Rates and Correlates of Uptake of Continuous Glucose Monitors Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care and Endocrinology Settings.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials indicate continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use may benefit adults with type 2 diabetes, but CGM rates and correlates in real-world care settings are unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to ascertain prevalence and correlates of CGM use and to examine rates of new CGM prescriptions across clinic types and medication regimens. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort using electronic health records in a large academic medical center in the Southeastern US. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with type 2 diabetes and a primary care or endocrinology visit during 2021. MAIN MEASURES: Age, gender, race, ethnicity, insurance, clinic type, insulin regimen, hemoglobin A1c values, CGM prescriptions, and prescribing clinic type. KEY RESULTS: Among 30,585 adults with type 2 diabetes, 13% had used a CGM. CGM users were younger and more had private health insurance (p < .05) as compared to non-users; 72% of CGM users had an intensive insulin regimen, but 12% were not taking insulin. CGM users had higher hemoglobin A1c values (both most recent and most proximal to the first CGM prescription) than non-users. CGM users were more likely to receive endocrinology care than non-users, but 23% had only primary care visits in 2021. For each month in 2021, a mean of 90.5 (SD 12.5) people started using CGM. From 2020 to 2021, monthly rates of CGM prescriptions to new users grew 36% overall, but 125% in primary care. Most starting CGM in endocrinology had an intensive insulin regimen (82% vs. 49% starting in primary care), whereas 28% starting CGM in primary care were not using insulin (vs. 5% in endocrinology). CONCLUSION: CGM uptake for type 2 diabetes is increasing rapidly, with most growth in primary care. These trends present opportunities for healthcare system adaptations to support CGM use and related workflows in primary care to support growth in uptake.

The Role of Habit Formation and Automaticity in Diabetes Self-Management: Current Evidence and Future Applications.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diabetes is a chronic condition that requires consistent self-management for optimal health outcomes. People with diabetes are prone to burnout, cognitive burden, and sub-optimal performance of self-management tasks. Interventions that focus on habit formation have the potential to increase engagement by facilitating automaticity of self-management task performance. The purpose of this review is to (1) clarify the conceptualizations of habit formation and behavioral automaticity in the context of health behavior interventions, (2) review the evidence of habit in relation to behaviors relevant to diabetes self-management, and (3) discuss opportunities for incorporating habit formation and automaticity into diabetes self-management interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Modern habit research describes a habit as a behavior that results over time from an automatic mental process. Automatic behaviors are experienced as cue-dependent, goal-independent, unconscious, and efficient. Habit formation requires context-dependent repetition to form cue-behavior associations. Results of diabetes habit studies are mixed. Observational studies have shown positive associations between habit strength and target self-management behaviors such as taking medication and monitoring blood glucose, as well as glycemic outcomes such as HbA1c. However, intervention studies conducted in similar populations have not demonstrated a significant benefit of habit-forming interventions compared to controls, possibly due to varying techniques used to promote habit formation. Automaticity of self-management behaviors has the potential to minimize the burden associated with performance of self-management tasks and ultimately improve outcomes for people with diabetes. Future studies should focus on refining interventions focused on context-dependent repetition to promote habit formation and better measurement of habit automaticity in diabetes self-management.

Exploring mHealth potential to improve kidney function: secondary analysis of a randomized trial of diabetes self-care in diverse adults.

BACKGROUND: Many individuals living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have comorbid Type 2 diabetes (T2D). We sought to explore if efficacious interventions that improve glycemic control may also have potential to reduce CKD progression. METHODS: REACH is a text message-delivered self-management support intervention, which focused on medication adherence, diet, and exercise that significantly improved glycemic control in N = 506 patients with T2D. Using data from the trial, we characterized kidney health in the full sample and explored the intervention's effect on change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12 months in a subsample of N=271 patients with eGFR data. RESULTS: In a diverse sample with respect to race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, 37.2% had presence of mild or heavy proteinuria and/or an eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. There was a trending interaction effect between intervention and presence of proteinuria at baseline (b = 6.016, p = .099) such that patients with proteinuria at baseline who received REACH had less worsening of eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should examine whether diabetes directed self-management support reduces CKD progression in ethnically diverse individuals with albuminuria. In highly comorbid populations, such as T2D and CKD, text-based support can be further tailored according to individuals' multimorbid disease self-management needs and is readily scalable for individuals with limited resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02409329 ).

Changes in family involvement occasioned by FAMS mobile health intervention mediate changes in glycemic control over 12 months.

Mobile phone-delivered interventions have proven effective in improving glycemic control (HbA1c) in the short term among adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Family systems theory suggests engaging family/friend in adults' diabetes self-care may enhance or sustain improvements. In secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial (N = 506), we examined intervention effects on HbA1c via change in diabetes-specific helpful and harmful family/friend involvement. We compared a text messaging intervention that did not target family/friend involvement (REACH), REACH plus family-focused intervention components targeting helpful and harmful family/friend involvement (REACH + FAMS), and a control condition. Over 6 months, both intervention groups experienced improvement in HbA1c relative to control, but at 12 months neither did. However, REACH + FAMS showed an indirect effect on HbA1c via change in helpful family/friend involvement at both 6 and 12 months while REACH effects were not mediated by family/friend involvement. Consistent with family systems theory, improvements in HbA1c mediated by improved family/friend involvement were sustained.

Development of a Typology of Diabetes-Specific Family Functioning Among Adults With Type 2.

BACKGROUND: Family members' responses to adults' diabetes and efforts to manage it vary widely. Multiple aspects of diabetes-specific family functioning have been identified as important for self-management and psychosocial well-being in theoretical (i.e., theories of social support and collaborative coping) and observational literature. PURPOSE: Develop a typological framework of diabetes-specific family functioning and examine cross-sectional associations between type and diabetes outcomes. METHODS: We used electronic health record (EHR) data to identify a cohort of 5,545 adults receiving outpatient care for type 2 diabetes and invited them to complete a survey assessing 10 dimensions of diabetes-specific family functioning. We used k-means cluster analysis to identify types. After type assignment, we used EHR data for the full cohort to generate sampling weights to correct for imbalance between participants and non-participants. We used weighted data to examine unadjusted associations between participant characteristics and type, and in regression models to examine associations between type and diabetes outcomes. Regression models were adjusted for sociodemographics, diabetes duration, and insulin status. RESULTS: We identified and named four types: Collaborative and Helpful (33.8%), Satisfied with Low Involvement (22.2%), Want More Involvement (29.6%), and Critically Involved (14.5%; reflecting the highest levels of criticism and harmful involvement). Across these types, hemoglobin A1c, diabetes distress, depressive symptoms, diabetes medication adherence, and diabetes self-efficacy worsened. After covariate adjustment, type remained independently associated with each diabetes outcome (all p's < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The typology extends theories of family support in diabetes and applications of the typology may lead to breakthroughs in intervention design, tailoring, and evaluation.

Mixed-Methods Randomized Evaluation of FAMS: A Mobile Phone-Delivered Intervention to Improve Family/Friend Involvement in Adults' Type 2 Diabetes Self-Care.

BACKGROUND: Family and friends have both helpful and harmful effects on adults' diabetes self-management. Family-focused Add-on to Motivate Self-care (FAMS) is a mobile phone-delivered intervention designed to improve family/friend involvement, self-efficacy, and self-care via monthly phone coaching, texts tailored to goals, and the option to invite a support person to receive texts. PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate how FAMS was received by a diverse group of adults with Type 2 diabetes and if FAMS improved diabetes-specific family/friend involvement (increased helpful and reduced harmful), diabetes self-efficacy, and self-care (diet and physical activity). We also assessed if improvements in family/friend involvement mediated improvements in self-efficacy and self-care. METHODS: Participants were prospectively assigned to enhanced treatment as usual (control), an individualized text messaging intervention alone, or the individualized text messaging intervention plus FAMS for 6 months. Participants completed surveys at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and postintervention interviews. Between-group and multiple mediator analyses followed intention-to-treat principles. RESULTS: Retention, engagement, and fidelity were high. FAMS was well received and helped participants realize the value of involving family/friends in their care. Relative to control, FAMS participants had improved family/friend involvement, self-efficacy, and diet (but not physical activity) at 3 and 6 months (all ps < .05). Improvements in family/friend involvement mediated effects on self-efficacy and diet for FAMS participants but not for the individualized intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: The promise of effectively engaging patients' family and friends lies in sustained long-term behavior change. This work represents a first step toward this goal by demonstrating how content targeting helpful and harmful family/friend involvement can drive short-term effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02481596.

Depressed Mood, Perceived Health Competence and Health Behaviors: aCross-Sectional Mediation Study in Outpatients with Coronary Heart Disease.

BACKGROUND: Identifying potential mechanisms that link depressed mood with worse health behaviors is important given the prevalence of depressed mood in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and its relationship with subsequent mortality. Perceived health competence is an individual's confidence in his/her ability to successfully engineer solutions to achieve health goals and may explain how depressed mood affects multiple health behaviors. OBJECTIVE: Examine whether or not perceived health competence mediates the relationship between depressed mood and worse health behaviors. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study conducted by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded Mid-South Clinical Data Research Network between August 2014 and September 2015. Bootstrapped mediation was used. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with coronary heart disease (n = 2334). MAIN MEASURES: Two items assessing perceived health competence, a single item assessing depressed mood, and a Health Behaviors Index including: the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ); select items from the National Adult Tobacco Survey and the Alcohol Use Disorder Inventory Test; and single items assessing diet and medication adherence. KEY RESULTS: Depressed mood was associated with lower perceived health competence (a = - 0.21, p < .001) and lower perceived health competence was associated with worse performance on a Health Behaviors Index(b = 0.18, p < .001). Perceived health competence mediated the influence of depressed mood on health behaviors (ab = - 0.04, 95% CI = - 0.05 to - 0.03). The ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect was used as a measure of effect size (PM = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Depressed mood is associated with worse health behaviors directly and indirectly via lower perceived health competence. Interventions to increase perceived health competence may lessen the deleterious impact of depressed mood on health behaviors and cardiovascular outcomes.

Out-of-home informal support important for medication adherence, diabetes distress, hemoglobin A1c among adults with type 2 diabetes.

Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often receive self-management support from adult children, siblings or close friends residing outside of their home. However, the role of out-of-home support in patients' self-management and well-being is unclear. Patients (N = 313) with HbA1c > 7.5% were recruited from community primary care clinics for a mobile health intervention trial and identified an out-of-home informal support person, herein called a CarePartner; 38% also had an in-home supporter. We tested cross-sectional adjusted associations between CarePartner relationship characteristics and patients' self-management, diabetes distress, and HbA1c and whether having an in-home supporter modified these associations. Greater CarePartner closeness was associated with a greater odds of perfect medication adherence (AOR = 1.19, p = .029), more fruit/vegetable intake (ß = 0.14, p = .018), and lower diabetes distress (ß = - 0.14, p = .012). More frequent CarePartner contact was associated with better HbA1c among patients with an in-home supporter but with worse HbA1c among patients without an in-home supporter (interaction ß = - 0.45, p = .005). Emotional closeness with a CarePartner may be important for supporting T2DM self-management and reducing diabetes distress. CarePartners may appropriately engage more frequently when patients with no in-home supporter have poorly controlled diabetes.

Family members' obstructive behaviors appear to be more harmful among adults with type 2 diabetes and limited health literacy.

Family members' diabetes-specific obstructive behaviors (e.g., nagging/arguing or getting in the way of patients' self-care) are associated with adults having worse glycemic control (HbA1C), with diabetes-specific supportive family behaviors protecting against this detrimental effect. Given the role of family members in helping patients with limited health literacy, patients' health literacy status may moderate these relations. The authors tested this hypothesis with 192 adults with type 2 diabetes. Twenty-six percent had limited health literacy, and limited health literacy was associated with more supportive family behaviors (p<.05), but not with obstructive family behaviors or with patients' HbA1C. Adjusted stratified analyses indicated obstructive family behaviors were more strongly associated with worse HbA1C among participants with limited health literacy and low supportive family behaviors than for participants with adequate health literacy and low supportive family behaviors (adjusted simple slopes ß=0.70, p=.05 vs. ß=0.36, p=.009). However, there was no association between obstructive family behaviors and HbA1C in the context of high supportive family behaviors, regardless of health literacy status. Involving family members in adults' self-care without teaching them to avoid obstructive behaviors may be particularly harmful for patients with limited health literacy. Future research should identify intervention content to reduce obstructive family behaviors and identify which supportive family behaviors may be protective.

Acceptability and feasibility of FAMS-T1D mHealth intervention to optimize self- and social regulation for emerging adults with type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D), self-regulation and social regulation skills can help avoid high A1c and diabetes distress. FAMS (Family/friend Activation to Motivate Self-care) is mobile phone-delivered intervention that supports development of these skills and is efficacious among adults with type 2 diabetes. However, the acceptability and feasibility of the FAMS intervention among emerging adults with T1D are unknown. METHODS: Therefore, we adapted FAMS for in a new disease context and developmental stage and then conducted a 3-month mixed-methods pre-post pilot study. Participants were emerging adults with T1D and a friend/family member enrolled as a support person (optional). Feasibility/acceptability outcomes and associated progression thresholds were recruitment (≥ 70% eligible emerging adults), retention (≥ 85%), intervention engagement (≥ 70%), and satisfaction (≥ 70%). We also collected qualitative feedback to determine if the intervention addressed relevant needs and explored changes in outcomes of interest (family/friend involvement, self-efficacy, self-management, distress, A1c). RESULTS: Recruitment rates indicate recruitment of emerging adults with T1D (n = 30) and their support persons (n = 20) is feasible - 79% of emerging adults who screened as eligible enrolled and 70% of enrolled emerging adults invited a support person. Emerging adults completed 98% of coaching sessions, and response rates to automated text messages were median 85% IQR [68%, 90%]. Changes in selected measures for outcomes of interest were in expected directions suggesting sensitivity to changes occasioned by the intervention in a future evaluative trial. Emerging adults said FAMS-T1D helped with setting realistic goals, motivated them to prioritize diabetes goals, and increased support, indicating acceptability of the intervention in this new disease and developmental context. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest potential for FAMS-T1D to engage emerging adults and their support persons and feasibility for an evaluative trial examining effects on self-regulation (self-efficacy, self-management), social regulation (family/friend involvement), and outcomes (diabetes distress, A1c). TRIAL REGISTRATION: We did not register this study on ClinicalTrials.gov because the purpose of the study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and study procedures and measures in preparation for a future trial. The purpose of that future trial will be to evaluate the effect of the intervention on health-related biomedical and behavioral outcomes, and that trial will be registered accordingly.

The Goldilocks Dilemma on Balancing User Response and Reflection in mHealth Interventions: Observational Study.

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) has the potential to radically improve health behaviors and quality of life; however, there are still key gaps in understanding how to optimize mHealth engagement. Most engagement research reports only on system use without consideration of whether the user is reflecting on the content cognitively. Although interactions with mHealth are critical, cognitive investment may also be important for meaningful behavior change. Notably, content that is designed to request too much reflection could result in users' disengagement. Understanding how to strike the balance between response burden and reflection burden has critical implications for achieving effective engagement to impact intended outcomes. Objective: In this observational study, we sought to understand the interplay between response burden and reflection burden and how they impact mHealth engagement. Specifically, we explored how varying the response and reflection burdens of mHealth content would impact users' text message response rates in an mHealth intervention. Methods: We recruited support persons of people with diabetes for a randomized controlled trial that evaluated an mHealth intervention for diabetes management. Support person participants assigned to the intervention (n=148) completed a survey and received text messages for 9 months. During the 2-year randomized controlled trial, we sent 4 versions of a weekly, two-way text message that varied in both reflection burden (level of cognitive reflection requested relative to that of other messages) and response burden (level of information requested for the response relative to that of other messages). We quantified engagement by using participant-level response rates. We compared the odds of responding to each text and used Poisson regression to estimate associations between participant characteristics and response rates. Results: The texts requesting the most reflection had the lowest response rates regardless of response burden (high reflection and low response burdens: median 10%, IQR 0%-40%; high reflection and high response burdens: median 23%, IQR 0%-51%). The response rate was highest for the text requesting the least reflection (low reflection and low response burdens: median 90%, IQR 61%-100%) yet still relatively high for the text requesting medium reflection (medium reflection and low response burdens: median 75%, IQR 38%-96%). Lower odds of responding were associated with higher reflection burden (P<.001). Younger participants and participants who had a lower socioeconomic status had lower response rates to texts with more reflection burden, relative to those of their counterparts (all P values were <.05). Conclusions: As reflection burden increased, engagement decreased, and we found more disparities in engagement across participants' characteristics. Content encouraging moderate levels of reflection may be ideal for achieving both cognitive investment and system use. Our findings provide insights into mHealth design and the optimization of both engagement and effectiveness.

Goal change and goal achievement for emerging adults across the pilot FAMS-T1D intervention for type 1 diabetes.

Objective: Interventions for emerging adults (EAs) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) focus on goal setting, but little is known about how goal achievement relates to intervention outcomes. We examined how goals change, how goal achievement relates to diabetes outcomes, and identified barriers and facilitators to goal achievement. Method: EAs with T1D (N=29, M age=21.6 years, 57% female) were coached monthly to set a behavioral goal across a 3-month feasibility trial. Coaching notes were qualitatively coded regarding type, complexity, and changes in goals. Goal achievement was measured via daily responses to texts. HbA1c, self-efficacy, diabetes distress, and self-care were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Results: EAs frequently set food goals (79%) in combination with other goals. EAs overwhelmingly changed their goals (90%), with most increasing goal complexity. Goal achievement was high (79% of days) and not affected by goal change or goal complexity. Goal achievement was associated with increases in self-efficacy and self-care across time. Qualitative themes revealed that aspects of self-regulation and social-regulation were important for goal achievement. Conclusion: Meeting daily diabetes goals may enhance self-efficacy and self-care for diabetes. Practice Implications: Assisting EAs to reduce self-regulation challenges and enhance social support for goals may lead to better diabetes outcomes.

Effects of a Patient Portal Intervention to Address Diabetes Care Gaps: Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the potential to significantly reduce complications, many patients do not consistently receive diabetes preventive care. Our research team recently applied user-centered design sprint methodology to develop a patient portal intervention empowering patients to address selected diabetes care gaps (eg, no diabetes eye examination in last 12 months). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effect of our novel diabetes care gap intervention on completion of selected evidence-based diabetes preventive care services and secondary outcomes. METHODS: We are conducting a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of the effect of the intervention on diabetes care gaps. Adult patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are recruited from primary care clinics affiliated with Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Participants are eligible if they have type 1 or 2 DM, can read in English, are aged 18-75 years, have a current patient portal account, and have reliable access to a mobile device with internet access. We exclude patients with medical conditions that prevent them from using a mobile device, severe difficulty seeing, pregnant women or women who plan to become pregnant during the study period, and patients on dialysis. Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention or usual care. The primary outcome measure will be the number of diabetes care gaps among 4 DM preventive care services (diabetes eye examination, pneumococcal vaccination, hemoglobin A1c, and urine microalbumin) at 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes will include diabetes self-efficacy, confidence managing diabetes in general, understanding of diabetes preventive care, diabetes distress, patient portal satisfaction, and patient-initiated orders at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after randomization. An ordinal logistic regression model will be used to quantify the effect of the intervention on the number of diabetes care gaps at the 12-month follow-up. For dichotomous secondary outcomes, a logistic regression model will be used with random effects for the clinic and provider variables as needed. For continuous secondary outcomes, a regression model will be used. RESULTS: This study is ongoing. Recruitment was closed in February 2022; a total of 433 patients were randomized. Of those randomized, most (n=288, 66.5%) were non-Hispanic White, 33.5% (n=145) were racial or ethnic minorities, 33.9% (n=147) were aged 65 years or older, and 30.7% (n=133) indicated limited health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: The study directly tests the hypothesis that a patient portal intervention-alerting patients about selected diabetes care gaps, fostering understanding of their significance, and allowing patients to initiate care-will reduce diabetes care gaps compared with usual care. The insights gained from this study may have broad implications for developing future interventions to address various care gaps, such as gaps in cancer screening, and contribute to the development of effective, scalable, and sustainable approaches to engage patients in chronic disease management and prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04894903; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04894903. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/56123.

How Caregivers Make Meaning of Child Mental Health Problems: Toward Understanding Caregiver Strain and Help Seeking.

Family caregivers' conceptualizations of their child's emotional and behavioral problems (EBP) influence help-seeking for the child and caregiver strain. We analyzed 21 interviews with caregivers to explore their conceptualizations about the cause of their child's EBP, their experiences of strain, and their reported help-seeking behaviors. Caregivers had divergent conceptualizations of their child's EBP: 12 caregivers viewed the EBP as caused by a disorder and described the onset of symptoms as the central stressful event, whereas 9 caregivers described their child's problems as a response to an earlier stressor (e.g. trauma, abuse, divorce). Different patterns of caregiver strain and help-seeking were associated with caregiver conceptualization. All caregivers voiced a need for peer-to-peer support for caregivers and youth with EBP.

The growing gap: A study of sleep, encoding, and consolidation of new words in chronic traumatic brain injury.

Word learning is an iterative and dynamic process supported by multiple neural and cognitive systems. Converging evidence from behavioral, cellular, and systems neuroscience highlights sleep as an important support for memory and word learning over time. In many lab-based word learning experiments, participants encode and subsequently retrieve newly learned words in a single session. These designs are inadequate to capture the full dynamic word learning process, making them less ecologically valid. Single timepoint studies also limit investigation of the role of behavioral and lifestyle factors, like sleep, in supporting word learning over time. Adults with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), who commonly exhibit deficits in the memory systems that support word learning and report concomitant sleep disturbance, provide a unique opportunity to examine the link between memory, sleep, and word learning. Here we examined word learning over time and the influence of sleep on short- and long-term word recall in 50 adults with chronic moderate-severe TBI and 50 demographically matched neurotypical peers. We used a randomized within-participant crossover design to assess immediate encoding of new words and the consolidation of those words over time across intervals that did or did not involve sleep. Participants completed this study over the course of two weeks in their own homes to capture the iterative, dynamic process of real-world word learning. We also measured sleep in free living conditions using actigraphy throughout the experiment. Participants with TBI exhibited a word learning deficit that began at encoding and persisted across time. Critically, this deficit grew over the course of the week. The performance gap between groups was larger at the 1-week post-test than the immediate post-test, suggesting deficits in both encoding and consolidation of new words in individuals with TBI. Participants with and without TBI remembered more words when they slept after learning. Ecologically valid research designs that examine the relationship between memory, sleep, and word learning over time promise to advance mechanistic accounts of word learning and improve the long-term retention of new words in individuals with and without brain injury.

Optimizing adaptive stepped-care interventions to change adults' health behaviors: A systematic review.

Chronic diseases are ubiquitous and costly in American populations. Interventions targeting health behavior change to manage chronic diseases are needed, but previous efforts have fallen short of producing meaningful change on average. Adaptive stepped-care interventions, that tailor treatment based on the needs of the individual over time, are a promising new area in health behavior change. We therefore conducted a systematic review of tests of adaptive stepped-care interventions targeting health behavior changes for adults with chronic diseases. We identified 9 completed studies and 13 research protocols testing adaptive stepped-care interventions for health behavior change. The most common health behaviors targeted were substance use, weight management, and smoking cessation. All identified studies test intermediary tailoring for treatment non-responders via sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) or singly randomized trials (SRTs); none test baseline tailoring. From completed studies, there were few differences between embedded adaptive interventions and minimal differences between those classified as treatment responders and non-responders. In conclusion, updates to this work will be needed as protocols identified here publish results. Future research could explore baseline tailoring variables, apply methods to additional health behaviors and target populations, test tapering interventions for treatment responders, and consider adults' context when adapting interventions.

Family involvement and diabetes distress across dyads for adults with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Family/friend involvement and diabetes distress are associated with outcomes for persons with type 2 diabetes (PWDs), but little is known about how they relate to each other. We aim to (1) describe associations between PWD and support person (SP) distress; (2) describe associations between involvement and diabetes distress for PWDs, for SPs, and across the dyad; and (3) explore whether associations differ by PWD-SP cohabitation. METHODS: PWDs and SPs co-enrolled in a study evaluating the effects of a self-care support intervention and completed self-report measures at baseline. RESULTS: PWDs and SPs (N = 297 dyads) were, on average, in their mid-50s and around one-third identified as racial or ethnic minorities. The association between PWD and SP diabetes distress was small (Spearman's ρ = 0.25, p < 0.01). For PWDs, experienced harmful involvement from family/friends was associated with more diabetes distress (standardized ß = 0.23, p < 0.001) independent of helpful involvement in adjusted models. Separately, SPs' self-reported harmful involvement was associated with their own diabetes distress (standardized ß = 0.35, p < 0.001) and with PWDs' diabetes distress (standardized ß = 0.25, p = 0.002), independent of SPs' self-reported helpful involvement. CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest dyadic interventions may need to address both SP harmful involvement and SP diabetes distress, in addition to PWD distress.

Acceptability and Feasibility of FAMS-T1D mHealth intervention to optimize self- & social regulation for emerging adults with type 1 diabetes.

Background: Among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D), self-regulation and social regulation skills can help avoid high A1c and diabetes distress. FAMS (Family/friend Activation to Motivate Self-care) is mobile phone-delivered intervention that supports development of these skills and is efficacious among adults with type 2 diabetes. However, the acceptability and feasibility of the FAMS intervention among emerging adults with T1D is unknown. Methods: Therefore, we adapted FAMS for in a new disease context and developmental stage then conducted a 3-month mixed-methods pre-post pilot study. Participants were emerging adults with T1D and a friend/family member enrolled as a support person (optional). Feasibility/acceptability outcomes and associated progression thresholds were recruitment (≥ 70% eligible emerging adults), retention (≥ 85%), intervention engagement (≥ 70%) and satisfaction (≥ 70%). We also collected qualitative feedback to determine if the intervention addressed relevant needs and explored changes in outcomes of interest (family/friend involvement, self-efficacy, self-management, distress, A1c). Results: Recruitment rates indicate recruitment of emerging adults with T1D and their support persons is feasible - 79% of emerging adults who screened as eligible enrolled and 70% of enrolled emerging adults invited a support person. Emerging adults completed 98% of coaching sessions, and response rates to automated text messages were median 85% IQR [68%, 90%]. Changes in selected measures for outcomes of interest were in expected directions suggesting sensitivity to changes occasioned by the intervention in a future evaluative trial. Emerging adults said FAMS-T1D helped with setting realistic goals, motivated them to prioritize diabetes goals, and increased support, indicating acceptability of the intervention in this new disease and developmental context. Conclusions: Findings suggest potential for FAMS-T1D to engage emerging adults and their support persons and feasibility for evaluation of effects on hypothesized intervention targets and outcomes in a subsequent evaluative trial. Trial Registration: We did not register this study on clinicaltrials.gov because the purpose of the study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and study procedures and measures in preparation for a future trial. The purpose of that future trial will be to evaluate the effect of the intervention on health-related biomedical and behavioral outcomes and that trial will be registered accordingly.

Family Typology for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Longitudinal Stability and Validity for Diabetes Management and Well-being.

OBJECTIVE: We validated longitudinally a typology of diabetes-specific family functioning (named Collaborative and Helpful, Satisfied with Low Involvement, Want More Involvement, and Critically Involved) in adults with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted k-means cluster analyses with nine dimensions to determine if the typology replicated in a diverse sample and if type assignment was robust to variations in sampling and included dimensions. In a subsample with repeated assessments over 9 months, we examined the stability and validity of the typology. We also applied a multinomial logistic regression approach to make the typology usable at the individual level, like a diagnostic tool. RESULTS: Participants (N = 717) were 51% male, more than one-third reported minority race or ethnicity, mean age was 57 years, and mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was 7.9% (63 mmol/mol; 8.7% [72 mmol/mol] for the longitudinal subsample). The typology was replicated with respect to the number of types and dimension patterns. Type assignment was robust to sampling variations (97% consistent across simulations). Type had an average 52% stability over time within participants; instability was not explained by measurement error. Over 9 months, type was independently associated with HbA1c, diabetes self-efficacy, diabetes medication adherence, diabetes distress, and depressive symptoms (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The typology of diabetes-specific family functioning was replicated, and longitudinal analyses suggest type is more of a dynamic state than a stable trait. However, type varies with diabetes self-management and well-being over time as a consistent independent indicator of outcomes. The typology is ready to be applied to further precision medicine approaches to behavioral and psychosocial diabetes research and care.