A new assay for measurement of the liberated domain I of the urokinase receptor in plasma improves the prediction of survival in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The liberated domain I of the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor [uPAR(I)] is a significant prognostic marker in lung and ovarian cancer, although the uPAR(I) concentration is below the limit of quantification (LOQ) in a substantial proportion of patient samples (Lung Cancer 2005;48:349-55; Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:5785-93; APMIS 2009;117:755-61). This study was undertaken to design an immunoassay with improved functional sensitivity for measuring uPAR(I) and to evaluate the prognostic value of uPAR(I) for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. METHODS: Surface plasmon resonance analysis identified 2 monoclonal antibodies, R3 and R20, that simultaneously bind to the liberated uPAR(I) but not to intact uPAR. We used R3 for capture and Eu-labeled R20 for detection in designing a 2-site sandwich time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TR-FIA 4) for measuring liberated uPAR(I). TR-FIA 4 was validated for use with citrated plasma. The prognostic value of the uPAR(I) concentration was evaluated in 298 CRC patients. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for the uni- and multivariate survival analyses. RESULTS: The LOQ was 0.65 pmol/L. Liberated uPAR(I) was measurable in all patient samples with TR-FIA 4. In the multivariate analysis that included sex, age, tumor stage, tumor localization, and adjuvant treatment, the uPAR(I) concentration measured with TR-FIA 4 (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.15-2.57; P = 0.009), as well as the concentration of intact soluble uPAR plus the cleaved uPAR fragment containing domains II and III, tumor stage, and age were independent predictors of prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: TR-FIA 4 has a functional sensitivity improved 4-fold over that of the previous uPAR(I) assay. The uPAR(I) concentration measured with TR-FIA 4 is an independent predictor of prognosis in CRC patients.

Biological variations in plasma VEGF and VEGFR-1 may compromise their biomarker value in colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) plays a prominent role in tumor angiogenesis and plasma VEGF concentration may carry prognostic information in colorectal cancer. The VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR-1) is a regulatory receptor which is shredded into plasma of patients with colorectal cancer. For both molecules, large biological variation and lack of standardization of assay procedures are major challenges. METHODS: We investigated pre-analytical, analytical, as well as short term and long term biological variation of plasma VEGF and VEGFR-1 in volunteers. In addition, we evaluated plasma VEGF and VEGFR-1 as markers of colorectal disease in a case-control study on four groups of 77 individuals undergoing bowel endoscopy. Groups were categorized as 'no findings', 'non-malignant findings', 'adenoma', or 'colorectal cancer'. RESULTS: In the studies on variation, temperature and delay before centrifugation significantly influenced plasma VEGF and, to a minor extent, plasma VEGFR-1 concentrations. In addition, we found large biological variations with CV up to 69.2% for VEGF and CV up to 35.9% for VEGFR-1. For both molecules the intra-subject variation exceeded the inter-subject variation. In the case control study neither plasma VEGF nor VEGFR-1 was able to differentiate between the four groups of individuals although plasma VEGFR-1 was significantly lower in patients with 'no findings'. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in plasma VEGF or VEGFR-1 between patients with no findings, benign disease, pre-malignant findings, and malignant findings after endoscopy. The poor discrimination between patients may be explained by the large inter- and intra-subject variations found for both molecules in volunteers.

Plasma tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 as a biological marker? Pre-analytical considerations.

UNLABELLED: Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) may be a valuable biological marker in Colorectal Cancer (CRC). However, prospective validation of TIMP-1 as a biological marker should include a series of pre-analytical considerations. TIMP-1 is stored in platelets, which may degranulate during collection and storage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of platelet TIMP-1 contamination on plasma TIMP-1 levels in healthy volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All four parts of this study were done on EDTA-plasma. 1: The effect of stasis was evaluated in plasma collected with and without tourniquet. The collected whole blood was centrifuged at three different g-values. The effect of cellular contamination was evaluated 2: by adding plasma from just above the buffy-coat to one of four tubes containing plasma from the same sample and 3: by separating the plasma into three layers: upper, middle and lower. 4: The effect of temperature was studied by collection and handling of corresponding samples on ice and at room temperature. Prior to analysis samples were stored at -80 degrees C. TIMP-1 was determined using a validated in-house ELISA. RESULTS: 1: TIMP-1 levels in plasma collected with or without stasis were not significantly different. Similarly TIMP-1 levels were not affected by the studied differences in centrifugation force. 2: TIMP-1 levels were significantly increased in plasma potentially contaminated with platelets (p<0.0001). 3: Separation of plasma into an upper, middle and lower layer did not affect the levels of plasma TIMP-1. 4: Samples kept at room temperature following collection showed significantly higher plasma TIMP-1 levels than samples kept on ice (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Contamination with platelets during handling and storage of plasma may have significant effect on TIMP-1 levels. The results can define a standard operating procedure for sample collection and handling, which is important in obtaining uniform, comparable and reproducible plasma TIMP-1 levels.