Gametic selection favours polyandry and selfing.

Competition among pollen or sperm (gametic selection) can cause evolution. Mating systems shape the intensity of gametic selection by determining the competitors involved, which can in turn cause the mating system itself to evolve. We model the bidirectional relationship between gametic selection and mating systems, focusing on variation in female mating frequency (monandry-polyandry) and self-fertilisation (selfing-outcrossing). First, we find that monandry and selfing both reduce the efficiency of gametic selection in removing deleterious alleles. This means that selfing can increase mutation load, in contrast to cases without gametic selection where selfing purges deleterious mutations and decreases mutation load. Second, we explore how mating systems evolve via their effect on gametic selection. By manipulating gametic selection, polyandry can evolve to increase the fitness of the offspring produced. However, this indirect advantage of post-copulatory sexual selection is weak and is likely to be overwhelmed by any direct fitness effects of mating systems. Nevertheless, gametic selection can be potentially decisive for selfing evolution because it significantly reduces inbreeding depression, which favours selfing. Thus, the presence of gametic selection could be a key factor driving selfing evolution.

Locally adaptive inversions in structured populations.

Inversions have been proposed to facilitate local adaptation, by linking together locally coadapted alleles at different loci. Prior work addressing this question theoretically has considered the spread of inversions in "continent-island" scenarios in which there is a unidirectional flow of maladapted migrants into the island population. In this setting, inversions capturing locally adaptive haplotypes are most likely to invade when selection is weak, because stronger local selection (i) more effectively purges maladaptive alleles and (ii) generates linkage disequilibrium between adaptive alleles, thus lessening the advantage of inversions. We show this finding only holds under limited conditions by studying the establishment of inversions in a more general two-deme model, which explicitly considers the dynamics of allele frequencies in both populations linked by bidirectional migration. In this model, the level of symmetry between demes can be varied from complete asymmetry (continent-island) to complete symmetry. For symmetric selection and migration, strong selection increases the allele frequency divergence between demes thereby increasing the frequency of maladaptive alleles in migrants, favoring inversions-the opposite of the pattern seen in the asymmetric continent-island scenario. We also account for the likelihood that a new inversion captures an adaptive haplotype in the first instance. When considering the combined process of capture and invasion in "continent island" and symmetric scenarios, relatively strong selection increases inversion establishment probability. Migration must also be low enough that the inversion is likely to capture an adaptive allele combination, but not so low as to eliminate the inversion's advantage. Overall, our analysis suggests that inversions are likely to harbor larger effect alleles that experience relatively strong selection.