Drug survival, effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab for moderate-to-severe psoriasis up to 5 years.

INTRODUCTION: Ixekizumab proved to be effective and safe for psoriasis treatment in several randomized clinical trials and real-life studies. Nevertheless, long-term real-world experiences are still lacking, with little data up to 4 years of treatment. OBJECTIVES: To analyse survival, effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab in a real-life cohort of patients affected by moderate-to-severe psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis up to 260 weeks (5 years). METHODS: We included all patients treated with ixekizumab from December 2017 to March 2021. Drug survival (DS) was analysed in patients at risk for up to 5 years. Cox analysis was adopted to evaluate possible predictive factors of discontinuation. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (meanPASI and PASI100, 90, and ≤3) was used as outcomes of effectiveness on observed patients at 16, 52, 104, 156, 208 and 260 weeks. Logistic regression was performed to identify possible predictive factors of response. RESULTS: DS was 65.5% at 260 weeks, with being a super-responder patient (achievement of PASI100 at 16 weeks and maintained at 28 weeks) correlated with less risk of discontinuation. PASI100, 90 and ≤3 was achieved by 54.1%, 60.5% and 73% of observed patients, respectively, at 16 weeks, and by 59.1%, 81.8% and 95.5%, respectively, at 260 weeks. High mean BMI was the only factor strongly associated with less achievement of the outcomes at the earlier time points: PASI100 at 16 weeks (OR 0.93, CI 0.87-0.98, p = 0.014) and at 104 weeks (OR 0.91, CI 0.84-0.98, p = 0.019), PASI90 achievement at 16 weeks (OR 0.94, CI 0.88-0.99, p = 0.028) and 104 weeks (OR 0.91, CI 0.83-0.99, p = 0.027), and PASI ≤3 (OR 0.86, CI 0.76-0.97, p = 0.018) at 104 weeks. No severe adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ixekizumab showed high effectiveness and safety for up to 5 years, with survival of 2/3 of treated patients. Rapid response to treatment is predictive of long-term response.

Efficacy of anti-IL-23 and anti-IL-17 after adalimumab failure in psoriatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Many national guidelines at the European level recommend first-line therapy based on the anti-TNF-alpha adalimumab for treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, mainly for economic reasons. Consequently, patients being treated with newer IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors underwent previous unsuccessful first-line adalimumab-based therapy. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors after treatment with adalimumab compared to adalimumab-naive psoriatic patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 1053 psoriatic patients treated with anti-IL17 and anti-IL23 agents, which included 68 and 24 adalimumab-experienced and 399 and 260 bio-naive patients. Efficacy was assessed with mean PASI, PASI90, PASI100, and <3. RESULTS: Concerning the achieving of PASI100, PASI90 and PASI < 3 in patients treated with anti-IL17 agents, no significant differences were observed between adalimumab-experienced and bio-naive patients. In patients treated with an anti-IL-23 agent, a faster response was observed in bio-naive patients, with PASI < 3 significantly higher than ADA-experienced patients at 16 weeks (77% vs. 58% p = 0.048). In a sub-analysis that evaluated the performance of anti-IL17 and anti-IL23 agents in adalimumab-experienced patients with a history of secondary failure, no significant differences were found. In multivariate analysis of PASI100, only anti-IL-17 therapy appeared to have a negative impact at 52 weeks (OR: 0.54 p = 0.04) independently of previous treatment. For PASI90, type of treatment and bio-naïve status did not seem to have an impact at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-IL 23 and anti-IL 17 agents are not significantly different in terms of efficacy in bio-naive patients or as second-line therapy after failure with a biosimilar or originator adalimumab.

Primary cutaneous lymphoma patients seen at a referral dermatological centre in 1 year: A single-centre observational retrospective cohort study of the diagnoses and staging, comorbidities and associated symptoms, treatment performed and clinical course.

IMPORTANCE: Primary cutaneous lymphomas (PCL) are rare diseases, but the indolent course makes their prevalence high. Although there are many treatment options, no hierarchy is recommended. OBJECTIVE: To identify the burden of PCL and describe clinical-pathologic features; associated comorbidities; analyse treatment approaches in real-life and the parameters associated with the achievement of complete response (CR). DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In this study, all the PCL patients (384 patients) consecutively seen at the Dermatologic Clinic of the University of Turin from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019, with follow-up updated to December 2020, were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Subtype of PCL, demographic data, time elapsed between first lesions and diagnosis, associated symptoms, comorbidities, staging at diagnosis, high-grade transformation, blood involvement, stage progression, therapies used and response were assessed. RESULTS: 247 were cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL, 64.3%), 137 cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (CBCL, 35.7%) and the most frequent subtype was MF (48.4%). 62.3% of CTCL patients showed at least one comorbidity, mainly cardiovascular (28.7%), 20.2% show other not cutaneous neoplasms. The main approaches were skin-directed therapies (topical steroids 65.6%; phototherapy 50.2%). 39.3% patients achieved a CR during the disease course. Pruritus, the presence of comorbidities and high-grade transformation were factors associated with failure to achieve CR, whereas stage IA of MF was associated with greater achievement of CR. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The Th2 cytokine related development of pruritus could justify increased resistance to treatment, while the presence of associated comorbidities could reduce treatment options as well as treatment compliance.