Sparse and inconsistent reporting of pre- and post-operative radiographic angles of total knee arthroplasty using true unrestricted kinematic alignment: An umbrella review and secondary meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To identify, synthesise and critically appraise findings of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on pre- and post-operative radiographic angles (lateral distal femoral angle [LDFA], medial proximal tibial angle [MPTA] and hip-knee-ankle [HKA] angle) of unrestricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Two authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Epistemonikos for systematic reviews, with or without meta-analyses, that reported on TKA outcomes using unrestricted kinematic alignment. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews and meta-analyses was independently assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2). The effect size with its 95% confidence interval (CI) for radiographic angles was extracted from the systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The characteristics of clinical studies included in systematic reviews were listed and tabulated. Pre- and post-operative MPTA, LDFA and HKA angles were summarised using meta-analytic random-effects models. RESULTS: Nineteen records were eligible for data extraction. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses included 44 clinical studies, of which 31 were on unrestricted kinematic alignment and 13 were on restricted versions of kinematic alignment. None of the included systematic reviews or meta-analyses fulfiled all seven critical AMSTAR-2 domains. Few comparative studies reported both pre- and post-operative angles (LDFA, n = 3; MPTA, n = 4; and HKA angle, n = 10). Mean pre- and post-operative LDFAs were 88.0° (range, 83-94°) and 88.0° (range, 80-96°) for the kinematic alignment group, and 88.2° (range, 83-95°) and 90.2° (range, 84-97°) for the mechanical alignment group. Mean pre- and post-operative MPTAs were 86.0° (range, 78-93°) and 87.1° (range, 78-94°) for the kinematic alignment group and 86.4° (range, 77-94°) and 89.6° (range, 84-95°) for the mechanical alignment group. Mean pre- and post-operative HKA angles were -3.3° (range, -24° to 24°) and -0.3° (range, -10° to 8°) for the kinematic alignment group and -6.9° (range, -25° to 7°) and -0.9° (range, -8° to 7°) for the mechanical alignment group. CONCLUSION: Most systematic reviews and meta-analyses that report outcomes of TKA using kinematic alignment do not distinguish between the different versions of kinematic alignment. The clinical studies included in systematic reviews are limited and inconsistent in their reporting of radiographic angles. Different alignment strategies are often grouped under the umbrella term of kinematic alignment, which contributes to conflicting reports, confusion and unresolved questions regarding the efficacy of true unrestricted kinematic alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

No significant difference in early clinical outcomes of custom versus off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to collect, synthesise and critically appraise findings of clinical studies that report outcomes of custom total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis was that, compared to off-the-shelf (OTS) TKA, custom TKA would yield better surgical, clinical and radiographic outcomes. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). On 8 February 2021, two authors independently searched and screened articles using MEDLINE®, Embase® and the Cochrane Library without restriction on date of publication. Findings from eligible articles were narratively synthesised and tabulated, and when ≥ 3 comparative studies reported the same outcome, results were pooled and summarised in forest plots. Quality assessments of the studies were done according to the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Checklists. RESULTS: A total of 15 articles were eligible for data extraction, of which 9 were case-control studies reporting on 929 custom versus 998 OTS TKA, 5 were case series reporting on results of 587 custom TKA, and 1 was a cross-sectional study reporting on results of 44 custom versus 132 OTS TKA. Five studies that compared early revision rates found the overall effect in favour of OTS TKA (odds ratio (OR), 0.4; p = n.s.) but the result did not reach statistical significance. Four studies found no statistically significant difference in KSS knee (standardised mean difference (SMD), - 0.10; p = n.s.) and function (SMD, 0.03; p = n.s.), and five studies found no statistically significant difference in range of motion (SMD, 0.02; p = n.s.). One study that compared bone-implant fit between custom and three OTS tibial components found no overhang but revealed under-coverage of up to 18% in knees with custom tibial baseplates. CONCLUSION: Custom TKA demonstrated no significant benefits compared to OTS TKA in terms of pooled clinical outcomes, but had considerably higher early revision rates. The findings of the present systematic review and meta-analysis suggest the need for studies with better comparable groups and standardisation of reporting outcomes amongst studies, that could increase the quality of evidence and enable pooling of results in future meta-analyses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Custom TKA enables adequate realignment with minimal ligament release and grants satisfactory outcomes in knees that had prior osteotomies or extra-articular fracture sequelae.

PURPOSE: To report the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of custom total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in knees that had prior osteotomies and/or extra-articular fracture sequelae. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analysed a consecutive series of 444 knees that received custom TKA between 2016 and 2019 and identified 41 knees that had prior extra-articular events (osteotomies or fracture sequelae). Patients responded to pre- and post-operative (> 12 months) questionnaires, including Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Net improvements were calculated by subtracting pre- from post-operative scores. In addition to a preoperative CT scan, pre- and post-operative long-leg weight-bearing radiographs were obtained, on which the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, femoral mechanical angle (FMA, between femoral mechanical axis and joint line) and tibial mechanical angle (TMA, between tibial mechanical axis and joint line) angles were measured, and alignment was planned within a 'target zone' of FMA and TMA within 85°-95° and HKA angle within 175°-183°. Agreements between preoperative, planned and post-operative angles were calculated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: From the initial 41 knees, 3 had incomplete post-operative data and 1 was revised for painful stiffness due to uncorrected rotational malunion, leaving 37 knees for analysis. Twenty had prior osteotomies (tibia, n = 18, femur, n = 2), 8 had isolated fractures (tibial, n = 3; femoral, n = 5), and 9 had both osteotomies and fractures. Postoperative coronal alignments were 90.4° ± 2.4° for FMA, 89.3° ± 2.6° for TMA and 179.9° ± 3.0° for HKA angle. Agreements between planned and achieved alignments were fair to excellent, and 29 (78%) knees were within the 'target zone'. At a mean follow-up of 15 ± 5 months, all clinical scores had improved significantly (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Custom TKA granted satisfactory clinical outcomes and a low complication rate in knees that had prior osteotomies and/or extra-articular fracture sequelae. Using custom implants and strategies for coronal alignment, 29 (78%) of the 37 knees were successfully aligned within the 'target zone', and 35 (95%) of the 41 knees did not require ligament release. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Considerable inter-individual variability of tibial geometric ratios renders bone-implant mismatch unavoidable using off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the variability in tibial geometric ratios among knees of different sexes and races to determine whether commercially-available tibial baseplates accommodate the morphologic diversity. The hypothesis was that anthropometric studies report considerable variability of tibial geometric ratios among sexes and races. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Two authors independently conducted an electronic search using MEDLINE® and Embase® on 28 January 2021 for clinical studies reporting on tibial geometric ratios. Tibial geometric ratios, as reported by the clinical studies, were represented by plotting their means and two standard deviations for comparison to two symmetric and two asymmetric commercially-available tibial baseplates. RESULTS: A total of 27 articles that reported on a combined total of 20,944 knees were eligible for data extraction. Variation in tibial aspect ratios was equal among sexes. The greatest variation in aspect ratio was observed among East Asians, followed by Caucasians, African-Americans, Indian and Middle Easterns. The variation in tibial asymmetry ratio was larger among men compared to women. The greatest variation in asymmetry ratio was observed among African-Americans, followed by Caucasians, East Asians, Indian and Middle Easterns. Bone-implant mismatch of > 3 mm overhang or > 4 mm under-coverage with four commercially-available tibial baseplates occurred in large proportions of knees due to variations in aspect ratio (in 17-100% of knees) and asymmetry ratio (in 7-100% of knees). CONCLUSION: Anthropometric studies reported considerable inter-individual variability of tibial geometric ratios, which exceeded effects of sexual dimorphism and racial diversity. Bone-implant mismatch may be unavoidable in a large proportion of knees, when considering that a surgeon generally only uses one or a few TKA brands. These findings support the drive towards patient-specific implants to potentially achieve accurate bone-implant fit by implant customisation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Sensitivity of Model-Based Predictions of Post-TKA Kinematic Behavior to Residual Errors in Ultrasound-Based Knee Collateral Ligament Strain Assessment.

Ultrasound-based ligament strain estimation shows promise in non-invasively assessing knee joint collateral ligament behavior and improving ligament balancing procedures. However, the impact of ultrasound-based strain estimation residual errors on in-silico arthroplasty predictions remains unexplored. We investigated the sensitivity of post-arthroplasty kinematic predictions to ultrasound-based strain estimation errors compared to clinical inaccuracies in implant positioning.Two cadaveric legs were submitted to active squatting, and specimen-specific rigid computer models were formulated. Mechanical properties of the ligament model were optimized to reproduce experimentally obtained tibiofemoral kinematics and loads with minimal error. Resulting remaining errors were comparable to the current state-of-the-art. Ultrasound-derived strain residual errors were then introduced by perturbing lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) stiffness. Afterwards, the implant position was perturbed to match with the current clinical inaccuracies reported in the literature. Finally, the impact on simulated post-arthroplasty tibiofemoral kinematics was compared for both perturbation scenarios. Ultrasound-based errors minimally affected kinematic outcomes (mean differences < 0.73° in rotations, 0.1 mm in translations). Greatest differences occurred in external tibial rotations (-0.61° to 0.73° for MCL, -0.28° to 0.27° for LCL). Comparatively, changes in implant position had larger effects, with mean differences up to 1.95° in external tibial rotation and 0.7 mm in mediolateral translation. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the ultrasound-based assessment of collateral ligament strains has the potential to enhance current computer-based pre-operative knee arthroplasty planning.

What are the perceived benefits and barriers to the use of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty? A survey of members of the European Knee Society.

PURPOSE: Members of the European Knee Society (EKS) recently took part in an online questionnaire on robot-assisted TKA. The purpose of this study was to report and analyse the questionnaire results on the demographics of users versus non-users, the drivers for users of the technology, and the barriers or limitations that hinder the uptake of robot-assisted TKA. METHODS: The questionnaire was composed of 16 questions covering surgeon demographics and drivers for or barriers to the use of robotics. Responses on four- or five-point Likert scales were trichotomised depending on the type of question ("not important" - "moderately important" - "important/very important" or "fully disagree/disagree" - "neutral" - "agree/fully agree"). Consensus on a statement was defined as at least 75% agreement. RESULTS: There was a 67% response rate. Forty-five surgeons performed conventional TKA, of which 78% aimed for systematic alignment, while 22 performed robot-assisted TKA, of which 82% aimed for individualised alignment, and 16 performed technology-assisted TKA, of which 56% aimed for systematic alignment. Respondents agreed that robotics significantly impact accuracy of bone cuts (51/62, 82%), intra-operative feedback on ligament balancing (56/62, 90%) as well as bone cut orientation and implant positioning (57/ 62, 92%), and assistance to customise alignment (56/62, 90%). Respondents agreed that associated costs (14/18, 78%) are an important aspect for not using or to stop using robotics. CONCLUSION: The majority of respondents still perform conventional TKA (54%), while only a small portion perform robot-assisted TKA (27%) or other technology-assisted TKA (19%). Most robot users aim for individualised lower limb alignment, whereas most other surgeons aimed for systematic lower limb alignment. There is consensus that robotic assistance has a positive impact on accuracy of bone cuts and alignment, but no consensus on its impact on other peri- or post-operative outcomes. Finally, the associated cost of robot-assisted TKA remains the main barrier to its uptake. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Sagittal femoral condylar shape varies along a continuum from spherical to ovoid: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Considerable anatomic variations of sagittal femoral condylar shape have been reported, with a continuum between spherical (or single-radius) and ovoid (or multi-radius) condyles. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to critically appraise and synthesise the available literature on the sagittal femoral profile. The hypothesis was that studies would reveal considerable variability among individuals, but also in their methodology to quantify sagittal profiles. METHODS: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. On 10 September 2021 two authors searched for Level I to IV studies that reported on the sagittal curvature of the medial and/or lateral femoral condyles using the MEDLINE®, EMBASE® and Cochrane Library. Results were summarised by tabulating means, standard deviations and/or ranges for the reported radii-of-curvature, or ellipsoidal semi-major and semi-minor lengths of the condyles. To quantify sagittal 'ovoidicity' and asymmetry, results were stratified according to coordinate reference frame (posterior condylar axis (PCA), clinical and surgical transepicondylar axis (cTEA and sTEA), unified sagittal plane (USP), or unclear) and summarised in forest plots as standardised mean differences (SMD). RESULTS: Thirty-eight articles were eligible for full text extraction, quantifying sagittal radii-of-curvature by best-fit circles (BFC), ellipsoids, polynomials, spherical or cylindrical fitting. Studies with clear definition of the measurement plane revealed that both condyles were generally ovoid, with considerably greater 'ovoidicity' at the medial condyle (SMD, 4.09) versus the lateral condyle (SMD, 3.33). In addition, distal condylar radii were greater medially when measured normal to the TEA (cTEA: SMD, 0.81; sTEA: SMD, 0.79), but greater laterally when measured in a USP (SMD, - 0.83). Posterior condylar radii were greater laterally when measured in a USP (SMD, - 0.60). CONCLUSION: Studies reported considerable variability of sagittal femoral condylar radii-of-curvature, which are not incremental, but rather a continuum that ranges from spherical to ovoid. Although this variation could be accommodated by single-, dual- and multi-radii femoral components, a surgeon typically uses only one or two TKA designs. Hence, there is a risk of mismatch between the native and prosthetic sagittal profile that could result in mid-flexion ligament imbalance unless other parameters are changed. These findings support the drive towards patient-specific implants to potentially achieve accurate sagittal bone-implant fit through implant customisation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Insufficient evidence to confirm benefits of custom partial knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesise the available literature and critically appraise current evidence on the functional and radiographic outcomes as well as reoperation and revision rates of custom partial knee arthroplasty, i.e., unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA), and patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and a protocol was registered with Prospero. On 25 May 2021, two authors independently searched and screened Level I-IV studies that reported on outcomes of custom partial knee arthroplasty using the databases of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and the Cochrane Library without restriction on date of publication. Findings from eligible articles were synthesised and tabulated, and quality assessments were done according to the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Checklists. RESULTS: Fifteen articles were eligible for data extraction, of which two comparative and four case series were on custom UKA (follow-up, 0-9 months), one comparative and five case series on custom BKA (follow-up, 0.25-72 months), and three case series on custom PFA (follow-up, 2-119 months). Three studies on custom UKA reported mean Knee Society Score (KSS) Knee of 86-94 and mean KSS Function of 94-95, and two studies on custom BKA reported mean KSS Knee of 90-94 and KSS function of 81, whereas one study on custom PFA reported KSS Knee of 91 and KSS Function of 89. Custom implants tended to have less bone-implant mismatch compared to off the shelf (OTS) implants. Revision rates were 3-25% for custom UKA (at 0-109 months), 3-5% for custom BKA (at 12-72 months), and 0-14% for custom PFA (at 2-119 months). CONCLUSION: Due to the small number of comparative studies and lack of consistency in reported outcomes, it remains difficult to ascertain the benefits of custom partial knee arthroplasty. Anecdotal evidence suggests that, compared to OTS implants, custom implants result in less bone-implant mismatch and that 78-91% of patients are either satisfied or very satisfied after custom partial knee arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Satisfactory mid- to long-term outcomes of TKA aligned using conventional instrumentation for flexion gap balancing with minimal soft tissue release.

PURPOSE: To describe a technique for flexion gap management in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using conventional instrumentation with minimal soft tissue release, by aligning the femoral component to restore close-to-native posterior condylar angle (PCA). The hypothesis was that this technique renders consistent outcomes, regardless the preoperative deformity or intraoperative parameters. METHODS: In a consecutive series of 152 TKAs, the femoral component was rotated to restore anatomic PCA of 2° ± 2° and the flexion gap was balanced with a final lateral flexion laxity of 1-3 mm. Patients were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score at a minimum follow-up of 4 years. Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed to determine associations between clinical scores and patient demographics, PCA, laxity, pre- and postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, and preoperative femoral mechanical angle (FMA) and tibial mechanical angle (TMA). RESULTS: Intraoperative measurements indicated a target PCA of 2.9° ± 1.0° (range 0°-6°) with a final lateral flexion laxity of 1.5 ± 0.6 mm (range 0-3). The target PCA was achieved in 145 knees (95%) and the desired final lateral flexion laxity was achieved in 151 knees (99.3%). There were no significant differences in postoperative clinical outcomes between knees within the target PCA range and outliers. KSS function decreased with age and preoperative HKA angle, and was lower for women, while KSS satisfaction improved with follow-up. OKS increased with target PCA and follow-up, decreased with preoperative TMA, was lower for women and better for knees with resurfaced patellae. UCLA activity decreased with age, preoperative HKA angle and BMI, and was lower for women. CONCLUSIONS: In this consecutive series of 152 TKAs performed with minimal ligament release, the target PCA and final lateral flexion laxity were simultaneously achieved in 95% of knees. At a minimum follow-up of 4 years, adequate clinical scores and patient satisfaction were achieved, even in knees outside the target PCA range. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Sexual dimorphism and racial diversity render bone-implant mismatch inevitable after off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the variability in femoral geometric ratios among knees of different sexes and races, and to appreciate whether the observed variability is accommodated by commonly implanted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components. The hypothesis was that the anthropometric studies report considerable variability of femoral geometric ratios among sexes and races. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Two authors independently conducted an electronic search using MEDLINE® and Embase® on 6 July 2020 for clinical studies reporting on femoral geometric ratios among sexes and races. Femoral geometric ratios were graphically represented as means and 2 standard deviations, and compared to those of 13 commonly implanted femoral components. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were identified that reported on a combined total of 2627 knees; all reported the aspect ratio, and 2 also reported the asymmetry ratio and trapezoidicity ratio. Men had wider knees than women, and compared to Caucasian knees, Arabian and Indian knees were wider, while East Asian were narrower. There were no differences in asymmetry ratio between men and women, nor among Caucasian and East Asian knees. Men had more trapezoidal knees than women, and East Asian knees were more trapezoidal than Caucasian knees. The commonly implanted femoral components accommodated less than a quarter of the geometric variability observed among sexes and races. CONCLUSION: Anthropometric studies reported considerable sexual dimorphism and racial diversity of femoral geometric ratios. Since a surgeon generally only uses one or a few TKA brands, bone-implant mismatch remains unavoidable in a large proportion of knees. These findings support the drive towards personalized medicine, and accurate bone-implant fit may only be achievable through customisation of implants, though the clinical benefits of custom TKA remain to be confirmed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Implant survival of 3rd-condyle and post-cam posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty are comparable at follow-up > 10 years: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To summarise the literature on 3rd-condyle total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs and compare their survival rates to those of post-cam TKA designs. The null hypothesis was that 3rd-condyle TKAs would have equivalent survival rates compared to contemporary post-cam TKAs. METHODS: An electronic literature search for Level I-V studies was independently conducted by two researchers using Medline® and Web of Science for studies published between January 1984 and October 2020 that specifically reported on rates of implant survival and complications, joint kinematics, clinical outcomes, and radiographic outcomes of 3rd-condyle TKA. The methodological quality of clinical studies was assessed according to the Downs and Black Quality Checklist for Health Care Intervention Studies, and for in vitro and in silico studies according to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool for assessing analytical cross-sectional studies. Findings extracted for each TKA design were presented as reported and synthesised narratively. Survival rates at 5, 10 and > 10 years of 3rd-condyle TKA designs were graphically compared to rates of post-cam TKA designs published in joint registries. RESULTS: A total of 38 studies were identified that reported on kinematics, clinical outcomes, radiographic alignment, and rates of complications and survival. Mean survival rates ranged from 96 to 98% at 5 years, 78-100% at 5-10 years, and 86-99% at > 10 years for 3rd-condyle PS TKAs. Mean survival rates ranged from 93 to 98% at 5 years, 89-99% at 5-10 years, and 88-95% at > 10 years for post-cam PS TKAs. CONCLUSION: Implant survival rates of 3rd-condyle TKAs are comparable to those of post-cam TKAs at follow-up > 10 years. When compared to post-cam PS TKA, 3rd-condyle designs offer an alternative for younger and more active patients when considering the added benefits of a lowered point-of-contact and larger congruent contact area at the intercondylar tibial sulcus, that reduce risks of loosening and component wear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Custom total knee arthroplasty facilitates restoration of constitutional coronal alignment.

PURPOSE: To describe a strategy for coronal alignment using a computed tomography (CT) based custom total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system, and to evaluate the agreement between the planned and postoperative Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle, Femoral Mechanical Angle (FMA) and Tibial Mechanical Angle (TMA). METHODS: From a consecutive series of 918 primary TKAs, 266 (29%) knees received CT-based posterior-stabilized cemented custom TKA. In addition to a preoperative CT-scan, pre- and post-operative radiographs of weight-bearing long leg, anterior-posterior and lateral views of the knee were obtained, on which the FMA, TMA and HKA angles were measured. CT-based three-dimensional (3D) models enabled to correct for cases with bony wear by referring to the non-worn areas and to estimate the native pre-arthritic angles. The alignment technique aimed to preserve or restore constitutional alignment (CA) within predetermined limits, by defining a 'target zone' based on three criteria: 1) a ± 3° (range 87°-93°) primary tolerance for the femoral and tibial resections; 2) a ± 2° secondary tolerance for component obliquity, extending the bounds for FMA and TMA (range 85°-95°); 3) a planned HKA angle range of 175°-183°. Agreement between preoperative, planned and postoperative measurements of FMA, TMA and HKA angle were calculated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Preoperative radiograph and CT-scan measurements revealed that, respectively, 73 (28%) and 103 (40%) knees were in the 'target zone', whereas postoperative radiographs revealed that 217 (84%) TKAs were in the 'target zone'. Deviation from the planned angles were - 0.5° ± 1.8° for FMA, - 0.5° ± 1.8° for TMA, and - 1.1° ± 2.1° for HKA angle. Finally, the agreement between the planned and achieved targets, indicated by ICC, were good for FMA (0.701), fair for TMA (0.462) and fair for HKA angle (0.472). CONCLUSION: Using this strategy for coronal alignment, 84% of custom TKAs were within the 'target zone' for FMA, TMA and HKA angles. These findings support the concepts of emerging personalized medicine technologies, and emphasise the importance of accurate strategies for preoperative planning, which are key to achieving satisfactory 'personalised alignment' that can further be improved by customisation of implant components. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Custom TKA combined with personalised coronal alignment yield improvements that exceed KSS substantial clinical benefits.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report Knee Society Scores (KSS) at 12-month follow-up in a series of 266 knees that received custom TKA. The hypothesis was that custom TKA combined with personalised alignment would yield improvements greater than substantial clinical benefits (SCB) of KSS Knee and Function. METHODS: From a consecutive series of 905 patients (918 knees) that received primary TKAs, 261 (29%) patients (266 knees) received computed tomography (CT)-based posterior-stabilised cemented custom TKA. Knees were aligned aiming to preserve or restore constitutional alignment within predetermined limits of 85°-95° for femoral mechanical angle (FMA) and tibial mechanical angle (TMA), and 175°-183° for hip knee ankle (HKA) angle. The KSS Knee and Function were collected preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, to determine if patients achieved SCB. Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed to determine associations between KSS scores (Knee and Function) and patient demographics as well as pre- and postoperative radiographic alignments. RESULTS: Of the initial cohort of 261 patients, 4 (1.8%) were reoperated for patellar resurfacing, 1 (0.4%) for lavage to treat infection, and 1 (0.4%) had arthroscopy to treat a stiff knee with < 90° range of motion. Complete clinical records were available for 227 patients (232 knees, 87%) that comprised 102 men (5 bilateral) and 125 women. At 12-month follow-up, mean improvements in KSS Knee and Function scores were, respectively, 61.0 ± 13.0 and 42.7 ± 16.7, which exceeded the SCB of KSS. Comparison of knees inside versus outside the target zone revealed no differences in KSS Knee (94.1 ± 9.1 versus 94.3 ± 9.0, n.s.) and Function (96.1 ± 9.2 versus 96.3 ± 8.9, n.s.). Multivariable analysis revealed worse KSS Knee in knees with preoperative FMA > 95° (ß = - 6.21; p = 0.023), but no association between KSS Function and patient demographics or pre- and postoperative radiographic alignments. CONCLUSIONS: Custom TKA combined with personalised alignment yielded improvements that exceeded substantial clinical benefits of KSS Knee and Function scores. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of custom TKA with 'personalised alignment' and encourage further investigations using comparative studies at longer follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Arthroscopic management of unexplained pain following total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Arthrofibrosis develops in 3-10% of knees after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which may result in pain and restricted range-of-motion. Treatment options include manipulation under anaesthesia, arthroscopic debridement, and quadricepsplasty, but there is little consensus on their efficacy for treatment of unexplained pain after TKA. The purpose of this study was to report the prevalence and characteristics of unexplained pain after TKA as revealed by arthroscopic exploration, and assess the efficacy of arthroscopic procedures to relieve pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a consecutive series of 684 TKAs, 11 patients (1.6%) had unexplained pain at 7-48 months after TKA. Causes of pain remained unidentified after systematic and differential assessment, but arthroscopic exploration revealed fibrotic tissues, which were debrided during the same procedure. Patients were assessed first at 6-61 months and last at 90-148 months, with pain on a visual analog scale (pVAS) and range-of-motion recorded during both assessments, but Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) only during the last assessment. Residual pain was classified as little or no pain (pVAS, 0-1), moderate pain (pVAS, 2-4), and severe pain (pVAS, 5-10). RESULTS: At first follow-up (n = 11) pVAS improved by 4.1 ± 1.1 (p < 0.001), and range-of-motion improved by 5.0° ± 7.1° (p = 0.041). Seven patients (64%) had little or no residual pain, while four (36%) had moderate residual pain. At final follow-up (n = 9) pVAS improved by 3.2 ± 2.9 (p < 0.001), and range-of-motion improved by 4.4° ± 8.5° (p = 0.154). Six patients (67%) had little or no residual pain, while one (11%) had moderate and two (22%) had severe residual pain. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic exploration revealed that all 11 knees with unexplained pain had fibrotic tissues, the removal of which alleviated pain in only 67%, while moderate to severe pain persisted in 33% which merits further scrutiny.

Sexual and ethnic polymorphism result in considerable mismatch between native trochlear geometry and off-the-shelf TKA prostheses.

PURPOSE: To determine if trochlear morphology in healthy knees depends on sex and ethnicity, and to compare it to off-the-shelf TKA prostheses. METHODS: Three retrospective series of CT angiograms from France (female, 124; male, 135), China (female, 122; male, 137) and South Africa (female, 21; male, 62) were used to digitize osseous landmarks at the level of the femoral epicondyles. Sulcus angle, trochlear rotation, lateral trochlear inclination, trochlear asymmetry ratio, and trochlear depth index were quantified for each knee and for 10 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) models. Univariable regression analyses were performed to determine associations of the five trochlear parameters with sex and ethnicity. Interquartile ranges (IQR) of native trochlear parameters were compared to the trochlear parameters of 10 off-the-shelf TKA prostheses. RESULTS: Compared to French knees, Chinese knees had greater sulcus angle (ß = 6.3°, p < 0.001), trochlear rotation (ß = 0.8°, p = 0.004) and trochlear depth index (ß = 1.60, p < 0.001). Conversely, South African knees had greater trochlear rotation (ß = 1.9°, p < 0.001) and lateral trochlear inclination (ß = 3.7°, p < 0.001). Female knees had smaller trochlear asymmetry ratios (ß = - 0.03, p = 0.05) but greater trochlear rotation angles (ß = 0.7, p = 0.005). Considerable mismatches in trochlear morphology were revealed between native knees and off-the-shelf TKA prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that thresholds used in the diagnosis of patellofemoral instability should be adapted to patient sex and ethnicity, and that standard off-the-shelf TKA may not restore native trochlear parameters in all patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative.

Patellar facet ratio affects knee pain, stair climbing and stair descent after TKA without patellar resurfacing.

PURPOSE: To determine whether knee pain or functional impairment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing are correlated with preoperative patellar morphology or postoperative patellar orientation. The hypotheses were that patellar shape, increased tilt and lateral displacement would be associated with pain and functional impairment. METHODS: From a consecutive series of 152 knees that received a cemented postero-stabilized TKA, the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were collected at a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Uni- and multi-variable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations between the collected clinical scores and patient demographics and patellar morphology, measured from pre- and post-operative frontal, lateral and skyline view radiographs. RESULTS: The OKS was 75 ± 23, whereas the KOOS pain, stair climbing, and descent were respectively 77 ± 24, 3.9 ± 1.1 and 3.8 ± 1.2. OKS was not associated with any radiographic outcomes, whereas KOOS pain was better for knees with larger medial patellar facets. The KOOS stair climbing and descent were also better for knees with larger medial patellar facets. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study partly confirm the hypotheses that pain and functional impairments after TKA without patellar resurfacing are associated with patellar shape. No association was revealed between postoperative patellar orientation and function nor pain. Quantitative consideration of patellar congruency could therefore prevent pain and improve function after TKA without patellar resurfacing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective study, Level III.

Inadequacy of computed tomography for pre-operative planning of patellofemoral arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative planning for patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) by comparing: (1) virtual implant positioning simulated on pre-operative images versus (2) real implant positioning from post-operative images. METHODS: The authors prospectively studied 15 patients that received a PFJ implant (Tornier, Montbonnot France). A pre-operative planning software was established to determine the size and position of the trochlear component. Pre-operative scans were used to perform virtual implantations by two different operators, which were then compared to the post-operative scans to calculate errors (ε) in implant positioning and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for intra- and inter-observer repeatability. RESULTS: Analysis was performed for 13 patients, for whom agreement between virtual and real surgery was excellent for anteroposterior (AP) position (ICC = 0.84; ε max = 3.5 mm), fair for proximodistal (PD) position (ICC = 0.50; ε max = 9.5 mm), and poor for mediolateral (ML) position (ICC = 0.07; ε max = 9.0 mm). It was fair for flexum-recurvatum (FR) alignment (ICC = 0.53; ε max = 8.2°), poor for varus-valgus (VV) alignment (ICC = 0.34; ε max = 10.0°), and internal-external (IE) rotation (ICC = 0.34; ε max = 10.6°). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative planning was insufficiently accurate to follow intra-operatively, the greatest errors being angular alignment (VV and FR). The clinical relevance of these findings is that PFA is difficult to plan pre/operatively due to non-visibility of cartilage on CT scans and to trochlear dysplasia in most cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective evaluation of operative tools on consecutive patients, Level III.

Complication rates are not higher after outpatient compared to inpatient fast-track total hip arthroplasty: a propensity-matched prospective comparative study.

PURPOSE: Concerns remain with regards to safety of fast-track (FT) and especially outpatient procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates and clinical outcomes of propensity-matched patients who received FT total hip arthroplasty (THA) in outpatient versus inpatient settings. The hypothesis was that 90-day postoperative complication rates of outpatient FT THA would not be higher than after inpatient FT THA. METHODS: This is a prospective study of consecutive patients who received FT THA at various rates of outpatient and inpatient surgery by 10 senior surgeons (10 centres). The decision between outpatient and inpatient surgery was made on a case-by-case basis depending on the surgeon and patient. All patients were followed until 90 days after surgery. Complications, readmissions and reoperations were collected, and their severity was assessed according to Clavien-Dindo. Patients completed Oxford Hip Score (OHS) at the latest follow-up. RESULTS: Compared to inpatient FT THA, patients scheduled for outpatient FT THA had no significant differences in 90-day postoperative complication rates (10.7% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.129). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in 90-day readmission rates and reoperation rates, in severity of postoperative complications, and in time of occurrence of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in rates of intraoperative complications, 90-day postoperative complications, readmissions, or reoperations between outpatient and inpatient FT THA. These findings may help hesitant surgeons to move towards outpatient THA pathways as there is no greater risk of early postoperative complications that could be more difficult to manage after discharge.

Sufficient Metaphyseal Bone for Wedge Removal and Fixation Hardware During Supratuberosity Tibial Deflexion Osteotomy in Knees With Excessive Posterior Tibial Slope.

BACKGROUND: Tibial deflexion osteotomy (TDO) is sometimes indicated for revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in knees with posterior tibial slope (PTS) ≥12° and aims to decrease PTS to around 5°. When planning TDO, measuring the anterior tibial metaphyseal height (aHt) could help ascertain whether the available metaphyseal bone would be sufficient to create the wedge and leave adequate residual bone. PURPOSE: To (1) determine whether, compared with knees with normal native PTS (<12°), aHt is greater in knees with excessive native PTS (≥12°), and (2) verify if, aiming to decrease PTS to 5°, supratuberosity TDO in knees with excessive native PTS could be performed without tibial tuberosity osteotomy, leaving a minimum of 15 mm of residual bone for fixation staples or plates. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: True lateral radiographs of 350 consecutive patients scheduled for ACL reconstruction were digitized to measure PTS, tibial medial plateau length, tibial anterior and posterior metaphyseal heights and inclinations, and patellar height. Measurements were compared between knees with PTS <12° and those with ≥12°. The wedge height required for supratuberosity TDO was estimated for knees with excessive PTS, aiming for a target PTS of 5°, to determine the proportion of knees that would have residual aHt <15 mm. RESULTS: A total of 326 knees had adequate true lateral radiographs. The mean PTS was 9.8°± 3.1° (range, 1°-20°) and exceeded 12° in 83 (25%) knees. There were no significant differences between knees with normal versus excessive PTS when comparing aHt (30.7 ± 4.5 mm vs 31.6 ± 4.9 mm; P = .270) and medial tibial plateau length (43.1 ± 5.4 mm vs 43.3 ± 5.6 mm; P = .910). Setting the target mPTS at 5° for supratuberosity TDO, the mean residual aHt was 25.0 ± 4.4 mm, and 7 (8%) knees had a residual aHt <20 mm, of which only 1 (1%) had residual aHt <15 mm. Setting the target mPTS at 0°, the mean residual aHt was 21.3 ± 4.2 mm, and 36 (43%) knees had a residual aHt <20 mm, of which only 4 (5%) had residual aHt <15 mm. CONCLUSION: aHt was not significantly different between knees with normal versus excessive PTS. Estimation of the wedge height required for supratuberosity TDO to reduce excessive PTS to 5° revealed sufficient metaphyseal bone for wedge removal in all knees. Furthermore, 99% of knees would have sufficient residual bone (aHt, ≥15 mm) to accommodate fixation staples or plates, without the need for tibial tuberosity osteotomy.