RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Saksenaea species (spp.) are uncommon causes of mucormycosis but are emerging pathogens mostly associated with trauma and soil contamination often in immunocompetent hosts. Due to lack of sporulation in the laboratory, diagnosis and susceptibility testing is difficult so optimal treatment regimens are unknown. CASE PRESENTATION: A 67 year-old man from the Northern Territory in Australia, with a history of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, developed disseminated Saksenaea infection after initially presenting with symptoms consistent with bacterial pyelonephritis. Despite a delay in diagnosis; with aggressive surgical management and dual therapy with amphotericin B and posaconazole, he survived. CONCLUSIONS: We describe an unusual case of disseminated infection with a favourable outcome to date.
Asunto(s)
Mucormicosis/diagnóstico , Mucormicosis/etiología , Anciano , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/etiología , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Masculino , Mucormicosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Mucormicosis/cirugía , Northern Territory , Triazoles/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Combination antibiotic therapy with an antitoxin agent, such as clindamycin, is included in some guidelines for severe, toxin-mediated Staphylococcus aureus infections. The evidence to support this practice is currently limited to in vitro, animal and observational human case-series data, with no previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs). OBJECTIVES: This pilot RCT aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a clinical trial to examine if adjunctive clindamycin with standard therapy has greater efficacy than standard therapy alone for S. aureus infections. METHODS: We performed an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicentre, pilot RCT (ACTRN12617001416381p) in adults and children with severe S. aureus infections, randomized to standard antibiotic therapy with or without clindamycin for 7â days. RESULTS: Over 28â months, across nine sites, 127 individuals were screened and 34 randomized, including 11 children (32%). The primary outcome-number of days alive and free of systemic inflammatory response syndrome ≤14â days-was similar between groups: clindamycin (3â days [IQR 1-6]) versus standard therapy (4â days [IQR 0-8]). The 90â day mortality was 0% (0/17) in the clindamycin group versus 24% (4/17) in the standard therapy group. Secondary outcomes-microbiological relapse, treatment failure or diarrhoea-were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: As the first clinical trial assessing adjunctive clindamycin for S. aureus infections, this study indicates feasibility and that adults and children can be incorporated into one trial using harmonized endpoints, and there were no safety concerns. The CASSETTE trial will inform the definitive S. aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial, which includes an adjunctive clindamycin domain and participants with non-severe disease.