Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 24 Suppl 2: S28-S35, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29369254

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The use of biogas systems to treat livestock waste is a common practice in Vietnam. However, farmers' knowledge and practices of the safe and appropriate use of household biogas units (HBUs) are still limited and could negatively impact human, animal, and environmental health. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of an intervention to improve knowledge and practices of biogas operation among farmers in 2 communes of Ha Nam Province, Vietnam. DESIGN: A community-based intervention approach. SETTING: This study was conducted from 2015 to 2016 in 2 communes of Ha Nam Province, Vietnam. PARTICIPANTS: Only farmers with HBUs (N = 399) participated in this research. Farmers were assigned to either an intervention group or a control group at a ratio of 1:2. INTERVENTION: Two intervention steps were implemented over a 6-month period as follows: (i) the core farmer group trained in 6 steps of HBU safe handling practice; and (ii) the core farmer group conducted peer-to-peer communication with its neighbors in the commune using the provided material. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Farmers' knowledge and practices in biogas operation were assessed by a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was administered before (baseline) and after the intervention (follow-up) to both the control and intervention groups. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the knowledge and practices of biogas operation between the 2 groups, in which farmers in the intervention group demonstrated better understanding of the related topic than the control group (P < .05, t test). A linear regression model indicated that baseline and follow-up scores in both knowledge and practices of the intervention group were higher than those of the control group. After the intervention, the mean difference score in knowledge and practices between the intervention and control groups was 5.0 and 2.0 points, respectively (P < .01). CONCLUSION: A community-based intervention approach could be applied to improve knowledge and practices among farmers in using biogas systems. However, further studies should be conducted to assess the sustainability and effectiveness of this model.


Asunto(s)
Biocombustibles/efectos adversos , Culinaria/instrumentación , Agricultores/psicología , Conocimiento , Adulto , Biocombustibles/normas , Participación de la Comunidad/métodos , Culinaria/métodos , Agricultores/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vietnam
2.
Environ Health Insights ; 14: 1178630220943206, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33088179

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contact with livestock wastewater on farms and in communities can pose a risk to human and animal health. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 180 households and 24 pig farms (96 wastewater samples) to explore information about pig production, livestock waste management, antibiotic use, and to analyze antibiotic residues and microbial contamination, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 120 households raising pigs, biogas systems were the most commonly used to treat animal waste (70%), followed by compositing (19%), and the remaining respondents discharged waste directly into drains or ponds (11%). The majority of respondents (78%) used antibiotics to treat and prevent disease in pigs, but 32% of them did not know of any disadvantages of antibiotic abuse. ELISA assays were performed on half of the wastewater samples (n = 48), demonstrating that residues of flouroquinolones and sulfonamides were present in 6.3% (3/48) and 22.9% (11/48) of tested samples, respectively. The average residual level of sulfamethazine was 27.8 ug/l. Further, E. coli concentrations exceeding regulatory levels in Vietnam were found in nearly all samples. Salmonella spp. was also found in 57.3% of samples, though prevalence rates varied across the different sites. Finally, G. lamblia was found in 8.4% of samples, and C. parvum was found in 5.2% of samples. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that livestock wastewater carried potential harmful pathogens and antibiotic residues that could come into contact with humans in the community. Thus, appropriate operation and application of livestock wastewater treatment (such as biogas or composting) and management should be a continued focused.

3.
Int J Public Health ; 62(Suppl 1): 83-91, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27837222

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper was to assess the diarrhea risks caused by various pathogens among those exposed to biogas wastewater through different activities. METHODS: Application of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) of biogas wastewater was conducted in Hanam Province, Vietnam. A total of 451 representatives from households that use biogas were interviewed about their practices of handling biogas plant and reuse of biogas effluent for irrigation. In addition, 150 samples of biogas wastewater were analyzed for Escherichia coli, Cryptosporidium parvum, and Giardia lamblia. Risk characterization was calculated using Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: The annual diarrhea risk caused by exposure to biogas effluent through irrigation activities ranged from 17.4 to 21.1% (E. coli O157:H7), 1.0 to 2.3% (G. lamblia), and 0.2 to 0.5% (C. parvum), while those caused through unblocking drains connected to biogas effluent tanks were 22.0% (E. coli), 0.7% (G. lamblia), and 0.5% (C. parvum). CONCLUSIONS: Further measures are needed to reduce the risk by either improving the microbial quality of biogas effluent or by ensuring the use of personal protective measures when exposed to biogas wastewater.


Asunto(s)
Riego Agrícola/métodos , Diarrea/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Aguas Residuales/microbiología , Aguas Residuales/parasitología , Microbiología del Agua , Animales , Biocombustibles , Cryptosporidium parvum/aislamiento & purificación , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Agricultores , Giardia lamblia/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Ganado
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA