Trial of Lixisenatide in Early Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Lixisenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist used for the treatment of diabetes, has shown neuroprotective properties in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease. METHODS: In this phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assessed the effect of lixisenatide on the progression of motor disability in persons with Parkinson's disease. Participants in whom Parkinson's disease was diagnosed less than 3 years earlier, who were receiving a stable dose of medications to treat symptoms, and who did not have motor complications were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to daily subcutaneous lixisenatide or placebo for 12 months, followed by a 2-month washout period. The primary end point was the change from baseline in scores on the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III (range, 0 to 132, with higher scores indicating greater motor disability), which was assessed in patients in the on-medication state at 12 months. Secondary end points included other MDS-UPDRS subscores at 6, 12, and 14 months and doses of levodopa equivalent. RESULTS: A total of 156 persons were enrolled, with 78 assigned to each group. MDS-UPDRS part III scores at baseline were approximately 15 in both groups. At 12 months, scores on the MDS-UPDRS part III had changed by -0.04 points (indicating improvement) in the lixisenatide group and 3.04 points (indicating worsening disability) in the placebo group (difference, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 5.30; P = 0.007). At 14 months, after a 2-month washout period, the mean MDS-UPDRS motor scores in the off-medication state were 17.7 (95% CI, 15.7 to 19.7) with lixisenatide and 20.6 (95% CI, 18.5 to 22.8) with placebo. Other results relative to the secondary end points did not differ substantially between the groups. Nausea occurred in 46% of participants receiving lixisenatide, and vomiting occurred in 13%. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with early Parkinson's disease, lixisenatide therapy resulted in less progression of motor disability than placebo at 12 months in a phase 2 trial but was associated with gastrointestinal side effects. Longer and larger trials are needed to determine the effects and safety of lixisenatide in persons with Parkinson's disease. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health and others; LIXIPARK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03439943.).

Differences in Survival across Monogenic Forms of Parkinson's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Survival of patients with monogenic Parkinson's disease may depend on the causative genes associated with the disease. In this study, we compare survival of patients with Parkinson's disease according to the presence of SNCA, PRKN, LRRK2, or GBA mutations. METHODS: Data from the French Parkinson Disease Genetics national multicenter cohort study were used. Patients with sporadic and familial Parkinson's disease were recruited between 1990 and 2021. Patients were genotyped for the presence of mutations in the SNCA, PRKN, LRRK2, or GBA genes. Vital status was collected from the National death register for participants born in France. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Of the 2,037 patients with Parkinson's disease, 889 had died after a follow-up of up to 30 years. Patients with PRKN (n = 100, HR = 0.41; p = 0.001) and LRRK2 mutations (n = 51, HR = 0.49; p = 0.023) had longer survival than those without any mutation, whereas patients with SNCA (n = 20, HR = 9.88; p < 0.001) or GBA mutations (n = 173, HR = 1.33; p = 0.048) had shorter survival. INTERPRETATION: Survival differs across genetic forms of Parkinson's disease, with higher mortality for patients with SNCA or GBA mutations, and lower mortality for those with PRKN or LRRK2 mutations. Differences in severity and disease progression among monogenic forms of Parkinson's disease likely explain these findings, which has important consequences for genetic counselling and choice of end points for future clinical trials for targeted therapies. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:123-132.

Antisense therapies in neurological diseases.

Advances in targeted regulation of gene expression allowed new therapeutic approaches for monogenic neurological diseases. Molecular diagnosis has paved the way to personalized medicine targeting the pathogenic roots: DNA or its RNA transcript. These antisense therapies rely on modified nucleotides sequences (single-strand DNA or RNA, both belonging to the antisense oligonucleotides family, or double-strand interfering RNA) to act specifically on pathogenic target nucleic acids, thanks to complementary base pairing. Depending on the type of molecule, chemical modifications and target, base pairing will lead alternatively to splicing modifications of primary transcript RNA or transient messenger RNA degradation or non-translation. The key to success for neurodegenerative diseases also depends on the ability to reach target cells. The most advanced antisense therapies under development in neurological disorders are presented here, at the clinical stage of development, either at phase 3 or market authorization stage, such as in spinal amyotrophy, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, transthyretin-related hereditary amyloidosis, porphyria and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; or in earlier clinical phase 1 B, for Huntington's disease, synucleinopathies and tauopathies. We also discuss antisense therapies at the preclinical stage, such as in some tauopathies, spinocerebellar ataxias or other rare neurological disorders. Each subtype of antisense therapy, antisense oligonucleotides or interfering RNA, has proved target engagement or even clinical efficacy in patients; undisputable recent advances for severe and previously untreatable neurological disorders. Antisense therapies show great promise, but many unknowns remain. Expanding the initial successes achieved in orphan or rare diseases to other disorders will be the next challenge, as shown by the recent failure in Huntington disease or due to long-term preclinical toxicity in multiple system atrophy and cystic fibrosis. This will be critical in the perspective of new planned applications to premanifest mutation carriers, or other non-genetic degenerative disorders such as multiple system atrophy or Parkinson disease.

Impulse control disorders and related behaviors in Parkinson's disease: risk factors, clinical and genetic aspects, and management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent findings and research directions on impulse control disorders and related behaviors (ICDRBs) in Parkinson's disease (PD). RECENT FINDINGS: Longitudinal studies found that prevalence increases during PD progression, incident ICDRBs being around 10% per year in patients treated with dopaminergic therapies. Screening tools and severity scales already developed have been validated and are available in several countries and languages. The main clinical risk factors include young age, male gender, type, doses and duration of dopaminergic therapy, PD motor severity and dyskinesia, depression, anxiety, apathy, sleep disorders, and impulsivity traits. Genetic factors are suspected by a high estimated heritability, but individual genes and variants remain to be replicated. Management of ICDRBs is centered on dopamine agonist decrease, with the risk to develop withdrawal symptoms. Cognitive behavioral therapy and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation also improve ICDRBs. In the perspective of precision medicine, new individual prediction models of these disorders have been proposed, but they need further independent replication. SUMMARY: Regular monitoring of ICDRB during the course of PD is needed, particularly in the subject at high risk of developing these complications. Precision medicine will require the appropriate use of machine learning to be reached in the clinical setting.

Automated Categorization of Parkinsonian Syndromes Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Clinical Setting.

BACKGROUND: Machine learning algorithms using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data can accurately discriminate parkinsonian syndromes. Validation in patients recruited in routine clinical practice is missing. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a machine learning algorithm trained on a research cohort and tested on an independent clinical replication cohort for the categorization of parkinsonian syndromes. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-two subjects, including 94 healthy control subjects, 119 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), 51 patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) with Richardson's syndrome, 35 with multiple system atrophy (MSA) of the parkinsonian variant (MSA-P), and 23 with MSA of the cerebellar variant (MSA-C), were recruited. They were divided into a training cohort (n = 179) scanned in a research environment and a replication cohort (n = 143) examined in clinical practice on different MRI systems. Volumes and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics in 13 brain regions were used as input for a supervised machine learning algorithm. To harmonize data across scanners and reduce scanner-dependent effects, we tested two types of normalizations using patient data or healthy control data. RESULTS: In the replication cohort, high accuracies were achieved using volumetry in the classification of PD-PSP, PD-MSA-C, PSP-MSA-C, and PD-atypical parkinsonism (balanced accuracies: 0.840-0.983, area under the receiver operating characteristic curves: 0.907-0.995). Performances were lower for the classification of PD-MSA-P, MSA-C-MSA-P (balanced accuracies: 0.765-0.784, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.839-0.871) and PD-PSP-MSA (balanced accuracies: 0.773). Performance using DTI was improved when normalizing by controls, but remained lower than that using volumetry alone or combined with DTI. CONCLUSIONS: A machine learning approach based on volumetry enabled accurate classification of subjects with early-stage parkinsonism, examined on different MRI systems, as part of their clinical assessment. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Loss-of-Function Mutations in NR4A2 Cause Dopa-Responsive Dystonia Parkinsonism.

BACKGROUND: The group of dystonia genes is expanding, and mutations of these genes have been associated with various combined dystonia syndromes. Among the latter, the cause of some dystonia parkinsonism cases remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To report patients with early-onset dystonia parkinsonism as a result of loss-of-function mutations in nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2. METHODS: Phenotypic characterization and exome sequencing were carried out in 2 families. RESULTS: The 2 patients reported here both had a history of mild intellectual disability in childhood and subsequently developed dystonia parkinsonism in early adulthood. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was normal, and DATscan suggested bilateral dopaminergic denervation. Two frameshift mutations in NR4A2 were identified: a de novo insertion (NM_006186.3; c.326dupA) in the first case and another small insertion (NM_006186.3; c.881dupA) in the second. CONCLUSIONS: NR4A2 haploinsufficiency mutations have been recently reported in neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Our findings indicate that dystonia and/or parkinsonism may appear years after initial symptoms. Mutations in NR4A2 should be considered in patients with unexplained dystonia parkinsonism. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Differential enhancement of ERK, PKA and Ca2+ signaling in direct and indirect striatal neurons of Parkinsonian mice.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by severe locomotor deficits due to the disappearance of dopamine (DA) from the dorsal striatum. The development of PD symptoms and treatment-related complications such as dyskinesia have been proposed to result from complex alterations in intracellular signaling in both direct and indirect pathway striatal projection neurons (dSPNs and iSPNs, respectively) following loss of DA afferents. To identify cell-specific and dynamical modifications of signaling pathways associated with PD, we used a hemiparkinsonian mouse model with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesion combined with two-photon fluorescence biosensors imaging in adult corticostriatal slices. After DA lesion, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation was increased in response to DA D1 receptor (D1R) or α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) stimulation. The cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) pathway contributing to ERK activation displayed supersensitive responses to D1R stimulation after 6-OHDA lesion. This cAMP/PKA supersensitivity was specific of D1R-responding SPNs and resulted from Gαolf upregulation and deficient phosphodiesterase activity. In lesioned striatum, the number of D1R-SPNs with spontaneous Ca2+ transients augmented while Ca2+ response to AMPA receptor stimulation specifically increased in iSPNs. Our work reveals distinct cell type-specific signaling alterations in the striatum after DA denervation. It suggests that over-activation of ERK pathway, observed in PD striatum, known to contribute to dyskinesia, may be linked to the combined dysregulation of DA and glutamate signaling pathways in the two populations of SPNs. These findings bring new insights into the implication of these respective neuronal populations in PD motor symptoms and the occurrence of PD treatment complications.

Molecular basis of dopamine replacement therapy and its side effects in Parkinson's disease.

There is currently no cure for Parkinson's disease. The symptomatic therapeutic strategy essentially relies on dopamine replacement whose efficacy was demonstrated more than 50 years ago following the introduction of the dopamine precursor, levodopa. The spectacular antiparkinsonian effect of levodopa is, however, balanced by major limitations including the occurrence of motor complications related to its particular pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Other therapeutic strategies have thus been developed to overcome these problems such as the use of dopamine receptor agonists, dopamine metabolism inhibitors and non-dopaminergic drugs. Here we review the pharmacology and molecular mechanisms of dopamine replacement therapy in Parkinson's disease, both at the presynaptic and postsynaptic levels. The perspectives in terms of novel drug development and prediction of drug response for a more personalised medicine will be discussed.

[Therapeutic and pharmacologic perspectives in Parkinson's disease]. / Perspectives thérapeutiques et pharmacologiques dans la maladie de Parkinson.

Therapeutic and pharmacologic perspectives in parkinson's disease. Despite the dopaminergic therapy which improves motor symptoms, there are still a lot of challenges to be fulfilled in Parkinson's disease. Dopamine replacement therapy is hampered by motor complications, has no efficacy on non-motor symptoms, and is not neuroprotective so does not change disease progression. Second line therapies, also mainly acting on motor symptoms, such as deep brain stimulation, and continuous administration of levodopa or apomorphine by pumps, can benefit to a limited number of patients but are associated with a high burden for the patients and their caregivers, and a high cost for society. Several therapeutic strategies are currently under evaluation to improve the treatment of motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, and some non-motor symptoms. The recent development of more predictive preclinical models and biomarkers of disease progression should allow fostering the development of innovative neuroprotective strategies. The stratification of patients through the combination of clinical, biological and brain imaging features will help to move towards personalized precision medicine by matching patients care to their individual progression profile.

Perspectives thérapeutiques et pharmacologiques dans la maladie de parkinson. Malgré le traitement dopaminergique qui améliore les symptômes moteurs, de nombreux défis restent à relever pour améliorer la prise en charge de la maladie de Parkinson. Le traitement dopaminergique s'accompagne de complications motrices, n'est pas efficace sur les symptômes non moteurs, et n'a pas d'action neuroprotectrice, c'està- dire qu'il ne change pas la progression de la maladie. Les traitements de seconde ligne, agissant également surtout sur les symptômes moteurs, tels que la stimulation cérébrale profonde et les administrations continues par pompes de lévodopa ou d'apomorphine, sont bénéfiques pour un nombre limité de patients mais aux dépens de contraintes importantes pour les patients et l'entourage, et d'un coût important pour la société. De nombreuses stratégies thérapeutiques sont en cours d'évaluation pour améliorer les fluctuations motrices, les dyskinésies et les symptômes non moteurs. Le développement concomitant de modèles précliniques plus prédictifs et de biomarqueurs de progression de la maladie devrait permettre d'accélérer le développement de stratégies neuroprotectrices innovantes. La stratification des patients par la combinaison de données cliniques, biologiques et d'imagerie cérébrale aidera le passage vers une médecine de précision pour une prise en charge personnalisée des patients.