Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.

OBJECTIVES: To determine in-hospital outcomes and assess high-risk groups among chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from January 2012 to September 2015 was performed. SETTING: Hospitals across the United States that offer TAVRs or SAVRs. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with a diagnosis of CHF and AS. INTERVENTIONS: The patients underwent either TAVR or SAVR. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Totals of 5,871 and 4,008 CHF patients underwent TAVR and SAVR, respectively. TAVR patients were significantly older, more were female, and had a higher comorbidity burden. No significant differences in in-hospital mortality were noted between TAVR and SAVR. However, mean length of stay was significantly longer by 3.5 days in the SAVR group, as was the mean total cost. With the exception of complete heart block, permanent pacemaker implantation, and vascular complications, the majority of postoperative events were higher among the SAVR group. Multivariate regression analysis identified postoperative cardiac, respiratory and renal complications as significant predictors of in-hospital mortality for both groups. Additionally, age ≥75 years and vascular complications were significant predictors of mortality for patients undergoing TAVR. CONCLUSIONS: Among CHF patients with symptomatic AS, TAVR had similar in-hospital mortality rate compared with SAVR despite higher comorbidity burden. TAVR patients are at a lower risk of cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal complications and might lead to reduced length of hospital stay and cost. Hence, TAVR may be a safer option in this population.

Does the Type of Chronic Heart Failure Impact In-Hospital Outcomes for Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures?

BACKGROUND: This study assessed in-hospital outcomes of patients with chronic systolic, diastolic, or mixed heart failure (HF) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify patients with aortic stenosis and chronic HF who underwent TAVR or SAVR between 2012 and 2015. Propensity score matching and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine outcome risk. RESULTS: A cohort of 9,879 patients with systolic (27.2%), diastolic (52.2%), and mixed (20.6%) chronic HF were included. No statistically significant differences in hospital mortality were noted. Overall, patients with diastolic HF had the shortest hospital stays and lowest costs. Compared with patients with diastolic HF, the risk of acute myocardial infarction (TAVR odds ratio [OR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.20-3.19; P = .008; SAVR OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.98-1.95; P = .067) and cardiogenic shock (TAVR OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.43-3.23; P < .001; SAVR OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.42-2.53; P ≤ .001) was higher in patients with systolic HF, whereas the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (TAVR OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.76; P < .001; SAVR OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.84; P = .004) was lower following aortic valve procedures. In TAVR, the risk of acute deep vein thrombosis and kidney injury was higher, although not statistically significant, in patients with systolic HF than in those with diastolic HF. CONCLUSION: These outcomes suggest that chronic HF types do not incur statistically significant hospital mortality risk in patients undergoing TAVR or SAVR.

Catastrophic Cardiac Events During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative complications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are decreasing but can be catastrophic when they occur. Systematic reports of the nature of these events are lacking in the contemporary era. Our study aimed to report the incidence, outcomes, and perioperative management of catastrophic cardiac events in patients undergoing TAVR and to propose a working strategy to address these complications. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who developed catastrophic cardiac events during or immediately after TAVR between 2015 and 2019 at a single academic centre. RESULTS: Of 2102 patients who underwent TAVR, 51 (2.5%) developed catastrophic cardiac events. The causes included cardiac perforation and tamponade (n = 19, 37.3%), acute left- ventricular failure (n = 10, 19.6%), coronary artery obstruction (n = 10, 19.6%), aortic-root disruption (n = 7, 13.7%), and device embolization (n = 5, 9.8%). Twenty-four patients (47.0%) with catastrophic cardiac events required stabilization by either intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The in-hospital mortality rate increased by 11.7-fold for patients with catastrophic cardiac events compared with those without (25.5% vs 2.0%, P < 0.001). Patients who developed aortic root disruption had the highest mortality rate (42.8%) compared with the others. The incidence of catastrophic cardiac events remained stable over a 5-year period, but the associated mortality decreased from 38.5% in 2015 to 9.1% in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Catastrophic cardiac events during TAVR are rare, but they account for a dramatic increase in perioperative mortality. Early recognition and development of a standardized perioperative team approach can help manage patients experiencing these complications.

Anesthesiology Resident Performance on the US Medical Licensing Examination Predicts Success on the American Board of Anesthesiology BASIC Staged Examination: An Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Correlation has been found between the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 examination results and anesthesiology resident success on American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) examinations. In 2014, the ABA instituted the BASIC examination at the end of the postgraduate year-2 year. We hypothesized a similar predictive value of USMLE scores on BASIC examination success. METHODS: After the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at UTHealth Institutional Review Board approved and waived written consent, we retrospectively evaluated USMLE Step examination performance on first-time BASIC examination success in a single academic department from 2014-2018. RESULTS: Over 5 years, 120 residents took the ABA BASIC examination and 108 (90%) passed on the first attempt. Ten of 12 first-time failures were successful on repeat examination but analyzed in the failure group. Complete data was available for 92 residents (76.7%), with absent scores primarily reflecting osteopathic graduates who completed Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination of the United States level examinations rather than USMLE. In the failure cohort, all 3 USMLE examination step scores were lower (P < .02). USMLE Step 1 score independently predicted success on the BASIC examination (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.17, P < .001). Although USMLE Step 2 score predicted BASIC examination success (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.18, P = .001), this did not remain after adjustment for Step 1 score using multiple logistic regression (P = .11). In multivariable logistical regression, first clinical anesthesia in-training examination score and USMLE Step 1 score were significant for predictors of success on the BASIC exam. CONCLUSIONS: In anesthesiology residency training, our preliminary single-center data is the first to suggest that USMLE Step 1 performance could be used as a predictor of success on the recently introduced ABA BASIC Examination. These findings do not support recent action to change USMLE scoring to a pass/fail report.

Assessment of a multimodal analgesia protocol to allow the implementation of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery: Retrospective analysis of patient outcomes.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of utilizing a multimodal analgesia protocol to allow the implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) in patients requiring cardio-pulmonary bypass. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patients treated with the proposed ERACS bundle in comparison to matched controls. SETTING: Single-center study. PATIENTS: A total of 50 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery limited to on pump coronary artery bypass graft. MEASUREMENTS: Perioperative outcomes of 25 patients that underwent ERACS protocol and 25 controls were measured. In-operating room (OR) extubation, total intubation time, total intra-OP fentanyl given, total post-OP morphine equivalent given, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS and post-OP complications were examined. MAIN RESULTS: The ERACS group and control group were equivalent with regards to age, gender, comorbidities, ASA classification and type of surgery. Mean cardiac bypass time and mean aortic clamp time were similar. Extubation in the OR was achieved for 12 patients in the ERACS group compared to 1 in the control group. Post-operative opioid consumption was lower in ERACS group (27.3 vs. 51.7 morphine equivalents, p = 0.006). Although ICU LOS and hospital LOS were shorter in the ERACS group, this did not reach significance. CONCLUSIONS: The ERACS group showed a significant decrease in opioid use and increased incidence of successful in OR extubation.

Systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve after aortic valve replacement.

We present a case of severe systolic anterior motion developing intraoperatively after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis.

Intraoperative assessment of pulmonary artery pressure using transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

We performed a retrospective chart review to investigate a potential relation between pulmonary artery (PA) diameter as measured by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography and PA pressures measured by PA catheter with the aim of determining whether main PA diameter can aid clinicians in the diagnosis of PA hypertension. A total of 82 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery were included in our study. Main PA diameter showed a moderate correlation with systolic and diastolic pressures, r = 0.576 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.407-0.703), P < 0.001, and r = 0.504 (95% CI, 0.319-0.648), P < 0.001, respectively. The authors believe that although a moderate correlation exists between main PA diameter and PA pressure, confounding hemodynamic variables prevent main PA diameter from being an accurate and reliable means of diagnosing PA hypertension.