Compensatory post-diuretic renal sodium reabsorption is not a dominant mechanism of diuretic resistance in acute heart failure.

AIMS: In healthy volunteers, the kidney deploys compensatory post-diuretic sodium reabsorption (CPDSR) following loop diuretic-induced natriuresis, minimizing sodium excretion and producing a neutral sodium balance. CPDSR is extrapolated to non-euvolemic populations as a diuretic resistance mechanism; however, its importance in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with ADHF in the Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance cohort receiving intravenous loop diuretics (462 administrations in 285 patients) underwent supervised urine collections entailing an immediate pre-diuretic spot urine sample, then 6-h (diuretic-induced natriuresis period) and 18-h (post-diuretic period) urine collections. The average spot urine sodium concentration immediately prior to diuretic administration [median 15 h (13-17) after last diuretic] was 64 ± 33 mmol/L with only 4% of patients having low (<20 mmol/L) urine sodium consistent with CPDSR. Paradoxically, greater 6-h diuretic-induced natriuresis was associated with larger 18-h post-diuretic spontaneous natriuresis (r = 0.7, P < 0.001). Higher pre-diuretic urine sodium to creatinine ratio (r = 0.37, P < 0.001) was the strongest predictor of post-diuretic spontaneous natriuresis. In a subgroup of patients (n = 43) randomized to protocol-driven intensified diuretic therapies, the mean diuretic-induced natriuresis increased three-fold. In contrast to the substantial decrease in spontaneous natriuresis predicted by CPDSR, no change in post-diuretic spontaneous natriuresis was observed (P = 0.47). CONCLUSION: On a population level, CPDSR was not an important driver of diuretic resistance in hypervolemic ADHF. Contrary to CPDSR, a greater diuretic-induced natriuresis predicted a larger post-diuretic spontaneous natriuresis. Basal sodium avidity, rather than diuretic-induced CPDSR, appears to be the predominant determinate of both diuretic-induced and post-diuretic natriuresis in hypervolemic ADHF.

First-in-Human Experience With Peritoneal Direct Sodium Removal Using a Zero-Sodium Solution: A New Candidate Therapy for Volume Overload.

BACKGROUND: Loop diuretics have well-described toxicities, and loss of response to these agents is common. Alternative strategies are needed for the maintenance of euvolemia in heart failure (HF). Nonrenal removal of sodium directly across the peritoneal membrane (direct sodium removal [DSR]) with a sodium-free osmotic solution should result in extraction of large quantities of sodium with limited off-target solute removal. METHODS: This article describes the preclinical development and first-in-human proof of concept for DSR. Sodium-free 10% dextrose was used as the DSR solution. Porcine experiments were conducted to investigate the optimal dwell time, safety, and scalability and to determine the effect of experimental heart failure. In the human study, participants with end-stage renal disease on peritoneal dialysis (PD) underwent randomization and crossover to either a 2-hour dwell with 1 L DSR solution or standard PD solution (Dianeal 4.25% dextrose, Baxter). The primary end point was completion of the 2-hour dwell without significant discomfort or adverse events, and the secondary end point was difference in sodium removal between DSR and standard PD solution. RESULTS: Porcine experiments revealed that 1 L DSR solution removed 4.1±0.4 g sodium in 2 hours with negligible off-target solute removal and overall stable serum electrolytes. Increasing the volume of DSR solution cycled across the peritoneum increased sodium removal and substantially decreased plasma volume (P=0.005). In the setting of experimental heart failure with elevated right atrial pressure, sodium removal was ≈4 times greater than in healthy animals (P<0.001). In the human proof-of-concept study, DSR solution was well tolerated and not associated with significant discomfort or adverse events. Plasma electrolyte concentrations were stable, and off-target solute removal was negligible. Sodium removal was substantially higher with DSR (4.5±0.4 g) compared with standard PD solution (1.0±0.3 g; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: DSR was well tolerated in both animals and human subjects and produced substantially greater sodium removal than standard PD solution. Additional research evaluating the use of DSR as a method to prevent and treat hypervolemia in heart failure is warranted. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03801226.

Empagliflozin in Heart Failure: Diuretic and Cardiorenal Effects.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors improve heart failure-related outcomes. The mechanisms underlying these benefits are not well understood, but diuretic properties may contribute. Traditional diuretics such as furosemide induce substantial neurohormonal activation, contributing to the limited improvement in intravascular volume often seen with these agents. However, the proximal tubular site of action of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors may help circumvent these limitations. METHODS: Twenty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic, stable heart failure completed a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study of empagliflozin 10 mg daily versus placebo. Patients underwent an intensive 6-hour biospecimen collection and cardiorenal phenotyping at baseline and again after 14 days of study drug. After a 2-week washout, patients crossed over to the alternate therapy with the above protocol repeated. RESULTS: Oral empagliflozin was rapidly absorbed as evidenced by a 27-fold increase in urinary glucose excretion by 3 hours (P<0.0001). Fractional excretion of sodium increased significantly with empagliflozin monotherapy versus placebo (fractional excretion of sodium, 1.2±0.7% versus 0.7±0.4%; P=0.001), and there was a synergistic effect in combination with bumetanide (fractional excretion of sodium, 5.8±2.5% versus 3.9±1.9%; P=0.001). At 14 days, the natriuretic effect of empagliflozin persisted, resulting in a reduction in blood volume (-208 mL [interquartile range, -536 to 153 mL] versus -14 mL [interquartile range, -282 to 335 mL]; P=0.035) and plasma volume (-138 mL, interquartile range, -379 to 154±453 mL; P=0.04). This natriuresis was not, however, associated with evidence of neurohormonal activation because the change in norepinephrine was superior (P=0.02) and all other neurohormones were similar (P<0.34) during the empagliflozin versus placebo period. Furthermore, there was no evidence of potassium wasting (P=0.20) or renal dysfunction (P>0.11 for all biomarkers), whereas both serum magnesium (P<0.001) and uric acid levels (P=0.008) improved. CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin causes significant natriuresis, particularly when combined with loop diuretics, resulting in an improvement in blood volume. However, off-target electrolyte wasting, renal dysfunction, and neurohormonal activation were not observed. This favorable diuretic profile may offer significant advantage in the management of volume status in patients with heart failure and may represent a mechanism contributing to the superior long-term heart failure outcomes observed with these agents. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03027960.

Renal negative pressure treatment as a novel therapy for heart failure-induced renal dysfunction.

Congestion is the primary pathophysiological lesion in most heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. Renal congestion increases renal tubular pressure, reducing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and diuresis. Because each nephron is a fluid-filled column, renal negative pressure therapy (rNPT) applied to the urinary collecting system should reduce tubular pressure, potentially improving kidney function. We evaluated the renal response to rNPT in congestive HF. Ten anesthetized ∼80-kg pigs underwent instrumentation with bilateral renal pelvic JuxtaFlow catheters. GFR was determined by iothalamate clearance (mGFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) by para-aminohippurate clearance. Each animal served as its own control with randomization of left versus right kidney to -30 mmHg rNPT or no rNPT. mGFR and RPF were measured simultaneously from the rNPT and no rNPT kidney. Congestive HF was induced via cardiac tamponade maintaining central venous pressure at 20-22.5 mmHg throughout the experiment. Before HF induction, rNPT increased natriuresis, diuresis, and mGFR compared with the control kidney (P < 0.001 for all). Natriuresis, diuresis, and mGFR decreased following HF (P < 0.001 for all) but were higher in rNPT kidney versus control (P < 0.001 for all). RPF decreased during HF (P < 0.001) without significant differences between rNPT treatments. During HF, the rNPT kidney had similar diuresis and natriuresis (P > 0.5 for both) and higher fractional excretion of sodium (P = 0.001) compared with the non-rNPT kidney in the no HF period. In conclusion, rNPT resulted in significantly increased diuresis, natriuresis, and mGFR, with or without experimental HF. rNPT improved key renal parameters of the congested cardiorenal phenotype.

Effect of Loop Diuretics on the Fractional Excretion of Urea in Decompensated Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Fractional excretion of urea (FEUrea) is often used to understand the etiology of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients receiving diuretics. Although FEUrea demonstrates diagnostic superiority over fractional excretion of sodium (FENa), clinicians often assume FEUrea is not affected by diuretics. OBJECTIVE: To assess the intravenous loop diuretic effect on FEUrea. METHODS: We analyzed a prospective cohort (n=297) hospitalized with hypervolemic heart failure at Yale New Haven Hospital System. FENa and FEUrea were calculated at baseline and serially after diuretics. The change in FEUrea at peak diuresis was compared with the pre-diuretic baseline. RESULTS: Mean baseline FEUrea was 35.2% ± 10.5% and increased by a mean 5.6% ± 10.5% following 80 mg (40-160 mg) of furosemide equivalents (P < .001). The magnitude of change in FEUrea was clinically important as the distribution of change in FEUrea was similar to the overall distribution of baseline FEUrea. Change in FEUrea was related to the diuretic response (r = 0.61, P < .001), with a larger FEUrea increase in diuretic responders (8.8%, interquartile range [IQR]: 1.8-16.9) than non-responders (1.2%, IQR: -3.2 to 5.5; P < .001). Diuretic administration reclassified 27% of patients between low and high FEUrea groups across a 35% threshold. Neither change in FEUrea nor percentage reclassified out of a low FEUrea category differed between patients with and without AKI (P > .63 for both). CONCLUSIONS: FEUrea is meaningfully affected by loop diuretics. The degree of change in FEUrea is highly variable between patients and commonly of a magnitude that could reclassify across categories of FEUrea.

In-Hospital Observation on Oral Diuretics After Treatment for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Evaluating the Utility.

BACKGROUND: Following treatment for acute decompensated heart failure, in-hospital observation on oral diuretics (OOD) is recommended, assuming it provides actionable information on discharge diuretic dosing and thus reduces readmissions. METHODS: In the Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance (MDR) cohort, we analyzed in-hospital measures of diuretic response, provider's decisions, and diuretic response ≈30 days postdischarge. In a Yale multicenter cohort, we assessed if in-hospital OOD was associated with 30-day readmission risk. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of in-hospital OOD. RESULTS: Of the 468 patients in the MDR cohort, 57% (N=265) underwent in-hospital OOD. During the OOD, weight change and net fluid balance correlated poorly with each other (r=0.36). Discharge diuretic dosing was similar between patients who had increased, stable, or decreased weight (decreased discharge dose from OOD dose in 77% versus 72% versus 70%, respectively), net fluid status (decreased discharge dose from OOD dose in 100% versus 69% versus 74%, respectively), and urine output (decreased discharge dose from OOD dose in 69% versus 79% versus 72%, respectively) during the 24-hour OOD period (P>0.27 for all). In participants returning at 30 days for formal quantification of outpatient diuretic response (n=98), outpatient and inpatient OOD natriuresis was poorly correlated (r=0.26). In the Yale multicenter cohort (n=18 454 hospitalizations), OOD occurred in 55% and was not associated with 30-day hospital readmission (hazard ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.93-1.05]; P=0.51). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital OOD did not provide actionable information on diuretic response, was not associated with outpatient dose selection, did not predict subsequent outpatient diuretic response, and was not associated with lower readmission rate. Additional research is needed to replicate these findings and understand if these resources could be better allocated elsewhere. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02546583.

Hemoconcentration of Creatinine Minimally Contributes to Changes in Creatinine during the Treatment of Decompensated Heart Failure.

Background: Worsening serum creatinine is common during treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). A possible contributor to creatinine increase is diuresis-induced changes in volume of distribution (VD) of creatinine as total body water (TBW) contracts around a fixed mass of creatinine. Our objective was to better understand the filtration and nonfiltration factors driving change in creatinine during ADHF. Methods: Participants in the ROSE-AHF trial with baseline to 72-hour serum creatinine; net fluid output; and urinary KIM-1, NGAL, and NAG were included (n=270). Changes in VD were calculated by accounting for measured input and outputs from weight-based calculated TBW. Changes in observed creatinine (Crobserved) were compared with predicted changes in creatinine after accounting for alterations in VD and non-steady state conditions using a kinetic GFR equation (Cr72HR Kinetic). Results: When considering only change in VD, the median diuresis to elicit a ≥0.3 mg/dl rise in creatinine was -7526 ml (IQR, -5932 to -9149). After accounting for stable creatinine filtration during diuresis, a change in VD alone was insufficient to elicit a ≥0.3 mg/dl rise in creatinine. Larger estimated decreases in VD were paradoxically associated with improvement in Crobserved (r=-0.18, P=0.003). Overall, -3% of the change in eCr72HR Kinetic was attributable to the change in VD. A ≥0.3 mg/dl rise in eCr72HR Kinetic was not associated with worsening of KIM-1, NGAL, NAG, or postdischarge survival (P>0.05 for all). Conclusions: During ADHF therapy, increases in serum creatinine are driven predominantly by changes in filtration, with minimal contribution from change in VD.

Changes in inferior vena cava area represent a more sensitive metric than changes in filling pressures during experimental manipulation of intravascular volume and tone.

AIMS: Remote monitoring of pulmonary artery pressure has reduced heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in chronic HF as elevation of pulmonary artery pressure provides information that can guide treatment. The venous system is characterized by high capacitance, thus substantial increases in intravascular volume can occur before filling pressures increase. The inferior vena cava (IVC) is a highly compliant venous conduit and thus a candidate for early detection of change in intravascular volume. We aimed to compare IVC cross-sectional area using a novel sensor with cardiac filling pressures during experimental manipulation of volume status, vascular tone, and cardiac function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Experiments were conducted in sheep to manipulate volume status (colloid infusion), vascular tone (nitroglycerin infusion) and cardiac function (rapid cardiac pacing). A wireless implantable IVC sensor was validated ex-vivo and in-vivo, and then used to measure the cross-sectional area of the IVC. Right- and left-sided cardiac filling pressures were obtained via right heart catheterization. The IVC sensor provided highly accurate and precise measurements of cross-sectional area in ex-vivo and in-vivo validation. IVC area changes were more sensitive than the corresponding changes in cardiac filling pressures during colloid infusion (p < 0.001), vasodilatation (p < 0.001) and cardiac dysfunction induced by rapid pacing (p ≤ 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Inferior vena cava area can be remotely and accurately measured in real time with a wireless implantable sensor. Changes in IVC area are more sensitive than corresponding changes in filling pressures following experimental volume loading and fluid redistribution. Additional research is warranted to understand if remote monitoring of the IVC may have advantages over pressure-based monitors in HF.

FGF-23 (Fibroblast Growth Factor-23) and Cardiorenal Interactions.

BACKGROUND: Animal models implicate FGF-23 (fibroblast growth factor-23) as a direct contributor to adverse cardiorenal interactions such as sodium avidity, diuretic resistance, and neurohormonal activation, but this has not been conclusively demonstrated in humans. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether FGF-23 is associated with parameters of cardiorenal dysfunction in humans with heart failure, independent of confounding factors. METHODS: One hundred ninety-nine outpatients with heart failure undergoing diuretic treatment at the Yale Transitional Care Center were enrolled and underwent blood collection, and urine sampling before and after diuretics. RESULTS: FGF-23 was associated with several metrics of disease severity such as higher home loop diuretic dose and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum chloride, and serum albumin. Multivariable analysis demonstrated no statistically significant association between FGF-23 and sodium avidity measured by fractional excretion of sodium, or proximal or distal tubular sodium reabsorption, either before diuretic administration or at peak diuresis (P≥0.11 for all). Likewise, FGF-23 was not independently associated with parameters of diuretic resistance (diuretic excretion, cumulative urine and sodium output, and loop diuretic efficiency [P≥0.33 for all]) or neurohormonal activation (plasma or urine renin [P≥0.36 for all]). Moreover, the upper boundary of the 95% CI of all the partial correlations were ≤0.30, supporting the lack of meaningful correlations. FGF-23 was not associated with mortality in multivariable analysis (P=0.44). CONCLUSIONS: FGF-23 was not meaningfully associated with any cardiorenal parameter in patients with heart failure. While our methods cannot rule out a small effect, FGF-23 is unlikely to be a primary driver of cardiorenal interactions.

Natriuretic Equation to Predict Loop Diuretic Response in Patients With Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Most acute decompensated heart failure admissions are driven by congestion. However, residual congestion is common and often driven by the lack of reliable tools to titrate diuretic therapy. The authors previously developed a natriuretic response prediction equation (NRPE), which predicts sodium output using a spot urine sample collected 2 h after loop diuretic administration. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to validate the NRPE and describe proof-of-concept that the NRPE can be used to guide diuretic therapy. METHODS: Two cohorts were assembled: 1) the Diagnosing and Targeting Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance (MDR) cohort was used to validate the NRPE to predict 6-h sodium output after a loop diuretic, which was defined as poor (<50 mmol), suboptimal (<100 mmol), or excellent (>150 mmol); and 2) the Yale Diuretic Pathway (YDP) cohort, which used the NRPE to guide loop diuretic titration via a nurse-driven automated protocol. RESULTS: Evaluating 638 loop diuretic administrations, the NRPE showed excellent discrimination with areas under the curve ≥0.90 to predict poor, suboptimal, and excellent natriuretic response, and outperformed clinically obtained net fluid loss (p < 0.05 for all cutpoints). In the YDP cohort (n = 161) using the NRPE to direct therapy mean daily urine output (1.8 ± 0.9 l vs. 3.0 ± 0.8 l), net fluid output (-1.1 ± 0.9 l vs. -2.1 ± 0.9 l), and weight loss (-0.3 ± 0.3 kg vs. -2.5 ± 0.3 kg) improved substantially following initiation of the YDP (p < 0.001 for all pre-post comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Natriuretic response can be rapidly and accurately predicted by the NRPE, and this information can be used to guide diuretic therapy during acute decompensated heart failure. Additional study of diuresis guided by the NRPE is warranted.

Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance Study: design and rationale.

INTRODUCTION: Diuretic resistance is a common complication impairing decongestion during hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). The current understanding of diuretic resistance mechanisms in ADHF is based upon extrapolations from other disease states and healthy volunteers. However, accumulating evidence suggests that the dominant mechanisms in other populations have limited influence on diuretic response in ADHF. Additionally, the ability to rapidly and reliably diagnose diuretic resistance is inadequate using currently available tools. AIMS: The Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance (MDR) Study is designed to rigorously investigate the mechanisms of diuretic resistance and develop tools to rapidly predict diuretic response in a prospective cohort hospitalized with ADHF. METHODS: Study assessments occur serially during the ADHF hospitalization and after discharge. Each assessment includes a supervised 6-hour urine collection with baseline blood and timed spot urine collections following loop diuretic administration. Patient characteristics, medications, physical exam findings, and both in-hospital and post-discharge HF outcomes are collected. Patients with diuretic resistance are eligible for a randomized sub-study comparing an increased loop diuretic dose with combination diuretic therapy of loop diuretic plus chlorothiazide. CONCLUSIONS: The Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance Study will establish a prospective patient cohort and biorepository to investigate the mechanisms of diuretic resistance and urine biomarkers to rapidly predict loop diuretic resistance.

Real World Use of Hypertonic Saline in Refractory Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A U.S. Center's Experience.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate real world safety and efficacy of hypertonic saline therapy in cases of refractory acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) at a large U.S. academic medical center. BACKGROUND: Hypertonic saline therapy has been described as a potential management strategy for refractory ADHF, but experience in the United States is limited. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in all patients receiving hypertonic saline for diuretic therapy-resistant ADHF at the authors' institution since March 2013. The primary analytic approach was a comparison of the trajectory of clinical variables prior to and after administration of hypertonic saline, with secondary focus on predictors of treatment response. RESULTS: A total of 58 hypertonic saline administration episodes were identified across 40 patients with diuretic-therapy refractory ADHF. Prior to hypertonic saline administration, serum sodium, chloride, and creatinine concentrations were worsening but improved after hypertonic saline administration (p < 0.001, all). Both total urine output and weight loss significantly improved with hypertonic saline (p = 0.01 and <0.001, respectively). Diuretic efficiency, defined as change in urine output per doubling of diuretic dose, also improved over this period (p < 0.01). There were no significant changes in respiratory status or overcorrection of serum sodium with the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients who were refractory to ADHF, hypertonic saline administration was associated with increased diuretic efficiency, fluid and weight loss, and improvement of metabolic derangements, and no adverse respiratory or neurological signals were identified. Additional study of hypertonic saline as a diuretic adjuvant is warranted.

Serum and Urine Albumin and Response to Loop Diuretics in Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Diuretic resistance can limit successful decongestion of patients with heart failure. Because loop diuretics tightly bind albumin, low serum albumin and high urine albumin can theoretically limit diuretic delivery to the site of action. However, it is unknown if this represents a clinically relevant mechanism of diuretic resistance in human heart failure. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In total, 208 outpatients with heart failure at the Yale Transitional Care Center undergoing diuretic treatment were studied. Blood and urine chemistries were collected at baseline and 1.5 hours postdiuretic administration. Urine diuretic levels were normalized to urine creatinine and adjusted for diuretic dose administered, and diuretic efficiency was calculated as sodium output per doubling of the loop diuretic dose. Findings were validated in an inpatient heart failure cohort (n=60). RESULTS: Serum albumin levels in the outpatient cohort ranged from 2.4 to 4.9 g/dl, with a median of 3.7 g/dl (interquartile range, 3.5-4.1). Serum albumin had no association with urinary diuretic delivery (r=-0.05; P=0.52), but higher levels weakly correlated with better diuretic efficiency (r=0.17; P=0.02). However, serum albumin inversely correlated with systemic inflammation as assessed by plasma IL-6 (r=-0.35; P<0.001), and controlling for IL-6 eliminated the diuretic efficiency-serum albumin association (r=0.12; P=0.12). In the inpatient cohort, there was no association between serum albumin and urinary diuretic excretion (r=0.15; P=0.32) or diuretic efficiency (r=-0.16; P=0.25). In the outpatient cohort, 39% of patients had microalbuminuria, and 18% had macroalbuminuria. There was no correlation between albuminuria and diuretic efficiency after adjusting for kidney function (r=-0.02; P=0.89). Results were similar in the inpatient cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Serum albumin levels were not associated with urinary diuretic excretion, and urinary albumin levels were not associated with diuretic efficiency.

Natriuretic Response Is Highly Variable and Associated With 6-Month Survival: Insights From the ROSE-AHF Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe sodium excretion in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) clearly and to evaluate the prognostic ability of urinary sodium and fluid-based metrics. BACKGROUND: Sodium retention drives volume overload, with fluid retention largely a passive, secondary phenomenon. However, parameters (urine output, body weight) used to monitor therapy in ADHF measure fluid rather than sodium balance. Thus, the accuracy of fluid-based metrics hinges on the contested assumption that urinary sodium content is consistent. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the ROSE-AHF (Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation-Acute Heart Failure) trial with 24-h sodium excretion available were studied (n = 316). Patients received protocol-driven high-dose loop diuretic therapy. RESULTS: Sodium excretion through the first 24 h was highly variable (range 0.12 to 19.8 g; median 3.63 g, interquartile range: 1.85 to 6.02 g) and was not correlated with diuretic agent dose (r = 0.06; p = 0.27). Greater sodium excretion was associated with reduced mortality in a univariate model (hazard ratio: 0.80 per doubling of sodium excretion; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 0.95; p = 0.01), whereas gross urine output (p = 0.43), net fluid balance (p = 0.87), and weight change (p = 0.11) were not. Sodium excretion of less than the prescribed dietary sodium intake (2 g), even in the setting of a negative net fluid balance, portended a worse prognosis (hazard ratio: 2.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.17 to 3.46; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients hospitalized with ADHF who were receiving high-dose loop diuretic agents, sodium concentration and excretion were highly variable. Sodium excretion was strongly associated with 6-month mortality, whereas traditional fluid-based metrics were not. Poor sodium excretion, even in the context of fluid loss, portends a worse prognosis.

Renal Effects of Intensive Volume Removal in Heart Failure Patients With Preexisting Worsening Renal Function.

Background The relationship between intensive volume removal in acute decompensated heart failure patients with preexisting worsening renal function (WRF) and renal tubular injury, postdischarge renal function, and clinical outcomes is unknown. Methods and Results We used data from the multicenter CARRESS-HF trial (Cardiorenal Rescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure) that randomized patients with acute decompensated heart failure and preexisting WRF to intensive volume removal with stepped pharmacological therapy or fixed rate ultrafiltration. Patients in the urinary renal tubular injury biomarker substudy (NAG [N-acetyl-b-D-glucosaminidase], KIM-1 [kidney injury molecule-1], and NGAL [neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin]) were evaluated (N=105). The severity of prerandomization WRF was unrelated to baseline renal tubular injury biomarkers ( r=0.14; P=0.17). During randomized intensive volume removal, creatinine further worsened in 53% of patients. Despite a small to moderate magnitude increase in creatinine in most of these patients, postrandomization WRF was strongly associated with worsening in renal tubular injury biomarkers (odds ratio, 12.6; P=0.004). This observation did not differ by mode of volume removal (stepped pharmacological therapy versus ultrafiltration, Pinteraction=0.46). Increase in renal tubular injury biomarkers was associated with a higher incidence of hemoconcentration (odds ratio, 3.1; P=0.015), and paradoxically, better recovery of creatinine at 60 days ( P=0.01). Conclusions In acute decompensated heart failure patients with preexisting WRF, intensive volume removal resulted in a further worsening of creatinine approximately half of the time, a finding associated with a rise in tubular injury biomarkers. However, decongestion and renal function recovery at 60 days were superior in patients with increased tubular injury markers. These data suggest that the benefits of decongestion may outweigh any modest or transient increases in serum creatinine or tubular injury markers that occur during intensive volume removal. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00608491.

Effect on Survival of Concurrent Hemoconcentration and Increase in Creatinine During Treatment of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.

Hemoconcentration during the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure is a surrogate for plasma volume reduction and is associated with improved survival, but most definitions only allow for hemoconcentration to be determined retrospectively. An increase in serum creatinine can also be a marker of aggressive decongestion, but in isolation is not specific. Our objective was to determine if combined hemoconcentration and worsening creatinine could better identify patients that were aggressively treated and, as such, may have improved postdischarge outcomes. A total of 4,181 patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure were evaluated. Those who experienced both hemoconcentration and worsening creatinine at any point had a profile consistent with aggressive in-hospital treatment and longer length of stay (p <0.01), higher loop diuretic doses (p <0.001), greater weight (p = 0.001), and net fluid loss (p <0.001) compared with the remainder of the cohort. In isolation, neither worsening creatinine (p = 0.11) nor hemoconcentration (p = 0.36) at any time were associated with improved survival. However, patients who experienced both (21%) had significantly better survival (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 0.94, pinteraction = 0.005). In conclusion, this combination of hemoconcentration and worsening creatinine, which can be determined prospectively during patient care, was associated with in-hospital parameters consistent with aggressive diuresis and improved postdischarge survival.