Screening for hearing loss versus parental concern regarding hearing problems: Subsequent referral and treatment for otitis media in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: The present study investigates whether general practitioner (GP) consultation initiated by failing the population hearing screening at age nine months or GP consultation because of parental concern over ear/hearing problems was more important in deciding on referral and/or surgical treatment of otitis media (OM). DESIGN: A questionnaire covering the history between birth and 21 months of age was used to obtain information on referral after failing the hearing screening, GP consultations for ear/hearing problems, and subsequent referral to a specialist and possible surgical treatment at an ENT department. SETTING: The province of Limburg, the Netherlands. SUBJECTS: Healthy infants invited for the hearing screening at age nine months, who responded in an earlier study called PEPPER (Persistent Ear Problems, Providing Evidence for Referral, response rate 58%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The odds of a child being surgically treated for OM. RESULTS: The response rate for the present questionnaire was 72%. Of all children tested, 3.9% failed the hearing screening and were referred to their GP. Of all 2619 children in this study, 18.6% visited their GP with ear/hearing problems. Children failing the hearing screening without GP consultation for ear/hearing problems were significantly more often treated surgically for OM than children passing the hearing screening but with GP consultation for ear/hearing problems. CONCLUSION: Objectified hearing loss, i.e. failing the hearing screening, was important in the decision for surgical treatment in infants in the Netherlands.

Risk factors for failing the hearing screen due to otitis media in Dutch infants.

Hearing loss from otitis media (OM) can affect young children's development. Some children with persistent OM-related hearing loss and associated problems can benefit from treatment, but researchers and clinicians are still unclear on how to identify them best. The present study aims to determine which factors are most related to the hearing loss in OM, as a first step towards an effective case-finding instrument for detecting infants with persistent OM-related hearing loss. The full PEPPER ('Persistent Ear Problems, Providing Evidence for Referral') item pool includes a wide range of risk factors for OM in a single questionnaire, and is easily completed by parents or guardians. The questionnaire was sent to all children invited for the universal hearing screen at age 9 months in Limburg, The Netherlands. Repeatedly failing of the hearing screen was used as outcome marker indicative of OM-related chronic hearing loss. Univariate analyses were conducted to determine statistically significant risk factors predicting 'fail' cases at this hearing screen. Five items were found as individually predictive of hearing screen failure and subsequent referral: 'having severe cold symptoms', 'attending day care with >4 children', 'having siblings', 'severe nasal congestion' and 'male gender'. Suitably worded parental questions document risk factors for OM-related hearing loss in infants, broadly consistent with past general literature on OM risk factors, but more focused. The findings justify further optimising and evaluation of an additive or multiplicative combination of these questions as a means for selecting and routing an infant with diagnosed or suspected OM to further care.

International perspectives on management of acute otitis media: a qualitative review.

BACKGROUND: Current opinions regarding the management of acute otitis media (AOM) in children vary across Western countries. With antibiotic resistance rising and more evidence regarding the limited clinical efficacy of antibiotics becoming available, interest in managing AOM other than with antibiotics is renewed. OBJECTIVES: To compare international rates of antibiotic prescription and surgery for AOM. To provide current evidence regarding the efficacy of various treatment options for AOM and their potential complications. METHODS: Qualitative (narrative) review. RESULTS: The percentage of patients given antibiotics for AOM varies from 31% in The Netherlands to more than 90% in most other Western countries. The 1998 prevalence of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains, on the other hand, ranges from 3% in The Netherlands to 53% in France. The surgical rate for tympanostomy tubes varies from 2 per 1000 children per year in the United Kingdom to 20 per 1000 in The Netherlands. The benefit of both antibiotic and surgical therapy in AOM appears to be limited, with numbers needed to treat ranging from 8 to 25 for antibiotic therapy, depending on the definition of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: International rates of antibiotic prescription and surgery for AOM vary strongly, which can be explained largely by the lack of uniform evidence-based guidelines. International debates with the aim of overcoming cultural differences regarding the management of otitis media, and of reaching agreement on guidelines on the basis of current evidence are necessary.