Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral activity of the novel core protein allosteric modulator ZM-H1505R (Canocapavir) in chronic hepatitis B patients: a randomized multiple-dose escalation trial.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) core protein-targeting antivirals (CpTAs) are promising therapeutic agents for treating chronic hepatitis B (CHB). In this study, the antiviral activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and tolerability of ZM-H1505R (Canocapavir), a chemically unique HBV CpTA, were evaluated in patients with CHB. METHODS: This study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 1b trial in Chinese CHB patients. Noncirrhotic and treatment-naive CHB patients were divided into three cohorts (10 patients per cohort) and randomized within each cohort in a ratio of 4:1 to receive a single dose of 50, 100, or 200 mg of Canocapavir or placebo once a day for 28 consecutive days. RESULTS: Canocapavir was well tolerated, with the majority of adverse reactions being grade I or II in severity. There were no serious adverse events, and no patients withdrew from the study. Corresponding to 50, 100, and 200 mg doses of Canocapavir, the mean plasma trough concentrations of the drug were 2.7-, 7.0-, and 14.6-fold of its protein-binding adjusted HBV DNA EC50 (135 ng/mL), respectively, with linear PK and a low-to-mild accumulation rate (1.26-1.99). After 28 days of treatment, the mean maximum HBV DNA declines from baseline were -1.54, -2.50, -2.75, and -0.47 log10 IU/mL for the 50, 100, and 200 mg of Canocapavir or placebo groups, respectively; and the mean maximum pregenomic RNA declines from baseline were -1.53, -2.35, -2.34, and -0.17 log10 copies/mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Canocapavir treatment is tolerated with efficacious antiviral activity in CHB patients, supporting its further development in treating HBV infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT05470829).

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of the Novel Hepatitis B Virus Capsid Assembly Modulator GST-HG141 in Healthy Chinese Subjects: a First-in-Human Single- and Multiple-Dose Escalation Trial.

Hepatitis B virus capsid assembly modulators (HBV CAMs) are promising, clinically validated therapeutic agents for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of GST-HG141, a novel HBV CAM, were evaluated in healthy Chinese volunteers. This phase Ia study included two parts: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled single-ascending-dose (SAD) (50, 100, 200, 300, 400, or 500 mg) study comprising a food-effect investigation (300 mg) and a multiple-ascending-dose (MAD) (100 or 200 mg twice daily) study. GST-HG141 reached the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) at 1.25 to 3.00 h (median Tmax). The exposure exhibited a linear increase, while the mean half-life (t1/2) ranged from 13.096 h to 22.121 h. The exposure of GST-HG141 (300 mg) was higher after food intake by about 2.4-fold. In the MAD study, steady state was reached at around day 5, and the mean trough steady-state concentrations were 423 and 588 ng/ml for 50- and 100-mg cohorts, respectively. The ratios of GST-HG141 accumulation were <1.5. GST-HG141 was well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. The rates of adverse events in the GST-HG141 cohort did not differ from those of the placebo cohort. GST-HG141 was tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. The safety and PK profiles of GST-HG141 support the further evaluation of its efficacy in individuals with CHB. (This study has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT04536337.).

The spatial and single-cell analysis reveals remodeled immune microenvironment induced by synthetic oncolytic adenovirus treatment.

Oncolytic viruses are multifaceted tumor killers, which can function as tumor vaccines to boost systemic antitumor immunity. In previous study, we rationally designed a synthetic oncolytic adenovirus (SynOV) harboring a synthetic gene circuit, which can kill tumors in mouse hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) models. In this study, we demonstrated that SynOV could sense the tumor biomarkers to lyse tumors in a dosage-dependent manner, and killed PD-L1 antibody resistant tumor cells in mouse model. Meanwhile, we observed SynOV could cure liver cancer and partially alleviate the liver cancer with distant metastasis by activating systemic antitumor immunity. To understand its high efficacy, it is essential to explore the cellular and molecular features of the remodeled tumor microenvironment (TME). By combining spatial transcriptome sequencing and single-cell RNA sequencing, we successfully depicted the remodeled TME at single cell resolution. The state transition of immune cells and stromal cells towards an antitumor and normalized status exemplified the overall cancer-suppressive TME after SynOV treatment. Specifically, SynOV treatment increased the proportion of CD8+ T cells, enhanced the cell-cell communication of Cxcl9-Cxcr3, and normalized the Kupffer cells and macrophages in the TME. Furthermore, we observed that SynOV could induce distant responses to reduce tumor burden in metastatic HCC patient in the Phase I clinical trial. In summary, our results suggest that SynOV can trigger systemic antitumor immunity to induce CD8+ T cells and normalize the abundance of immune cells to remodel the TME, which promises a powerful option to treat HCC in the future.

Comparison of Pharmacokinetic Similarity, Immunogenicity, and Safety of Ustekinumab and BAT2206 in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects in a Double-Blind, Randomized, Single-Dose, Parallel-Group Phase I Trial.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the similarity of BAT2206 to its originator, ustekinumab, including pharmacokinetic profiles, immunogenicity, and safety in healthy Chinese male subjects. METHODS: This was a double-blinded, randomized, single-dose, parallel-group clinical trial, in which 270 healthy male subjects were enrolled to receive a single subcutaneous injection (45 mg) of either BAT2206 or ustekinumab (European Union or USA) at a 1:1:1 ratio. The pairwise pharmacokinetic similarities and the safety and immunogenicity of both drugs were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The results showed that the 90% confidence interval of the geometric mean ratio for primary pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) among BAT2206 and ustekinumab (USA or European Union sourced) groups were all within the predefined equivalent interval of 80-125%. Furthermore, all the groups had similar incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events, in which the majority of cases belonged to Common Terminology Criteria for the Classification of Adverse Events Grade 1 or 2. Anti-drug antibodies were detected in 54 (20.1%) subjects, namely 24 (26.7%), 13 (14.8%), and 17 (18.9%) patients in the BAT2206, ustekinumab (European Union), and ustekinumab (USA) groups, respectively. In contrast, the incidences of positive neutralizing antibodies were similar among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetic similarity between BAT2206 and ustekinumab (USA or European Union sourced) was confirmed. The three groups had similar safety profiles, and the investigational drugs were well tolerated by subjects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04371185).

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single, and multiple dose-escalation Phase I clinical trial to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profiles of oral S086, a novel angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, in healthy Chinese volunteers.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of single ascending doses (SAD) and multiple ascending doses (MAD) of S086 in healthy Chinese volunteers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase I clinical trial enrolled 113 subjects, including 65 subjects in the SAD (60-1080 mg) study and 48 subjects in the MAD study (180-720 mg). The safety, PK (sacubitril, LBQ657, and EXP3174) and PD (MAD study: blood pressure, pulse) of S086 were assessed. RESULTS: There were no deaths, serious adverse events, or discontinuations due to TEAEs, and there were no significant safety concerns associated with S086. PK parameters for sacubitril, LBQ657, and EXP3174 increased in a dose-dependent manner after single oral doses of S086. Plasma concentrations of sacubitril, LBQ657, and EXP3174 were maintained at steady state within 5 days of once-daily oral administration of S086. In the MAD study, S086 administration was associated with a dose-dependent decrease in mean diastolic and systolic blood pressure compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and PK profile profiles of S086 support the use of S086 240 mg once daily in a future Phase II study in patients with heart failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at chinadrugtrials.org.cn (CT.gov identifier: CTR20182350 and CTR20182351).

A randomized dose-escalation study on the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel recombinant human albumin in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Recombinant human albumin (rHA) is an alternative to human serum albumin (HSA) for treating ascites in cirrhosis patients. This study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of rHA in healthy subjects to guide the design for further clinical trials. METHODS: Healthy subjects aged 18-55 years were enrolled in this double-blinded, first-in-human, placebo-controlled single ascending dose (SAD) (1.25, 5, 10, 20, or 30g) and positive-controlled multiple-dose study (3-day treatment of 10g/day for three cycles every three weeks). The safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs). Antibodies (IgE and IgD) and cytokines were analyzed for immunogenicity. Serum albumin levels and changes in plasma colloid osmotic pressure (PCOP) and hematocrit (HCT) were measured for PK/PD analysis. RESULTS: rHA was well tolerated as all AEs were assessed as mild or moderate. No severe allergy or difference in the incidence of AEs was observed among the different cohorts in the SAD study or in the different cycles in the multiple-dose study. The incidence of AEs was similar for the rHA and HSA cohort. Antibodies or cytokines showed no changes after drug administration. As expected, serum albumin levels and PCOP increases, and HCT ratio decreases were dose-related with significant differences (p < 0.01). No differences were observed between rHA and HSA. CONCLUSION: rHA is safe and well-tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. rHA and HSA exhibited similar safety, tolerability, and PK/PD profiles. The results support further evaluation of rHA treatment in cirrhotic patients with ascites. The clinical trial registration numbers are CTR20191221 (http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/clinicaltrials.searchlistdetail.dhtml).