Application of lung ultrasonography in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

PURPOSE: Lung ultrasonography (LU) is useful to assess lung lesions and variations at bedside. To investigate the results of LU in severe and critical patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we performed a single-institution study to evaluate the related lung lesions and variations, and prophylactic strategies, in a large referral and treatment center. METHODS: We included 91 adult patients with severe and critical COVID-19, namely 62 males and 29 females, with an average age of 59 ± 11 years, who underwent LU. We collected the following patient information: sex, age, days in hospital, and days in ICU. In the ultrasound examinations, we recorded the presence of discrete B lines, confluent B lines, consolidation, pleural thickening, pleural effusion, and pneumothorax (PTX). RESULTS: Among the 91 severe and critical patients, 59 cases had scattered B lines, 56 cases had confluent B lines, 58 cases had alveolar-interstitial syndrome (AIS), 48 cases had lung consolidation, six cases had pleural thickening, 39 cases had pleural effusion (average depth of the pleural effusion: 1.0 ± 1.5 cm), and 20 patients developed PTX. In the Cox multivariate analysis, there were significant differences in age, hospitalization days, ICU days, and lung consolidation. CONCLUSION: Lung ultrasonography performed at the bedside can detect lung diseases, such as B lines, PTX, pulmonary edema, lung consolidation, pleural effusion, and variations of these findings. Our findings support the use of LU and measurements for estimating factors, and monitoring response to therapy in severe and critical COVID-19 patients.

The role of ultrasound in determining the amount of pleural effusion.

BACKGROUND: There is no standardized system to evaluate pleural effusion size on ultrasound (US). We aimed to explore the role of US in determining the amount of pleural effusion, with an attempt to provide evidence for clinical efficacy evaluation and treatment program selection. METHODS: A total of 98 patients undergoing thoracoscopy at our center were enrolled in this study. The patients take a sitting position, then the maximum depths of the pleural effusion by US at the subscapular line, posterior axillary line, midaxillary line, anterior axillary line, and midclavicular line, as well as the maximum thickness of the pleural effusion at the subscapular line, were measured before pleural effusion drainage. Then, the corresponding values in the lateral position were also measured. The relationships between the actual pleural effusion amounts and the measurements at these lines were analyzed using the multivariate linear regression model (MLRM). RESULTS: The regression equation of the group with a pleural effusion amount of 500-1,000 mL in the sitting position showed statistical significance (P=0.001). The P values of the maximum depths at the subscapular line (X1) and midclavicular line (X5) and the maximum thickness at the subscapular line (X6) were below 0.05. Thus, a final model was established using X1, X5, and X6 as the independent variables. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of US examination and MLRM enables the quantitative determination of pleural effusion.