Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 86(1): 61-67, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34153386

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many women affected by hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are of childbearing age. To date, the literature is limited on pregnancy-related outcomes for women with HS. OBJECTIVE: To investigate maternal and obstetric outcomes and treatment utilization among women with HS. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims Database. Pregnant women with HS (n = 998) and 5:1 age-matched pregnant women without HS (n = 5065) were identified and information on claims related to diagnoses, procedures, and medications were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared to women without HS, pregnant women with HS had significantly lower odds of having a live birth (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.51) and significantly higher odds of having elective terminations (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.13-2.96), gestational hypertension (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.12-1.84), and cesarean deliveries (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.06-1.55), and of receiving HS designated treatment during pregnancy (OR, 4.41; 95% CI, 3.56-5.46). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective and convenience sampling and absence of clinical information to correlate HS severity and outcomes. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with HS have an increased probability of select complicated maternal and obstetric outcomes. Women planning for pregnancy or who are currently pregnant may benefit from coordinated care by dermatologists and obstetric providers.


Asunto(s)
Hidradenitis Supurativa , Bases de Datos Factuales , Familia , Femenino , Hidradenitis Supurativa/complicaciones , Hidradenitis Supurativa/epidemiología , Hidradenitis Supurativa/terapia , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Matern Child Health J ; 17(1): 180-8, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22392601

RESUMEN

The study objectives are to describe child care type and quality experienced by developmentally at-risk children, examine quality differences between Head Start and non-Head Start settings, and identify factors associated with receiving higher-quality child care. Data are analyzed from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey, Birth Cohort, a prospective study of a nationally representative sample of US children born in 2001. The sample consisted of 7,500 children who were assessed at 48 months of age. The outcome of interest is child care quality, measured by the Early Childhood Environmental Rating Scale (center care) and the Family Day Care Rating Scale (family day care). Results of descriptive and multivariate regression analyses are presented. Less than one-third of poor children were in Head Start. Child care quality was higher in Head Start centers than other centers, particularly among poor children (4.75 vs. 4.28, p < 0.001), Hispanics (4.90 vs. 4.45, p < 0.001), and whites (4.89 vs. 4.51, p < 0.001). African Americans experienced the lowest quality care in both Head Start and non-Head Start centers. Quality disadvantage was associated with Head Start family care settings, especially for low birthweight children (2.04 in Head Start vs. 3.58 in non-Head Start, p < 0.001). Lower family day care quality was associated with less maternal education and African American and Hispanic ethnicity. Center-based Head Start provides higher quality child care for at-risk children, and expansion of these services will likely facilitate school readiness in these populations. Quality disadvantages in Head Start family day care settings are worrisome and warrant investigation.


Asunto(s)
Cuidado del Niño/normas , Intervención Educativa Precoz , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Peso al Nacer , Preescolar , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
Matern Child Health J ; 15(7): 1001-10, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20703786

RESUMEN

The objective of this paper is to examine patterns of cognitive delay at 24 and 48 months and quantify the effects of perinatal and sociodemographic risk factors on persistent and variable cognitive delay. Using data from 7,200 children in the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B), multiple logistic regression models identified significant predictors of low cognitive functioning at 24 and 48 months. Additional multiple logistic models predicting cognitive delay at 48 months were estimated separately for children with and without delay at 24 months. Of the nearly 1,000 children delayed at 24 months, 24.2% remained delayed by 48 months; 7.9% of the children not delayed at 24 months exhibited delay at 48 months. Low and very low birthweight increased cognitive delay risk at 24, but not 48 months. Low maternal education had a strongly increasing effect (OR = 2.3 at 24 months, OR = 13.7 at 48 months), as did low family income (OR = 1.4 at 24 months, OR = 7.0 at 48 months). Among children delayed at 24 months, low maternal education predicted delay even more strongly at 48 months (OR = 30.5). Low cognitive functioning is highly dynamic from 24 to 48 months. Although gestational factors including low birthweight increase children's risk of cognitive delay at 24 months, low maternal education and family income are more prevalent in the pediatric population and are much stronger predictors of both persistent and emerging delay between ages 24 and 48 months.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Atención Perinatal , Clase Social , Desarrollo Infantil , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Examen Neurológico , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
5.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 23(3): 186-98, 2009 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19775380

RESUMEN

Cognitively delayed children are at risk for poor mental and physical health throughout their lives. The economically disadvantaged and some race/ethnic groups are more likely to experience cognitive delay, but the age at which delays first emerge and the underlying mechanisms responsible for disparities are not well understood. The objective of this study was to determine when sociodemographic disparities in cognitive functioning emerge, and identify predictors of low cognitive functioning in early childhood. Data were from 7308 singleton and 1463 multiple births in the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort (ECLS-B), a nationally representative cohort of children born in the USA in 2001. Multiple logistic regression analyses examined associations between sociodemographic characteristics and low cognitive functioning at 9 and 24 months, and tested whether gestational and birth-related factors mediate these associations. Sociodemographic characteristics were statistically significant predictors of low cognitive functioning among singletons at 24 months, including the three lowest quintiles of socio-economic status [lowest quintile, odds ratio (OR) = 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI][1.7, 4.1]], non-white race/ethnicity (African American OR = 1.8 [95% CI 1.3, 2.5], Hispanic OR = 2.3 [95% CI 1.6, 3.2]), and gender (male OR = 2.1, [95% CI 1.7, 2.5]). Gestational and birth characteristics associated with low cognitive function at 9 months included very low and moderately low birthweight (OR = 55.0 [95% CI 28.3, 107.9] and OR = 3.6 [95% CI 2.6, 5.1]), respectively, and very preterm and moderately preterm delivery (OR = 3.6 [95% CI 2.0, 6.7] and OR = 2.4 [95% CI 1.7, 3.5]), respectively, but they had weaker effects by 24 months (ORs for birthweight: 3.7 [95% CI 2.3, 5.9] and 1.8 [95% CI 1.4, 2.3]; ORs for preterm: 1.8 [95% CI 1.1, 2.9] and 0.9 [95% CI 0.7, 1.3]). Results for multiple births were similar. Sociodemographic disparities in poor cognitive functioning emerged by 24 months of age, but were not mediated by gestational or birth characteristics. Further investigation of processes whereby social disadvantage adversely affects development prior to 24 months is needed.


Asunto(s)
Desarrollo Infantil/fisiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/epidemiología , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/epidemiología , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Examen Neurológico , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
7.
J Nutr ; 136(1): 159-65, 2006 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16365076

RESUMEN

Mounting evidence indicates that the amount and type of fat in the diet can have important effects on bone health. Most of this evidence is derived from animal studies. Of the few human studies that have been conducted, relatively small numbers of subjects and/or primarily female subjects were included. The present study assessed the relation of dietary fat to hip bone mineral density (BMD) in men and women using NHANES III data (n = 14,850). Multivariate models using SAS-callable SUDAAN were used to adjust for the sampling scheme. Models were adjusted for age, sex, weight, height, race, total energy and calcium intakes, smoking, and weight-bearing exercise. Data from women were further adjusted for use of hormone replacement therapy. Including dietary protein, vitamin C, and beta-carotene in the model did not influence the outcome. Analysis of covariance was used to generate mean BMD by quintile of total and saturated fat intake for 4 sex/age groups. Saturated fat intake was negatively associated with BMD at several hip sites. The greatest effects were seen among men < 50 y old (linear trend P = 0.004 for the femoral neck). For the femoral neck, adjusted mean BMD was 4.3% less among men with the highest compared with the lowest quintile of saturated fat intake (BMD, 95% CI: highest quintile: 0.922 g/cm2, 0.909-0.935; lowest quintile: 0.963 g/cm2, 95% CI: 0.950-0.976). These data indicate that BMD is negatively associated with saturated fat intake, and that men may be particularly vulnerable to these effects.


Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Grasas de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Grasas de la Dieta/efectos adversos , Grasas de la Dieta/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Osteoporosis/etiología , Distribución por Sexo , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA