Many Moving Pieces: Virtual Preoperative Surgical Planning for Traumatic Occlusal Splints.

INTRODUCTION: Achieving anatomic reduction and re-establishing premorbid occlusion in patients with complex maxillomandibular fractures is challenging even for seasoned surgeons. Historically, surgeons have utilized occlusal splints to help establish occlusal relationships before fracture reduction and fixation. These acrylic splints are fabricated from dental impressions and require manual repositioning of tooth bearing segments along the fracture line to reapproximate premorbid occlusion. The process is laborious, requires a dental lab, and is less efficacious in edentulous patients or those with significantly comminuted fractures; as such it has largely fallen out of practice. Recently, with advances in virtual 3D modeling and printing, we demonstrate that occlusal splints can be designed from computed tomography scans, manipulated virtually, and printed without obtaining impressions from the patient. METHODS/RESULTS: In our series of 3 patients with complex maxillomandibular fractures, occlusal splints were created by 1) obtaining maxillofacial computed tomography scans, 2) reducing the fractures virtually, and 3) using orthognathic virtual surgery software to create the splint. The time between planning and delivery of the splint was 4 to 7 days. These splints were successfully utilized to help establish premorbid occlusion in conjunction with maxillomandibular fixation and aided in expeditious intraoperative fracture reduction and fixation. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of complex facial fractures, occlusal splints can be a useful adjunct in the operative reduction and fixation of fractures. With the advent of virtual preoperative surgical planning via 3D modeling and 3D printing, these occlusal splints can be created of a sufficient fidelity to avoid the strict need for dental impressions.

Novel Approach of Mandibular Distraction to Avoid Tracheostomy in KAT6B-related Gene Disorders.

Previously, severe upper airway obstruction in patients with retrognathia and glossoptosis has been managed with tracheostomy. However, tracheostomy is associated with significant morbidity. In recent years, mandibular distraction has become an alternative management strategy in infants, but these applications have been limited to patient populations with retrognathia and glossoptosis. The authors present 2 unique cases of patients with KAT6B-related gene disorders, who present with a paradox of tongue-based airway obstruction in the absence of retrognathia. In both cases mandibular distraction osteogenesis with an obliquely oriented vector was successfully performed and both children avoided the need for tracheostomy.

Predicting the Ideal Patient for Ambulatory Cleft Lip Repair.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) for cleft lip repair is increasing to reduce costs. This study better defines the patient population appropriate for ambulatory cleft repair with uplift modeling, a predictive analytics technique. METHODS: Pediatric patients who underwent cleft lip repair were identified in the 2007 to 2011 California Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database. The 2-model uplift approach was utilized using multivariate logistic regressions fit to assess the effect of ASCs, age, comorbidities, and procedure type on mortality or 30-day readmission. RESULTS: Of the pediatric cleft lip repairs in California between 2007 and 2011, 2383 (83%) were conducted in inpatient facilities and 498 (17%) in ASCs. The 30-day readmission rates were 2.01% and 1.93% for ASC repairs and inpatient repairs, respectively ( P = .909). Uplift modeling predicts that of the 2881 patients, approximately 40% of patients would have benefit from an ASC repair and an ASC repair would have had no effect on the remaining 60%. Patients likely to benefit from an ASC repair were more likely younger than 1 year old, nonsyndromic, not to have a respiratory or neurologic diagnosis, have less number of procedures, and to have undergone an isolated cleft lip repair. CONCLUSION: Uplift modeling predicts that approximately 40% of patients would benefit from an ASC cleft lip repair. Targeting patients younger than 1 year old, nonsyndromic, with no respiratory or neurologic diagnosis for ASC cleft lip repair, may be a safe and cost-saving endeavor.

Age at Time of Craniosynostosis Repair Predicts Increased Complication Rate.

OBJECTIVE: This study uses administrative data to assess the optimal timing for surgical repair of craniosynostosis and to identify factors associated with risk of perioperative complications. DESIGN: Statistical analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database (2006, 2009, 2012). SETTING: KID-participating hospitals in 44 states. PATIENTS: Children 0 to 3 years of age with ICD-9 codes for surgical correction of craniosynostosis (756 and 0124, 0125, 0201, 0203, 0204, or 0206). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Age-based cohorts were assessed for perioperative complications. We performed a multivariable analysis to determine characteristics associated with increased risk of complications. RESULTS: 21 million admissions were screened and 8417 visits met criteria for inclusion. Seventy-five percent of procedures occurred before age 1. Complications occurred in 8.6% of patients: 6.6% of patients at age 0 to 6 months, 10.3% of patients aged 7 to 12 months, and 13.9% of patients 12 to 36 months. Patients with acrocephalosyndactyly or associated congenital anomalies experienced complications in 22.9% of cases (OR = 3.07, 95% CI = 2.33, 4.03). CONCLUSION: Craniosynostosis repair is safe; however, the risk of complications increases with age at intervention. Presence of a syndromic congenital deformity at any age carries the greatest increased risk of perioperative complications. This suggests that optimal timing of intervention is within the first year of life, especially in those cases with additional factors increasing perioperative risk. These data support the importance of counseling patients of the increased risk associated with delaying craniosynostosis repair.

Is resurfacing arthroplasty appropriate for posttraumatic osteoarthritis?

BACKGROUND: High survival has been reported for resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with femoral deformities. Also, hardware removal may not always be necessary with resurfacing arthroplasty and may eliminate some of the difficulties performing total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with posttraumatic osteoarthritis. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked: (1) are survivorship higher in patients who underwent resurfacing arthroplasty compared with patients with nontraumatic osteoarthritis; and (2) are those higher compared with all patients who have resurfacing? METHODS: We identified 29 patients (29 hips) who had hip resurfacing for posttraumatic arthritis. These were compared with a matched cohort who had hip resurfacings for nontraumatic osteoarthritis and to all patients who underwent hip resurfacing for osteoarthritis during this time. The mean age was 47 years and mean body mass index was 27 kg/m(2). Survivorship and Harris hip scores were compared. Radiographs were evaluated for signs of radiolucencies, penciling, or osteolysis. The mean followup was 39 months (range, 24-99 months). RESULTS: The 5-year survivorship was 90% in the posttraumatic group, 93% in the matched osteoarthritis group, and 97% in the entire osteoarthritis cohort. The mean Harris hip score for the posttraumatic group at last followup was 90 points. Other than the patients who underwent revision, we observed no radiographic radiolucencies or loosening in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The survival of resurfacing arthroplasty appears comparable to THA in posttraumatic osteoarthritis and for resurfacing in patients with osteoarthritis. Therefore, resurfacing may present an alternative treatment to THA in these patients.

A Leg to Stand on: Trauma Center Designation and Association with Rate of Limb Salvage in Patients Suffering Severe Lower Extremity Injury.

BACKGROUND: Mangled extremities are one of the most difficult injuries for trauma surgeons to manage. We compare limb salvage rates for a limb-threatening lower extremity injuries managed at Level I vs Level II trauma centers (TCs). STUDY DESIGN: We identified all adult patients with a limb-threatening injury who underwent primary amputation or limb salvage (LS) using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program database at ACS Level I vs II TCs between 2007 and 2017. A limb-threatening injury was defined as an open tibial fracture with concurrent arterial injury (Gustilo type IIIc). Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were performed to minimize confounding by indication. RESULTS: There were 712 records for analysis; 391 (54.9%) LS performed and 321 (45.1%) underwent amputation. The rate of LS was statistically higher among patients treated at Level I TCs vs those treated at Level II TCs (47.4% vs 34.8%; p = 0.01). Patients with penetrating injuries (13% vs 9.5%; p = 0.046) and tibial/peroneal artery injury (72.9% vs 50.4%; p < 0.001), as opposed to popliteal artery injury (30.8% vs 58.8%; p < 0.001), were more likely to have LS. The risk-adjusted odds of LS was 3.13 times higher at Level I TCs vs Level II TCs (95% CI, 1.59 to 6.34; p = 0.001). Limb salvage rates were significantly higher at Level I TCs compared with Level II TCs (53.0% vs 34.8%; p = 0.004), even after propensity matching. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a mangled extremity, limb salvage rates are 50% higher at Level I TCs compared with Level II TCs, independent of case mix and injury severity.

Scientific evidence for the use of modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as a surgical treatment for monocompartmental knee arthritis remains a controversial procedure with questions surrounding the benefits and survivorship of the procedure versus osteotomies or total knee arthroplasties. The authors, by examining the complete body of literature for scientific evidence concerning the procedure, will describe the history of usage of these prostheses, their rationale for usage, modern devices and their results, and why they may have advantages as a treatment modality for monocompartmental knee arthritis. Outcomes of current unicompartmental designs will be presented and evaluated to determine which aspects of the design and patient selection technique are associated with success or failure. Commonly asked questions regarding the use of these devices will be addressed. The authors will also describe some potential modifications that might affect the use of these components in the future, including minimally invasive procedures and robotics, and how these devices may change over the next 5 years.