Defining the Core Content for Transport Physician Training Programs.

In many parts of the world, emergency medical services (EMS) clinical care is traditionally delivered by different levels or types of EMS clinicians, such as emergency medical technicians and paramedics. In some areas, physicians are also included among the cadre of professionals administering EMS-based care. This is especially true in the interfacility transport (IFT) setting. Though there is significant overlap between the knowledge and skills necessary to safely and effectively provide care in the IFT and prehospital settings, the IFT care environment requires physicians to develop several additional competencies beyond those that are expected of traditional EMS clinicians. NAEMSP first published recommendations regarding what some of these competencies should be in 1983 and subsequently updated those recommendations in 2002. This document is an updated work, given the evolution of the field.

Interfacility Transport of Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Suspected COVID-19 in the Prone Position.

OBJECTIVE: Prone positioning during mechanical ventilation in patients with severe respiratory failure is an important intervention with both physiologic and empiric rationale for its use. This study describes a consecutive cohort of patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 who were transported in the prone position in order to determine the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) during transport. METHODS: This retrospective study used prospectively collected data from a provincial air and land critical care transport system where specially trained critical care paramedic crews transported intubated and mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 in the prone position. SAEs were determined a priori, and included markers of new hemodynamic or respiratory instability, new resuscitative measures, and equipment or vehicle malfunction. Two authors independently reviewed each patient care record to identify SAEs during transport, and the ability of the crews to successfully manage such events. RESULTS: From April 2020 to June 2021, 127 intubated and mechanically ventilated patients were transported in the prone position. Of these, 117 were transported by land vehicle, 7 by rotor-wing, and 3 by fixed wing aircraft. 67 (52.8%) were vasopressor-dependent, 5 (3.9%) were receiving inhaled vasodilators, 9 (7.1%) were hypoxic (SpO2 < 88%), and 3 (2.4%) were hypotensive (SBP < 90 or MAP < 65 mm Hg) when the transport crew made patient contact at the sending hospital. Of the 122 (96.1%) patients in which a pre-transport PaO2/FiO2 ratio was available, the mean (median; range) was 86.7 (81; 47-144), with 27 patients greater having a ratio greater than 100. The mean (median; range) transport time was 49 (45; 14-176) minutes. There were 19 SAEs in 18 (14.2%) patients during transport, the most common of which was new hypoxia requiring ventilator adjustments (15 of 18 patients). All SAEs were successfully managed by the transport crews. No patient experienced tracheal tube obstruction, unintentional extubation, cardiac arrest, or died during transport. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 can be safely transported in the prone position by specially trained critical care paramedic crews.

A Dedicated SARS-CoV-2 Testing Center for Public Service Agency Personnel: Implementation, Results, and Impact on Human Resources.

Objective: A global pandemic due to an emerging infectious disease requires efficient use of resources to ensure continued operation of essential services. To mitigate risk to these services and the population served, there needs to be a rapid identification of infected personnel via screening and testing.Methods: This retrospective study used prospectively collected data from a dedicated SARS-CoV-2 testing center for fire, police, and paramedic personnel in Toronto, Canada to determine the incidence of seropositive personnel and their immediate household, and estimate the days off work saved by timely access to testing and results.Results: In the consecutive 12-month study period, 10624 tests were carried out. Of 7951 personnel tested, 282 (3.55%) were positive, with positivity rates ranging from 2.52% for paramedics, 4.01% for police, and 4.25% for fire personnel. Household members tested positive in 173 of 2592 cases (6.67%), ranging from 5.22% for fire, 6.34% for paramedic, and 7.04% for police households. The median time to obtain test results was 1 day, with 90% available within 2 days. Implementation of the Center is estimated to have saved the Services 7669 person-days off work.Conclusion: A dedicated SARS-CoV-2 testing center for essential personnel can improve access to diagnostic testing and turnaround time for results, and provide a positive impact on human resource availability during a pandemic.

Toward an all-inclusive trauma system in Central South Ontario: development of the Trauma-System Performance Improvement and Knowledge Exchange (T-SPIKE) project.

Background: There is currently no integrated data system to capture the true burden of injury and its management within Ontario's regional trauma networks (RTNs), largely owing to difficulties in identifying these patients across the multiple health care provider records. Our project represents an iterative effort to create the ability to chart the course of care for all injured patients within the Central South RTN. Methods: Through broad stakeholder engagement of major health care provider organizations within the Central South RTN, we obtained research ethics board approval and established data-sharing agreements with multiple agencies. We tested identification of trauma cases from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2017, and methods to link patient records between the various echelons of care to identify barriers to linkage and opportunities for administrative solutions. Results: During 2017, potential trauma cases were identified within ground paramedic services (23 107 records), air medical transport services (196 records), referring hospitals (7194 records) and the lead trauma hospital trauma registry (1134 records). Linkage rates for medical records between services ranged from 49% to 92%. Conclusion: We successfully conceptualized and provided a preliminary demonstration of an initiative to collect, collate and accurately link primary data from acute trauma care providers for certain patients injured within the Central South RTN. Administration-level changes to the capture and management of trauma data represent the greatest opportunity for improvement.

Contexte: On ne dispose actuellement d'aucun système intégré de gestion des données pour évaluer le fardeau réel des traumatismes et de leur gestion dans les réseaux régionaux de traumatologie (RRT) en Ontario, en bonne partie en raison de la difficulté d'identifier les cas parmi la multiplicité des dossiers d'intervenants médicaux. Notre projet représente un effort itératif pour créer la capacité de cartographier le parcours de soin de tous les polytraumatisés du RRT de la région Centre-Sud. Méthodes: Grâce à l'engagement général des intervenants des grandes organisations de santé du RRT de la région Centre-Sud, nous avons obtenu l'approbation d'un comité d'éthique de la recherche et conclu des accords de partage des données avec plusieurs agences. Nous avons testé l'identification des cas de traumatologie du 1er janvier au 31 décembre 2017 et les méthodes de liaison des dossiers de patients entre les divers échelons de soin pour identifier les obstacles à la liaison et leurs solutions administratives possibles. Résultats: Au cours de 2017, les cas de traumatologie potentiels ont été identifiés auprès des services ambulanciers terrestres (23 107 dossiers), des services de transport médical aérien (196 dossiers), des hôpitaux référents (7194 dossiers) et du registre hospitalier principal de traumatologie (1134 dossiers). Les taux de liaison entre les différents services pour les dossiers médicaux variaient de 49 % à 92 %. Conclusion: Nous avons conceptualisé et présenté avec succès la démonstration préliminaire d'un projet visant à recueillir, colliger et relier avec justesse les données primaires des intervenants en traumatologie aiguë pour certains patients blessés du RRT du Centre-Sud. Des changements administratifs centrés sur la saisie et la gestion des données de traumatologie représentent la meilleure voie vers une amélioration.

Pretransport Risk Assessment of Agitated Patients in Air Medical Transport.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability for a simple pretransport mental health risk assessment tool for patients who are agitated or experiencing an acute psychiatric illness to predict in-transit disruptive behavior necessitating additional intervention(s) while being transported via air ambulance. METHODS: We conducted this retrospective cohort study using existing data from the provincial air and land critical care transport system (Ornge) in Ontario, Canada, from April 2019 until March 2020. A total of 498 cases were included in this study. Transport medicine physicians fill in the modified mental health risk assessment tool as part of their pretransport assessment of each mental health patient undergoing transport. The transport medicine physician-derived risk score is categorized as low, moderate, and high. The primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the modified tool for predicting pre- or in-transit disruptive behavior necessitating escalation in care. RESULTS: Of those patients meeting the study criteria, 207, 198, and 93 cases were assessed as low, moderate, and high risk, respectively, for potential agitation or disruptive behavior requiring escalation of care during transport. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.2%-70.8%), 87.1% (95% CI, 86.9%-87.2%), 37.6% (95% CI, 37.0%-38.2%), and 96.3% (95% CI, 96.2%-96.4%), respectively. CONCLUSION: A simple pretransport risk assessment tool can reliably rule out the need for escalation of care during air medical transport of the potentially agitated patient. This may help improve resource utilization and safety, without sacrificing quality of care.

Paediatric health care access in community health centres is associated with survival for critically ill children who undergo inter-facility transport: A province-wide observational study.

BACKGROUND: Diverse settlement makes inter-facility transport of critically ill children a necessary part of regionalized health care. There are few studies of outcomes and health care services use of this growing population. METHODS: A retrospective study evaluated the frequency of transports, health care services use, and outcomes of all critically ill children who underwent inter-facility transport to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in Ontario from 2004 to 2012. The primary outcome was PICU mortality. Secondary outcomes were 24-hour and 6-month mortality, PICU and hospital lengths of stay, and use of therapies in the PICU. RESULTS: The 4,074 inter-facility transports were for children aged median (IQR) 1.6 (0.1 to 8.3) years. The rate of transports increased from 15 to 23 per 100,000 children. There were 233 (5.7%) deaths in PICU and an additional 78 deaths (1.9%) by 6 months. Length of stay was median (IQR) 2 (1 to 5) days in PICU and 7 (3 to 14) days in the receiving hospital. Lower PICU mortality was independently associated with prior acute care contact (odds ratio [OR]=0.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2 to 0.6) and availability of paediatric expertise at the referral hospital (OR=0.7, 95% CI: 0.5 to 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: We found that in Ontario, children undergoing inter-facility transport to PICUs are increasing in number, consume significant acute care resources, and have a high PICU mortality. Access to paediatric expertise is a potentially modifiable factor that can impact mortality and warrants further evaluation.

Frequency, Composition, and Predictors of In-Transit Critical Events During Pediatric Critical Care Transport.

OBJECTIVES: Transport of pediatric patients is common due to healthcare regionalization. We set out to determine the frequency of in-transit critical events during pediatric critical care transport and identify factors associated with these events. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using administrative and clinical data. SETTING: Single pediatric critical care transport provider in Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: All pediatric care transports between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2010. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was in-transit critical events, defined by an adaptation of a recent consensus definition. In-transit critical events occurred in 1,094 (12.3%) of 8,889 transports. Hypotension (3.6%), tachycardia (3.7%), and bradycardia (3.3%) were the most common critical events. Crews performed medical interventions in 194 transports (2.2%). The frequency and makeup of critical events varied across patient age groups. Age, pretransport mechanical ventilation, pretransport cardiovascular instability, transport duration, scene calls, and paramedic crew level were independently associated with increased risk of in-transit critical events in multivariate analysis. A Transport Pediatric Early Warning Score of 7 or greater predicted in-transit critical events with high specificity but low sensitivity (92.0% and 20.0%, respectively), but was not superior of the combination of pretransport mechanical ventilation and pretransport cardiovascular instability (sensitivity and specificity of 12.6% and 97.4%, respectively). Removal of early warning signs from the definition resulted in critical event rates comparable to those published in adults and improved predictive performance. CONCLUSIONS: Using new consensus definitions of transport-related critical events, we found critical events occurred in almost one in eight transports, and were strongly associated with pretransport cardiovascular instability. Transport Pediatric Early Warning Score was poorly predictive of in-transit critical events, and was not superior to the presence of pretransport mechanical ventilation and cardiovascular instability. Future prospective studies are required to elucidate the optimal matching of transport resources to patients, in particular those with both pretransport cardiovascular instability and mechanical ventilation.

Emergent and Urgent Transfers to Neurosurgical Centers in Ontario.

Critically ill neurosurgical patients require expedient access to neurosurgical centers (NC) to improve outcome. In regionalized health systems patients are often initially evaluated at a non-neurosurgical center (NNC) and are subsequently transferred to a NC using air or ground vehicles. We sought to identify barriers to accessing a NC for critically ill patients by analyzing interfacility transfer times and referral patterns in the province of Ontario. A retrospective observational analysis was undertaken. The cohort included patients in Ontario with emergent and urgent neurologic pathologies who underwent transfer from a NNC to NC between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2013. Timing, clinical, and geographic data were collected for each transfer. We identified 1103 emergent/urgent transfers. The median transfer time to a NC was 3.4 h (IQR -2.2, 3.8) and varied by the geographic region of origin. A total of 17% of the patients bypassed a closer NC during transfer to their destination NC. Transfers that bypassed a closer NC travelled further (101 miles vs. 296 miles, p < 0.001), took longer (3.1 h vs. 3.9 h, p < 0.001), and in some regions were associated with a higher risk of in-transit clinical decline (3.0% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.05) when compared with transfers that ended at the closest NC. Regionalization of neurosurgical services in Ontario has led to heavy reliance upon patient transfers to maintain continuity of care. Access to a NC varied across the province, which may represent regional differences in neurosurgical bed availability, resource limitations at smaller NCs, or environmental factors. Our descriptions of referral patterns and transport times can guide health system planning in Ontario and similar jurisdictions in the United States and Canada.

Intra-aortic Balloon Pump-Dependent Patient Transports by Critical Care Paramedics.

OBJECTIVE: Transport of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)-dependent patients between hospitals is increasingly common. The transports are typically time-sensitive and require personnel familiar with IABP operation and management of a potentially unstable patient. This study examined transports performed by specially trained critical care paramedics in a large air medical and land critical care transport service. METHODS: This retrospective, descriptive review prospectively collected data for IABP-dependent patient transports in Ontario, Canada in a 10-year interval beginning September 2003. Call records and patient care reports were reviewed to capture demographic, patient care, adverse events, and transport-related data. Adverse events, including resuscitation medication, procedure, and patient instability, were independently reviewed by 2 investigators. RESULTS: There were 162 IABP-dependent patients transported. Seventy-one were performed by land critical care transport vehicles, 60 by helicopter, and 31 by fixed wing aircraft. The mean patient age was 63.7 ± 13.8 years; the majority (72.2%) were men. Fifty-nine patients (36.4%) were inotrope or vasopressor dependent, and 46 (28.4%) were intubated and mechanically ventilated. The most common indications for IABP insertion were acute myocardial infarction requiring prompt surgical intervention (n = 70), bridge to definitive care (n = 41), and cardiogenic shock (n = 37). The mean transport time was 92.7 ± 79.4 minutes. There were 48 adverse events in 35 patients, most commonly hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg, n = 18) and tachyarrhythmia requiring therapy (n = 12). There were 3 IABP-related events and 3 cases in which the transport vehicle was inoperable resulting in a transport delay. One patient with cardiogenic shock died before departing the sending hospital. Paramedics managed all events without assistance from other health care personnel. CONCLUSION: Specially trained critical care flight paramedics can safely transport potentially unstable IABP-dependent patients to definitive cardiac surgical care.

Post-medication Hypotension after Administration of Sedatives and Opioids during Critical Care Transport.

OBJECTIVE: Identification of modifiable risk factors for hypotension during critical care transport is important to optimize patient preparation, crew training, and patient safety. We set out to determine the incidence of hemodynamic deterioration after administration of opioids or sedatives during critical care transport, and identify patient- and transport-level predictors. METHODS: We assembled a retrospective cohort of adults undergoing urgent critical care transport between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2010. The primary outcome was post-medication hypotension, defined by new hypotension or new vasopressor within 10 minutes of medication administration. RESULTS: Opioids or sedatives were administered 28,592 times in 8,328 patient transports, with 159 episodes of post-medication hypotension (0.6% of all medication administrations). Mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.9; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 2.7-8.9), baseline vasopressor requirement (adjusted OR 2.1; 95%CI 1.3-3.4), transport duration (adjusted OR 1.5; 95%CI 1.1-2.2) per log unit increment of duration), surgical diagnosis (adjusted OR 4.1; 95%CI 1.6-10.7 compared to trauma), and ACP crew level (adjusted OR 2.4 compared to baseline of CCP; 95%CI 1.5-3.8) were all associated with an increased odds of post-medication hypotension. ACP crew level remained associated with increased post-medication hypotension in a sensitivity analysis of 1,242 propensity-matched pairs (crude OR for ACP vs. CCP 3.0; 95%CI 1.4-6.5). CONCLUSIONS: Post-medication hypotension occurred once in every 160 drug administrations and was associated with mechanical ventilation, baseline hemodynamic instability, transport duration, surgical diagnosis, and ACP crew. These findings provide targets for improvements in patient preparation, crew training, and clinical practices.

Increased trauma center volume is associated with improved survival after severe injury: results of a Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between trauma center volume and outcome. BACKGROUND: The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium is a network of 11 centers and 60 hospitals conducting emergency care research. For many procedures, high-volume centers demonstrate superior outcomes versus low-volume centers. This remains controversial for trauma center outcomes. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium multicenter out-of-hospital Hypertonic Saline Trial in patients with Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less (traumatic brain injury) or systolic blood pressure of 90 or less and pulse of 110 or more (shock). Regression analyses evaluated associations between trauma volume and the following outcomes: 24-hour mortality, 28-day mortality, ventilator-free days, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Scale incidence, worst Multiple Organ Dysfunction Scale score, and poor 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score. RESULTS: A total of 2070 patients were evaluated: 1251 in the traumatic brain injury cohort and 819 in the shock cohort. Overall, 24-hour and 28-day mortality was 16% and 25%, respectively. For every increase of 500 trauma center admissions, there was a 7% decreased odds of 24-hour and 28-day mortality for all patients. As trauma center volume increased, nonorgan dysfunction complications increased, ventilator-free days increased, and worst Multiple Organ Dysfunction Scale score decreased. The associations with higher trauma center volume were similar for the traumatic brain injury cohort, including better neurologic outcomes at 6 months, but not for the shock cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Increased trauma center volume was associated with increased survival, more ventilator-free days, and less severe organ failure. Trauma system planning and implementation should avoid unnecessary duplication of services.

Critical events during land-based interfacility transport.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The risks associated with urgent land-based transport of critically ill patients are not well known and have important implications for patient safety, care delivery, and policy development. We seek to determine the incidence of in-transit critical events and associated patient- and transport-level factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using clinical and administrative data. We included adults undergoing urgent land-based critical care transport by a dedicated transport provider between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2010. The primary outcome was in-transit critical event, defined by adverse events or resuscitative procedures. RESULTS: In-transit critical events were observed in 333 (6.5%) of 5,144 urgent land transports. New hypotension (4.4%) or new vasopressors (1.6%) were the most common critical events, with fewer respiratory events (1.3%). Advanced care paramedics had a higher rate compared with critical care paramedics (odds ratio [OR] 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 2.2), especially for patients with baseline hemodynamic instability. In multivariate analysis, mechanical ventilation (adjusted OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.2), baseline hemodynamic instability (adjusted OR 3.7; 95% CI 2.8 to 4.9), out-of-hospital duration (adjusted OR 3.6; 95% CI 2.9 to 4.5 per log-fold increase in time), and neurologic diagnosis (adjusted OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3 to 0.7 compared with that of medical patients) were associated with critical events. CONCLUSION: Critical events occurred in approximately 1 in 15 transports and were associated with mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic instability, and transport duration, and were less frequent in neurologic patients. The finding that hypotension is common and predicted by pretransport hemodynamic instability has implications for the preparation and management of this patient group.