Anti-Platelet Aggregation and Anti-Cyclooxygenase Activities for a Range of Coffee Extracts (Coffea arabica).

Coffee is rich in caffeine (CF), chlorogenic acid (CGA) and phenolics. Differing types of coffee beverages and brewing procedures may result in differences in total phenolic contents (TPC) and biological activities. Inflammation and increases of platelet activation and aggregation can lead to thrombosis. We focused on determining the chemical composition, antioxidant activity and inhibitory effects on agonist-induced platelet aggregation and cyclooxygenase (COX) of coffee beverages in relation to their preparation method. We prepared instant coffee and brewed coffee beverages using drip, espresso, and boiling techniques. Coffee extracts were assayed for their CF and CGA contents using HPLC, TPC using colorimetry, platelet aggregation with an aggregometer, and COX activity using ELISA. The findings have shown all coffee extracts, except the decaffeinated types, contained nearly equal amounts of CF, CGA, and TPC. Inhibitory effects of coffee extracts on platelet aggregation differed depending on the activation pathways induced by different agonists. All espresso, drip and boiled coffee extracts caused dose dependent inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by ADP, collagen, epinephrine, and arachidonic acid (ARA). The most marked inhibition was seen at low doses of collagen or ARA. Espresso and drip extracts inhibited collagen-induced platelet aggregation more than purified caffeine or CGA. Espresso, boiled and drip coffee extracts were also a more potent inhibitors of COX-1 and COX-2 than purified caffeine or CGA. We conclude that inhibition of platelet aggregation and COX-1 and COX-2 may contribute to anti-platelet and anti-inflammatory effects of espresso and drip coffee extracts.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Use in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Are These Drugs an Effective and Safe Alternative to Warfarin? A Systematic Review of the Literature: Comment.

We respond to comments by Dufrost et al. about the RAPS trial, in particular, showing that the trial did achieve its target sample size; pointing out that thrombin potential is not synonymous with overall thrombin generation; confirming that overall, no increased thrombotic risk was evident comparing rivaroxaban with warfarin; and that high-risk patients (28% were triple positive, representative of patients with venous thromboembolism requiring standard-intensity anticoagulation) were included; and clarifying our rationale for using a laboratory surrogate primary outcome measure instead of a clinical one.

Residual plasmatic activity of ADAMTS13 is correlated with phenotype severity in congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

The quantification of residual plasmatic ADAMTS13 activity in congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) patients is constrained by limitations in sensitivity and reproducibility of commonly used assays at low levels of ADAMTS13 activity, blunting efforts to establish genotype-phenotype correlations. In the present study, the residual plasmatic activity of ADAMTS13 was measured centrally by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (limit of detection = 0.5%) in 29 congenital TTP patients. The results were used to study correlations among ADAMTS13 genotype, residual plasmatic activity, and clinical phenotype severity. An ADAMTS13 activity above 0.5% was measured in 26 (90%) patients and lower levels of activity were associated with earlier age at first TTP episode requiring plasma infusion, more frequent recurrences, and prescription of fresh-frozen plasma prophylaxis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that activity levels of less than 2.74% and 1.61% were discriminative of age at first TTP episode requiring plasma infusion < 18 years, annual rate of TTP episodes > 1, and use of prophylaxis. Mutations affecting the highly conserved N-terminal domains of the protein were associated with lower residual ADAMTS13 activity and a more severe phenotype in an allelic-dose dependent manner. The results of the present study show that residual ADAMTS13 activity is associated with the severity of clinical phenotype in congenital TTP and provide insights into genotype-phenotype correlations.

Automated measurement of coagulation and fibrinolytic activation markers: Outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

BACKGROUND: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by marked hypoxaemia and lung oedema, often accompanied by disordered blood coagulation and fibrinolytic systems, endothelial damage and intravascular fibrin deposition. PATIENTS/METHODS: We present a retrospective observational study of 104 patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Plasma samples were collected within 72 h of admission. In addition to routine coagulation and haematology testing, soluble thrombomodulin (sTM), thrombin-antithrombin (TAT), tissue plasminogen activator-plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 complex (tPAI-C) and plasmin-α2 antiplasmin complex (PIC) were performed by automated chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassays. RESULTS: Significantly higher levels of D-dimer, TAT, sTM and tPAI-C were observed in non-survivors compared to survivors. To confirm which parameters were independent risk factors for mortality, multiple logistic regression was performed on D-dimer, TAT. sTM, tPAI-C and PIC data. Only increasing sTM was significantly associated with mortality, with an odds ratio of 1.065 for each 1.0 TU/mL increment (95% CI 1.025-1.115). CONCLUSIONS: Of the haemostatic variables measured, sTM, which can be rapidly assayed, is the best independent predictor of mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, and this suggests that endothelial dysfunction plays an important role in disease progression.

A performance evaluation of chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassays on the Sysmex CN-6500 haemostasis analyser.

BACKGROUND: The Sysmex CN-6500 is a new haemostasis analyser with an integrated immunoassay module that performs chemiluminescence enzyme assay (CLEIA) in addition to coagulation, turbidimetric, chromogenic and platelet aggregation tests. AIMS: To evaluate the analytical performance of the CN-6500 against the predicate device (Sysmex HISCL-800) for soluble thrombomodulin (TM), thrombin-antithrombin (TAT), tissue plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 complex (tPAI-C) and plasmin α2 plasmin inhibitor complex (PIC) assays. METHODS: Imprecision was assessed by testing two levels of quality control plasmas 10 times on 5 separate days. Comparability was studied in 230 plasmas from normal donors (n = 30), patients with suspected disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC, n = 100), sepsis (n = 20) or liver disease (n = 20), lipaemic (n = 20), haemolysed (n = 20) and icteric samples (n = 20). Limit of detection, limit of quantitation and linearity were determined by testing serial dilutions of normal plasma. Sample carryover was assessed by testing samples with high and low normal levels of the analytes concerned. RESULTS: The CN-6500 performed 21 CLEIA tests per hour, while simultaneously performing coagulation tests. Acceptable between-run imprecision was obtained using commercial controls with normal and high activity for each analyte (%CV <4%), for all four assays. Excellent linearity was observed (slope 0.89-1.03; r2 >0.99) across the measurement range. The lower limits of detection and quantitation were as follows: TM <0.3/0.6 TU/ml, TAT >0.1/<0.2 ng/ml, PIC <0.004/<0.008 µg/ml and tPAI-C < 0.01/<0.1 ng/ml, respectively. All four assays showed excellent correlation between analysers and were unaffected by haemolysis, icterus or lipaemia. No carryover was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that the performance of the CLEIA assays on the CN-6500 is comparable to that of a stand-alone immunoassay analyser.

Comparison of Acquired Activated Protein C Resistance, Using the CAT and ST-Genesia® Analysers and Three Thrombin Generation Methods, in APS and SLE Patients.

BACKGROUND: Acquired activated protein C resistance (APCr) has been identified in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). OBJECTIVE: To assess agreement between the ST-Genesia® and CAT analysers in identifying APCr prevalence in APS/SLE patients, using three thrombin generation (TG) methods. METHODS: APCr was assessed with the ST-Genesia using STG-ThromboScreen and with the CAT using recombinant human activated protein C and Protac® in 105 APS, 53 SLE patients and 36 thrombotic controls. Agreement was expressed in % and by Cohen's kappa coefficient. RESULTS: APCr values were consistently lower with the ST-Genesia® compared to the CAT, using either method, in both APS and SLE patients. Agreement between the two analysers in identifying APS and SLE patients with APCr was poor (≤65.9%, ≤0.20) or fair (≤68.5%, ≥0.29), regardless of TG method, respectively; no agreement was observed in thrombotic controls. APCr with both the ST Genesia and the CAT using Protac®, but not the CAT using rhAPC, was significantly greater in triple antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) APS patients compared to double/single aPL patients (p < 0.04) and in thrombotic SLE patients compared to non-thrombotic SLE patients (p < 0.05). Notably, the ST-Genesia®, unlike the CAT, with either method, identified significantly greater APCr in pregnancy morbidity (median, confidence intervals; 36.9%, 21.9-49.0%) compared to thrombotic (45.7%, 39.6-55.5%) APS patients (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Despite the broadly similar methodology used by CAT and ST-Genesia®, agreement in APCr was poor/fair, with results not being interchangeable. This may reflect differences in the TG method, use of different reagents, and analyser data handling.

Point-of-care testing in haemostasis.

Point-of-care testing (POCT) in haematology has seen a significant increase in both the spectrum of tests available and the number of tests performed annually. POCT is frequently undertaken with the belief that this will reduce the turnaround time for results and so improve patient care. The most obvious example of POCT in haemostasis is the out-of-hospital monitoring of the International Normalized Ratio in patients receiving a vitamin K antagonist, such as warfarin. Other areas include the use of the Activated Clotting Time to monitor anticoagulation for patients on cardio-pulmonary bypass, platelet function testing to identify patients with apparent aspirin or clopidogrel resistance and thrombelastography to guide blood product replacement during cardiac and hepatic surgery. In contrast to laboratory testing, POCT is frequently undertaken by untrained or semi-trained individuals and in many cases is not subject to the same strict quality control programmes that exist in the central laboratory. Although external quality assessment programmes do exist for some POCT assays these are still relatively few. The use of POCT in haematology, particularly in the field of haemostasis, is likely to expand and it is important that systems are in place to ensure that the generated results are accurate and precise.

The impact of elective knee/hip replacement surgery and thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban or dalteparin on thrombin generation.

Total hip/knee replacement surgeries are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and post-operative thromboprophylaxis has become standard treatment. This study aimed to: (i) assess the impact of hip/knee replacement surgery on ex vivo thrombin generation (TG), prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 (F1 + 2), thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT) and D-dimer; (ii) compare the anticoagulant effects of dalteparin and rivaroxaban on TG 24 h after surgery. Haemostatic variables were assessed in plasma samples of 51 patients taken pre-operatively, peri-operatively, and 24 h post-operatively. Prophylaxis, once a day, with dalteparin or rivaroxaban, starting 6­8 h post-operatively, was administered in 25 (14 knee/11 hip) and 26 patients (13 knee/13 hip) respectively. TG, F1 + 2, TAT and D-dimer increased during surgery. Dalteparin patients showed a variable TG response 24 h after surgery: conversely, the effect of rivaroxaban on TG was consistent across individuals. Good correlation was seen between rivaroxaban levels and TG-lag-time (rs = 0·46, P = 0·01); TG-time-to-Peak (rs = 0·53, P = 0·005); TG-peak-thrombin (rs = −0·59, P = 0·001); and TG-velocity-index-rate (rs = −0·61, P = 0·0009). Patients who received rivaroxaban showed a greater decrease of TG, F1 + 2 and TAT (but not D-dimer) than those on dalteparin. TG increases during hip/knee replacement surgery. Rivaroxaban inhibits TG more than dalteparin at 24 h after surgery.

A practical method for reducing the interference due to lipaemia in coagulation tests.

INTRODUCTION: Plasma samples with gross lipaemia present a challenge for coagulation laboratories using optical analysers. High-speed centrifugation may be used to remove excess lipids but it has not established whether this affects haemostasis tests. The aims were to determine whether the removal of lipid by centrifugation affects PT, APTT, fibrinogen, D-dimer and von Willebrand factor activity measurements. METHODS: Twenty-six lipaemic samples (median [range]): triglyceride 4.6 mmol/L [0.5-17.0]; cholesterol: 4.06 mmol/L [2.20-9.41] and 20 plasmas spiked with Intralipid 20 or lipid isolated from patient plasmas (median triglyceride of 11.95 mmol/L [5.0-17.0] and cholesterol 4.33 [3.22-7.06]), were tested before and after the removal of the lipid layer by centrifugation (10000 g for 10 minutes). Tests were performed using the CS-5100 (Sysmex) coagulation analyser. RESULTS: Thirteen, 9, 3 and 1 of the lipaemic or spiked samples failed to give PT, APTT, fibrinogen and D-dimer results, respectively. Centrifugation significantly reduced triglyceride (median 2.7, [0-6.1 mmol/L]) and cholesterol (median 0.52 [0-3.5]), allowing clot detection in all tests. There were no statistically significant differences in fibrinogen, D-dimer or VWF levels in samples before and after lipid removal. A small but clinically insignificant change in PT and APTT was observed after lipid removal. CONCLUSION: High-speed centrifugation reduces lipaemia sufficiently to allow testing on an optical coagulation analyser without introducing clinically significant differences PT, APTT, fibrinogen, D-dimer or VWF activity values.

A comparative evaluation of the CN-6000 haemostasis analyser using coagulation, amidolytic, immuno-turbidometric and light transmission aggregometry assays.

BACKGROUND: The CN-6000 (Sysmex Corp.) is a new haemostasis analyser with blood coagulation, amidolytic, immuno-turbidometric and light transmission aggregometry (LTA) capabilities. Transmitted light is monitored at multiple wavelengths (340, 405, 575, 660, 800 nm), from an LED light source. AIMS: To evaluate the performance of the CN-6000 against a predicate device. METHODS: The CN-6000 was evaluated against the CS-5100 (Sysmex) for 14 different tests, using 880 samples from normal subjects, anticoagulated patients, critically ill patients, plasmas with high or low fibrinogen content or abnormal levels of interfering substances. Between-day assay imprecision was assessed using commercial QC materials (n = 10 replicates on each of 5 days). RESULTS: Acceptable levels of imprecision were obtained for all assays. Agreement between the two analysers was excellent for all assays. Throughput was 35% higher using the CN-6000 (337 vs 250 tests per hour for PT, aPTT and fibrinogen). The CN-6000 also demonstrated improved clot detection in plasmas with high levels of interfering substances as demonstrated by a 29% reduction in "vote-outs" due to low light transmission (24 vs 34). CONCLUSIONS: The CN-6000 demonstrated excellent comparability with the predicate instrument and acceptable levels of imprecision in all assays. Improvements in throughput and clot detection in the presence of interfering substances were also shown.

Dual effect of Platelet Factor 4 on the activities of Factor Xa.

Platelet Factor 4 (PF4) prevents inhibition of blood coagulation proteases by heparin via formation of a putative enzyme-PF4 complex. To investigate the contribution of the latter, the activity of factor Xa (fXa) was determined in chromogenic assays measuring hydrolysis of a peptide substrate S2765 or cleavage of the macromolecular substrate prothrombin in the activating complex, prothrombinase. Upon preincubation with fXa and heparin, PF4 at about 250 nM decreased the k(cat) of S2765 hydrolysis about fivefold and that of prothrombin activation about 25-fold. In the presence of saturating fVa, inhibition of fXa by PF4 was abolished, while in the presence of limiting fVa, PF4 altered the interaction of fXa with fVa. Interestingly, high concentrations of PF4 restored fXa activity toward S2765 and prothrombin, indicating a dual effect of PF4 on fXa activities. These findings suggest that PF4 in the presence of heparin is an allosteric effector of the prothrombinase complex.

Clinical and laboratory practice for lupus anticoagulant testing: An International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee survey.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines have contributed to more uniformity in the performance and interpretation of lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing. However, points to reconsider include testing for LA in patients on anticoagulation, cut-off values, and interpretation of results. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization committee (ISTH SSC) questionnaire was to capture the spectrum of clinical and laboratory practice in LA detection, focusing on variability in practice, so that the responses could inform further ISTH SSC recommendations. METHODS: Members of the ISTH SSC on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies and participants of the Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies Programme of the External quality Control of diagnostic Assays and Tests Foundation were invited to complete a questionnaire on LA testing that was placed on the ISTH website using RedCap, with data tallied using simple descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There was good agreement on several key recommendations in the ISTH and other guidelines on LA testing, such as sample processing, principles of testing, choice of tests, repeat testing to confirm persistent positivity and the use of interpretative reporting. However, the results highlight that there is less agreement on some other aspects, including the timing of testing in relation to thrombosis or pregnancy, testing in patients on anticoagulation, cut-off values, and calculation and interpretation of results. CONCLUSIONS: Although some of the variability in practice in LA testing reflects the lack of substantive data to underpin evidence-based recommendations, a more uniform approach, based on further guidance, should reduce the inter-center variability of LA testing.

Comparison of real world and core laboratory lupus anticoagulant results from the Antiphospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and International Networking (APS ACTION) clinical database and repository.

BACKGROUND: Variability remains a challenge in lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing. OBJECTIVE: To validate LA test performance between Antiphospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and International Networking (APS ACTION) Core laboratories and examine agreement in LA status between Core and local/hospital laboratories contributing patients to this prospective registry. METHODS: Five Core laboratories used the same reagents, analyzer type, protocols, and characterized samples for LA validation. Non-anticoagulated registry samples were retested at the corresponding regional Core laboratories and anticoagulated samples at a single Core laboratory. Categorical agreement and discrepancies in LA status between Core and local/hospital laboratories were analyzed. RESULTS: Clotting times for the reference/characterized plasmas used for normalized ratios were similar between Core laboratories (CV <4%); precision and agreement for LA positive/negative plasma were similar (all CV ≤5%) in the four laboratories that completed both parts of the validation exercise; 418 registry samples underwent LA testing. Agreement for LA positive/negative status between Core and local/hospital laboratories was observed in 87% (115/132) non-anticoagulated and 77% (183/237) anticoagulated samples. However, 28.7% (120/418) of samples showed discordance between the Core and local/hospital laboratories or equivocal LA results. Some of the results of the local/hospital laboratories might have been unreliable in 24.7% (41/166) and 23% (58/252) of the total non-anticoagulated and anticoagulated samples, respectively. Equivocal results by the Core laboratory might have also contributed to discordance. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratories can achieve good agreement in LA performance by use of the same reagents, analyzer type, and protocols. The standardized Core laboratory results underpin accurate interpretation of APS ACTION clinical data.

Performance evaluation of a new small-volume coagulation monitor: the SmartCheck INR system.

The SmartCheck INR (Unipath, Bedford, England) is a point-of-care device for professional and patient self-monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy. It measures the international normalized ratio (INR) and assesses test strip integrity, temperature, and sample quality. No significant differences were found in SmartCheck INR results from 3 different instruments or in 3 test-strip lots. Within run imprecision was 0.89% and 6.36% for low and high control samples, respectively (mean INR, 0.99 and 4.08, respectively). Comparability was assessed in 68 patients receiving warfarin by using PTHS Plus (Instrumentation Laboratory, Lexington, MA) and Innovin (Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany) thromboplastins. Good correlations were observed between the methods (r = 0.89 and r = 0.90, respectively) with no significant differences in means: SmartCheck INR, 2.82; Innovin, 2.75; PTHS Plus, 2.74. Clinical agreement with laboratory methods was 88% for Innovin and 97% for PTHS Plus. The SmartCheck INR was easy to use with no mechanical failures during the evaluation and a low test-strip failure rate of 4.7%. The SmartCheck INR provides accurate and reproducible results and is suitable for routine monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy in the majority of patients.

Detection of acquired resistance to activated protein C associated with antiphospholipid antibodies using a novel clotting assay.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPA) frequently interfere with the protein C pathway. This manifests as acquired activated protein C (APC) resistance in the absence of factor V Leiden and has been proposed as a putative mechanism for the pathogenesis of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We have developed a Russell's viper venom test, performed with and without activation of endogenous protein C, which is sensitive to aPA-associated APC resistance. Results were reported as the endogenous APC ratio (EAPCr); the ratio of the two clotting times normalized against pooled normal plasma. Forty-four patients with aPA, anticardiolipin and/or lupus anticoagulant, including 34 with a history of thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity; a control group of aPA-negative patients; and 26 healthy normals were studied. EAPCr (mean, SD) was significantly higher in APS patients (1.94, 0.58) than normals (0.98, 0.12) or controls (1.14, 0.19; P < 0.00001). Elevated EAPCr (> 1.22) occurred in 91% of aPA-positive patients, predominantly due to resistance to APC (87%) rather than prolonged basal clotting times alone (15%). Significant correlation was observed between the EAPCr value and dilute Russell's viper venom time (rs = 0.44, P = 0.003), IgG anticardiolipin (rs = 0.54, P = 0.002), protein S (r = -0.46, P = 0.01) and activated partial thromboplastin time-based APC resistance (r = -0.61, P = 0.001). There was no significant relationship between EAPCr and protein C concentration, anti-beta2-glycoprotein-I (anti-beta2GPI) or IgM anticardiolipin. Purified aPA IgG caused a dose-dependent increase in APC resistance when added to normal plasma. We conclude that aPA-associated acquired APC resistance is a common feature of APS and may be independent of anti-beta2GPI.

Plasma factor XIII level variations during menstrual cycle.

Factor XIII (FXIII) has an important role in the control of bleeding through fibrin cross-linking; however, its effect within the menstrual cycle is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to examine changes in FXIII activity during the normal menstrual cycle and correlate FXIII activity with menstrual blood loss. A total of 32 healthy normal women of reproductive age were recruited. Menstrual blood loss was measured using the pictorial blood-assessment chart (PBAC). A bleeding score questionnaire was also completed. Blood samples were taken during the menstrual, proliferative, periovulatory, secretory and premenstrual phase for assessment of FXIII level. The mean ±â€ŠSD FXIII level was lowest during menstrual and periovulatory phases (114 ±â€Š23 and 114 ±â€Š21 IU/dl, respectively). Mean FXIII level during the secretory and premenstrual phases were higher than the menstrual phase (P = 0.036). Mean secretory phase FXIII was also significantly higher compared with the periovulatory phase (P = 0.02). There was no significant correlation between FXIII level during the menstrual phase and age (P = 0.53) or PBAC score (P = 0.53). There were no significant differences in FXIII level during the menstrual phase between women with PBAC scores of at least 100 (n = 14; mean 116 IU/dl) and women with PBAC scores less than 100 (n = 18; mean 113 IU/dl). There was no correlation between FXIII level and bleeding score. FXIII activity was lower during menstrual and periovulatory phases of the cycle. However, the small difference between mean values (8 IU/dl) would be unlikely to have a significant impact on diagnosis of FXIII deficiency and clinical management.

Rivaroxaban versus warfarin to treat patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (RAPS): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2/3, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban is established for the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism, but whether it is useful in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome is uncertain. METHODS: This randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2/3, non-inferiority trial, done in two UK hospitals, included patients with antiphospholipid syndrome who were taking warfarin for previous venous thromboembolism, with a target international normalised ratio of 2·5. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to continue with warfarin or receive 20 mg oral rivaroxaban daily. Randomisation was done centrally, stratified by centre and patient type (with vs without systemic lupus erythematosus). The primary outcome was percentage change in endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) from randomisation to day 42, with non-inferiority set at less than 20% difference from warfarin in mean percentage change. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. Other thrombin generation parameters, thrombosis, and bleeding were also assessed. Treatment effect was measured as the ratio of rivaroxaban to warfarin for thrombin generation. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN68222801. FINDINGS: Of 116 patients randomised between June 5, 2013, and Nov 11, 2014, 54 who received rivaroxaban and 56 who received warfarin were assessed. At day 42, ETP was higher in the rivaroxaban than in the warfarin group (geometric mean 1086 nmol/L per min, 95% CI 957-1233 vs 548, 484-621, treatment effect 2·0, 95% CI 1·7-2·4, p<0·0001). Peak thrombin generation was lower in the rivaroxaban group (56 nmol/L, 95% CI 47-66 vs 86 nmol/L, 72-102, treatment effect 0·6, 95% CI 0·5-0·8, p=0·0006). No thrombosis or major bleeding were seen. Serious adverse events occurred in four patients in each group. INTERPRETATION: ETP for rivaroxaban did not reach the non-inferiority threshold, but as there was no increase in thrombotic risk compared with standard-intensity warfarin, this drug could be an effective and safe alternative in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and previous venous thromboembolism. FUNDING: Arthritis Research UK, Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, LUPUS UK, Bayer, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre.