Control of landing under conditions of height-induced threat.

PURPOSE: Landing involves a tuned anticipatory control to allow for soft and safe contact with the ground. Fearful situations are known to affect postural control strategies during standing, but it is still unclear how fear interferes with the control of a voluntary dynamic task requiring coordination between posture and movement. METHODS: Ground reaction forces, limb movements, physiological arousal, and perceived levels of confidence and fear of falling were recorded when hopping off a box to a platform situated 0.8 m above ground and 3.2 m above ground. RESULTS: Height induced a perceived threat as arousal was augmented by the elevated surface for all subjects. Threat induced by height modifies the way participants land, leading to a stiffer landing, as evidenced by an increased loading rate at touchdown during high threat conditions. Greater psychological and physiological changes are associated with greater changes in the control of landing: individuals that are less confident/more fearful appear to compensate for this stiffer landing, by slowing down their landing. CONCLUSION: Threatening conditions induces a harder contact to the ground, but the strategy is dependent of the level of confidence/fear. Less confident/more fearful participants are more focused on coping strategy and adopt a more cautious behaviour.

Utilizing Physiological Principles of Motor Unit Recruitment to Reduce Fatigability of Electrically-Evoked Contractions: A Narrative Review.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is used to produce contractions to restore movement and reduce secondary complications for individuals experiencing motor impairment. NMES is conventionally delivered through a single pair of electrodes over a muscle belly or nerve trunk using short pulse durations and frequencies between 20 and 40Hz (conventional NMES). Unfortunately, the benefits and widespread use of conventional NMES are limited by contraction fatigability, which is in large part because of the nonphysiological way that contractions are generated. This review provides a summary of approaches designed to reduce fatigability during NMES, by using physiological principles that help minimize fatigability of voluntary contractions. First, relevant principles of the recruitment and discharge of motor units (MUs) inherent to voluntary contractions and conventional NMES are introduced, and the main mechanisms of fatigability for each contraction type are briefly discussed. A variety of NMES approaches are then described that were designed to reduce fatigability by generating contractions that more closely mimic voluntary contractions. These approaches include altering stimulation parameters, to recruit MUs in their physiological order, and stimulating through multiple electrodes, to reduce MU discharge rates. Although each approach has unique advantages and disadvantages, approaches that minimize MU discharge rates hold the most promise for imminent translation into rehabilitation practice. The way that NMES is currently delivered limits its utility as a rehabilitative tool. Reducing fatigability by delivering NMES in ways that better mimic voluntary contractions holds promise for optimizing the benefits and widespread use of NMES-based programs.

Decreased excitability of motor axons contributes substantially to contraction fatigability during neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

The present study was designed to (i) determine the time course of changes in motor axon excitability during and after neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES); and (ii) characterize the relationship between contraction fatigability, NMES frequency, and changes at the axon, neuromuscular junction, and muscle. Eight neurologically intact participants attended 3 sessions. NMES was delivered over the common peroneal nerve at 20, 40, or 60 Hz for 8 min (0.3 s "on", 0.7 s "off"). Threshold tracking was used to measure changes in axonal excitability. Supramaximal stimuli were used to assess neuromuscular transmission and force-generating capacity of the tibialis anterior muscle. Torque decreased by 49% and 62% during 8 min of 40 and 60 Hz NMES, respectively. Maximal twitch torque decreased only during 60 Hz NMES. Motor axon excitability decreased by 14%, 27%, and 35% during 20, 40, and 60 Hz NMES, respectively. Excitability recovered to baseline immediately (20 Hz) and at 2 min (40 Hz) and 4 min (60 Hz) following NMES. Overall, decreases in axonal excitability best predicted how torque declined over 8 min of NMES. During NMES, motor axons become less excitable and motor units "drop out" of the contraction, contributing substantially to contraction fatigability and its dependence on NMES frequency. Novelty: The excitability of motor axons decreased during NMES in a frequency-dependent manner. As excitability decreased, axons failed to reach threshold and motor units dropped out of the contraction. Overall, decreased excitability best predicted how torque declined and thus is a key contributor to fatigability during NMES.

The influence of postural threat on strategy selection in a stepping-down paradigm.

To walk safely in their environment, people need to select adequate movement strategies during gait. In situations that are perceived as more threatening, older adults adopt more cautious strategies. For individuals with excessive fear, selecting adequate strategies might be troubling. We investigated how a postural threat affects the selection of strategies within and between older adults by using a stepping-down paradigm. In twenty-four older adults we determined the height at which they switched in stepping-down strategies from a less demanding but more balance threatening heel landing to a more demanding yet safer toe landing. We expected that this switching height would be lower in the high (0.78 m elevation) compared to low threat (floor level) condition. Furthermore, we investigated if older adults, for which the postural threat evoked an increase in the perceived fear, presented a different stepping down strategy due to the postural threat. Our results indicated that the postural threat changed older adults' strategies selection towards a more conservative toe landing. Hence, despite the additional effort, older adults prefer more cautious strategies during a postural threat. No effects of perceived fear on strategy selection between individuals were observed, potentially due to relatively small differences in fear among participants.

The Effect of Unilateral Vestibular Loss on Standing Balance During Postural Threat.

OBJECTIVE: Vestibular deficit patients have an increased fall risk and fear of falling. Postural threat, known to increase balance-related fear and anxiety, influences vestibular gains during quiet standing in young healthy adults. The current study examined whether there is a similar relationship for peripheral unilateral vestibular loss (UVL) patients in comparison to age-matched healthy controls (HC). SETTING: University laboratory. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective laboratory study. PATIENTS AND CONTROLS: Eleven UVL patients, nine with vestibular neurectomy. Eleven aged-matched HCs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects stood on a hydraulic lift placed at two heights: low (0.8 m, away from the edge) and high (3.2 m, at the edge). Amplitude (root mean square), mean power frequency (MPF), and mean position were analyzed for center of foot pressure (COP) and 90% ranges for angle amplitude and velocity for trunk sway. RESULTS: Group interactions were strongest for anterior-posterior (AP) COP and trunk pitch angle. AP lean away from the edge was greater in HCs than UVLs. HCs, but not UVLs had a decrease in root mean square AP COP with height. Trunk pitch sway was changed similarly. Both groups had increased trunk pitch velocity at height. Changes with height were less for roll: MPF of lateral COP increased with height for UVLs with no changes for HCs, and trunk roll amplitude decreased for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This report provides evidence for a differential effect of height induced postural threat on balance control between UVLs and HCs presumably due to the reduced vestibular-spinal gain in UVL subjects.