Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Clin J Sport Med ; 27(1): 26-30, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27014942

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Commotio cordis, sudden death with chest impact, occurs clinically despite chest wall protectors worn in sports. In an experimental model of commotio cordis, commercially available chest wall protectors failed to prevent ventricular fibrillation (VF). The goal of the current investigation was to develop a chest wall protector effective in the prevention of commotio cordis. DESIGN: In the Tufts experimental model of commotio cordis the ability of chest protectors to prevent VF was assessed. Impacts were delivered with a 40-mph lacrosse ball, timed to the vulnerable period for VF. INTERVENTION: A chest wall protector or no chest wall protector (control) was randomly assigned to be placed over the chest. Four iterative series of 2 to 4 different chest wall material combinations were assessed. Materials included 3 different foams (Accelleron [Unequal Technologies, Glen Mills, PA], closed cell high density foam; Airilon [Unequal Technologies, Glen Mills, PA], closed cell low density soft foam; and an open cell memory foam) that were adhered to a layer of TriDur (Unequal Technologies, Glen Mills, PA), a flexible elastomeric coated aramid that was bonded to a semirigid polypropylene polymer (ImpacShield, Unequal Technologies, Glen Mills, PA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Induction of VF by chest wall impact was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Of 80 impacts without chest protectors, 43 (54%) resulted in VF. Ventricular fibrillation with chest protectors ranged from a high of 60% to a low of 5%. Of 12 chest protectors assessed, only 3 significantly lowered the risk of VF compared with impacts without chest protectors. These 3 chest protectors were combinations of Accelleron, Airilon, TriDur, and ImpacShield of different thicknesses. Protection increased linearly with the thicker combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Effective protection against VF with chest wall protection can be achieved in an experimental model of commotio cordis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Chest protector designs incorporating these novel materials will likely be effective in the prevention of commotio cordis on the playing field.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/prevención & control , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Ropa de Protección , Animales , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Masculino , Porcinos , Fibrilación Ventricular/etiología , Fibrilación Ventricular/prevención & control
2.
Am J Cardiol ; 125(12): 1896-1900, 2020 06 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32305220

RESUMEN

Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) may require higher energies to terminate ventricular fibrillation (VF); thus, dual coil defibrillation leads are often implanted. However, single coil leads may be preferred in young patients. All patients with HCM implanted with a transvenous ICD from years 2000 to 2014 were included. Of 249 patients, 223 underwent VF testing including 150 with a dual coil lead and 73 a single coil. Patients tested with dual coil compared with single coil had lower successful VF energies (15.7 ± 6.1 joule to 20.2 ± 7.9 joule (p <0.0001)). Adequate safety margin for defibrillation was noted in 97.3% of patients. Notably, 6 (4 with single coil leads) had inadequate safety margins (defined as ≥10 joule). Three of these 6 patients required replacement of a single coil lead with a dual coil lead. The remaining 3 underwent waveform tilt alteration, higher energy ICD, or removal of the can from the shock vector. There were no clinical or implant predictors of inadequate safety margins. In follow-up of 16 ± 30 months (range 0 to 170), there were 24 arrhythmias including 13 VF, all successfully terminated. In conclusion, in HC patients undergoing ICD implantation, single coil leads can provide adequate safety margins. In conclusion, defibrillation testing should be considered in all HC patients undergoing ICD implantation, and should be performed in those undergoing implantation with a single coil lead.


Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/terapia , Desfibriladores Implantables , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Card Electrophysiol Clin ; 7(2): 173-86, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26002384

RESUMEN

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an autosomal dominant disease caused by mutations in genes coding for cardiac sarcomeres. HCM is the most common inherited heart disease, with a prevalence of 0.2%. There are multiple genetic variants that cause pleomorphic clinical attributes and disease characterized by myocardial disarray and myocardial hypertrophy. Patients are at an increased risk of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Management of these arrhythmias is complex. Atrial fibrillation is associated with increased mortality and thromboembolism. Ventricular arrhythmias are life threatening and best treated with an implantable defibrillator.


Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica , Electrocardiografía , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA