Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Intensive Care Med ; 37(4): 491-499, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34898320

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether high-dose dexamethasone increases the number of ventilator-free days (VFD) among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by COVID-19. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, open-label, clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19-related ARDS were enrolled from June 17, 2020, to March 27, 2021, in four intensive care units (ICUs) in Argentina. INTERVENTION: 16 mg of dexamethasone intravenously daily for five days followed by 8 mg of dexamethasone daily for five days or 6 mg of dexamethasone intravenously daily for 10 days. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was ventilator-free days during the first 28 days. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality at 28 and 90 days, infection rate, muscle weakness, and glycemic control in the first 28 days. RESULTS: Data from 98 patients who received at least one dose of dexamethasone were analyzed. The trial was prematurely terminated due to low enrollment rate. At 28 days after randomization, there was no difference between high- and low-dose dexamethasone groups in VFD (median, 0 [interquartile range [IQR] 0-14] vs. 0 [IQR 0-1] days; P = .231), or in the mean duration of mechanical ventilation (19 ± 18 vs. 25 ± 22 days; P = .078). The cumulative hazard of successful discontinuation from mechanical ventilation was increased by the high-dose treatment (adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.5; P < .001). None of the prespecified secondary and safety outcomes showed a significant difference between treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ARDS due to COVID-19, the use of higher doses of dexamethasone compared with the recommended low-dose treatment did not show an increase in VFD. However, the higher dose significantly improved the time required to liberate them from the ventilator.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , COVID-19/complicaciones , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Chest ; 160(6): e639-e643, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34872678

RESUMEN

CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with a recent history of generalized seizures. Three months earlier, he started with intermittent hemoptysis. CT scan showed a cavitary lung lesion in the upper segment of the right inferior lobe (RIL). Because of his job as a social worker in a high-risk population, he started treatment for Mycobacterium TB; however, the BAL culture result was negative. At the time of his current admission, he has continued taking rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and levofloxacin. He denied the use of any illicit drugs or alcohol. He had no history of smoking. One year earlier, he visited Southeast Asia, Oceania, and South Africa for several months. He reported a weight loss of 7 kg since then. Except for a recurrent oral candidiasis, he did not have a relevant medical history. His family history was notable for mother with lupus, and brother with sarcoidosis.


Asunto(s)
Ascomicetos/aislamiento & purificación , Encefalopatías/microbiología , Enfermedad Granulomatosa Crónica/inmunología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Fúngicas/microbiología , Adulto , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Encefalopatías/tratamiento farmacológico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Enfermedades Pulmonares Fúngicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Convulsiones/microbiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
3.
Trials ; 21(1): 743, 2020 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32843098

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to explore the effectiveness and safety of high dose dexamethasone treatment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome secondary to SARS-Cov-2 pneumonia. TRIAL DESIGN: Multicentre, randomized clinical trial, controlled, open label, parallel group, to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of high dose dexamethasone in adult patients with confirmed COVID-19, with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. PARTICIPANTS: We will include patients with SARS-Cov-2 pneumonia who develop acute respiratory distress syndrome, in several intensive care units (ICU) in Buenos Aires, Argentina (CEMIC, Clinica Bazterrica, Sanatorio Sagrado Corazon) Inclusion criteria: Men and women, age ≥ 18 years old. Confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, by RT-PCR. Diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (hypoxemic respiratory failure not explained by cardiac disease + PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 300 with a Positive End-Expiratory Pressure ≥ 5 cm H2O + bilateral pulmonary infiltrates) Length of mechanical ventilation of at least 72 hours Informed consent (next of kin / legal guardian) Exclusion criteria: Pregnant or breast-feeding women. Terminal disease (advanced cancer; under palliative care; cardiovascular, respiratory, or renal disease with a life expectancy less ≤ 1 year). Therapeutic limitation (advance directives or do not resuscitate order) Severe immunosuppression (HIV infection, long-term use of immunosuppressive agents, active cancer). Patients under chronic treatment with glucocorticoids for other diseases (≥ 8 mg prednisone, or equivalent) Participation in another randomized clinical trial. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Eligible patients will be randomized to receive standard ICU patient care (group 1) or standard ICU patient care plus high dose dexamethasone (group 2). Group 1: dexamethasone up to 6 mg/24 hours for up to 10 days + ventilatory, hemodynamic, nutritional, and antimicrobial support according to international guidelines. Group 2: dexamethasone 16 mg/24 hours for 5 days followed by dexamethasone 8 mg/24 hours for 5 days + ventilatory, hemodynamic, nutritional, and antimicrobial support according to international guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME: The main result is ventilator-free days at 28 days (Days without ventilator support in the first 28 days following randomization). Secondary outcomes are 28-days and 90-days mortality, frequency of nosocomial infections in the first 28 days after randomization, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score variation and prone position in the first 10-days, viral shedding 28-days after randomization, and delirium and muscle weakness at ICU discharge. RANDOMISATION: Treatment will be assigned according to site stratified randomization by permuted random blocks sequence 1:1 generated with a table in R language concealed in a randomization tool in REDCap (Research Electronic Data CAPture) platform. BLINDING (MASKING): This is an open trial, so no masking of treatment assignment will be used. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): Assuming a 3 days difference in ventilator-free days between treatment groups, with a mean of 9 days, and a standard deviation of 9 days; the necessary sample size would be 284 subjects (142 per group), with a power of 80% and a two-tailed alpha error of 0.05. TRIAL STATUS: The protocol with code 1264, version 3.0 on date: May 13, 2020 is approved by the local Ethics Committee. The trial is in the recruitment phase. Recruitment began May 22, 2020 and is anticipated to be complete by the end of December 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered under the title "Dexamethasone for COVID-19 Related ARDS: a Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial" with ClinicalTrials number NCT04395105, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04395105 , registered on 20 May 2020. FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/tratamiento farmacológico , Argentina , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Delirio/epidemiología , Humanos , Mortalidad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Pandemias , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Posición Prona , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Esparcimiento de Virus , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
5.
Chest ; 161(5): e327-e328, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35526908
7.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 115(9): 1820-5, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23810183

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis between post-neurosurgical bacterial meningitis (PNBM) and aseptic meningitis is difficult. Inflammatory and biochemical cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) changes mimic those classically observed after CNS surgery. CSF lactate assay has therefore been proposed as a useful PNBM marker. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CSF lactate as a PNBM marker in patients hospitalized after a neurosurgical procedure. METHODS: Between July 2005 and June 2009, a prospective clinical study, in which all patients with clinical suspicion of PNBM were enrolled, was conducted at our neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit. PNBM diagnosis was categorized as proven, probable or negative before the analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients, 51 males with a mean age of 50 years (range 32-68 years) were included. Surgery was elective in 76% patients, mostly for brain tumors (57%); thirty PNBM episodes were identified. CSF parameters were significantly different in glucose concentration (27 mg% vs. 73 mg%, p<0.001), lactate (8 mmol/L vs. 2.8 mmol/L, p<0.001), CSF neutrophil pleocytosis (850 mm(-3) vs. 10mm(-3), p<0.001), and protein levels (449 mg% vs. 98 mg%) between the PNBM and non-PNBM groups. The ROC curve that best fits PNBM diagnosis is lactate. CONCLUSION: Increased CSF lactate is a useful PNBM marker, with better predictive value than CSF hypoglycorrhachia or pleocytosis. Lactate levels ≥ 4 mmol/L showed 97% sensitivity and 78% specificity, with a 97% negative predictive value.


Asunto(s)
Ácido Láctico/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Meningitis Bacterianas/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Meningitis Bacterianas/etiología , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Presión Intracraneal , Masculino , Meningitis Aséptica/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Meningitis Bacterianas/microbiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/microbiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Punción Espinal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA