Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Urol ; 198(2): 335-344, 2017 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28322857

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We assessed the midterm oncologic outcomes of vascular targeted photodynamic therapy with padeliporfin for low risk prostate cancer treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively assessed all patients treated with vascular targeted photodynamic therapy for low risk prostate cancer at our center. Patients were followed every 6 months. All patients underwent prostate biopsies 6 months after treatment or when there was biological or clinical progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points were absent clinically significant cancer in the treated lobes, radical therapy and the prostate specific antigen rate. Variables were compared with the chi-square, Mann-Whitney or Wilcoxon test. Progression-free survival is reported with Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: A total of 82 men were treated with vascular targeted photodynamic therapy. Median followup was 68 months (range 6 to 89). Median progression-free survival was 86 months (95% CI 82-90). Median prostate specific antigen decreased significantly by 41% 6 months after treatment and it remained stable during followup (p <0.001). A total of 115 lobes were treated and absent clinically significant cancer was achieved in 94 (82%). Of the 82 patients 20 (24%) underwent radical therapy, including radical prostatectomy in 18 and brachytherapy in 2, at a median of 22 months (range 6 to 86). Study limitations include a single arm design, small population size and midterm followup. CONCLUSIONS: Padeliporfin vascular targeted photodynamic therapy for low risk prostate cancer achieved an 82% rate of absent clinically significant cancer in treated lobes and 76% of patients avoided radical therapy at a median followup of 68 months. However, longer followup is required to determine long-term outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Bacterioclorofilas/uso terapéutico , Fotoquimioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Asian J Androl ; 22(5): 454-458, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31939351

RESUMEN

Vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) using padeliporfin is currently assessed as a low-risk prostate cancer (LRPCa) treatment. The aim of this study was to assess erectile function outcomes of VTP for LRPCa treatment. We prospectively included all patients treated with VTP for LRPCa. The primary endpoint was the post-treatment International Index of Erectile Function score (IIEF5 score) evolution (at 6 months, 12 months, and then every year for 5 years). Secondary endpoints were the need of erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment and its efficacy. Eighty-two men were included. The median follow-up was 68 (range: 6-89) months. There was a 3-point significant decrease in the median IIEF5 score between baseline and at 6 months post-VTP (23 [range: 1-25] vs 20 [range: 1-25], P = 0.005). There was a 1-point decrease at 1 year and 2 years post-VTP compared to baseline (22 [range: 2-25] and 22 [range: 0-25], P < 0.005). There was no significant difference at 3, 4, and 5 years compared to baseline. Twenty-seven (32.9%) patients received ED treatment: phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDEI5; n = 18), intracavernous injections (ICI; n = 9), and intra-urethral gel (n = 1). The median IIEF5 score statistically significantly increased after ED treatment (7 [range: 0-24] vs 21 [range: 1-25], P < 0.001). ED treatment was efficient for 75% of the patients. There was no statistically significant difference between IIEF5 score at baseline and after ED treatment (P = 0.443). Forty-six patients were totally potent before VTP and among them, 13 needed ED treatment post-VTP with a success rate of 69.2%. VTP induced minimal changes in erectile function with a 3-point and a 1-point reduction in the IIEF5 score at 6 months and at 1 year, respectively. When required, ED treatment was efficient.


Asunto(s)
Bacterioclorofilas/efectos adversos , Disfunción Eréctil/terapia , Erección Peniana/efectos de los fármacos , Fotoquimioterapia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Bacterioclorofilas/uso terapéutico , Disfunción Eréctil/inducido químicamente , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5/uso terapéutico , Fotoquimioterapia/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA