RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine type-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) are generally effective in preventing delayed bleeding and healing artificial wounds after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This study aimed to review the therapeutic effects of PPIs and H2RAs on damage caused by EMR and ESD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirteen articles were collected between 2002 and 2022 by searching Medlib, ScienceDirect, PubMed, International Scientific Indexing (ISI), Embase, and Scopus databases using valid keywords. The main inclusion criteria were delayed wound healing, bleeding, epigastric pain, intraoperative bleeding, and perforation. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were evaluated using a random or fixed effects model. Data analysis was performed using Stata v. 14.2. RESULTS: A total of 13 articles including 1,483 patients were analyzed. The results showed that delayed bleeding was significantly less frequent in the PPI group than in the H2RA group (OR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.39-0.92). Subgroup analysis showed that PPI was more effective in preventing delayed bleeding than H2RA for ESD wounds (OR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.44-1.08). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the incidence of epigastric pain, intraoperative bleeding, wound healing, and perforation after endoscopic treatments. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis results reveal that PPI is more effective than H2RA in preventing delayed bleeding after endoscopic treatment, particularly in patients treated with ESD. However, there was no significant difference between PPI and H2RA in terms of intraoperative bleeding, epigastric pain, wound healing, and perforation from endoscopic therapy.
RESUMEN
Background: In colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer, human vision limitations may lead to higher miss rate of lesions; artificial intelligence (AI) assistance has been demonstrated to improve polyp detection. However, there still lacks direct evidence to demonstrate whether AI is superior to trainees or experienced nurses as a second observer to increase adenoma detection during colonoscopy. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of assistance from AI and human observer during colonoscopy. Methods: A prospective multicenter randomized study was conducted from 2 September 2019 to 29 May 2020 at four endoscopy centers in China. Eligible patients were randomized to either computer-aided detection (CADe)-assisted group or observer-assisted group. The primary outcome was adenoma per colonoscopy (APC). Secondary outcomes included polyp per colonoscopy (PPC), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and polyp detection rate (PDR). We compared continuous variables and categorical variables by using R studio (version 3.4.4). Results: A total of 1,261 (636 in the CADe-assisted group and 625 in the observer-assisted group) eligible patients were analysed. APC (0.42 vs 0.35, P = 0.034), PPC (1.13 vs 0.81, P < 0.001), PDR (47.5% vs 37.4%, P < 0.001), ADR (25.8% vs 24.0%, P = 0.464), the number of detected sessile polyps (683 vs 464, P < 0.001), and sessile adenomas (244 vs 182, P = 0.005) were significantly higher in the CADe-assisted group than in the observer-assisted group. False detections of the CADe system were lower than those of the human observer (122 vs 191, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Compared with the human observer, the CADe system may improve the clinical outcome of colonoscopy and reduce disturbance to routine practice (Chictr.org.cn No.: ChiCTR1900025235).
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) without symptoms or silent GERD can be easily missed in patients with hypertension. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of GERD, specifically the prevalence of silent GERD in hypertensive patients, and to explore its possible predictors. METHODS: Consecutive patients with hypertension referred to the cardiovascular clinic of Suining Central Hospital in 2016 were screened for this study. A Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) and an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were employed for the evaluation of silent GERD. Included patients were divided into silent-GERD group and non-GERD control group. The demographic characteristics and antihypertensive agent prescriptions were collected and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of silent GERD and GERD in patients with hypertension was 15.1% and 31.4%, respectively. 66 patients were included in the silent-GERD group, and 298 patients were included in the non-GERD control group. Abdominal obesity and untreated hypertension were positive predictors, while controlled hypertension was a negative predictor for silent GERD. The prescription of calcium channel blockers was not a predictor for it. CONCLUSIONS: High prevalence of GERD, specifically silent GERD, could be found in patients with hypertension. Abdominal obesity and untreated hypertension were positive predictors for silent GERD, while controlled hypertension was a negative predictor for it.