Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 54
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 66(3): e0197521, 2022 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35007134

RESUMEN

The objectives were to analyze treatment, clinical outcomes, and predictors of mortality in hospitalized patients with Acinetobacter baumannii infection. This was a retrospective cohort study of inpatients with A. baumannii cultures and treatment from 2010 to 2019. Patients who died during admission were compared to those who survived, to identify predictors of inpatient mortality, using multivariable unconditional logistic regression models. We identified 4,599 inpatients with A. baumannii infection; 13.6% died during admission. Fluoroquinolones (26.8%), piperacillin-tazobactam (24%), and carbapenems (15.6%) were used for treatment. Tigecycline (3%) and polymyxins (3.7%) were not used often. Predictors of inpatient mortality included current acute respiratory failure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.94), shock (aOR 3.05), and acute renal failure (aOR 2.01); blood (aOR 1.94) and respiratory (aOR 1.64) infectious source; multidrug-resistant A. baumannii (MDRAB) infection (aOR 1.66); liver disease (aOR 2.15); and inadequate initial treatment (aOR 1.30). Inpatient mortality was higher in those with MDRAB versus non-MDRAB (aOR 1.61) and in those with CRAB versus non-CRAB infection (aOR 1.68). Length of stay >10 days was higher among those with MDRAB versus non-MDRAB (aOR 1.25) and in those with CRAB versus non-CRAB infection (aOR 1.31). In our national cohort of inpatients with A. baumannii infection, clinical outcomes were worse among those with MDRAB and/or CRAB infection. Predictors of inpatient mortality included several current conditions associated with severity, infectious source, underlying illness, and inappropriate treatment. Our study may assist health care providers in the early identification of admitted patients with A. baumannii infection who are at higher risk of death.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 66(6): e0211721, 2022 06 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35416712

RESUMEN

Activated platelets have known antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Accelerated clearance of platelets induced by S. aureus can result in thrombocytopenia and increased mortality in patients. Recent studies suggest that P2Y12 inhibition protects platelets from accelerated clearance. We therefore evaluated the effect of P2Y12 inhibition on clinical outcomes in patients with S. aureus bacteremia across a large national cohort. Our retrospective cohort (2010 to 2018) included patients admitted to Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals with blood cultures positive for S. aureus and treated with standard-of-care antibiotics. Employing propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazards regression models, we compared clinical outcomes in patients treated with clopidogrel for at least the 30 days prior to admission and continuing for at least 5 days after admission to patients without any P2Y12 inhibitor use in the year preceding admission. Mortality was significantly lower among clopidogrel users than P2Y12 inhibitor nonusers (n = 147 propensity score-matched pairs): the inpatient mortality hazard ratio (HR) was 0.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 0.86), and 30-day mortality HR was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.98). There were no differences in 30-day readmission, 30-day S. aureus reinfection, microbiological clearance, or thrombocytopenia. Clopidogrel use at the time of infection reduced in-hospital mortality by 89% and 30-day mortality by 57% among a cohort of patients with S. aureus bacteremia. These results support the need to further study the use of P2Y12 inhibitors as adjunctive therapy in S. aureus bloodstream infections.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Trombocitopenia , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Clopidogrel/farmacología , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus , Trombocitopenia/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): e2763-e2772, 2021 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32590839

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Unnecessary antibiotic treatment of suspected urinary tract infections (UTI) is common in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). However, less is known about the extent of suboptimal treatment, in terms of antibiotic choice, dose, and duration, after the decision to use antibiotics has been made. METHODS: We described the frequency of potentially suboptimal treatment among residents with an incident UTI (the first during the study with none in the year prior) in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) community living centers (CLCs; 2013-2018). Time trends were analyzed using Joinpoint regression. Residents with UTIs receiving potentially suboptimal treatment were compared with those receiving optimal treatment, to identify resident characteristics predictive of suboptimal antibiotic treatment, using multivariable unconditional logistic regression models. RESULTS: We identified 21 938 residents with an incident UTI treated in 120 VA CLCs, of whom 96.0% were male. Potentially suboptimal antibiotic treatment was identified in 65.0% of residents and decreased 1.8% annually (P < .05). Potentially suboptimal initial drug choice was identified in 45.6% of residents, suboptimal dose frequency in 28.6%, and longer than recommended duration in 12.7%. Predictors of suboptimal antibiotic treatment included prior fluoroquinolone exposure (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38), chronic renal disease (1.19), age ≥85 years (1.17), prior skin infection (1.14), recent high white blood cell count (1.08), and genitourinary disorder (1.08). CONCLUSION: Similar to findings in non-VA facilities, potentially suboptimal treatment was common but improving in CLC residents with an incident UTI. Predictors of suboptimal antibiotic treatment should be targeted with antibiotic stewardship interventions to improve UTI treatment.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Infecciones Urinarias , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Fluoroquinolonas , Instituciones de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico
4.
BMC Geriatr ; 21(1): 436, 2021 07 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34301192

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic use is associated with several antibiotic-related harms in vulnerable, older long-term care (LTC) residents. Suboptimal antibiotic use may also be associated with harms but has not yet been investigated. The aim of this work was to compare rates of poor clinical outcomes among LTC residents with UTI receiving suboptimal versus optimal antibiotic treatment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among residents with an incident urinary tract infection (UTI) treated in Veterans Affairs LTC units (2013-2018). Potentially suboptimal antibiotic treatment was defined as use of a suboptimal initial antibiotic drug choice, dose frequency, and/or excessive treatment duration. The primary outcome was time to a composite measure of poor clinical outcome, defined as UTI recurrence, acute care hospitalization/emergency department visit, adverse drug event, Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), or death within 30 days of antibiotic discontinuation. Shared frailty Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to compare the time-to-event between suboptimal and optimal treatment. RESULTS: Among 19,701 LTC residents with an incident UTI, 64.6% received potentially suboptimal antibiotic treatment and 35.4% experienced a poor clinical outcome. In adjusted analyses, potentially suboptimal antibiotic treatment was associated with a small increased hazard of poor clinical outcome (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11) as compared with optimal treatment, driven by an increased hazard of CDI (aHR 1.94, 95% CI 1.54-2.44). CONCLUSION: In this national cohort study, suboptimal antibiotic treatment was associated with a 6% increased risk of the composite measure of poor clinical outcomes, in particular, a 94% increased risk of CDI. Beyond the decision to use antibiotics, clinicians should also consider the potential harms of suboptimal treatment choices with regards to drug type, dose frequency, and duration used.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología
5.
Crit Care Med ; 48(4): 525-532, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32205599

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The relationship between the timing of antibiotics and mortality among septic shock patients has not been examined among patients specifically with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a Veterans Affairs S. aureus bacteremia database. SETTING: One-hundred twenty-two hospitals in the Veterans Affairs Health System. PATIENTS: Patients with septic shock and S. aureus bacteremia admitted directly from the emergency department to the ICU from January 1, 2003, to October 1, 2015, were evaluated. INTERVENTIONS: Time to appropriate antibiotic administration and 30-day mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 506 patients with S. aureus bacteremia and septic shock were included in the analysis. Thirty-day mortality was 78.1% for the entire cohort and was similar for those participants with methicillin-resistant S. aureus and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus bacteremia. Our multivariate analysis revealed that, as compared with those who received appropriate antibiotics within 1 hour after emergency department presentation, each additional hour that passed before appropriate antibiotics were administered produced an odds ratio of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.02-1.21) of mortality within 30 days. This odds increase equates to an average adjusted mortality increase of 1.3% (95% CI, 0.4-2.2%) for every hour that passes before antibiotics are administered. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study further support the importance of prompt appropriate antibiotic administration for patients with septic shock. Physicians should consider acting quickly to administer antibiotics with S. aureus coverage to any patient suspected of having septic shock.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/mortalidad , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/dietoterapia , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación
6.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 28(5): 707-715, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30916833

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: As changes in antibiotic therapy are common, intent-to-treat and definitive therapy exposure definitions in infectious disease clinical trials and observational studies may not accurately reflect all antibiotics received over the course of the infection. Therefore, we sought to describe changes in antibiotic therapy and unique treatment patterns among patients with bacteremia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospitalizations from Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers (January 2002-September 2015) and community hospitals (de-identified Optum Clinformatics DataMart with matched Premier Hospital data; October 2009-March 2013). In the VA population, antibiotic exposures were mapped from the culture collection date among those with positive Staphylococcus aureus cultures. In the Optum-Premier population, exposures were mapped from the admission date among those with a primary diagnosis of bacteremia. RESULTS: Our study included 50 467 bacteremia admissions, with only 14% of admissions having the same treatment pattern as another admission. For every 100 bacteremia admissions, 89 had changes in antibiotic therapy. For every 100 bacteremia admissions with changes in therapy, 95 had unique antibiotic treatment patterns. These findings were consistent in both populations, over time, and among different facilities within study populations. The median time to first therapy change was 2 days after initial therapy, with a median of three changes. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in antibiotic therapy for bloodstream infections were nearly universal regardless of hospital setting. Based on our findings, common antibiotic exposure definitions of intent-to-treat and definitive therapy would misclassify exposure in 86% of admissions, which highlights the need for better operational definitions of exposure in infectious diseases research.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Duración de la Terapia , Femenino , Hospitales de Veteranos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29530854

RESUMEN

The molecular and clinical factors associated with biofilm-forming methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are incompletely understood. Biofilm production for 182 MRSA isolates obtained from clinical culture sites (2004 to 2013) was quantified. Microbiological toxins, pigmentation, and genotypes were evaluated, and patient demographics were collected. Logistic regression was used to quantify the effect of strong biofilm production (versus weak biofilm production) on clinical outcomes and independent predictors of a strong biofilm. Of the isolates evaluated, 25.8% (47/182) produced strong biofilms and 40.7% (74/182) produced weak biofilms. Strong biofilm-producing isolates were more likely to be from multilocus sequence typing (MLST) clonal complex 8 (CC8) (34.0% versus 14.9%; P = 0.01) but less likely to be from MLST CC5 (48.9% versus 73.0%; P = 0.007). Predictors for strong biofilms were spa type t008 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 to 17.1) and receipt of chemotherapy or immunosuppressants in the previous 90 days (aOR, 33.6; 95% CI, 1.68 to 673). Conversely, patients with high serum creatinine concentrations (aOR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.72) or who previously received vancomycin (aOR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.002 to 0.39) were less likely to harbor strong biofilm-producing MRSA. Beta-toxin-producing isolates (aOR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.89) and isolates with spa type t895 (aOR, 0.02 95% CI, <0.001 to 0.47) were less likely to produce strong biofilms. Patient outcomes also varied between the two groups. Specifically, patients with strong biofilm-forming MRSA were significantly more likely to be readmitted within 90 days (aOR, 5.43; 95% CI, 1.69 to 17.4) but tended to have decreased 90-day mortality (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.12 to 1.06). Patients that harbored t008 and received immunosuppressants were more likely to have strong biofilm-producing MRSA isolates. Clinically, patients with strong biofilm-forming MRSA were less likely to die at 90 days but five times more likely to be readmitted.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Genotipo , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , Factores de Riesgo
8.
Gynecol Oncol ; 138(1): 109-14, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25933682

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Genetic predisposition is responsible for 5-10% of breast cancer, 10% of ovarian cancer and 2-5% of uterine cancer. The study objective was to compare genetic counseling and testing referral rates among women with breast cancer that met NCCN referral guidelines to the referral rates among women with gynecologic cancers and determine predictors of referral. METHODS: Utilizing an institutional tumor registry database, patients from an academic women's oncology program were identified who met a subset of NCCN guidelines for genetic referral between 2004 and 2010. Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer, breast cancer ≤50years of age, or uterine cancer <50years of age were included. A retrospective electronic chart review was conducted to evaluate for a genetic referral and uptake of genetic testing. RESULTS: 820 women were included (216 uterine, 314 breast, and 290 ovarian cancer). The overall genetic referral rate was 21.7%. 34% of eligible breast cancer patients were referred compared to 13.4% of uterine cancer and 14.5% of ovarian cancer patients (p<0.0001). Younger age, breast cancer diagnosis, family history and earlier stage were all significant referral predictors. The odds of being referred increased with the number of affected family members. 70.8% of referred patients, consulted with genetics. Among those who consulted with genetics, 95.2% underwent testing. CONCLUSIONS: Although increasing, genetic counseling remains underutilized across cancer diagnosis. Women with breast cancer are more likely to be referred than women with gynecologic cancers. Younger age, earlier stage and positive family history appear to be predictive of referral for genetic evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Asesoramiento Genético , Pruebas Genéticas , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/genética , Adhesión a Directriz , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/genética , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/genética
9.
Am J Emerg Med ; 33(7): 882-6, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25921968

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare time from medication administration to disposition from the Emergency Department (ED) between women treated for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy with different antiemetic agents. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women 13 weeks gestation or less treated in our Women and Infants Hospital ED for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy between 2009 and 2011. Data was collected on patient demographics, antiemetics used, and time to disposition. We analyzed time of administration of the antiemetic used first line (ondansetron versus metoclopramide versus promethazine or prochlorperazine) to time the discharge order was placed. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 439 women treated in the ED for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Forty-four percent received ondansetron alone, 47% received any other antiemetic alone, and 9% received more than one agent first line. Antiemetic agent selected did not differ by patient age, parity, current treatment for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, orthostatics, ketonuria or disposition. We found no difference in time from medication administration to disposition between women who received ondansetron and women who received any other antiemetic (metoclopramide, prochlorperazine or promethazine). Adjusting for potential confounders, compared to patients who received any other first line therapy, patients who received ondansetron had 2.09 times the odds of having a time to disposition at or above the 75th percentile (95% CI 1.31-3.34). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ondansetron in the ED for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy was associated with similar mean time from administration to disposition as other antiemetics.


Asunto(s)
Antieméticos/uso terapéutico , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Metoclopramida/uso terapéutico , Náuseas Matinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Ondansetrón/uso terapéutico , Proclorperazina/uso terapéutico , Prometazina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotensión Ortostática/etiología , Cetosis/etiología , Náuseas Matinales/complicaciones , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
10.
Am J Perinatol ; 32(3): 283-8, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25077469

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the association of antepartum anemia with chorioamnionitis at term. STUDY DESIGN: This is a case control study of women with and without chorioamnionitis who delivered following spontaneous or induced labor at ≥ 37 weeks' gestation. Cases had both intrapartum fever ≥ 38°C and histologic chorioamnionitis. Controls were afebrile and matched by physician practice group. Anemia was defined by CDC guidelines as hemoglobin < 10.5 g/dL (second trimester) or < 11.0 g/dL (third trimester). RESULTS: A total of 101 cases and 197 controls were identified. The prevalence of anemia at the second and third trimester complete blood count (CBC) was significantly higher in the chorioamnionitis group (p = 0.02). This association persisted after multiple logistic regression controlling for known clinical risk factors (adjusted odds ratios, 2.47; range, 1.24-4.94). CONCLUSION: Anemia at the time of the second and third trimester CBC was more prevalent among women who developed chorioamnionitis at term. Antepartum anemia may be a modifiable risk factor in the prevention of chorioamnionitis at term.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/epidemiología , Corioamnionitis/epidemiología , Corioamnionitis/patología , Complicaciones Hematológicas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Trimestres del Embarazo , Nacimiento a Término
11.
Am J Perinatol ; 32(5): 481-6, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25486284

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the risk of morbidity associated with maternal lactic acid concentration in women with possible sepsis in pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort of pregnant and postpartum patients with signs of sepsis. Morbidity outcomes were compared by lactic acid concentration. Linear regression was used to evaluate the association between lactic acid and adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Out of the 850 women included, 159 had lactic acid measured. Patients with lactic acid measured had higher morbidity: positive blood cultures (16.8 vs. 5.5%, p = 0.04), admission to the intensive care unit (5 vs. 0.1%, p < 0.01) or acute monitoring unit (17.2 vs. 0.9%, p < 0.01), longer hospital stay (median 3 vs. 2 days, p < 0.01), and preterm delivery (18.3 vs. 10.9%, p = 0.05). The mean lactic concentration was higher in patients admitted to the intensive care (2.6 vs. 1.6 mmol/L, p = 0.04) and telemetry unit (2.0 vs. 1.6, p = 0.03), and in those with positive blood cultures (2.2 vs. 1.6, p < 0.01). Lactic acid was positively associated with intensive care or telemetry unit admission, adjusted odds ratio per 1 mmol/L increase in lactic acid 2.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.33-4.12). CONCLUSION: Elevated lactic acid in pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal outcomes from presumed sepsis. In this cohort, lactic acid measurement was a marker of more severe infection.


Asunto(s)
Ácido Láctico/sangre , Morbilidad , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Sepsis/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Lineales , Oportunidad Relativa , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
12.
J Reprod Med ; 60(11-12): 501-6, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26775458

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine interest in global health (GH) work among Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS)fellows. STUDY DESIGN: An anonymous, online survey was sent to FPMRS fellows in March 2012. All fellows at accredited and nonaccredited U.S. FPMRS programs were eligible. Of at least 123 fellows, 58 (47%) completed the survey and met inclusion criteria. Survey questions included demographics, GH interest and experience, barriers to GH experience, and career goals. RESULTS: Of those 58 fellows, 79% of respondents graduated from Ob-Gyn residencies, 41% were first year fellows, 45% spoke another language fluently, and 62% had previously worked and/or studied in a developing country. Of the respondents 74% desired GH experience during fellowship, 78% desired GH experience after fellowship, and 40% reported seeing themselves integrating GH into their career. Top barriers to GH work in fellowship were lack of elective time (74%), cost (70%), and personal commitments (67%). A total of 39% of respondents said the ability to work in GH somewhat or strongly affected their decision to pursue FPMRS, and 26% said the availability of GH opportunities affected their fellowship rank list. Family (88%), clinical commitments (78%), and cost (67%) were the biggest reported hurdles to future GH work. CONCLUSION: Nearly three-quarters of FPMRS fellows are interested in GH work in fellowship. Almost half would like to include it in future practice. Barriers in fellowship include elective time, cost, and personal commitments.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Becas , Salud Global , Ginecología/educación , Urología/educación , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
13.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; 38(1): 29-34, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25427832

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To describe the incidence and risk factors for iatrogenic premature preterm rupture of membranes (iPPROM) after fetoscopic laser surgery for the twin-to-twin-transfusion syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients who have undergone fetoscopic laser surgery at a single fetal treatment center since 2000. We defined iPPROM as spontaneous rupture of membranes before the onset of labor prior to 34 weeks of gestation. The iPPROM cohort was compared to the cohort without iPPROM for several preoperative, operative, and delivery characteristics. RESULTS: Ninety-two consecutive patients were reviewed. The overall rate of iPPROM was 18.5% (n = 17). The rates of iPPROM within 1 and 4 weeks were 5.4 and 10.9%, respectively. The median interval from surgery to delivery was significantly shorter in the iPPROM group (21 vs. 62 days, p = 0.01). The mean gestational age at delivery (27.0 vs. 31.1 weeks, p = 0.02) was lower in the iPPROM group. No other characteristics studied differed significantly between the groups. DISCUSSION: The incidence of iPPROM was substantially lower than in recent multicenter reports; however, no risk factors of iPPROM could be identified. Whether this is related to variations in surgical or anesthetic management will require further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Rotura Prematura de Membranas Fetales/epidemiología , Rotura Prematura de Membranas Fetales/etiología , Transfusión Feto-Fetal/cirugía , Fetoscopía/efectos adversos , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/epidemiología , Incidencia , Masculino , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
14.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 211(1): 39.e1-8, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24613756

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We sought to design an emergency department sepsis scoring system to identify risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission in pregnant and postpartum women. STUDY DESIGN: The Sepsis in Obstetrics Score (S.O.S.) was created by modifying validated scoring systems in accordance with recognized physiologic changes of pregnancy. The S.O.S. was applied to a retrospective cohort of pregnant and postpartum patients from February 2009 through May 2011 with clinical suspicion of sepsis. The primary outcome was ICU admission. Secondary outcomes were telemetry unit admission, length of stay, positive blood cultures, positive influenza swabs, perinatal outcome, and maternal mortality. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to estimate the optimal score for identification of risk of ICU admission. RESULTS: In all, 850 eligible women were included. There were 9 ICU (1.1%) and 32 telemetry (3.8%) admissions, and no maternal deaths. The S.O.S. had an area under the curve of 0.97 for ICU admission. An S.O.S. ≥6 (maximum score 28) had an area under the curve of 0.92 with sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 95.2%, positive predictive value of 16.7%, and negative predictive value of 99.9% for ICU admission, with an adjusted odds ratio of 109 (95% confidence interval, 18-661). An S.O.S. ≥6 was independently associated with increased ICU or telemetry unit admissions, positive blood cultures, and fetal tachycardia. CONCLUSION: A sepsis scoring system designed specifically for an obstetric population appears to reliably identify patients at high risk for admission to the ICU. Prospective validation is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , APACHE , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/etiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/terapia , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Sepsis/etiología , Sepsis/terapia , Adulto Joven
15.
Am J Perinatol ; 31(2): 105-12, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23508701

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The enforcement of a one-step gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis would capture more patients with milder forms of glucose intolerance thereby increasing the incidence. We propose to identify characteristics predicting the need for medical therapy in such patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of patients with mild GDM, defined as a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < 95 mg/dL on the 3-hour 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Patients requiring medical therapy for glucose control were compared with diet-controlled patients. A predictive model was constructed with variables of significance. RESULTS: Included were 143 patients requiring medical therapy and 224 diet-treated patients. Mean FPG on 3-hour OGTT, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), and BMI at 26 to 30 weeks were all significantly higher in patients requiring therapy. Combining several variables produced a predictive model with 76% sensitivity, 52% specificity, 48% positive predictive value, and 78% negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal factors (alone or in combination) do not allow for prediction of the possible need for therapy in mild GDM patients.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Glucemia/análisis , Índice de Masa Corporal , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Diabetes Gestacional/dietoterapia , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Intolerancia a la Glucosa/diagnóstico , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/métodos , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/normas , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
16.
J Reprod Med ; 59(7-8): 393-400, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25098030

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the liikelihood of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)--who are at increased risk for developing overt diabetes--undergoing postpartum testing, and the patient characteristics associated with abnormal postpartum glucose tolerance testing (GTT) in mild GDM. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review that included mild GDM patients, defined as those with fasting plasma glucose levels < 95 mg/dL on a 3-hour 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Patients who underwent postpartum testing were assessed and predictive factors for abnormal results evaluated. RESULTS: Mild GDM was diagnosed in 414 (39.6%) women, 201 (48.6%) of whom completed a postpartum 2-hour 75-g OGTT. Abnormal testing was seen in 69 (34.3%), with diabetes in 6 (3%); those with abnormal testing had been diagnosed with GDM at an earlier gestational age, had higher 1-hour 50-g OGTT values, and were also more likely to require pharmacologic therapy. Combining several variables produced a predictive model with positive and negative predictive values of 50% and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Antenatal factors (alone or in combination) do not allow for prediction of abnormal postpartum OGTT results in mild GDM patients. Patients with mild GDM are at a slightly decreased postpartum risk of developing diabetes and prediabetes as compared to other patients with GDM.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/análisis , Diabetes Gestacional/sangre , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Periodo Posparto , Adulto , Diabetes Gestacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Análisis Multivariante , Estado Prediabético/sangre , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
17.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 289(6): 1177-83, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24481876

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a strong risk factor for the development of diabetes. We assessed the impact of a 1-year intensive follow-up demonstration program, using direct nurse and outreach worker case management, aimed at increasing compliance with postpartum oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT). STUDY DESIGN: During the year of implementation, a nurse or bilingual outreach worker contacted patients to encourage attendance at their scheduled postpartum 2-h 75-g OGTT and assisted in overcoming obstacles to testing. All patients with GDM seen in our specialty clinic the previous year served as a control group for comparison. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one patients treated during the year prior to implementation were compared to the 207 in the demonstration program. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. After the program's implementation, postpartum OGTT adherence increased from 43.1 to 59.4 % (p < 0.01, hazard ratio 1.59; 95 % confidence interval 1.20-2.12). Had the program been in place the previous year, we calculated that 12 additional cases of diabetes or prediabetes would have been detected, increasing the total number from 33 to 45 such cases. CONCLUSION: Implementation of direct nurse and outreach worker case management leads to a modest, but important increase in adherence to postpartum OGTT testing.


Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , New England/epidemiología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital , Periodo Posparto , Estado Prediabético/diagnóstico , Embarazo , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Padres Solteros , Fumar/epidemiología
18.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 81(12): 509-520, 2024 Jun 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38365226

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections are challenging to treat due to underlying patient conditions, pathogen characteristics, and high antibiotic resistance rates. As newer antibiotic therapies come to market, limited data exist about their real-world utilization. METHODS: This was a national retrospective cohort study of ceftazidime/avibactam (approved in 2015) utilization among inpatients from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System, from 2015 through 2021. Joinpoint regression was used to estimate time trends in utilization. RESULTS: Ceftazidime/avibactam use increased by 52.3% each year (days of therapy per 1,000 bed days; 95% confidence interval, 12.4%-106.4%). We identified 1,048 unique predominantly male (98.3%) and white (66.2%; Black, 27.7%) patients treated with ceftazidime/avibactam, with a mean (SD) age of 71.5 (11.9) years. The most commonly isolated organisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (36.3%; carbapenem resistant, 80.6%; MDR, 65.0%) and Klebsiella species (34.1%; carbapenem resistant, 78.4%; extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistant, 90.7%). Common comorbid conditions included hypertension (74.8%), nervous system disorders (60.2%), diabetes mellitus (48.7%), and cancer (45.1%). Median time to ceftazidime/avibactam initiation from admission was 6 days, with a median of 3 changes in therapy before ceftazidime/avibactam initiation and a subsequent median length of inpatient stay of 14 days (median of 8 days of ceftazidime/avibactam therapy). Treatment heterogeneity was high, both before ceftazidime/avibactam initiation (89.6%) and during ceftazidime/avibactam treatment (85.6%), and common concomitant antibiotics included vancomycin (41.4%), meropenem (24.1%), cefepime (15.2%), and piperacillin/tazobactam (15.2%). The inpatient mortality rate was 23.6%, and 20.8% of patients had a subsequent admission with ceftazidime/avibactam treatment. CONCLUSION: Utilization of ceftazidime/avibactam increased from 2015 to 2021 in the national VA Healthcare System. Ceftazidime/avibactam was utilized in complex, difficult-to-treat patients, with substantial treatment heterogeneity and variation in the causative organism and culture sites.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Compuestos de Azabiciclo , Ceftazidima , Combinación de Medicamentos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humanos , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Pacientes Internos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Veteranos
19.
Pharmacotherapy ; 44(4): 308-318, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38483080

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There are known disparities in the treatment of infectious diseases. However, disparities in treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) are largely uninvestigated. OBJECTIVES: We characterized UTI treatment among males in Veterans Affairs (VA) outpatient settings by age, race, and ethnicity and identified demographic characteristics predictive of recommended first-choice antibiotic therapy. METHODS: We conducted a national, retrospective cohort study of male VA patients diagnosed with a UTI and dispensed an outpatient antibiotic from January 2010 through December 2020. Recommended first-choice therapy for complicated UTI was defined as use of a recommended first-line antibiotic drug choice regardless of area of involvement (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim) and a recommended duration of 7 to 10 days of therapy. Multivariable models were used to identify demographic predictors of recommended first-choice therapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] > 1). RESULTS: We identified a total of 157,898 males diagnosed and treated for a UTI in the outpatient setting. The average antibiotic duration was 9.4 days (±standard deviation [SD] 4.6), and 47.6% of patients were treated with ciprofloxacin, 25.1% with sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, 7.6% with nitrofurantoin, and 6.6% with levofloxacin. Only half of the male patients (50.6%, n = 79,928) were treated with recommended first-choice therapy (first-line drug choice and appropriate duration); 77.6% (n = 122,590) were treated with a recommended antibiotic choice and 65.9% (n = 104,070) with a recommended duration. Age 18-49 years (aOR 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.11) versus age ≥65 years was the only demographic factor predictive of recommended first-choice therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of the patients included in this study did not receive recommended first-choice therapies; however, racial and ethnic disparities were not identified. Underutilization of recommended first-choice antibiotic therapy in complicated UTIs continues to be an area of focus for antimicrobial stewardship programs.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infecciones Urinarias , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Factores de Edad , Atención Ambulatoria , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Etnicidad , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Grupos Raciales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente
20.
Infect Dis Ther ; 13(1): 155-172, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38217842

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Limited data exist regarding real-world utilization of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. We identified predictors of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use among Veterans Affairs (VA) outpatients nationally. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among outpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who were eligible to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir between January and December of 2022, to identify factors associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use (i.e., demographics, medical history, prior medication and healthcare exposures, frailty, and other clinical characteristics) using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We included 309,755 outpatients with COVID-19 who were eligible for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, of whom 12.2% received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir uptake increased from 1.1% to 23.2% over the study period. Factors associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir receipt included receiving a COVID-19 booster vs. none (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.19 [95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12-2.26]), age ≥ 50 vs. 18-49 years (aORs > 1.5 for all age groups ≥ 50 years), having HIV (aOR 1.36 [1.22-1.51]), being non-frail vs. severely frail (aOR 1.22 [1.13-1.33]), and having rheumatoid arthritis (aOR 1.12 [1.04-1.21). Those with concomitant use of potentially interacting antiarrhythmics (aOR 0.35 [0.28-0.45]), anticoagulants/antiplatelets (aOR 0.42 [0.40-0.45]), and/or psychiatric/sedatives (aOR 0.84 [0.81-0.87]) were less likely to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increases over time, overall utilization of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was low. Predictors of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir utilization were consistent with known risk factors for progression to severe COVID-19, including older age and underlying medical conditions. Unvaccinated and undervaccinated patients and those receiving potentially interacting medications for cardiovascular or mental health conditions (antiarrhythmic, alpha-1 antagonist, anticoagulant/antiplatelet, sedative/hypnotic/psychiatric) were less likely to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Further education of prescribers and patients about nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment guidelines is needed to improve overall uptake and utilization in certain high-risk subpopulations.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA