreed that obesity was an issue in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Over half (55%) found it difficult to discuss overweight and obesity with children and families and only 22.5% reported measuring height and weight often. Key themes included a willingness to address childhood obesity, with experience and training being key enablers to discussing the issue. There was a perceived lack of culturally appropriate programs to support AHWs working with families. CONCLUSIONS: AHWs report a willingness to address childhood obesity within their roles, however many find it difficult to raise the issue with families, with even fewer routinely undertaking obesity assessment practices. SO WHAT?: These findings could inform training initiatives for AHWs to optimise screening, identification, referral, and treatment of childhood obesity in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.

Cultural adaptation of health interventions including a nutrition component in Indigenous peoples: a systematic scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Indigenous populations throughout the world experience poorer health outcomes than non-indigenous people. The reasons for the health disparities are complex and due in part to historical treatment of Indigenous groups through colonisation. Evidence-based interventions aimed at improving health in this population need to be culturally safe. However, the extent to which cultural adaptation strategies are incorporated into the design and implementation of nutrition interventions designed for Indigenous peoples is unknown. The aim of this scoping review was to explore the cultural adaptation strategies used in the delivery of nutrition interventions for Indigenous populations worldwide. METHODS: Five health and medical databases were searched to January 2020. Interventions that included a nutrition component aimed at improving health outcomes among Indigenous populations that described strategies to enhance cultural relevance were included. The level of each cultural adaptation was categorised as evidential, visual, linguistic, constituent involving and/or socio-cultural with further classification related to cultural sensitivity (surface or deep). RESULTS: Of the 1745 unique records screened, 98 articles describing 66 unique interventions met the inclusion criteria, and were included in the synthesis. The majority of articles reported on interventions conducted in the USA, Canada and Australia, were conducted in the previous 10 years (n = 36) and focused on type 2 diabetes prevention (n = 19) or management (n = 7). Of the 66 interventions, the majority included more than one strategy to culturally tailor the intervention, combining surface and deep level adaptation approaches (n = 51), however, less than half involved Indigenous constituents at a deep level (n = 31). Visual adaptation strategies were the most commonly reported (n = 57). CONCLUSION: This paper is the first to characterise cultural adaptation strategies used in health interventions with a nutrition component for Indigenous peoples. While the majority used multiple cultural adaptation strategies, few focused on involving Indigenous constituents at a deep level. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of cultural adaptation strategies for specific health outcomes. This could be used to inform co-design planning and implementation, ensuring more culturally appropriate methods are employed.

Response to 'Systematic reviews do not always capture context of real-world intervention programmes for childhood obesity' by Wild et al., 2021 in BMC Public Health.

In a correspondence to BMC Public Health, Wild et al. respond to our systematic review that synthesised results of interventions to prevent or treat childhood obesity in Maori and Pacific Islanders. Our review included the Whanau Pakari study as one of six included studies - a multidisciplinary intervention for Maori children and adolescents living with obesity led by their research team. Our review suggested that future research can incorporate stronger co-design principles when designing culturally-tailored interventions to maximise cultural specificity, enhance engagement, facilitate program ownership and contribute to improved health and weight-related outcomes. We commend Whanau Pakari and the team of Wild et al. on their sustained commitment to addressing obesity in priority populations and agree that systematic reviews struggle to capture real-world context of interventions for complex diseases such as obesity. In this article, we respond sequentially to the comments made by Wild et al. and (1) clarify the scope of our review article (2) reiterate our commendation of mixed-methods approaches that capture real-world context (3) explain a referencing error that caused a misinterpretation of our results (4) clarify our interpretation of some Whanau Pakari characteristics (5) welcome partnership to facilitate shared learning with Wild et al.

i-PATHWAY: Development and validation of a prediction model for childhood obesity in an Australian prospective birth cohort.

AIM: To develop and validate a model (i-PATHWAY) to predict childhood (age 8-9 years) overweight/obesity from infancy (age 12 months) using an Australian prospective birth cohort. METHODS: The Transparent Reporting of a multivariable Prediction model for individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) checklist was followed. Participants were n = 1947 children (aged 8-9 years) from the Raine Study Gen2 - an Australian prospective birth cohort - who had complete anthropometric measurement data available at follow up. The primary outcome was childhood overweight or obesity (age 8-9 years), defined by age- and gender-specific cut-offs. Multiple imputation was performed to handle missing data. Predictors were selected using 2000 unique backward stepwise logistic regression models. Predictive performance was assessed via: calibration, discrimination and decision-threshold analysis. Internal validation of i-PATHWAY was conducted using bootstrapping (1000 repetitions) to adjust for optimism and improve reliability. A clinical model was developed to support relevance to practice. RESULTS: At age 8-9 years, 18.9% (n = 367) of children were classified with overweight or obesity. i-PATHWAY predictors included: weight change (0-1 year); maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI); paternal BMI; maternal smoking during pregnancy; premature birth; infant sleep patterns; and sex. After validation, predictive accuracy was acceptable: calibration slope = 0.956 (0.952-0.960), intercept = -0.052 (-0.063, -0.048), area under the curve = 0.737 (0.736-0.738), optimised sensitivity = 0.703(0.568-0.790), optimised specificity = 0.646 (0.571-0.986). The clinical model retained acceptable predictive accuracy without paternal BMI. CONCLUSIONS: i-PATHWAY is a simple, valid and clinically relevant prediction model for childhood overweight/obesity. After further validation, this model can influence state and national health policy for overweight/obesity screening in the early years.

Healthier Together: Co-design of a culturally tailored childhood obesity community prevention program for Maori & Pacific Islander children and families.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Children of Maori & Pacific Islander descent living in Australia have a greater prevalence of overweight/obesity and an increased risk of adverse health outcomes. This study aimed to co-design Healthier Together, a community-based, childhood overweight/obesity prevention program tailored to Maori & Pacific Islander cultures. METHODS: Co-design involved a three-phase, iterative, participatory and experience-based process, guided by the Te Ara Tika: Guidelines for Maori Research Ethics to promote respect and equity. Following traditional oratory customs of Maori & Pacific Islander cultures, "talanoa" facilitated the collaborative program design with recruited Maori & Pacific Islander consumers, cultural advisors and health professionals. Co-design formulated program objectives, session plans, resources and evaluation tools. RESULTS: Co-design developed a 9-week community-based childhood overweight/obesity prevention program providing culturally tailored education across four themes: (a) nutrition (b) physical activity (c) positive parenting practices (d) culture and health. Strong community engagement developed a program highly tailored to the local Maori & Pacific Islander population. CONCLUSIONS: Co-design methodology promotes equity and inclusion of all stakeholders, acknowledges and caters to diversity and creates a medium for openness, respect and shared purpose. Community-led participatory approaches are pivotal to engaging and empowering communities to successfully improve health behaviours, particularly in tackling childhood overweight/obesity. SO WHAT?: Healthier Together is culturally significant to ensure relevance, effectiveness and sustainability. It is relevant and potentially adaptable to other priority populations across Australia and globally. Ultimately, the delivery of culturally tailored health care will contribute to a reduction in the health inequity experienced amongst priority populations.

Interventions to prevent or treat childhood obesity in Maori & Pacific Islanders: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Maori and Pacific Islander people are a priority population originating from Australasia. Maori and Pacific Islander children exhibit greater risk of obesity and associated morbidities compared to children of other descent, secondary to unique cultural practices and socioeconomic disadvantage. Despite these known risk factors, there is limited synthesised evidence for preventing and treating childhood obesity in this unique population. The objective of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate global prevention or treatment interventions for overweight or obesity that targeted Maori and Pacific Islander children and adolescents (aged 2-17 years). METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The databases PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL were searched from inception to August 2018. Study quality and risk of bias was assessed using a modified Downs and Black Quality Checklist for Health Care Intervention Studies. Studies were included if RCT/intervention/case control/ or prevention study designs. The study group was defined under the search term 'Oceanic Ancestry Group'. RESULTS: Of the initial 94 articles identified, six were included describing two prevention and three treatment interventions. Interventions were heterogenous in setting, design, length and outcomes. Four interventions were implemented in New Zealand. Most studies were of 'fair' quality. One study recruited an exclusive population of Maori and Pacific Islander participants. In the five studies that recruited mixed populations, one performed sub-group analysis on Maori and Pacific Islander participants. No study reported an improvement in anthropometric outcomes post-intervention in complete or sub-group analysis. Improvements in cardiometabolic or psychological secondary outcomes were inconsistent across all studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of evidence to recommend specific intervention characteristics to optimise obesity prevention or treatment outcomes for Maori and Pacific Islander children. Future research requires greater consideration of cultural values and beliefs, community engagement, exclusive targeting of Maori and Pacific Islander children and families, and sub-group analyses for mixed-population studies. Incorporating co-design principles during study design and implementation can maximise the cultural specificity of interventions and may contribute to improved health and weight-related outcomes for this at-risk, priority population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019121790 (26 March 2019).

Correction to: Building a Children's Health Service and System Research Strategy: development and integration in an Australian paediatric healthcare setting.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Building a Children's Health Service and System Research Strategy: development and integration in an Australian paediatric healthcare setting.

BACKGROUND: Health services and systems research (HSSR) strategies dedicated to paediatric health care and service delivery are limited. Strategies are available but are outdated and yet to be optimised for use in a paediatric health system. We aim to describe the development and integration of a Children's Health Service and System Research Strategy (CHSSR-S) in Children's Health Queensland (CHQ), a large specialist quaternary hospital and health service caring for children and young people in Queensland and northern New South Wales, Australia. METHODS: The CHSSR-S was developed using an inductive, bottom-up, participatory systems approach across three phases: (1) Identifying local HSSR capacity; (2) Development; (3) Integration. A HSSR "Champion" was appointed to lead all phases. Clinical, research and system-based stakeholders (n = 14) were individually identified, contacted and participated in dedicated meetings and a workshop to iteratively design the CHSSR-S. A health system-wide CHSSR-S governance committee was established to drive phase three. Health system integration was achieved by multicomponent, action-based strategies. RESULTS: The final CHSSR-S comprised ten Research Priorities and three Research Enablers, and was successfully integrated within CHQ via a range of platforms. Research Priorities included: (1) Population Health; (2) Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Cancer; (3) Indigenous Health; (4); Mental Health; (5) Nutrition and Obesity; (6) Rare Neurodevelopmental Disorders; (7) Sepsis; (8) Screening, surveillance and monitoring; (9) Innovation; and (10) Electronic Medical Record (EMR). Research Priorities were supported by three Research Enablers: (1) Data; (2); Evaluation and Health Economics; and (3) Policy. CONCLUSIONS: The CHSSR-S is the first known paediatric HSSR strategy developed and integrated within a large dedicated paediatric health system. The CHSSR-S may be used to guide global paediatric healthcare systems to prioritise HSSR in their local setting to optimise health service delivery and patient outcomes.

Clinical relevance and validity of tools to predict infant, childhood and adulthood obesity: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the global availability of a multicomponent tool predicting overweight/obesity in infancy, childhood, adolescence or adulthood; and to compare their predictive validity and clinical relevance.Design/SettingThe PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. The databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science and PsycINFO were searched. Additional articles were identified via reference lists of included articles. Risk of bias was assessed using the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Quality Criteria Checklist. The National Health and Medical Research Council's Levels of Evidence hierarchy was used to assess quality of evidence. Predictive performance was evaluated using the ABCD framework. SUBJECTS: Eligible studies: tool could be administered at any life stage; quantified the risk of overweight/obesity onset; used more than one predictor variable; and reported appropriate prediction statistical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the initial 4490 articles identified, twelve articles (describing twelve tools) were included. Most tools aimed to predict overweight and/or obesity within childhood (age 2-12 years). Predictive accuracy of tools was consistently adequate; however, the predictive validity of most tools was questioned secondary to poor methodology and statistical reporting. Globally, five tools were developed for dissemination into clinical practice, but no tools were tested within a clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, a clinically relevant and highly predictive overweight/obesity prediction tool is yet to be developed. Clinicians can, however, act now to identify the strongest predictors of future overweight/obesity. Further research is necessary to optimise the predictive strength and clinical applicability of such a tool.

Prevalence of malnutrition, obesity and nutritional risk of Australian paediatric inpatients: a national one-day snapshot.

AIM: Low prevalence rates of malnutrition at 2.5% to 4% have previously been reported in two tertiary paediatric Australian hospitals. The current study is the first to measure the prevalence of malnutrition, obesity and nutritional risk of paediatric inpatients in multiple hospitals throughout Australia. METHODS: Malnutrition, obesity and nutritional risk prevalence were investigated in 832 and 570 paediatric inpatients, respectively, in eight tertiary paediatric hospitals and eight regional hospitals across Australia on a single day. Malnutrition and obesity prevalence was determined using z-scores and body mass index (BMI) percentiles. High nutritional risk was determined as a Paediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score of 2 or more. RESULTS: The prevalence rates of malnourished, wasted, stunted, overweight and obese paediatric patients were 15%, 13.8%, 11.9%, 8.8% and 9.9%, respectively. Patients who identified as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander were more likely to have lower height-for-age z-scores (P < 0.01); however, BMI and weight-for-age z-scores were not significantly different. Children who were younger, from regional hospitals or with a primary diagnosis of cardiac disease or cystic fibrosis had significantly lower anthropometric z-scores (P = 0.05). Forty-four per cent of patients were identified as at high nutritional risk and requiring further nutritional assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of malnutrition and nutritional risk of Australian paediatric inpatients on a given day was much higher when compared with the healthy population. In contrast, the proportion of overweight and obese patients was less.