Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Surg ; 192(4): 513-5, 2006 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16978963

RESUMEN

Specimen mammograms are often a time-consuming event for image-guided surgery. The use of an intraoperative imaging device may improve the speed of surgery, but comparison must be made to ensure accuracy is maintained. One hundred fifty consecutive image localized patients underwent both intraoperative digital specimen mammogram (in the operating room) and standard specimen mammogram (in radiology). Intraoperative mammograms as read by breast surgeons were as accurate as standard films while saving an average of 19 minutes per operative procedure. Intraoperative digital specimen mammograms can accurately identify target lesions while saving operating room time.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Mama/cirugía , Sistemas de Computación , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Mamografía/métodos , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 14(4): 1478-85, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17235716

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Specimen mammography during image guided breast surgery is a daily occurrence. The process of specimen travel, imaging and reporting may take 20-30 minutes. An intraoperative method to obtain digital specimen mammograms may expedite the process. We compared intraoperative digital specimen mammography (IDSM) as well as standard specimen mammography (SSM) on 121 consecutive image guided lumpectomies. METHODS: Each lumpectomy specimen had IDSM obtained followed by travel to radiology for SSM. Surgical decisions were based on all imaging obtained. Data included 1) the ability of each imaging method to identify the target lesion, 2) degree of concordance of surgical interpretation of IDSM compared to radiologist interpretation of SSM, 3) the time required from lumpectomy to surgical review of images from each method, and 4) potential operative time savings. RESULTS: Intraoperative digital specimen mammography (IDSM) was equally as accurate as standard x-ray film specimen mammography. There was no significant difference between 1) the frequency of identification of the target lesion by surgeon or radiologist, 2) lack of identification of any lesion, or 3) frequency of involved margins using imaging criteria. However, there was a marked difference in 1) the time needed to obtain images ready to read, 2) the ability to re-excise tissue promptly, and 3) the overall operating room time with an average decrease of 19 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative digital specimen mammography (IDSM) was equally accurate as SSM obtained in this study. Use of this new technology allows surgeons to quickly view specimen images which translate into shorter more efficient operations.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Sistemas de Computación , Mamografía/métodos , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica , Enfermedades de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA