Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the oral phosphate binder VS-505 (AP301).

BACKGROUND: VS-505 (AP301), an acacia and ferric oxyhydroxide polymer, is a novel fiber-iron-based phosphate binder. This two-part phase 2 study evaluated the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of oral VS-505 administered three times daily with meals in treating hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). METHODS: In Part 1, patients received dose-escalated treatment with VS-505 2.25, 4.50, and 9.00 g/day for 2 weeks each, guided by serum phosphorus levels. In Part 2, patients received randomized, open-label, fixed-dosage treatment with VS-505 (1.50, 2.25, 4.50, or 6.75 g/day) or sevelamer carbonate 4.80 g/day for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in serum phosphorus. RESULTS: The study enrolled 158 patients (Part 1: 25; Part 2: 133), with 130 exposed to VS-505 in total. VS-505 was well tolerated. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders, mainly feces discolored (56%) and diarrhea (15%; generally during weeks 1‒2 of treatment). Most gastrointestinal disorders resolved without intervention, and none were serious. In Part 1, serum phosphorus significantly improved (mean change -2.0 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval -2.7, -1.4) after VS-505 dose escalation. In Part 2, serum phosphorus significantly and dose-dependently improved in all VS-505 arms, with clinically meaningful reductions with VS-505 4.50 and 6.75 g/day, and sevelamer carbonate 4.80 g/day (mean change -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0), -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2), and -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5) mg/dL, respectively). In both Parts, serum phosphorus reductions occurred within 1 week of VS-505 initiation, returning to baseline within 2 weeks of VS-505 discontinuation. CONCLUSION: VS-505, a novel phosphate binder, was well tolerated with a manageable safety profile, and effectively and dose-dependently reduced serum phosphorus in CKD patients with hyperphosphatemia receiving MHD. Clinical Trial registration number: NCT04551300.

Meta-analysis of contribution of genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes or transporters to axitinib pharmacokinetics.

PURPOSE: Axitinib, an orally administered inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor 1, 2 and 3, is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/5 but is also a substrate for CYP1A2, CYP2C19, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A1 and the drug transporters P-glycoprotein (encoded by the ABCB1 gene) and OATP1B1 (encoded by SLC01B1). The potential contribution of polymorphisms in genes encoding these enzymes and transporters to axitinib pharmacokinetic variability was assessed. METHODS: A fixed effects meta-analysis was performed using data pooled from 11 healthy volunteer clinical pharmacology trials to investigate the potential association between axitinib exposure and major polymorphisms in these genes following a 5-mg dose of axitinib. RESULTS: Up to 15 variant alleles were evaluated and up to 315 healthy volunteers per polymorphism were assayed. None of the polymorphisms analysed was a statistically significant predictor of axitinib pharmacokinetic variability. Amongst genotypes and inferred phenotypes, CYP2C19 genotype and the ABCB1 (G2677T/A) polymorphism were the closest to statistical significance in influencing axitinib pharmacokinetic variability after multiple-testing adjustment. However, no enzyme or transporter genotype/inferred phenotype contributed >5% to the overall pharmacokinetic variability of axitinib. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant associations between the specific polymorphisms analysed and axitinib plasma exposure were observed, suggesting that genotype- or inferred phenotype-based adjustment of axitinib dose in individual subjects is not warranted.

Fine Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety Between GB242 and Infliximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Phase III Study.

INTRODUCTION: This phase III trial (NCT04178850) evaluated the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of GB242, an infliximab biosimilar, vs. infliximab (Remicade®) reference product in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) combination with methotrexate (MTX) therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either GB242 or INF (3 mg/kg). Therapeutic equivalence of clinical response according to the American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate at week 30 was declared if the two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was within ± 14%. The comparison of GB242 with INF also included the proportion of patients achieving a week 30 ACR 50 response, ACR70 response, change in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), as well as safety and immunogenicity. RESULTS: A total of 570 subjects were randomized into GB242 (N = 285) or INF (N = 285) and 283 subjects in each group were analyzed. At week 30, the ACR20 was 62.54% for the GB242 group (95% CI 56.62-68.20%) and 56.89% for the INF group (95% CI 50.90-62.74%). The difference between the two groups was 5.65% with a 95% CI of - 2.48 to 13.74. ACR50 response was 37.12% for GB242 and 32.86% for INF at week 30. ACR70 response was 19.79% for GB242 and 16.96% for INF at week 30, respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable (77.4% in GB242 vs. 80.2% in INF) and detection of antidrug antibodies (ADA) to infliximab up to week 30 (60.8% in GB242 vs. 59.4% in INF) was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: GB242 demonstrated equivalent efficacy to INF at week 30. Moreover, GB242 was well tolerated, with a similar immunogenicity and safety profile comparable to INF.

First open-label, single-arm, prospective study of real-world use of FIX replacement therapy in a predominantly pediatric hemophilia B population in China.

BACKGROUND: Nonacog alfa (recombinant factor IX [FIX]) is approved in China for the control and prevention of bleeding events in patients with hemophilia B. This was the first study to assess prophylaxis and on-demand therapy with recombinant FIX replacement in a real-world setting in China. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nonacog alfa in Chinese patients with hemophilia B. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02336178), patients received on-demand or prophylactic treatment with intravenous nonacog alfa for approximately 6 months or 50 exposure days, whichever occurred first. The primary safety outcome was medically important events (i.e., development of FIX inhibitors, allergic reactions, and thrombotic events). Key secondary efficacy outcomes included the annualized bleeding rate for on-demand treatment and prophylaxis, response to on-demand treatment, the number of infusions per bleeding event, and the number of breakthrough bleeding events within 48 hours of prophylaxis. RESULTS: Seventy male patients (mean [standard deviation] age 7.8 [7.2] years) were enrolled (on-demand, n = 37; prophylaxis, n = 57 [24 patients were included in both groups]). Thirty-eight (54%) patients had up to 50 FIX exposure days before the study. The only medically important event was a transient low-titer FIX inhibitor (incidence 1.4%, 95% confidence interval, 0-7.7). The mean annualized bleeding rate was 26.3 for on-demand treatment and 6.5 for prophylaxis. A mean (standard deviation) of 1.5 (1.7) nonacog alfa infusions were given per bleeding episode; 78.8% of episodes resolved with 1 infusion. Response was "excellent" or "good" for 88% of the on-demand infusions. Twenty-three bleeding events (n = 11 patients) occurred within 48 hours of 2032 prophylaxis doses (1.13%). CONCLUSION: In the real-world setting, nonacog alfa is safe and effective for on-demand treatment and for prophylaxis for patients with hemophilia B in China.

Safety and Efficacy of Moroctocog Alfa (AF-CC) in Chinese Patients with Hemophilia A: Results of Two Open-Label Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Moroctocog alfa albumin-free cell culture (AF-CC) increases plasma levels of factor VIII (FVIII) activity and, in China, is indicated for the control and prevention of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and recovery data of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) in patients with hemophilia participating in two open-label studies, both conducted in China. METHODS: The authorization study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00868530) enrolled patients aged ≥6 years, previously treated with ≥1 exposure day of FVIII replacement therapy. The real-world study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02492984) enrolled patients of any age who were previously untreated or requiring surgical prophylaxis. In both studies, on-demand treatment was administered over 6 months. Key assessments included response to treatment, FVIII inhibitor development, and recovery. RESULTS: In the authorization study (N = 53; mean age, 23.2 years; severe hemophilia, 23%), response was excellent/good for 90% of infusions at 24 hours. Seven patients developed inhibitors. Mean (SD) FVIII recovery at the initial and final visits was 1.77 (0.50) and 1.67 (0.45) (IU/dL)/(IU/kg), respectively. In the real-world study (N = 85; mean age, 9.5 years; severe hemophilia, 58%), response was rated as excellent or good for most (87%) on-demand infusions and for all surgical prophylaxis patients (n = 14). Seven patients developed FVIII inhibitors. Mean (SD) FVIII recovery at the initial and final visits was 1.71 (0.50) and 1.68 (0.31) (IU/dL)/(IU/kg), respectively. No new safety signals were observed in either study. CONCLUSION: On-demand treatment and surgical prophylaxis with moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) is safe and effective for both previously treated and previously untreated Chinese patients with hemophilia A.

Meta-analysis for genome-wide association study identifies multiple variants at the BIN1 locus associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

Recent GWAS studies focused on uncovering novel genetic loci related to AD have revealed associations with variants near CLU, CR1, PICALM and BIN1. In this study, we conducted a genome-wide association study in an independent set of 1034 cases and 1186 controls using the Illumina genotyping platforms. By coupling our data with available GWAS datasets from the ADNI and GenADA, we replicated the original associations in both PICALM (rs3851179) and CR1 (rs3818361). The PICALM variant seems to be non-significant after we adjusted for APOE e4 status. We further tested our top markers in 751 independent cases and 751 matched controls. Besides the markers close to the APOE locus, a marker (rs12989701) upstream of BIN1 locus was replicated and the combined analysis reached genome-wide significance level (p = 5E-08). We combined our data with the published Harold et al. study and meta-analysis with all available 6521 cases and 10360 controls at the BIN1 locus revealed two significant variants (rs12989701, p = 1.32E-10 and rs744373, p = 3.16E-10) in limited linkage disequilibrium (r²â€Š =  0.05) with each other. The independent contribution of both SNPs was supported by haplotype conditional analysis. We also conducted multivariate analysis in canonical pathways and identified a consistent signal in the downstream pathways targeted by Gleevec (P = 0.004 in Pfizer; P = 0.028 in ADNI and P = 0.04 in GenADA). We further tested variants in CLU, PICALM, BIN1 and CR1 for association with disease progression in 597 AD patients where longitudinal cognitive measures are sufficient. Both the PICALM and CLU variants showed nominal significant association with cognitive decline as measured by change in Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes (CDR-SB) score from the baseline but did not pass multiple-test correction. Future experiments will help us better understand potential roles of these genetic loci in AD pathology.