Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Dis Esophagus ; 35(12)2022 Dec 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35411928

RESUMEN

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a severe complication after esophagectomy. Clinical presentation of AL is diverse and there is large practice variation regarding treatment of AL. This study aimed to explore different AL treatment strategies and their underlying rationale. This mixed-methods study consisted of an international survey among upper gastro-intestinal (GI) surgeons and focus groups with expert upper GI surgeons. The survey included 10 case vignettes and data sources were integrated after separate analysis. The survey was completed by 188 respondents (completion rate 69%) and 6 focus groups were conducted with 20 international experts. Prevention of mortality was the most important goal of primary treatment. Goals of secondary treatment were to promote tissue healing, return to oral feeding and safe hospital discharge. There was substantial variation in the preferred treatment principles (e.g. drainage or defect closure) and modalities (e.g. stent or endoVAC) within different presentations of AL. Patients with local symptoms were treated by supportive means only or by non-surgical drainage and/or defect closure. Drainage was routinely performed in patients with intrathoracic collections and often combined with defect closure. Patients with conduit necrosis were predominantly treated by resection and reconstruction of the anastomosis or by esophageal diversion. This mixed-methods study shows that overall treatment strategies for AL are determined by vitality of the conduit and presence of intrathoracic collections. There is large variation in preferred treatment principles and modalities. Future research may investigate optimal treatment for specific AL presentations and aim to develop consensus-based treatment guidelines for AL after esophagectomy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomía , Humanos , Esofagectomía/métodos , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Surg Innov ; 26(5): 545-550, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31161875

RESUMEN

Background. Chylothorax is a rare but severe complication after esophagectomy with an incidence of 1.9% to 8.9%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative lipid-rich feeding in reducing the incidence of post-esophagectomy chylothorax. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed among patients who underwent totally minimally invasive esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis (tMIE Ivor Lewis) from February 2015 until December 2016. In this group, a lipid-rich solution was administered intraoperatively via a feeding jejunostomy. A historical cohort of identical patients operated in the period December 2012 to February 2015 did not receive intraoperative feeding and was used as a control. Results. In total, 133 patients underwent tMIE Ivor Lewis, of whom 59 patients (44%) received lipid-rich solution intraoperatively. The administered median total volume was 800 mL. During thoracic dissection, the thoracic duct was clearly visible in 37 patients (63%). With the help of lipid-rich feeding, intraoperative unintended duct damage was detected in 3 patients and treated. Postoperatively, 1 out of 59 patients (1.7%) developed chylothorax that was managed nonoperatively. In the control group, chylothorax was seen in 3 out of 74 patients (4.1%), P = .629. Conclusions. Intraoperative lipid-rich solution through a feeding jejunostomy helps identify thoracic duct damage during tMIE and may reduce postoperative chylothorax.


Asunto(s)
Quilotórax/etiología , Quilotórax/prevención & control , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía , Yeyunostomía , Lípidos/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Conducto Torácico/lesiones , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
J Surg Oncol ; 117(4): 651-658, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29603271

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive esophagectomy is emerging with comparable short-term outcomes as open esophagectomies. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is considered standard of care in the Netherlands for patients with esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term oncologic outcome after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. METHODS: Neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel based chemotherapy was concomitantly given with 41.4 Gy radiotherapy. Six weeks after neoadjuvant treatment, totally minimally invasive esophagectomy was performed. RESULTS: From December 2010 until December 2015 161 patients received this combination of treatment. In 128 male and 33 female patients with median age of 65 years (58-71), 88 minimally invasive esophagectomies with intrathoracic anastomosis and 73 minimally invasive esophagectomies with cervical anastomosis were carried out. Radical (R0) resection was confirmed in 156 patients (97%). In hospital mortality occurred in 6 patients (3.7%). Overall survival was 79% and 51% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, with a median follow-up of 24.5 months (13-38). Disease-free survival was, respectively, 76% and 55%. CONCLUSIONS: Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer is a safe treatment with low postoperative mortality rates and favorable overall and disease-free survival.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Anciano , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Endosonografía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 33(1): 31-36, 2023 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36730429

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage is one of the most life-threatening complications after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (ILE), with various treatment strategies. Endoscopic techniques are emerging as a less invasive alternative to surgery. Among the current endoscopic techniques, a single placement of an endoluminal nasogastric tube inside the cavity with controlled suction drainage (SD) seems to be an attractive option. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of SD as treatment for anastomotic leakage after ILE. METHODS: This retrospective analysis was performed among patients who underwent ILE in a high-volume esophageal cancer center in the Netherlands. Patients with an anastomotic leakage that received SD as primary treatment were selected. A nasogastric tube was endoscopically placed into the cavity of the leakage for controlled suction with 15 mm Hg. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients received SD and was successful in 26 patients (77%). Seven patients (21%) developed empyema despite the SD for which additional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was performed. Mortality was 5.9% (2 patients) and median intensive care unit and hospital stay were 3 days (1 to 9) and 25 days (14 to 43), respectively. The median time to closure of the leak was 41 days (23 to 65). A total of 16 patients underwent home treatment for a median of 23 (14 to 42) days. CONCLUSIONS: Controlled SD seems to be an effective treatment for anastomotic leakage after ILE. This therapy can safely and effectively be completed in an ambulant, outpatient setting.


Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/cirugía , Succión , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Esofagectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía
5.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 25(3): 603-608, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32710135

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the incidence, treatment and postoperative outcomes of an acute hiatal hernia (HH) after totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (tMIE) for oesophageal cancer. METHODS: The incidence and treatment of acute HH were analysed from our prospective database including all patients that were surgically treated for oesophageal cancer in the period between January 2011 and December 2018. RESULTS: Within the study period, the database contained 307 patients that underwent minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Patients' characteristics were in line with the literature of Western data. The incidence of acute HH was 2.6% (N = 8). All patients presented with gastro-intestinal obstruction symptoms, that required acute operation, repositioning of the intrathoracic organs in combination with a crural repair. Mesh reinforcement was used in 38% (N = 3). In two patients, the intestines were partially resected due to ischemia. Postoperative complications, as atrial fibrillation, respiratory failure and anastomotic leakage, were seen in 63% (N = 5). Recurrence-rate was 38% (N = 3). CONCLUSIONS: This present study demonstrates that an acute HH after tMIE is a serious complication with an incidence of 2.6%. When symptomatic and acute, HH requires surgical intervention and has high postoperative morbidity and recurrence-rate. Therefore, this requires treatment in a centre specialised in oesophageal surgery.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Hernia Hiatal , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA