MYC status determination in aggressive B-cell lymphoma: the impact of FISH probe selection.

AIMS: To assess how hybridization probe design may affect MYC status determination in Burkitt lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the results obtained with one dual-fusion and two break-apart commercial probes in a retrospective series of 91 aggressive B-cell lymphomas. All three probes were able to detect the IGH-MYC translocation in every case bearing it (13/13). However, seven of 13 (54%) non-IGH-MYC (light-chain immunoglobulin or non-immunoglobulin-MYC) rearrangements were unambiguously detected by just one of the probes tested. On the other hand, when the IGH-MYC dual-fusion probe was used, nine of 15 (60%) cases with a hybridization pattern suggestive of a non-IGH-MYC translocation were attributable to MYC copy gain rather than MYC rearrangement, as demonstrated by both break-apart probes. CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account the prognostic and therapeutic implications of the MYC translocation, probe design and limitations should be particularly kept in mind when MYC hybridization patterns are interpreted. In our experience, detection of 8q24 abnormalities could be optimized by a two-probe approach involving the application of both IGH-MYC dual-fusion and MYC break-apart selected kits.

Immunohistochemical detection of MYC protein correlates with MYC gene status in aggressive B cell lymphomas.

AIMS: MYC gene translocation entails a bad prognosis and a poor response to rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) in diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCL), and more intensive chemotherapy regimens could be more effective in those cases. Its evaluation requires cytogenetic or fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) studies, which are expensive and not widely available. The aim of this work was to find an immunohistochemical marker able to be used as a screening tool to identify MYC translocations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Aggressive B cell lymphomas in which MYC status was assessed during their diagnostic work-up between 2007 and 2010 were collected, their immunophenotype was re-evaluated, and were stratified according to the Hans algorithm. Two tissue microarrays were built in order to evaluate MYC protein expression with a commercially available antibody. The study was performed on 56 specimens: nine Burkitt lymphomas (eight translocated), 45 DLBCLs (nine translocated) and two lymphomas with intermediate features (both translocated). Only MYC protein expression detected by immunohistochemistry correlated with MYC translocation. No relationship was seen between MYC gene copies and protein expression. CONCLUSIONS: MYC protein expression detected by immunohistochemistry using a commercially available antibody correlates with MYC gene translocation, and could be used as a screening tool to select those cases in which confirmatory genetic testing is mandatory.