RESUMEN
Cervical artery dissection is an important cause of stroke, particularly in young adults. Data conflict on the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected cervical artery dissection, leading to variability in practice. We aim to provide an overview of cervical artery dissection in the setting of minor or no reported mechanical trigger with a focus on summarizing the available evidence and providing suggestions on the diagnostic evaluation, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Writing group members drafted their sections using a literature search focused on publications between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2022, and included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies, meta-analyses, opinion papers, case series, and case reports. The writing group chair and vice chair compiled the manuscript and obtained writing group members' approval. Cervical artery dissection occurs as a result of the interplay among risk factors, minor trauma, anatomic and congenital abnormalities, and genetic predisposition. The diagnosis can be challenging both clinically and radiologically. In patients with acute ischemic stroke attributable to cervical artery dissection, acute treatment strategies such as thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are reasonable in otherwise eligible patients. We suggest that the antithrombotic therapy choice be individualized and continued for at least 3 to 6 months. The risk of recurrent dissection is low, and preventive measures may be considered early after the diagnosis and continued in high-risk patients. Ongoing longitudinal and population-based observational studies are needed to close the present gaps on preferred antithrombotic regimens considering clinical and radiographic prognosticators of cervical artery dissection.
Asunto(s)
Disección de la Arteria Carótida Interna , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral , Humanos , Adulto Joven , American Heart Association , Arterias , Disección de la Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico , Disección de la Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/diagnóstico , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , AdultoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This review aims to reinforce the importance of improving sex balance in preclinical trials and sex and gender diversity and proportional balance in clinical trials enrollment and how this influences interpretation of stroke clinical trials. It also aims to identify strategies for improvement in data collection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted of publications in English, using MeSH terms sex, sex characteristics, gender identity, transgender, gender-nonconforming persons, clinical trials as topic, stroke. Of 249 search results, 217 were human or animal studies related to stroke, the majority of which were reviews, secondary analyses of stroke clinical trials, meta analyses, or retrospective studies, subject to the methods of sex and gender acquisition per the primary data source. Articles were reviewed, noting inclusion or absence of sex and gender definitions and trial design. Selected articles were supplemented with United States Food and Drug Administration, National Institutes of Health, and National Academy of Science, Engineering, and Medicine publications. RESULTS: The majority of preclinical studies continue to report sex as a binary variable, and the majority of stroke clinical trials report sex and gender as interchangeable and binary. Mindful trial design and statistical analysis can improve accuracy in the interpretation of sex and gender differences. Guidance exists to improve reporting on currently accepted sex and gender definitions, recommended data collection instruments, and appropriate statistical analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Despite acknowledgement of having failed to achieve diverse and proportionally balanced enrollment, sex and gender imbalance across the research continuum remains prevalent. Responsible incorporation of sex and gender in stroke clinical trials can be achieved through thoughtful study design, use of contemporary sex and gender definitions, inclusive prospective data collection, balanced enrollment with prespecified goals, and appropriate statistical analysis.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Selección de Paciente , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Factores Sexuales , Animales , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Proyectos de Investigación , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Sujetos de Investigación , Identidad de Género , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
DNA methylation (DNAm)-based deconvolution estimates contain relative data, forming a composition, that standard methods (testing directly on cell proportions) are ill-suited to handle. In this study we examined the performance of an alternative method, analysis of compositions of microbiomes (ANCOM), for the analysis of DNAm-based deconvolution estimates. We performed two different simulation studies comparing ANCOM to a standard approach (two sample t-test performed directly on cell proportions) and analyzed a real-world data from the Women's Health Initiative to evaluate the applicability of ANCOM to DNAm-based deconvolution estimates. Our findings indicate that ANCOM can effectively account for the compositional nature of DNAm-based deconvolution estimates. ANCOM adequately controls the false discovery rate while maintaining statistical power comparable to that of standard methods.
DNA methylation (DNAm)-based deconvolution provides highly accurate estimates of the proportion of each cell type in a mixed-cell type biological sample (e.g., whole-blood). These estimates can be used for examining the association between cell type proportions and biological or clinical end points; for example, comparing the estimated neutrophil proportion in whole blood between smokers and non-smokers. Cell proportion data has unique features which present challenges for traditional and widely used statistical methods. In response to this issue, our work presents two simulation studies and a real-world analysis that benchmark the performance of current standard statistical methods against an alternative method called analysis composition of microbes (ANCOM), which was originally developed for the analysis of microbiome data. In our real-world analysis we used DNAm data collected from Women's Health Initiative Long Life Study I and compared the results of each method against a gold-standard that is typically not available for these analyses. In each of our simulation studies, ANCOM was able to detect true differences in cell proportions between the groups being compared but had a much lower rate of false discovery compared with the standard statistical methods. Our real-world analysis demonstrated similar findings. Overall, our study highlights the potential of ANCOM as a powerful and robust method for analyzing DNAm-derived deconvolution estimates when the interest is comparisons of cell type proportions and biological or clinical end points. ANCOM's ability to minimize false discovery while maintaining robust statistical power positions it as a valuable addition to the epigenomic analysis toolkit.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Understanding the current status of and temporal trends of stroke epidemiology by age, race, and stroke subtype is critical to evaluate past prevention efforts and to plan future interventions to eliminate existing inequities. We investigated trends in stroke incidence and case fatality over a 22-year time period. METHODS: In this population-based stroke surveillance study, all cases of stroke in acute care hospitals within a 5-county population of southern Ohio/northern Kentucky in adults aged ≥20 years were ascertained during a full year every 5 years from 1993 to 2015. Temporal trends in stroke epidemiology were evaluated by age, race (Black or White), and subtype (ischemic stroke [IS], intracranial hemorrhage [ICH], or subarachnoid hemorrhage [SAH]). Stroke incidence rates per 100,000 individuals from 1993 to 2015 were calculated using US Census data and age-standardized, race-standardized, and sex-standardized as appropriate. Thirty-day case fatality rates were also reported. RESULTS: Incidence rates for stroke of any type and IS decreased in the combined population and among White individuals (any type, per 100,000, 215 [95% CI 204-226] in 1993/4 to 170 [95% CI 161-179] in 2015, p = 0.015). Among Black individuals, incidence rates for stroke of any type decreased over the study period (per 100,000, 349 [95% CI 311-386] in 1993/4 to 311 [95% CI 282-340] in 2015, p = 0.015). Incidence of ICH was stable over time in the combined population and in race-specific subgroups, and SAH decreased in the combined groups and in White adults. Incidence rates among Black adults were higher than those of White adults in all time periods, and Black:White risk ratios were highest in adults in young and middle age groups. Case fatality rates were similar by race and by time period with the exception of SAH in which 30-day case fatality rates decreased in the combined population and White adults over time. DISCUSSION: Stroke incidence is decreasing over time in both Black and White adults, an encouraging trend in the burden of cerebrovascular disease in the US population. Unfortunately, however, Black:White disparities have not decreased over a 22-year period, especially among younger and middle-aged adults, suggesting the need for more effective interventions to eliminate inequities by race.