RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lorlatinib is a brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor indicated for ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a global phase II study, patients who experience disease progression despite prior treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was assessed. Herein, we report real-world clinical outcomes of lorlatinib-treated patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who were heavily pretreated and progressed on first- and second-generation ALK-TKIs, in a Taiwanese population under the lorlatinib expanded access program (EAP). METHODS: This multicenter observational study examined the effectiveness and safety of ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients that progressed from previous second-generation ALK-TKI therapy and received lorlatinib treatment subsequently. Patients who received lorlatinib treatment under EAP between Jul 2017 and Sep 2019 were eligible. Patients were followed for at least one year from the first lorlatinib treatment until study completion. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were eligible for safety analysis (male: 46.0 %; median age: 52.8 [27.5-78.3] years; brain metastases: 81.0 %). Fifty-four patients with more than one-month lorlatinib treatment were included in the effectiveness analysis. Prior to lorlatinib treatment, 10 patients (18.5 %) received one ALK-TKI, 27 (50.0 %) received two ALK-TKIs, and 17 (31.5 %) received three or more ALK-TKIs. The overall median rwPFS was 9.2 months (95 % confidence interval: 5.3-21.1). The best overall response rate (n = 51) was 13.7 %, with a disease control rate of 80.4 %. CONCLUSION: Lorlatinib exhibits substantial activity and tolerability when used clinically in a later-line setting in a Taiwanese population with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.
Asunto(s)
Aminopiridinas , Quinasa de Linfoma Anaplásico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Lactamas Macrocíclicas , Lactamas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Pirazoles , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinasa de Linfoma Anaplásico/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anciano , Taiwán , Aminopiridinas/uso terapéutico , Lactamas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Lactamas Macrocíclicas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The 2023 consensus from the Taiwanese Dermatological Association (TDA) and Taiwan Lung Cancer Society (TLCS) addresses the management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-induced skin toxicities in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Providing a comprehensive overview, the consensus reflects recent advances in understanding causes and developmental processes of TKI-related skin toxicities. Aimed at guiding clinicians in Taiwan, the consensus integrates new treatment perspectives while incorporating experiences from local dermatology experts. Recommendations underwent a voting process, achieving consensus when 75% or more of experts agreed, leading to their inclusion. Approved by over 90% of participants, the recommended treatment algorithms for major skin toxicities offer valuable insights for clinicians managing TKI-associated effects in NSCLC patients.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To elucidate treatment patterns and their outcomes in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and brain metastasis (BM). METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients with SCLC and BM were stratified by treatment modality into three groups: those treated with systemic therapy only, those treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and systemic therapy, and those treated with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and systemic therapy. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and time to central nervous system progression (TTCP). RESULTS: The analysis included 149 patients. After BM diagnosis, 48 patients (32.2%) received systemic therapy alone, 33 received SRS with systemic therapy, and 68 received WBRT with systemic therapy. The median OS and TTCP were 7.2 months and 8.7 months, respectively. Patients receiving WBRT with systemic therapy exhibited better intracranial control, but not better OS, than did the other patients. Key prognostic factors affecting OS were age, BM lesion count, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Notably, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and BM lesion count significantly influenced intracranial control in patients treated with SRS and systemic therapy. CONCLUSION: Although WBRT combined with systemic therapy offer better intracranial control in patients with SCLC and BM, this approach is not superior to the other approaches in terms of OS benefits. Emerging systemic therapies, such as immunotherapy, may be used as alternative or adjunctive treatments for specific patient populations. Further studies are warranted to refine treatment selection.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radiocirugia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Irradiación Craneana , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: ALK-positive NSCLC patients exhibit a particularly high propensity for the development of brain metastases. Current guidelines suggest transit to next-line therapy (SysTx) or local radiotherapy (RadTx) including whole-brain radiotherapy and radiosurgery. However, the clinical impact of these two strategies remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis focusing on patients with stage IV ALK-positive NSCLC who underwent first-line ALK TKI treatment. Patients with intracranial progression may receive two different treatment strategies: SysTx and RadTx. Our objective was to investigate the outcomes associated with these two distinct treatment pathways. RESULTS: A total 20 patients of ALK-positive NSCLC who received first-line ALK TKI therapy and subsequently developed intracranial progression were enrolled. About 55% of patients had brain metastasis initially. Nine patients (45%) were treated with crizotinib at first. Patients treated with crizotinib demonstrated a significantly shorter intracranial PFS1 (crizotinib: 8.27 months vs. others: 27.0 months, p = 0.006). Following intracranial progression, approximately 60% of patients transitioned to the next line of systemic treatment (SysTx), while the remaining 40% opted for local cranial radiotherapy (RadTx). Intriguingly, our analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in intracranial progression-free survival (PFS2) between these two distinct treatment strategies. (SysTx: 20.87 months vs. RadTx: 28.23 months, p = 0.461). CONCLUSION: The intracranial progression-free survival showed no difference between the two strategies suggesting that both local radiotherapy and systemic therapy may be valid options. Individualized strategy, molecular analysis, and multidisciplinary conferences may all play a pivotal role in decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Crizotinib/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Quinasa de Linfoma Anaplásico/genética , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In this study we report our 30-year experience in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) brain metastases (BMs). It will serve to provide detailed longitudinal outcomes and predictors of efficacy in treating LUSC-BMs with SRS. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients and 109 tumors treated with SRS at our center between 1993 and 2022. Patient demographics, PDL1 genotype, immunotherapy use and mortality cause were recorded. Radiological and clinical outcomes were followed at 1-3-month intervals post-SRS. Cox-regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were performed in statistical analysis. RESULTS: We included 37 male and 14 female patients (median age 62.7 years at BM diagnosis). Median overall survival (OS) time was 6.9 months, 6-month OS rate was 62.1%, and Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) was the only independent predictor. Median time for local control maintenance was 7.6 months, 6-month local control rate was 69.1%, with TKI as the only independent predictor. Median time to distant failure was 5.13 months, 6-month distant failure rate was 51.1%, and factors with significant impact included gender (p = 0.002), presence of extracranial metastases (p < 0.001), use of immunotherapy(p < 0.001), PDL1 genotype (p = 0.034), and total intracranial metastases number (p = 0.008). However, no definitive benefits of immunotherapy were identified in patients with higher PDL1 mutational tumors. CONCLUSION: In this study we defined the natural history of disease progression and outcomes in SRS-treated LUSC-BM patients. We also identified predictors of OS and tumor control among these patients. The findings of this study will serve as a guide when counseling these patients for SRS.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Pulmón , Células Epiteliales/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Given the availability of TKIs with high central nervous system efficacy, the question arises as to whether upfront SRS provides additional clinical benefits. The goal of this study was to characterize the clinical outcomes of SRS as salvage therapy for TKI-uncontrolled BMs. METHODS: This retrospective study included EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients presenting BMs at the time of primary tumor diagnosis. BMs were categorized into three subgroups, referred to as "Nature of TKI-treated BMs", "TKI-controlled brain metastases ± SRS", and "SRS salvage therapy". The first subgroup analysis characterized the effects of TKIs on tumor behavior. In the second subgroup, we compared outcomes of TKI-controlled BMs treated with TKI alone versus those treated with combined TKI-SRS therapy. The third subgroup characterized the outcomes of TKI-uncontrolled BMs treated with SRS as salvage therapy Clinical outcomes include local and distant tumor control. RESULTS: This study included 106 patients with a total of 683 BMs. TKI treatment achieved control in 63% of local tumors at 24 months. Among the TKI-controlled BMs, local tumor control was significantly higher in the combined TKI-SRS group (93%) than in the TKI-alone group (65%) at 24 months (p < 0.001). No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of distant tumor control (p = 0.832). In dealing with TKI-uncontrolled BMs, salvage SRS achieved local tumor control in 58% of BMs at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: While upfront TKI alone proved highly effective in BM control, this study also demonstrated the outcomes of SRS when implemented concurrently with TKI or as salvage therapy for TKI-uncontrolled BMs. This study also presents a strategy of the precise timing and targeting of SRS to lesions in progression.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Receptores ErbB/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs) is a common cause of radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy; however the safety of alternative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains unclear. This study examined the incidence of leukoencephalopathy in patients treated with SRS alone versus WBRT plus SRS for BMs with a focus on the relationship between prognostic factors and leukoencephalopathy. METHODS: Analysis was performed between 2002 and 2021. The total enrollment was 993 patients with the distribution: WBRT plus SRS (n = 291) and SRS only (n = 702). Leukoencephalopathy was graded from 0 to 3 for changes in white matter indicated by the MRI after WBRT or SRS. Patient characteristics and SRS dosimetric parameters were reviewed to identify factors that contributed to the incidence of leukoencephalopathy or overall survival. RESULTS: The incidence of leukoencephalopathy was consistently higher in WBRT plus SRS group than in SRS alone group (p < 0.001). Leukoencephalopathy was also associated with a larger total tumor volume (â§28cm3; p = 0.028) and age (> 77 years; p = 0.025). Nonetheless, the SRS integral dose to skull in the subgroup of WBRT plus SRS treatment was not demonstrated significance in development of leukoencephalopathy (p = 0.986 for integral dose 1-2 J, p = 0.776 for integral dose > 2 J). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that SRS is safe for oligo-BMs in terms of leukoencephalopathy development. Patient age and total tumor volume were identified as important factors in assessing the development of leukoencephalopathy. The additional of SRS (even at an integral dose > 2 J) did not increase the incidence of leukoencephalopathy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Leucoencefalopatías , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Anciano , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Irradiación Craneana/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Leucoencefalopatías/etiología , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is the first-line treatment for EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, its applicability to patients with wild-type NSCLC remains an issue of contention. This study compared the effects of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) alone versus combining GKRS and TKIs in treating two genetic forms of NSCLC. METHODS: This retrospective study examined 479 NSCLC patients with 1982 brain metastases who underwent GKRS and for whom imaging follow-up data or death records were available. All our patients were consecutive. All gene mutations were confirmed by lung biopsy. The three main endpoints in this study were overall survival (OS), local intracranial tumor control (LC), and distal intracranial tumor control (DC). RESULTS: There were 296 NSCLC patients with EGFR positive: TKI treatment (n = 262) and without TKI treatment (n = 34). GKRS + TKIs was more effective than GKRS alone in terms of OS (HR 0.53, p = 0.085) and DC (HR 0.51, p < 0.001). There were 150 NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR: TKI treatment (n = 50) and without TKI treatment (n = 100). GKRS + TKIs was less effective than GKRS alone in terms of OS (HR 1.82, p = 0.049) and DC (HR: 1.40, p = 0.011). We observed no difference in terms of LC in both genetic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combining GKRS with TKIs proved effective in EGFR positive NSCLC patients; however, we do not observe the similar results when combining GKRS with TKIs for patients with wild-type NSCLC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Receptores ErbB , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Receptores ErbB/genética , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Mutación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion in lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC). METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive lung cancer patients with LMC suffering from increased intracranial pressure (IICP) and hydrocephalus between February 2017 and February 2020. We evaluated the survival benefit of CSF diversion surgery and assessed the outcomes of treatments administered post-LMC in terms of overall survival and shunt-related complications. RESULTS: The study cohort included 50 patients (median age: 59 years). Ventricular peritoneal (VP) shunts were placed in 33 patients, and lumbar peritoneal (LP) shunts were placed in 7 patients. Programmable shunts were placed in 36 patients. Shunt adjustment was performed in 19 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that shunt placement increased overall survival from 1.95 months to 6.21 months (p = 0.0012) and increased Karnofsky Performance Scores (KPS) from 60 to 70. Univariate analysis revealed no difference between VP or LP shunts in terms of survival. No differences in post-shunt systemic treatments (tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or systemic treatments) were observed in overall survival. Shunt-related complications were noted in 7 patients, including shunt obstruction (n = 4), infection (n = 1), and over-drainage (n = 2). CONCLUSION: CSF diversion (VP or LP shunt) appears to be an effective and safe treatment for lung cancer patients with LMC and hydrocephalus. Programmable shunts should be considered for complex cases, which commonly require pressure adjustments as the disease progresses.
Asunto(s)
Hidrocefalia , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinomatosis Meníngea , Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hidrocefalia/etiología , Hidrocefalia/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Carcinomatosis Meníngea/complicaciones , Carcinomatosis Meníngea/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Derivación Ventriculoperitoneal/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Lung cancers are life-threatening malignancies that cause great healthcare burdens in Taiwan and worldwide. The 5-year survival rate for Taiwanese patients with lung cancer is approximately 29%, an unsatisfactorily low number that remains to be improved. We first reviewed the molecular epidemiology derived from a deep proteogenomic resource in Taiwan. The nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2)antioxidant mechanism was discovered to mediate the oncogenesis and tumor progression of lung adenocarcinoma. Additionally, DNA replication, glycolysis and stress response are positively associated with tumor stages, while cell-to-cell communication, signaling, integrin, G protein coupled receptors, ion channels and adaptive immunity are negatively associated with tumor stages. Three patient subgroups were discovered based on the clustering analysis of protein abundance in tumors. The first subgroup is associated with more advanced cancer stages and visceral pleural invasion, as well as higher mutation burdens. The second subgroup is associated with EGFR L858R mutations. The third subgroup is associated with PI3K/AKT pathways and cell cycles. Both EGFR and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways have been shown to induce NRF2 activation and tumor cell proliferation. We also reviewed the clinical evidence of patient outcomes in Taiwan given various approved targeted therapies, such as EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)inhibitors, in accordance with the patients' characteristics. Somatic mutations occurred in EGFR, KRAS, HER2 and BRAF genes, and these mutations have been detected in 55.7%, 5.2%, 2.0% and 0.7% patients, respectively. The EGFR mutation is the most prevalent targetable mutation in Taiwan. EML4-ALK translocations have been found in 9.8% of patients with wild-type EGFR. The molecular profiling of advanced NSCLC is critical to optimal therapeutic decision-making. The patient characteristics, such as mutation profiles, protein expression profiles, drug-resistance profiles, molecular oncogenic mechanisms and patient subgroup systems together offer new strategies for personalized treatments and patient care.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Factor 2 Relacionado con NF-E2 , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Mutación , Factor 2 Relacionado con NF-E2/genética , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/genética , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/genética , Taiwán/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Lung cancer is the leading cause of death from cancer in Taiwan and throughout the world. Immunotherapy has revealed promising and significant efficacy in NSCLC, through immune checkpoint inhibition by blocking programmed cell death protein (PD)-1/PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) signaling pathway to restore patients' T-cell immunity. One novel type of long, non-coding RNAs, circular RNAs (circRNAs), are endogenous, stable, and widely expressed in tissues, saliva, blood, urine, and exosomes. Our previous results revealed that the plasma level of hsa_circ_0000190 can be monitored by liquid-biopsy-based droplet digital PCR and may serve as a valuable blood-based biomarker to monitor the disease progression and the efficacy of immunotherapy. In this study, hsa_circ_0000190 was shown to increase the PD-L1 mRNA-mediated soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) expression, consequently interfering with the efficacy of anti-PD-L1 antibody and T-cell activation, which may result in immunotherapy resistance and poor outcome. Our results unraveled that hsa_circ_0000190 facilitated the tumorigenesis and immune evasion of NSCLC by upregulating sPD-L1 expression, potentially developing a different aspect in elucidating the molecular immunopathogenesis of NSCLC. Hsa_circ_0000190 upregulation can be an effective indicator for the progression of NSCLC, and hsa_circ_0000190 downregulation may possess a potential therapeutic value for the treatment of NSCLC in combination with immunotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno B7-H1/genética , Carcinogénesis/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Evasión Inmune/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , ARN Circular/genética , Regulación hacia Arriba/genética , Células A549 , Animales , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Línea Celular Tumoral , Regulación hacia Abajo/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Desnudos , Linfocitos T/fisiología , TaiwánRESUMEN
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and its tumorigenesis involves the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic events in the respiratory epithelium. Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, RNA modification, and histone modifications, have been widely reported to play an important role in lung cancer development and in other pulmonary diseases. Whereas the functionality of DNA and chromatin modifications referred to as epigenetics is widely characterized, various modifications of RNA nucleotides have recently come into prominence as functionally important. N6-methyladosine (m6A) is the most prevalent internal modification in mRNAs, and its machinery of writers, erasers, and readers is well-characterized. However, several other nucleotide modifications of mRNAs and various noncoding RNAs have also been shown to play an important role in the regulation of biological processes and pathology. Such epitranscriptomic modifications play an important role in regulating various aspects of RNA metabolism, including transcription, translation, splicing, and stability. The dysregulation of epitranscriptomic machinery has been implicated in the pathological processes associated with carcinogenesis including uncontrolled cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. In recent years, with the advancement of RNA sequencing technology, high-resolution maps of different modifications in various tissues, organs, or disease models are being constantly reported at a dramatic speed. This facilitates further understanding of the relationship between disease development and epitranscriptomics, shedding light on new therapeutic possibilities. In this review, we summarize the basic information on RNA modifications, including m6A, m1A, m5C, m7G, pseudouridine, and A-to-I editing. We then demonstrate their relation to different kinds of lung diseases, especially lung cancer. By comparing the different roles RNA modifications play in the development processes of different diseases, this review may provide some new insights and offer a better understanding of RNA epigenetics and its involvement in pulmonary diseases.
Asunto(s)
Epigénesis Genética , Enfermedades Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Procesamiento Postranscripcional del ARN , ARN/genética , Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Adenosina/metabolismo , Animales , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/metabolismo , ARN/metabolismo , ARN Largo no Codificante/genética , ARN Largo no Codificante/metabolismo , ARN Mensajero/genética , ARN Mensajero/metabolismoRESUMEN
The sudden outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV, later named SARS-CoV-2) in Wuhan, China, which rapidly grew into a global pandemic, marked the third introduction of a virulent coronavirus into the human society, affecting not only the healthcare system, but also the global economy. Although our understanding of coronaviruses has undergone a huge leap after two precedents, the effective approaches to treatment and epidemiological control are still lacking. In this article, we present a succinct overview of the epidemiology, clinical features, and molecular characteristics of SARS-CoV-2. We summarize the current epidemiological and clinical data from the initial Wuhan studies, and emphasize several features of SARS-CoV-2, which differentiate it from SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), such as high variability of disease presentation. We systematize the current clinical trials that have been rapidly initiated after the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic. Whereas the trials on SARS-CoV-2 genome-based specific vaccines and therapeutic antibodies are currently being tested, this solution is more long-term, as they require thorough testing of their safety. On the other hand, the repurposing of the existing therapeutic agents previously designed for other virus infections and pathologies happens to be the only practical approach as a rapid response measure to the emergent pandemic, as most of these agents have already been tested for their safety. These agents can be divided into two broad categories, those that can directly target the virus replication cycle, and those based on immunotherapy approaches either aimed to boost innate antiviral immune responses or alleviate damage induced by dysregulated inflammatory responses. The initial clinical studies revealed the promising therapeutic potential of several of such drugs, including favipiravir, a broad-spectrum antiviral drug that interferes with the viral replication, and hydroxychloroquine, the repurposed antimalarial drug that interferes with the virus endosomal entry pathway. We speculate that the current pandemic emergency will be a trigger for more systematic drug repurposing design approaches based on big data analysis.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Vacunas Virales , Betacoronavirus/química , Betacoronavirus/genética , Betacoronavirus/inmunología , Betacoronavirus/fisiología , COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Genoma Viral , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Neumonía Viral/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Sueroterapia para COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most advanced lung cancer patients have already received many types of treatment before starting immunotherapy. Compared with advanced lung cancer patients under first-line treatment, those receiving immunotherapy are vulnerable to many health problems and increased frailty. PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate frailty in advanced lung cancer patients before starting immunotherapy. METHODS: A total of 52 pre-immunotherapy patients completed the survey. Frailty status was determined using the Fried standard and survey questionnaires included the Barthel Index, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, the Chinese version of scales of international physical activities questionnaire (short version). In addition, the handgrip and 4.6-meter walk speed of the participants were measured. RESULTS: The ratio of frailty was 17.3%, with comorbidities (p = .023), body mass index (p = .004), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Status (p < .001), activities of daily living status (p < .001), albumin (p = .042), and C-reactive protein (p = .048) all associated with frailty. CONCLUSIONS / IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In this study, weight loss and low physical activity were the main symptoms of frailty in patients with advanced lung cancer. Therefore, healthcare workers should assess the nutrition and physical activity status of patients before initiating immunotherapy. We suggest that clinical care workers provide frailty care to patients before administering immunotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Anciano Frágil , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Fuerza de la Mano , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , PacientesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends lung cancer screening among individuals aged 55-80 years with a 30 pack-year cigarette smoking history and, if they are former smokers, those who quit within the past 15 years. Our previous report found that two-thirds of newly diagnosed patients with lung cancer do not meet these criteria; they are reported to be either long-term quitters (≥15 years since quitting) or from a younger age group (age 50-54 years). We aimed to assess survival outcomes in these two subgroups. METHODS: For this prospective, observational cohort study we identified and followed up patients aged 50-80 years with lung cancer, with a smoking history of 30 pack-years or more, and included both current smokers and former smokers who quit within the past 30 years. We identified patients from two cohorts in the USA: a hospital cohort (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) and a community cohort (Olmsted County, MN). Patients were divided into those meeting USPSTF criteria (USPSTF group) versus those not meeting USPSTF criteria (long-term quitters or the younger age group). The main outcome was overall survival at 5 years after diagnosis. 5-year overall survival was analysed with and without matching age and pack-years smoked for long-term quitters. The USPSTF group was subdivided into two age subgroups (55-69 years and 70-80 years) for multivariable regression analysis. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 1997, and Dec 31, 2017, 8739 patients with lung cancer were identified and followed up. Median follow-up was 6·5 (IQR 3·8-10·0) years, and median overall survival was 16·9 months (95% CI 16·2-17·5). 5-year overall survival was 27% (95% CI 25-30) in long-term quitters, 22% (19-25) in the younger age group, and 23% (22-24) in the USPSTF group. In both cohorts, 5-year overall survival did not differ significantly between long-term quitters and the USPSTF group (hospital cohort: hazard ratio [HR] 1·02 [95% CI 0·94-1·10]; p=0·72; community cohort: 0·97 [0·75-1·26]; p=0·82); matched analysis showed similar results in both cohorts. 5-year overall survival also did not differ significantly between the younger age group and the USPSTF group in both cohorts (hospital cohort: HR 1·16 [95% CI 0·98-1·38], p=0·08; community cohort: 1·16 [0·74-1·82]; p=0·52); multivariable regression analyses stratified by age group yielded similar findings. INTERPRETATION: Patients with lung cancer who quit 15 or more years before diagnosis and those who are up to 5 years younger than the age cutoff recommended for screening, but otherwise meet USPSTF criteria, have a similar risk of death to those individuals who meet all USPSTF criteria. Individuals in both subgroups could benefit from screening, as expansion of USPSTF screening criteria to include these subgroups could enable earlier detection of lung cancer and improved survival outcomes. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health and the Mayo Clinic Foundation.
Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicios Preventivos de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Fumar/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are liable to develop significant comorbidities, including lung cancer. Whether they are at a higher risk for cancer of other types remains debatable, especially for Asians. We studied the risk of incident cancer in COPD patients using a nationwide representative database, the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. METHODS: From 1995 to 2008, 50,875 COPD patients who were free of antecedent malignancy were identified and followed up to development of malignancy, death or end of 2008, whichever came first. The risk of cancer was determined with the standardized incidence ratio (SIR), which is based on comparison to the national cancer incidence among the general population. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 5.61 years, 3623 (7.02 %) patients developed cancer and the SIR was 1.2 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.24, p < 0.001]. The risk remained higher at <1, 1-5, and even ≥5 years after the diagnosis of COPD (SIR 1.83, 1.07, and 1.11, respectively). Furthermore, the risk was significantly higher for some specific types of cancer, including head and neck cancer (SIR 1.23, 95 % CI 1.08-1.39, p = 0.002), esophageal cancer (SIR 1.35, 95 % CI 1.08-1.67, p = 0.010), lung and mediastinal cancer (SIR 1.86, 95 % CI 1.74-1.99, p < 0.001), breast cancer (SIR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.01-1.4, p = 0.041), prostate cancer (SIR 1.20, 95 % CI 1.06-1.35, p < 0.001), cancer of the central nervous system (SIR 1.58, 95 % CI 1.05-2.28, p = 0.030), lymphoma (SIR 1.53, 95 % CI 1.22-1.90, p < 0.001), and multiple myeloma (SIR 1.95, 95 % CI 1.31-2.80, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: COPD patients had increased risk for incident cancers, including lung cancer and several extrapulmonary cancers.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Taiwán/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Background: Pulmonary infections are a crucial health concern for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether the clinical outcome of pulmonary infection is influenced by immunotherapy(IO) remains unclear. By evaluating immune signatures, this study investigated the post-immunotherapy risk of pulmonary infection in patients with lung cancer and identified circulating biomarkers that predict post-immunotherapy infection. Methods: Blood specimens were prospectively collected from patients with NSCLC before and after chemotherapy(C/T) and/or IO to explore dynamic changes in immune signatures. Real-world clinical data were extracted from medical records for outcome evaluation. Mass cytometry and ELISA were employed to analyze immune signatures and cytokine profiles to reveal potential correlations between immune profiles and the risk of infection. Results: The retrospective cohort included 283 patients with advanced NSCLC. IO was associated with a lower risk of pneumonia (odds ratio=0.46, p=0.012). Patients receiving IO and remained pneumonia-free exhibited the most favorable survival outcomes compared with those who received C/T or developed pneumonia (p<0.001). The prospective cohort enrolled 30 patients. The proportion of circulating NK cells significantly increased after treatment in IO alone (p<0.001) and C/T+IO group (p<0.01). An increase in cell densities of circulating PD-1+CD8+(cytotoxic) T cells (p<0.01) and PD-1+CD4+ T cells (p<0.01) were observed in C/T alone group after treatment. In IO alone group, a decrease in cell densities of TIM-3+ and PD-1+ cytotoxic T cells (p<0.05), and PD-1+CD4+ T cells (p<0.01) were observed after treatment. In C/T alone and C/T+IO groups, cell densities of circulating PD-1+ cytotoxic T cells significantly increased in patients with pneumonia after treatment(p<0.05). However, in IO alone group, cell density of PD-1+ cytotoxic T cells significantly decreased in patients without pneumonia after treatment (p<0.05). TNF-α significantly increased after treatment with IO alone (p<0.05) but decreased after C/T alone (p<0.01). Conclusions: Our results indicate that the incorporation of immunotherapy into treatment regimens may potentially offer protective effects against pulmonary infection. Protective effects are associated with reduction of exhausted T-cells and augmentation of TNF-α and NK cells. Exhausted T cells, NK cells, and TNF-α may play crucial roles in immune responses against infections. These observations highlight the potential utility of certain circulating biomarkers, particularly exhausted T cells, for predicting post-treatment infections.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neumonía , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1 , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Neumonía/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lung adenocarcinoma-an aggressive and life-threatening malignancy-is a type of non-small-cell lung cancer. Despite medical advancements, the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma remains unfavorable, likely because of its heterogeneous nature. Furthermore, few subtype-specific treatments are available for lung adenocarcinoma. This study was conducted to explore the molecular subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We performed a joint analysis of transcriptome and proteome data from East Asian patients with lung adenocarcinoma (nonsmokers, 86.5%). RESULTS: Four novel subtypes were identified based on distinct molecular characteristics: subtypes I, II, III, and IV. In patients with subtype I lung adenocarcinoma, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 activates cell proliferation; inhibiting this factor suppresses tumor growth, and reducing its level induces autophagy. Subtype II is characterized by Kristen rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog-activating oncogenesis; the onset age of this subtype is the lowest among all subtypes. Subtype III manifests as an advanced disease at diagnosis; it is characterized by a core serum response-related oncogenic signature, which indicates poor overall survival in Western patients with lung cancer. Subtype IV is more common in men than in women; it has astroglial characteristics. A Connectivity Map analysis revealed that the oncogenic expression patterns corresponding to subtypes I, II, III, and IV can be reversed by the inhibitors of Inhibitor of κB (IκB) kinase (eg, withaferin A), mammalian target of rapamycin (eg, everolimus), Src proto-oncogene (Src) (eg, saracatinib), and Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-ß/Smad (eg, LY-364947), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study introduced an innovative multiomics data analysis pipeline. Using this approach, we successfully identified four molecular subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma and their candidate therapeutic agents. The newly identified subtypes can be combined with the current biomarkers to generate a comprehensive roadmap for treatment decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón , Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Multiómica , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/genética , PronósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Molecular subtyping of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) tumors based on the expression of four transcription factors (ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1) using immunohistochemical (IHC) staining has recently emerged as a proposed approach. This study was aimed to examine this subtyping method in Asian patients with SCLC and investigate its correlation with treatment efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two tumor samples from patients with SCLC, including de novo cases and those transformed from EGFR-mutant tumors, were analyzed. IHC staining was used to measure the expression of the four transcription factors and conventional SCLC markers. Subtypes were defined based on relative expression levels. The treatment response and outcome of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy were also reviewed. RESULTS: ASCL1 was the most common subtype, observed in 55.2 % of the samples, followed by NEUROD1 (26.9 %) and POU2F3 (9 %). No tumor exhibited predominant YAP1 positivity, while 41.8 % of the samples demonstrated positivity for two subtype markers. Approximately 50 % of the patients experienced a subtype switch after disease progression. Patients with the ASCL1/NEUROD1 (SCLC-A/N) subtype had similar progression-free survival (PFS) compared to non-SCLC-A/N patients after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy. Transformed SCLC patients had significantly worse PFS than de novo SCLC patients after chemoimmunotherapy. (2.1 vs. 5.4 months, P = 0.023) CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the challenges associated with using IHC alone for molecular subtyping, highlighting the frequent co-expression of subtypes and temporal changes following treatment. Further research is warranted to explore the prognostic and therapeutic implications of IHC subtyping in patients with SCLC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoints have gained increasing attention in cancer treatment, emphasizing the need for predictive biomarkers. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have emerged as critical regulators of tumor immunity, particularly in the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, and have shown potential in predicting immunotherapy efficacy. Yet, the detailed roles of circRNAs in cancer immunotherapy are not fully understood. While existing databases focus on either circRNA profiles or immunotherapy cohorts, there is currently no platform that enables the exploration of the intricate interplay between circRNAs and anti-tumor immunotherapy. A comprehensive resource combining circRNA profiles, immunotherapy responses, and clinical outcomes is essential to advance our understanding of circRNA-mediated tumor-immune interactions and to develop effective biomarkers. METHODS: To address these gaps, we constructed The Cancer CircRNA Immunome Atlas (TCCIA), the first database that combines circRNA profiles, immunotherapy response data, and clinical outcomes across multicancer types. The construction of TCCIA involved applying standardized preprocessing to the raw sequencing FASTQ files, characterizing circRNA profiles using an ensemble approach based on four established circRNA detection tools, analyzing tumor immunophenotypes, and compiling immunotherapy response data from diverse cohorts treated with immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs). RESULTS: TCCIA encompasses over 4,000 clinical samples obtained from 25 cohorts treated with ICBs along with other treatment modalities. The database provides researchers and clinicians with a cloud-based platform that enables interactive exploration of circRNA data in the context of ICB. The platform offers a range of analytical tools, including browse of identified circRNAs, visualization of circRNA abundance and correlation, association analysis between circRNAs and clinical variables, assessment of the tumor immune microenvironment, exploration of tumor molecular signatures, evaluation of treatment response or prognosis, and identification of altered circRNAs in immunotherapy-sensitive and resistant tumors. To illustrate the utility of TCCIA, we showcase two examples, including circTMTC3 and circMGA, by employing analysis of large-scale melanoma and bladder cancer cohorts, which unveil distinct impacts and clinical implications of different circRNA expression in cancer immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: TCCIA represents a significant advancement over existing resources, providing a comprehensive platform to investigate the role of circRNAs in immuno-oncology.