Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 64(1): 25-32, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27103337

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients are often turned down from receiving treatment for descending thoracic aortic diseases (DTADs) because of the uncertain benefits, especially in acute settings. This study investigated the impact of old age and timing of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) on outcomes of DTAD in patients older than 75 years of age. METHODS: Patients from a prospective TEVAR database were dichotomized by age (75 and 80 years of age). Older and young patients were compared in three timing scenarios: (1) elective procedures, (2) any emergency (within 15 days from onset), and (3) acute ruptures (any emergency subgroup). Primary outcome was perioperative mortality assessed at 30 and 90 days. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2015, 141 consecutive TEVARs (71.6% men) were performed. Fifty-seven patients (40.4%) were older than 75 years of age; 28 were octogenarians. Eighty-three TEVARs were performed electively and 58 emergently. Among overall emergencies, 42 TEVARs were for acute ruptures. In the elective scenario, the 30-day mortality rate was 5.0% vs 0 (odds ratio [OR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.1; P = .23), and 90-day mortality was 7.5% vs 0, for patients older than 75 years of age vs those who were younger than 75, respectively (P = .11). No octogenarian died. In the emergency scenario, 30-day mortality was 41.2% vs 9.8%, for patients older than 75 years of age vs those who were younger than 75, respectively (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.6-26.6; P = .01) with unchanged rates at 90 days. The mortality rate was 50% for octogenarians. In the acute rupture scenario, 30-day mortality was 40% vs 11.1% (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.10-25.99; P = .05) for patients older than 75 years of age vs those younger than 75 years of age and 46% vs 10% (OR, 7.5; 95% CI, 1.47-37.46; P = .016) for octogenarians vs younger patients. Rates remained unchanged at 90 days. Patients older than age 75 survived for a mean of 53.98 ± 7.7 months after TEVAR. CONCLUSIONS: In the elderly patient population with DTAD, mortality risks from TEVAR are strongly related to timing and age. When compared to younger patients, those older than 75 years of age have three to five times the risk of mortality after urgent or emergent TEVAR. However, older patients should still be considered for emergent life-saving treatment, given that the majority survives.


Asunto(s)
Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Aorta/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Aorta/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Urgencias Médicas , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Selección de Paciente , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
J Vasc Surg ; 58(5): 1412-6, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23827335

RESUMEN

Visceral aneurysms are rare in the general population (<2%), and the most serious complication is represented by aneurysm rupture. The use of stent grafts to exclude visceral aneurysms is described in several reports but is reserved for patients with favorable anatomy. We report here on a hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm in a liver transplant patient and a patient with an aneurysmal vein graft degeneration of a renal bypass, both with no suitable proximal neck for standard stent grafting. Both patients were successfully treated with a custom-made aortic endograft with a single fenestration for the hepatic or renal artery, together with a visceral covered stent. Although initial results are promising, long-term follow-up is required to assess durability.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso/cirugía , Aneurisma/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Arteria Hepática/cirugía , Arteria Renal/cirugía , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma/etiología , Aneurisma Falso/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Falso/etiología , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Arteria Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Radiografía Intervencional , Arteria Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Safena/trasplante , Stents , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA