Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 71
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Epidemiol Infect ; 148: e187, 2020 05 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32418558

RESUMEN

Surveillance of new cases of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in Italy was started in 2007 by the Ministry of Health (MoH). In 2012, pneumococcal childhood vaccination was introduced at the national level and, in 2017, for citizens aged 65 years and over. We describe here IPD epidemiology in Italy over the past 10 years investigating the impact of the vaccine programme on disease burden. Reports of IPD cases, data on serotype and vaccination coverage (VC) data were obtained from MoH annual reports, for the period 2007-2017. IPD notification rate and proportion by year, region, age and serotype were calculated. In 2007, 525 cases were reported (rate 0.88/100 000), rising to 1703 cases (rate 2.82/100 000) in 2017. The distribution of IPD cases by age group over time registered the largest share among individuals aged 65 years and over. A decreasing trend in notification rate was observed among those aged 0-4 years. During the same period, the 24-month VC increased, ranging from 80.9% to 96.7% in 2017. Molecular data indicated re-emergence of PPSV23-specific serotypes and non-vaccine serotypes. We observed an increase in IPD notifications during 2007-2017, likely due to an improved surveillance system, at least in some regions, with the relative quota of IPD notifications decreasing among vaccinated children cohorts. Further strengthening of IPD surveillance system, including molecular and vaccine coverage data, would be needed to assess and inform pneumococcal vaccination strategies in Italy.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
2.
Ann Ig ; 32(6): 674-681, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33175077

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Toscana virus (TOSV) is an arbovirus transmitted to humans by Phlebotomus spp sandflies. It causes aseptic meningitis and meningoencephalitis with marked seasonality. Here we describe the clinical, microbiological and epidemiological features of two clusters of cases occurred in Tuscany in 2018. METHODS: A confirmed case was defined as the detection of anti-TOSV IgM and IgG in serum sample, in presence of typical clinical manifestations. We consulted hospital records of hospitalized patients to collect clinical information and obtained epidemiological information from the local health authority investigation report. We telephonically interviewed patients using a standard questionnaire for a 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 12 cases of TOSV meningo-encephalitis with onset between 4th of July and 12th of September accessed health care services in the province of Livorno. Eight cases were males with median age 41,5 and four were not resident in the area. Serological investigations confirmed a recent TOSV infection. Eight cases reported visiting Elba Island and four had a possible occupational-related exposure. CONCLUSIONS: This surge of infection emphasizes the need of information campaigns coupled with adequate surveillance and control interventions against TOSV that, among other arboviruses, is a growing issue of concern in Italy.


Asunto(s)
Meningoencefalitis/epidemiología , Fiebre por Flebótomos/epidemiología , Virus de Nápoles de la Fiebre de la Mosca de los Arenales , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Entrevistas como Asunto , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Islas del Mediterráneo/epidemiología , Meningitis Aséptica/diagnóstico , Meningitis Aséptica/epidemiología , Meningoencefalitis/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Fiebre por Flebótomos/diagnóstico , Virus de Nápoles de la Fiebre de la Mosca de los Arenales/inmunología , Estaciones del Año , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Turismo , Enfermedad Relacionada con los Viajes , Adulto Joven
3.
Ann Ig ; 30(4): 346-363, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29895052

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nowadays whooping cough (pertussis) represents one of the most prevalent vaccine-preventable diseases in Western countries; even more, it is currently on rise. In many countries, the use of acellular pertussis adult vaccine in combination with tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Tdap) is recommended for women during pregnancy to protect newborns in the first months of life, when they are too young to be vaccinated. In Italy, vaccination of women during the third trimester of pregnancy is included in the national immunization programme (PNPV 2017-2019), though up to now, this vaccination strategy has not been efficiently implemented. OBJECTIVE: In view of the public health importance of pertussis, particularly in young infants, we undertook this review to summarise the existing evidence on immunogenicity, effectiveness, safety and uptake of pertussis vaccine in expectant mothers to protect newborns from pertussis. CONCLUSION: There is an increasing evidence that supports the safety, immunogenicity and effectiveness of Triaxis® e Boostrix® pertussis vaccination during pregnancy to protect infants before they receive their primary immunisations. In particular, both vaccines showed 90% effectiveness in the reduction of pertussis disease and hospitalization in newborns, with 95% effectiveness in the reduction of deaths. In Italy, the implementation of antenatal vaccination against pertussis is needed to narrow the gap between the recommendation of the PNPV and the prevention strategies actually offered by the public health system. To reach a good level of vaccine coverage, providers' recommendations are critical. Hence, extensive education of vaccine givers and all primary and secondary healthcare professionals who have any contact with pregnant women is needed.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/administración & dosificación , Vacunación/métodos , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Adulto , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/inmunología , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/microbiología , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/prevención & control , Italia , Embarazo , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Tos Ferina/inmunología
4.
Ann Ig ; 30(6): 509-516, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30614500

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has identified some risk factors for the occurrence of side effects linked to energy drinks (EDs) consumption by young people. EDs consumption has been evaluated in a sample of students in Italy together with some aspects of their lifestyle. METHODS: The survey was performed in two high schools from September 2016 to June 2017. 583 students between 14 to 18 years were recruited and a standard questionnaire (EFSA checklist) was used to collect information on responders characteristics, beverages consumption, EDs with alcohol, and EDs and sports. RESULTS: Despite 350 out of 583 responders (60%) consumed EDs, only 146 out of 583 (25%) were EDs-alcohol consumers. Moreover, 208 out of 379 (55%) of all physically active adolescents reported frequent EDs consumption before sport trainings. CONCLUSIONS: Study results highlight the need for primary prevention measures in communication campaigns and training delivered by school to limit potential health threats related to excess of EDs consumption.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Bebidas Energéticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estilo de Vida , Deportes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Lista de Verificación , Bebidas Energéticas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Instituciones Académicas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
Epidemiol Infect ; 145(3): 413-419, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27866483

RESUMEN

Polio cases due to wild virus are reported by only three countries in the world. Poliovirus type 2 has been globally eradicated and the last detection of poliovirus type 3 dates to November 2012. Poliovirus type 1 remains the only circulating wild strain; between January and September 2016 it caused 26 cases (nine in Afghanistan, 14 in Pakistan, three in Nigeria). The use of oral polio vaccine (OPV) has been the key to success in the eradication effort. However, paradoxically, moving towards global polio eradication, the burden caused by vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs) becomes increasingly important. In this paper circulation of both wild virus and VDPVs is reviewed and implications for the polio eradication endgame are discussed. Between April and May 2016 OPV2 cessation has been implemented globally, in a coordinated switch from trivalent OPV to bivalent OPV. In order to decrease the risk for cVDPV2 re-emergence inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) has been introduced in the routine vaccine schedule of all countries. The likelihood of re-emergence of cVDPVs should markedly decrease with time after OPV cessation, but silent circulation of polioviruses cannot be ruled out even a long time after cessation. For this reason, immunity levels against polioviruses should be kept as high as possible in the population by the use of IPV, and both clinical and environmental surveillance should be maintained at a high level.


Asunto(s)
Erradicación de la Enfermedad , Poliomielitis/epidemiología , Poliomielitis/prevención & control , Poliovirus/clasificación , Poliovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Afganistán/epidemiología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Política de Salud , Humanos , Nigeria/epidemiología , Pakistán/epidemiología , Poliomielitis/virología , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/inmunología , Vacuna Antipolio Oral/administración & dosificación , Vacuna Antipolio Oral/inmunología
6.
J Prev Med Hyg ; 57(1): E5-8, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27346941

RESUMEN

Influenza is a public health priority in Europe. The impact of influenza pandemics on public health is very high, but seasonal influenza also constitutes an important burden in terms of hospitalisation and excess deaths. Influenza vaccination is a fundamental pillar of disease prevention. In the absence of a clear decision-making process for vaccination policies, EU institutions have, in recent years, fostered collaboration among Member States. Such collaboration was closer during the 2009 pandemic, which constituted a clear cross-border threat to EU citizens' health. The EU institutions have been supporting national vaccination programmes by providing evidence of the effectiveness and safety of influenza vaccination. Decision 1082/2013 was a major step toward EU collaboration, in that it highlighted the role of pandemic vaccination in the field of preparedness and emergency response, in which concerted action is clearly valuable.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Salud Pública , Vacunación , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
Euro Surveill ; 18(45): 20627, 2013 Nov 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24229791

RESUMEN

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of contracting infections at work and further transmitting them to colleagues and patients. Immune HCWs would be protected themselves and act as a barrier against the spread of infections and maintain healthcare delivery during outbreaks, but vaccine uptake rates in HCWs have often been low. In order to achieve adequate immunisation rates in HCWs, mandatory vaccination policies are occasionally implemented by healthcare authorities, but such policies have raised considerable controversy. Here we review the background of this debate, analyse arguments for and against mandatory vaccination policies, and consider the principles and virtues of clinical, professional, institutional and public health ethics. We conclude that there is a moral imperative for HCWs to be immune and for healthcare institutions to ensure HCW vaccination, in particular for those working in settings with high-risk groups of patients. If voluntary uptake of vaccination by HCWs is not optimal, patients' welfare, public health and also the HCW's own health interests should outweigh concerns about individual autonomy: fair mandatory vaccination policies for HCWs might be acceptable. Differences in diseases, patient and HCW groups at risk and available vaccines should be taken into consideration when adopting the optimal policy.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Programas Obligatorios/ética , Vacunación/ética , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
Euro Surveill ; 17(26)2012 Jun 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22790533

RESUMEN

Measles is a highly contagious and potentially fatal disease. Europe is far from the 95% coverage rates necessary for elimination of the disease, although a safe and cost-effective vaccine is available. We reviewed the literature on studies carried out in European countries from January 1991 to September 2011 on knowledge, attitudes and practices of health professionals towards measles vaccination and on how health professionals have an impact on parental vaccination choices. Both quantitative and qualitative studies were considered: a total of 28 eligible articles were retrieved. Healthcare workers are considered by parents as a primary and trustworthy source of information on childhood vaccination. Gaps in knowledge and poor communication from healthcare workers are detrimental to high immunisation rates. Correct and transparent information for parents plays a key role in parental decisions on whether to have their children vaccinated. Healthcare workers' knowledge of and positive attitudes towards measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination are crucial to meeting the measles elimination goal. An effort should be made to overcome potential communication barriers and to strengthen vaccine education among healthcare professionals.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Sarampión/prevención & control , Paperas/prevención & control , Rol Profesional , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Comunicación , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Padres , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
Euro Surveill ; 17(22)2012 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22687916

RESUMEN

This report provides an updated overview of recommended and mandatory vaccinations in the European Union (EU), Iceland and Norway, considering the differences in vaccine programme implementation between countries. In 2010, the Vaccine European New Integrated Collaboration Effort (VENICE) network, conducted a survey among the VENICE project gatekeepers to learn more about how national vaccination programmes are implemented, whether recommended or mandatory. Information was collected from all 27 EU Member States, Iceland and Norway. In total 15 countries do not have any mandatory vaccinations; the remaining 14 have at least one mandatory vaccination included in their programme. Vaccination against polio is mandatory for both children and adults in 12 countries; diphtheria and tetanus vaccination in 11 countries and hepatitis B vaccination in 10 countries. For eight of the 15 vaccines considered, some countries have a mixed strategy of recommended and mandatory vaccinations. Mandatory vaccination may be considered as a way of improving compliance to vaccination programmes. However, compliance with many programmes in Europe is high, using only recommendations. More information about the diversity in vaccine offer at European level may help countries to adapt vaccination strategies based on the experience of other countries. However, any proposal on vaccine strategies should be developed taking into consideration the local context habits.


Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/normas , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Programas de Inmunización , Programas Obligatorios , Vacunación Masiva/organización & administración , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Práctica de Salud Pública/normas , Adulto , Niño , Enfermedades Transmisibles/inmunología , Unión Europea , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Política de Salud , Humanos , Islandia/epidemiología , Esquemas de Inmunización , Programas Obligatorios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Vacunación Masiva/métodos , Noruega/epidemiología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Práctica de Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derivación y Consulta
10.
Euro Surveill ; 17(4)2012 Jan 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22297139

RESUMEN

In August 2010 the Vaccine European New Integrated Collaboration Effort (VENICE) project conducted a survey to collect information on influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination policies and vaccination coverage in the European Union (EU), Norway and Iceland. Of 29 responding countries, 26 organised national pandemic influenza vaccination and one country had recommendations for vaccination but did not have a specific programme. Of the 27 countries with vaccine recommendations, all recommended it for healthcare workers and pregnant women. Twelve countries recommended vaccine for all ages. Six and three countries had recommendations for specific age groups in children and in adults, countries for specific adult age groups. Most countries recommended vaccine for those in new risk groups identified early in the pandemic such as morbid obese and people with neurologic diseases. Two thirds of countries started their vaccination campaigns within a four week period after week 40/2009. The reported vaccination coverage varied between countries from 0.4% to 59% for the entire population (22 countries); 3% to 68% for healthcare workers (13 countries); 0% to 58% for pregnant women (12 countries); 0.2% to 74% for children (12 countries). Most countries identified similar target groups for pandemic vaccine, but substantial variability in vaccination coverage was seen. The recommendations were in accordance with policy advice from the EU Health Security Committee and the World Health Organization.


Asunto(s)
Política de Salud , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/normas , Vacunación/normas , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Política de Salud/economía , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/métodos , Humanos , Islandia/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Noruega/epidemiología , Pandemias/economía , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/economía , Vacunación/economía
11.
Euro Surveill ; 15(47)2010 Nov 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21144444

RESUMEN

The Venice 2 human papillomavirus vaccination survey evaluates the state of introduction of the HPV vaccination into the national immunisation schedules in the 29 participating countries. As of July 2010, 18 countries have integrated this vaccination. The vaccination policy and achievements vary among those countries regarding target age groups, delivery infrastructures and vaccination coverage reached. Financial constraints remain the major obstacle for the 11 countries who have not yet introduced the vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Vacunación Masiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Niño , Toma de Decisiones , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Política de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización/tendencias , Esquemas de Inmunización , Vacunación Masiva/economía , Vacunación Masiva/tendencias , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/inmunología , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/economía , Adulto Joven
12.
Euro Surveill ; 15(44)2010 Nov 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21087586

RESUMEN

In 2009 the second cross-sectional web-based survey was undertaken by the Vaccine European New Integrated Collaboration Effort (VENICE) project across 27 European Union (EU) member states (MS), Norway and Iceland (n=29) to determine changes in official national seasonal influenza vaccination policies since a survey undertaken in 2008 and to compare the estimates of vaccination coverage between countries using data obtained from both surveys. Of 27 responding countries, all recommended vaccination against seasonal influenza to the older adult population. Six countries recommended vaccination of children aged between six months and <18 years old. Most countries recommended influenza vaccination for those individuals with chronic medical conditions. Recommendations for vaccination of healthcare workers (HCW) in various settings existed in most, but not all countries. Staff in hospitals and long-term care facilities were recommended vaccination in 23 countries, and staff in out-patient clinics in 22 countries. In the 2009 survey, the reported national estimates on vaccine coverage varied by country and risk group, ranging from 1.1% - 82.6% for the older adult population; to between 32.9% -71.7% for clinical risk groups; and from 13.4% -89.4% for HCW. Many countries that recommend the influenza vaccination do not monitor the coverage in risk groups. In 2008 and 2009 most countries recommended influenza vaccination for the main risk groups. However, despite general consensus and recommendations for vaccination of high risk groups, many countries do not achieve high coverage in these groups. The reported vaccination coverage still needs to be improved in order to achieve EU and World Health Organization goals.


Asunto(s)
Guías como Asunto , Política de Salud , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Unión Europea , Humanos , Islandia , Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Internet , Noruega
13.
J Prev Med Hyg ; 61(2): E152-E161, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32802999

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is one of the most severe vaccine-preventable disease not yet under control. In Italy, although different anti-meningococcal vaccines are available, their offer among regions is heterogeneous. The aim of this study is to describe the epidemiology of IMD in Italy based on analysis of national surveillance data for 2011-2017 to optimize the vaccination strategy. METHODS: IMD surveillance data from the Italian National Health Institute were analysed. Microsoft Excel was used to present trend analysis, stratifying by age and serogroups. RESULTS: In Italy, during the period 2011-2017, the incidence of IMD increased from 0.25 cases/100,000 inhabitants in 2011 to 0.33 cases/100,000 in 2017. Most cases after 2012 were caused by non-B serogroups. The number of cases in subjects aged 25-64 years increased steadily after 2012 (36 cases in 2011, 79 in 2017), mostly due to non-B serogroups, representing more than 65% of cases in those aged 25+ years. CONCLUSIONS: In the period from 2011 to 2017, the incidence of IMDs increased in Italy. The increase, probably due also to a better surveillance, highlights the importance of the disease in the adult population and the high level of circulation of non-B serogroups in particular after 2012. Our analysis supports an anti-meningococcal vaccination plan in Italy that should include the highest number of preventable serogroups and be aimed at vaccinating a wider population through a multicohort strategy.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Meningocócicas/fisiopatología , Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Italia/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Adulto Joven
14.
Euro Surveill ; 14(12)2009 Mar 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19341605

RESUMEN

The first pneumococcal vaccine targeting the youngest age groups, a seven-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV7), was licensed in Europe in 2001. Since then several European countries have introduced PCV7 in their childhood vaccination schedules.Still, information on vaccination schemes, vaccine uptake and impact of vaccine introduction is scarce in Europe. The following article summarises the characteristics of national pneumococcal vaccination programmes for children in 32 European countries and provides an estimate of vaccine use based on sales data for 22 countries between 2001 and 2007. There were wide variations in the recommended PCV7 vaccination schemes and in PCV7 use.High vaccine uptake was not always related to the presence of a national vaccination programme.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas Neumococicas , Preescolar , Europa (Continente) , Vacuna Neumocócica Conjugada Heptavalente , Humanos , Lactante , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19756336

RESUMEN

Childhood vaccination programmes in Europe are basically very safe and effective. On the other hand there are very large differences between countries in the way they are organised. In this paper we analyse the immunisation schedules used in 29 European countries to highlight similarities and differences. One of the most evident differences is the total number of doses administered under 18 years of age, which ranges between 4 and 7 if we consider DT-containing vaccines. Any change in vaccination schedules is associated with costs. Thus, this process is worthy only if it can lead in the long run to an overall improvement in the national vaccination programmes. National sovereignty in the area of vaccination programmes prevails; therefore any step forward will be feasible only if consensus in Europe is reached.


Asunto(s)
Esquemas de Inmunización , Vacunación Masiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Virosis/epidemiología , Virosis/prevención & control , Niño , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
J Prev Med Hyg ; 50(3): 181-90, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20411653

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A geographic analysis of the causes of death is an important tool for assessing the effectiveness of Public Health initiatives. The aim of this study is to analyse the causes of death between 2000 and 2004, to discover any excess mortality from cancer in Province of Taranto, an area at high environmental risk. METHODS: Mortality data from cancer were selected from the Puglia Regional Nominative Causes of Death Registry. Crude and standardized rates and Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMR) were calculated for the five Provinces of the Puglia Region, their capital cities and in four concentric rings around the industrial area located in Province of Taranto. RESULTS: . Even if the highest death rate for all tumours resulted in the Province of Lecce (24.9 x 10,000), in the cities of Lecce and Bari (29 x 10,000), the distribution of the SMRs in Province of Taranto showed an excess of mortality (+10%) in the ring next to industrial area. For lung cancer the highest rate was reported in city of Taranto (6 x 10,000) and the highest risk (+24%) in the ring next to industrial area. Moreover, in this area 9 (70%) of the 13 considered malignant tumours types presented an excess of mortality. CONCLUSION: The results uphold the data reported in the published literature. It is fundamental to intensify research into other risk factors (exposure at work and aberrant lifestyles). Moreover, there is an increasing need for a Regional Cancer Register.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Práctica de Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervalos de Confianza , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Geografía , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pleurales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pleurales/mortalidad , Prevalencia , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
17.
Euro Surveill ; 13(33)2008 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18761891

RESUMEN

The European Union Member States are simultaneously considering introducing HPV vaccination into their national immunisation schedules. The Vaccine European New Integrated Collaboration Effort (VENICE) project aims to develop a collaborative European vaccination network. A survey was undertaken to describe the decision status and the decision-making process regarding the potential introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in to their national immunisation schedules. A web-based questionnaire was developed and completed online in 2007 by 28 countries participating in VENICE. As of 31 October 2007,five countries had decided to introduce HPV vaccination into the national immunisation schedule, while another seven had started the decision-making process with a recommendation favouring introduction. Varying target populations were selected by the five countries which had introduced the vaccination. Half of the surveyed countries had undertaken at least one ad hoc study to support the decision-making process. According to an update of the decision-status from January 2008, the number of countries which had made a decision or recommendation changed to 10 and 5 respectively. This survey demonstrates the rapidly evolving nature of HPV vaccine introduction in Europe and the existence of expertise and experience among EU Member States. The VENICE network is capable of following this process and supporting countries in making vaccine introduction decisions. A VENICE collaborative web-space is being developed as a European resource for the decision-making process for vaccine introduction.


Asunto(s)
Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Esquemas de Inmunización , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/provisión & distribución , Toma de Decisiones , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Vacunación Masiva/organización & administración , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/inmunología , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapéutico
18.
J Hosp Infect ; 98(1): 46-52, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28917570

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prevention of legionellosis remains a critical issue in healthcare settings where monochloramine (MC) disinfection was recently introduced as an alternative to chlorine dioxide in controlling Legionella spp. contamination of the hospital water network. Continuous treatments with low MC doses in some instances have induced a viable but non-culturable state (VBNC) of Legionella spp. AIM: To investigate the occurrence of such dormant cells during a long period of continuous MC treatment. METHODS: Between November 2010 and April 2015, 162 water and biofilm samples were collected and Legionella spp. isolated in accordance with standard procedures. In sampling sites where MC was <1.5mg/L, VBNC cells were investigated by ethidium monoazide bromide (EMA)-real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and 'resuscitation' test into Acanthamoeba polyphaga CCAP 1501/18. According to the Health Protection Agency protocol, free-living protozoa were researched in 60 five-litre water samples. FINDINGS: In all, 136 out of 156 (87.2%) of the samples taken from sites previously positive for L. pneumophila ST269 were negative by culture, but only 47 (34.5%) negative by qPCR. Although no positive results were obtained by EMA-qPCR, four out of 22 samples associated with MC concentration of 1.3 ± 0.5mg/L showed VBNC legionella resuscitation. The presence of the amoeba A. polyphaga in the hospital water network was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first report evidencing the emergence of VNBC legionella during a long period of continuous MC treatment of a hospital water network, highlighting the importance of keeping an appropriate and uninterrupted MC dosage to ensure the control of legionella colonization in hospital water supplies.


Asunto(s)
Cloraminas/farmacología , Desinfectantes/farmacología , Legionella/efectos de los fármacos , Legionella/aislamiento & purificación , Microbiología del Agua , Acanthamoeba/aislamiento & purificación , Acanthamoeba/microbiología , Azidas/metabolismo , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/metabolismo , Hospitales , Legionella/fisiología , Viabilidad Microbiana/efectos de los fármacos , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA