Comparison of S-1-cisplatin every 5 weeks with capecitabine-cisplatin every 3 weeks for HER2-negative gastric cancer (recurrent after S-1 adjuvant therapy or chemotherapy-naïve advanced): pooled analysis of HERBIS-2 (OGSG 1103) and HERBIS-4A (OGSG 1105) trials.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the HERBIS-4A phase II trial comparing S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) with capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (GC). We performed a pooled analysis of HERBIS-4A and HERBIS-2, the phase II trial comparing SP with XP in HER2-negative recurrent GC patients with a recurrence-free interval after S-1 adjuvant therapy of ≥ 6 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either SP [S-1 (40-60 mg twice daily for 21 days) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 8), every 5 weeks] or XP [capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days) plus cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1), every 3 weeks]. RESULTS: In the pooled analysis, SP (n = 44-50) showed a longer progression-free survival [6.4 versus 5.1 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.666; P = 0.062], overall survival (14.8 versus 10.6 months; HR, 0.695; P = 0.099), and time to treatment failure (4.6 versus 3.6 months; HR, 0.668; P = 0.045) as well as a higher disease control rate (86.4% versus 68.1%, P = 0.149) compared with XP (n = 47-51). A significant survival advantage for SP over XP was apparent in patients with a performance status of 0, a differentiated-type tumor histology, or a primary tumor localization to the upper portion of the stomach. CONCLUSION: Our pooled analysis supports the use of SP in the first-line setting for patients with HER2-negative advanced or recurrent GC with a recurrence-free interval of ≥ 6 months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The HERBIS-2 trial was registered with UMIN-CTR as UMIN000006105.

[Improvement of Pain Control after Dealing with Chemical Coping-A Case of Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer].

A 57-year-old female underwent abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Although she received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, she had presacral recurrence with pain 26 months postoperatively. We provided palliative care in parallel with systemic chemotherapy, but she had difficulty controlling pain despite using high-dose opioids at 43 months after surgery. Multimodal therapy contributed to a reduction in opioid use for a brief time. Nevertheless, she required high-dose opioid therapy again at 50 months after the procedure. Since she used a rescue dose for relieving anticipatory anxiety for pain, we estimated that she developed chemical coping. After we tried analgesic adjuvant therapy and psychotherapy, her opioid use was reduced. For 10 months afterward, her disease worsened with time, but her pain was well-controlled. In cases where it is difficult to control pain, protection against exacerbation or opioid dose escalation should be considered. Furthermore, psychological contexts, including chemical coping, should also be considered. It may lead to the use of a proper dose of opioids and improve quality of life for patients.

The activation of Akt during preoperative chemotherapy for esophageal cancer correlates with poor prognosis.

The activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway plays an important role in tumorigenesis and resistance to anticancer drugs. The aim of this study was to elucidate the role of the Akt/mTOR pathway in chemoresistance and the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received preoperative chemotherapy. We evaluated p-Akt and p-mTOR expression by immunohistochemistry in the surgical specimens of 143 ESCC (51 patients with and 92 without preoperative chemotherapy). In 37 patients of the former group, paired tissue samples obtained before and after chemotherapy were examined immunohistochemically. The incidence of p-Akt expression was higher in ESCC with than without chemotherapy (51.0 vs. 25.0%, p=0.0018). Although p-Akt expression was not associated with an advanced tumor stage, a comparison between before and after chemotherapy demonstrated an increased p-Akt expression during chemotherapy (p=0.0348). The p-Akt expression did not correlate with survival in ESCC without chemotherapy, but was associated with poor prognosis in those with chemotherapy (p=0.0058). In particular, an increased p-Akt expression during chemotherapy was associated with poor survival (p=0.0022). Notably, the p-mTOR expression did not correlate with p-Akt expression (p=0.1482). The depth of the tumor invasion, clinical response and p-Akt expression correlated with the prognosis of 51 ESCC with chemotherapy. A multivariate analysis showed that p-Akt expression was the only independent predictor of poor prognosis in ESCC patients with chemotherapy. p-Akt expression increases after chemotherapy in ESCC and a high expression correlates with poor prognosis. Our results suggest that the activation of Akt is a potentially useful therapeutic target in ESCC patients treated with chemotherapy.