RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare real-world persistence, effectiveness and tolerability of ustekinumab versus TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: One-year data from Italian subjects enrolled in the PsABio study (PsA patients receiving 1st- to 3rd-line treatment with ustekinumab or TNFi) were evaluated. Treatment persistence was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves; hazard ratios (HR) of stopping treatment, and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), were computed through Cox regression models. Proportions of patients reaching clinical effectiveness endpoints were analysed using logistic regression, including propensity score (PS) adjustment for imbalanced baseline covariates, and non-response imputation if treatment was stopped/switched. RESULTS: Among 222 participants with follow-up data (effectiveness set), 101 received ustekinumab and 121 TNFi. In the ustekinumab group, 74.3% continued treatment up to 12±3 months compared to 63.6% in the TNFi group. Ustekinumab showed better persistence than TNFi, overall and in specific subgroups (females, monotherapy without methotrexate, BMI <25 or >30 kg/m2, patients receiving ustekinumab as 2nd-line treatment instead of a second TNFi). Overall, the PS-adjusted HR of treatment discontinuation was 0.46 (95% CI: 0.26-0.82) for ustekinumab vs. TNFi. cDAPSA LDA/remission was achieved in 43.5% of ustekinumab and 43.6% of TNFi-treated patients, while MDA was achieved in 24.2% and 28.0% of patients, respectively. After PS adjustment, odds ratios of clinical effectiveness did not differ significantly. Both treatments showed an acceptable safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, real-life study found a better persistence of ustekinumab than TNFi in PsA patients. At 1 year, both treatments showed similar effectiveness.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Psoriásica , Femenino , Humanos , Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Ustekinumab/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As illustrated by the Montreal classification, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is much more than heartburn and patients constitute a heterogeneous group. Understanding if links exist between patients' characteristics and GERD symptoms, and classify subjects based on symptom-profile could help to better understand, diagnose, and treat GERD. The aim of this study was to identify distinct classes of GERD patients according to symptom profiles, using a specific statistical tool: Latent class analysis. METHODS: An observational single-visit study was conducted in 5 European countries in 7700 adults with typical symptoms. A latent class analysis was performed to identify "latent classes" and was applied to 12 indicator symptoms. RESULTS: On 7434 subjects with non-missing indicators, latent class analysis yielded 5 latent classes. Class 1 grouped the highest severity of typical GERD symptoms during day and night, more digestive and non-digestive GERD symptoms, and bad sleep quality. Class 3 represented less frequent and less severe digestive and non-digestive GERD symptoms, and better sleep quality than in class 1. In class 2, only typical GERD symptoms at night occurred. Classes 4 and 5 represented daytime and nighttime regurgitation. In class 4, heartburn was also identified and more atypical digestive symptoms. Multinomial logistic regression showed that country, age, sex, smoking, alcohol use, low-fat diet, waist circumference, recent weight gain (>5 kg), elevated triglycerides, metabolic syndrome, and medical GERD treatment had a significant effect on latent classes. CONCLUSION: Latent class analysis classified GERD patients based on symptom profiles which related to patients' characteristics. Although further studies considering these proposed classes have to be conducted to determine the reproducibility of this classification, this new tool might contribute in better management and follow-up of patients with GERD.
Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico/clasificación , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Dieta con Restricción de Grasas/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/epidemiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatología , Grecia/epidemiología , Humanos , Hipertrigliceridemia/epidemiología , Italia/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólico/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Federación de Rusia/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Fumar/epidemiología , España/epidemiología , Circunferencia de la CinturaRESUMEN
Introduction: Data about the clinical presentation and management of early and mild spondyloarthritis (SpA) are limited. Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe the baseline characteristics of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve patients with axial or peripheral SpA. Methods: The Spondyloarthritis Italian Registry: Evidence from a National Pathway (SIRENA) study is an ongoing, Italian, multicenter, prospective registry of patients with a first or newly confirmed diagnosis of SpA according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria. To be included, patients had to be naïve to conventional, targeted, and biological DMARDs for SpA. Patients were enrolled between June 2017 and June 2019 and classified into groups according to disease presentation: predominantly axial or peripheral manifestations. The study is ongoing, and patients are being followed for 2 years, with an evaluation every 6 months according to clinical practice. Differences in baseline demographics, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics between axial and peripheral SpA were evaluated. Results: In this study, 350 patients were enrolled, of which 123 (35.1%) were axial and 227 (64.9%) were peripheral patients. Patients with axial SpA were significantly younger at enrollment (median age: 44 vs. 53 years), had significantly more anxiety/depression (13 vs. 2.6%), and expressed higher disease activity compared to patients with peripheral SpA. Patients with peripheral SpA had significantly more cardiometabolic disorders (33 vs. 18.7%), skin psoriasis (65.2 vs. 21.1%), and nail psoriasis (35.5 vs. 17.1%) than patients with axial SpA. Dactylitis, enthesitis, and fibromyalgia were observed, respectively, in 17.6, 51.2, and 5.7% of patients with axial SpA and 24.3, 40, and 3.1% of patients with peripheral SpA. In both disease groups, women tended to report depression, joint tenderness, and higher disease activity more frequently than their male counterparts. At inclusion, a new diagnosis of SpA was performed in 58% of axial and 77% of peripheral patients, with a median time from symptom onset to diagnosis of 36 and 24 months, respectively. At baseline, most patients with axial SpA (77%) started a biological DMARD, while over half of the peripheral patients started a conventional DMARD. Conclusions: Based on a well-characterized clinical registry of SpA, we provided real-world insights on the clinical features of DMARD-naïve SpA patients, pointing out major differences between axial and peripheral disease in terms of clinical characteristics and treatment pattern. Future prospective evaluations within the SIRENA study will improve knowledge on SpA and contribute to defining the best therapeutic approach.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For many women finding the right contraceptive method can be challenging and consistent and correct use over a lifetime is difficult. Even remembering to take a birth control pill every day can be a challenge. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate women's experience with a weekly ethinylestradiol/norelgestromin contraceptive patch (EE/NGMN patch), given new technologies recently developed in hormonal contraception to increase women's options in avoiding daily dosing. METHODS: In 24 Italian sites, 207 women received the EE/NGMN patch for up to 6 cycles. At study end, overall satisfaction and preference, as well as compliance, efficacy and safety, were evaluated. RESULTS: 175 women (84.5%) completed the study. The overall satisfaction rate was 88%; convenience and once-a-week frequency of the patch were especially appreciated. At baseline, 82 women (39.4%) were using a contraceptive method, mainly oral contraceptives and barrier methods, but only 45.1% were very satisfied/satisfied; after 6 months with the patch, 86.3% of this subset was very satisfied/satisfied. Considering the method used in the 3 months before the study entry, 78.1% strongly preferred/preferred the patch, for convenience (53.9%), ease of use/simplicity (28.9%), fewer (9.2%) and less severe (2.6%) side effects. Compliance was very high: 1034/1110 cycles (93.2%) were completed with perfect compliance and the mean subject's compliance score was 90%. One on-therapy pregnancy occurred. The patch was safe and well tolerated: adverse events frequency was low, with predominantly single reports of each event. Most of them started and subsided during cycle 1. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the EE/NGMN patch is associated with high satisfaction levels and excellent compliance. At study end, the majority of women indicated that they would continue using the patch.
Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/administración & dosificación , Combinación Etinil Estradiol-Norgestrel/administración & dosificación , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Cutánea , Adolescente , Adulto , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Norgestrel/administración & dosificación , Norgestrel/análogos & derivados , Oximas/administración & dosificación , Embarazo , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As weight gain is one of the most frequently cited reasons for not using and for discontinuing hormonal contraceptives, in an open-label, single-arm, multicentre clinical study we evaluated the effect of the ethinylestradiol/norelgestromin contraceptive patch (EVRA, Janssen-Cilag International, Belgium) on body composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). METHODS: Body weight and impedance vector components (resistance (R) and reactance (Xc), at 50 kHz frequency, Akern-RJL Systems analyzer) were recorded before entry, after 1, 3 and 6 months in 182 Italian healthy women aged 29 yr (18 to 45), and with BMI 21.8 kg/m2 (16 to 31). Total body water (TBW) was estimated with a BIA regression equation. Vector BIA was performed with the RXc mean graph method and the Hotelling's T2 test for paired and unpaired data. RESULTS: After 6 months body weight increased by 0.64 kg (1.1%) and TBW increased by 0.51 L (1.7%). The pattern of impedance vector displacement indicated a small increase in soft tissue hydration (interstitial gel fluid). Body composition changes did not significantly differ among groups of previous contraceptive methods. Arterial blood pressure did not significantly change over time. CONCLUSION: After 6 months of treatment with the ethinylestradiol/norelgestromin contraceptive patch we found a minimal, clinically not relevant, increase in body weight less than 1 kg that could be attributed to an adaptive interstitial gel hydration. This fluctuation is physiological as confirmed by the lack of any effect on blood pressure. This could be useful in increasing women's choice, acceptability and compliance of the ethinylestradiol/norelgestromin contraceptive patch.
Asunto(s)
Composición Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/efectos adversos , Aumento de Peso/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Cutánea , Adolescente , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Agua Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Agua Corporal/metabolismo , Combinación de Medicamentos , Impedancia Eléctrica , Etinilestradiol/administración & dosificación , Etinilestradiol/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Norgestrel/administración & dosificación , Norgestrel/efectos adversos , Norgestrel/análogos & derivados , Oximas/administración & dosificación , Oximas/efectos adversos , Aumento de Peso/fisiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Proton pump inhibitors are widely used for the treatment of acid-related disorders. Rabeprazole is a potent and irreversible inhibitor of H(+)/K(+)-ATPase gastric pump, and it is indicated for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, Zollinger Ellison syndrome, duodenal and gastric ulcers and for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in combination with antibiotics. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data show that rabeprazole achieves a pronounced acid suppression from the first administration that is maintained with repeated use; this may translate into faster onset of symptom relief for patients, particularly suitable when the indication is for the on-demand long-term maintenance of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Due to its predominantly nonenzymatic metabolism, rabeprazole has a lower potential for drug-drug interactions. The objective of this article is to update efficacy and safety data of rabeprazole in the treatment of acid-related disorders, following a previous review dated 2008.
Asunto(s)
2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Antiulcerosos/uso terapéutico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Úlcera Péptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Síndrome de Zollinger-Ellison/tratamiento farmacológico , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbencimidazoles/química , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbencimidazoles/farmacocinética , Antiulcerosos/química , Antiulcerosos/farmacocinética , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Úlcera Péptica/microbiología , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/química , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacocinética , RabeprazolRESUMEN
Rabeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) presenting a very advantageous pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile over older PPIs. In particular, this drug has a very fast onset of action, due to a short activation time and a very high pKa, and may therefore be defined as a 'second generation' PPI. The aim of this article is to provide an update on the pharmacology and clinical profile of rabeprazole and its use in acid-related disorders, with a particular focus on its role in gastroesophageal reflux disease; in the treatment and prevention of duodenal and gastric ulcers and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome; in the therapy of the extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (in particular the respiratory and ear, nose and throat ones); and in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.
Asunto(s)
2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbencimidazoles/química , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbencimidazoles/farmacocinética , Esófago de Barrett/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/química , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacocinética , Rabeprazol , Úlcera Gástrica/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Zollinger-Ellison/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
The WHSC1/MMSET gene, involved in t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) in multiple myeloma, encodes putative isoforms (MMSET I, MMSET II and RE-IIBP) which are thought to be involved in transcription regulation. We investigated their activity in transfected 293T and HeLa cells. Both MMSET I and MMSET II were localised in the nucleus, whereas RE-IIBP showed cytoplasmic and nucleolar staining. MMSET I dose-dependently repressed the transcriptional activity of the promoter region of the thymidine kinase gene, whereas MMSET II and RE-IIBP had no effect. The HDAC inhibitor, trichostatin A, reduced MMSET I repression activity and in vitro co-immunoprecipitation analyses indicated that MMSET I specifically recruits HDAC1 and mSin3b, but not HDAC2 or HDAC4. Our data support the hypothesis that MMSET may act as a transcription regulator; different functions may be associated with distinct isoforms.