RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We aim to assess the early use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) using the computed tomography severity index (CTSI) in prognosis prediction. The CTSI combines quantification of pancreatic and extrapancreatic inflammation with the extent of pancreatic necrosis. METHODS: Post-hoc retrospective analysis of a large, multicentric database (44 institutions) of SAP patients in Japan. The area under the curve (AUC) of the CTSI for predicting mortality and the odds ratio (OR) of the extent of pancreatic inflammation and necrosis were calculated using multivariable analysis. RESULTS: In total, 1097 patients were included. The AUC of the CTSI for mortality was 0.65 (95 % confidence interval [CI:] [0.59-0.70]; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, necrosis 30-50 % and >50 % in low-enhanced pancreatic parenchyma (LEPP) was independently associated with a significant increase in mortality, with OR 2.04 and 95 % CI 1.01-4.12 (P < 0.05) and OR 3.88 and 95 % CI 2.04-7.40 (P < 0.001), respectively. However, the extent of pancreatic inflammation was not associated with mortality, regardless of severity. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of necrosis in LEPP assessed using early CECT of SAP was a better predictor of mortality than the extent of pancreatic inflammation.
Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Necrosis , Páncreas , Pancreatitis , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Pancreatitis/patología , Pancreatitis/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Páncreas/diagnóstico por imagen , Páncreas/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Pronóstico , Adulto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Inflamación/diagnóstico por imagen , Japón/epidemiología , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/diagnóstico por imagen , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/mortalidad , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to clarify the clinical utility of measuring serum pancreatic enzymes after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the purpose of predicting post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) by a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. METHODS: Studies on the prediction accuracy of PEP by serum amylase or lipase measured at 2, 3, and 4 h after ERCP were collected. A literature search was performed in PubMed and the Cochrane Library database for studies published between January 1980 and March 2023. The quality of individual studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Data were analyzed using Meta-DiSc 2.0 software. RESULTS: We searched the databases and identified 20 observational studies (12,313 participants). PEPs were defined according to criteria by Cotton or modified Cotton, revised Atlanta criteria, or the Japanese criteria. Meta-analysis of eight studies (4389 participants) showed a pooled sensitivity of 71.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 56.1-82.5) and pooled specificity of 91.2% (95% CI 85.9-94.6) for the serum amylase cut-off value at 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). Another meta-analysis of five studies (1970 participants) showed a pooled sensitivity of 85.8% (95% CI 61.9-95.7) and pooled specificity of 85.3% (95% CI 81.9-88.1) for the serum lipase cut-off value at 3 times ULN. CONCLUSION: Despite a high risk of bias due to various reference standards, this updated meta-analysis and the utility assessment by a decision tree showed the utility of serum amylase or lipase levels more than 3 times ULN measured 2-4 h after ERCP for predicting PEP.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Owing to its low risk of adverse effects, teicoplanin has been extensively used in patients with infections caused by MRSA. To promote the better management of patients receiving teicoplanin, we have updated the guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). METHODS: The guidelines were developed by a committee following the methodology handbook published by the Japanese Medical Information Distribution Service. Nine clinical questions were selected. The committee conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to establish evidence-based recommendations for the target trough concentration (Cmin). An initial electronic database search returned 515 articles, and 97 articles qualified for a full review. Four and five studies were included for the efficacy evaluation of cut-off Cmin values of 15 and 20 mg/L, respectively. RESULTS: Compared with Cmin < 15 mg/L, a target Cmin value of 15-30 mg/L resulted in increased clinical efficacy in patients with non-complicated MRSA infections (OR = 2.68; 95% CI = 1.14-6.32) without an increase in adverse effects. Although there was insufficient evidence, target Cmin values of 20-40 mg/L were suggested in patients with complicated or serious MRSA infections. A 3 day loading regimen followed by maintenance treatment according to renal function was recommended to achieve the target trough concentrations. Because of the prolonged half-life of teicoplanin, measurement of the Cmin value on Day 4 before reaching steady state was recommended. CONCLUSIONS: The new guideline recommendations indicate the target Cmin value for TDM and the dosage regimen to achieve this concentration and suggest practices for specific subpopulations.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo de Drogas , Teicoplanina , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Consenso , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Humanos , Japón , Teicoplanina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Toluidine is a known cause of bladder cancer, but it is less widely recognized as a cause of methemoglobinemia because methemoglobinemia is rare. We herein report a case of methemoglobinemia caused by toluidine in a 50-year-old man. A solution of toluidine overflowed from its container during transportation and adhered to the man's clothes, but he drove to his workplace 100 km away without changing his clothes or undergoing decontamination. Before arriving at his workplace, he developed dyspnea and called emergency services, and he was then transported to a local hospital. He had significant cyanosis upon arrival, and arterial blood gas analysis revealed a high methemoglobin level of 44%. He was diagnosed with toluidine-induced methemoglobinemia and was transported to our hospital, where he was admitted to the intensive care unit. Treatment for methemoglobinemia was started immediately after hospitalization, and the patient's symptoms and methemoglobin level improved. Methemoglobinemia should be considered in workers who handle toluidine and develop cyanosis and dyspnea.
Asunto(s)
Metahemoglobinemia , Cianosis/inducido químicamente , Cianosis/complicaciones , Disnea/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Metahemoglobina/efectos adversos , Metahemoglobina/análisis , Metahemoglobinemia/inducido químicamente , Metahemoglobinemia/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Toluidinas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Arbekacin is the first aminoglycoside antibacterial agent approved for treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in Japan. Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended during arbekacin treatment, little evidence for the target exposure and once-daily dosing has been reported. This study aimed to clarify the target peak/trough concentrations and the effectiveness of once-daily dosing of arbekacin against nephrotoxicity or treatment failure via meta-analysis. METHODS: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web. RESULTS: Nine observational cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. A peak arbekacin concentration of ≥15-16 µg/mL did not exhibit a statistically significant lower risk of treatment failure (risk ratio [RR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.30-1.24). A trough arbekacin concentration of <2 µg/mL resulted in a significantly lower risk of nephrotoxicity (RR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.15-0.61). Once-daily dosing significantly reduced the risk of treatment failure (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.39-0.97) but not nephrotoxicity (RR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.16-1.75). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily dosing can improve the therapeutic efficacy of arbekacin, and a trough arbekacin concentration of <2 µg/mL can reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity. A peak arbekacin concentration of ≥15-16 µg/mL did not exhibit the significant lower risk of treatment failure. Additional clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.
Asunto(s)
Dibekacina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Dibekacina/análogos & derivados , Monitoreo de Drogas , Humanos , JapónRESUMEN
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: It has been recommended that the trough concentration (Cmin ) of teicoplanin should be maintained at ≥20 µg/ml for difficult-to-treat complicated infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Conversely, Cmin of teicoplanin of at least 10 µg/ml is required for non-complicated MRSA infections. Considering the low incidence of nephrotoxicity for teicoplanin, Cmin = 15-30 µg/ml has been suggested for most MRSA infections. Thus, we assessed the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of teicoplanin at this target Cmin . METHODS: We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Ichushi-Web) to identify eligible studies. Studies were included if they provided the incidence of treatment success, mortality in patients with MRSA infection, and/or hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity according to the Cmin range. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Four trials assessing clinical success (n = 299) and three studies assessing adverse effects (n = 546) were included. Cmin = 15-30 µg/ml significantly increased the probability of treatment success compared with Cmin < 15 µg/ml (odds ratio [OR] = 2.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14-6.32, p = 0.02). The all-cause mortality rate did not differ between the groups (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.13-1.61, p = 0.22). Cmin = 15-30 µg/ml did not increase the risks of nephrotoxicity (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.49-1.69, p = 0.76) or hepatotoxicity (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.18-2.44, p = 0.54). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Teicoplanin therapy using a Cmin target of 15-30 µg/ml is likely to be associated with better clinical responses than Cmin < 15 µg/ml without increasing the risk of adverse effects.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Teicoplanina/administración & dosificación , Teicoplanina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor (TNFi) treatment is effective for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Although several meta-analyses have been performed to evaluate the association between TNFi treatment and surgical morbidity, the results are controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) after surgery for UC and CD in patients on TNFis, based on literature published between January 2000 and May 2019 (registered on PROSPERO, No. CRD42019134156). Overall, 2175 UC patients in 13 observational studies (OBSs) and 7084 CD patients in 16 OBSs were included. The incidences of incisional (INC) SSI and organ/space (O/S) SSI after surgery for UC were 179/1985 (9.0%) and 176/2175 (8.1%), respectively. TNFi use was not associated with the incidences of INC SSI (odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.47-2.32) or O/S SSI (OR 1.85, 95% CI (0.82-4.20)) after surgery for UC. The INC SSI and O/S SSI incidences after surgery for CD were 289/3089 (9.4%) and 526/7,084 (7.4%), respectively. Preoperative TNFi use was not associated with INC SSI (OR 0.98, 95% CI (0.52-1.83)) or O/S SSI incidence (OR 1.09, 95% CI (0.78-1.52)) after surgery for CD. We did not find a significant association between preoperative TNFi use and SSI in surgery for UC or CD.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/uso terapéutico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Humanos , Incidencia , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of gastroenterological surgical site infections (SSIs) were published in Japanese by the Japan Society for Surgical Infection in 2018. This is a summary of these guidelines for medical professionals worldwide. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and comprehensive evaluation of the evidence for diagnosis and treatment of gastroenterological SSIs, based on the concepts of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The strength of recommendations was graded and voted using the Delphi method and the nominal group technique. Modifications were made to the guidelines in response to feedback from the general public and relevant medical societies. RESULTS: There were 44 questions prepared in seven subject areas, for which 51 recommendations were made. The seven subject areas were: definition and etiology, diagnosis, preoperative management, prophylactic antibiotics, intraoperative management, perioperative management, and wound management. According to the GRADE system, we evaluated the body of evidence for each clinical question. Based on the results of the meta-analysis, recommendations were graded using the Delphi method to generate useful information. The final version of the recommendations was published in 2018, in Japanese. CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese Guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of gastroenterological SSI were published in 2018 to provide useful information for clinicians and improve the clinical outcome of patients.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Humanos , Japón , Atención Perioperativa , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Shock and organ damage occur in critically ill patients in the emergency department because of biological responses to invasion, and cytokines play an important role in their development. It is important to predict early multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) because it is useful in predicting patient outcomes and selecting treatment strategies. This study examined the accuracy of biomarkers, including interleukin (IL)-6, in predicting early MOD in critically ill patients compared with that of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA). METHODS: This was a multicenter observational sub-study. Five universities from 2016 to 2018. Data of adult patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome who presented to the emergency department or were admitted to the intensive care unit were prospectively evaluated. qSOFA score and each biomarker (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-α, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin [PCT]) level were assessed on Days 0, 1, and 2. The primary outcome was set as MOD on Day 2, and the area under the curve (AUC) was analyzed to evaluate qSOFA scores and biomarker levels. RESULTS: Of 199 patients, 38 were excluded and 161 were included. Patients with MOD on Day 2 had significantly higher qSOFA, SOFA, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores and a trend toward worse prognosis, including mortality. The AUC for qSOFA score (Day 0) that predicted MOD (Day 2) was 0.728 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.651-0.794). IL-6 (Day 1) showed the highest AUC among all biomarkers (0.790 [95% CI: 0.711-852]). The combination of qSOFA (Day 0) and IL-6 (Day 1) showed improved prediction accuracy (0.842 [95% CI: 0.771-0.893]). The combination model using qSOFA (Day 1) and IL-6 (Day 1) also showed a higher AUC (0.868 [95% CI: 0.799-0.915]). The combination model of IL-8 and PCT also showed a significant improvement in AUC. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of IL-6, IL-8 and PCT to qSOFA scores improved the accuracy of early MOD prediction.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Sepsis , Adulto , Biomarcadores , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/diagnóstico , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an adjunct procedure designed to sustain the circulation until definitive hemostasis is obtained. The device is indicated in trauma patients with abdominal trauma and/or pelvic fractures, but there is limited evidence for its use in gastrointestinal bleeding. A 76-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency department of our hospital because of shock, manifesting as hematemesis. We performed emergency endoscopy and detected active bleeding from a gastric ulcer. Achieving hemostasis was difficult, and she experienced shock again during the procedure, leading to cardiopulmonary arrest. REBOA was performed after the return of spontaneous circulation because she continued to be in a state of shock. Her blood pressure rose, and endoscopic hemostasis was continued with balloon inflation, but it didn't stop the bleeding completely, so we shifted to emergency laparotomy and performed suture hemostasis. The patient developed no postoperative complications and was transferred to another hospital. REBOA can be effective at improving the hemodynamic status in patients with uncontrollable gastrointestinal bleeding.
Asunto(s)
Oclusión con Balón , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Choque Hemorrágico , Úlcera Gástrica , Anciano , Aorta , Femenino , Humanos , Choque Hemorrágico/etiología , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Úlcera Gástrica/complicacionesRESUMEN
Management of early nutrition plays an important role in the treatment of acute pancreatitis patients, but the sample sizes of randomized control trials that have compared enteral and parental nutrition were small. From the data of Diagnostic Procedure Combination, we identified patients who had been diagnosed with acute pancreatitis and discharged from the hospital between 2014 and 2015. We compared the length of hospital stay and hospital mortality among patients with acute pancreatitis that was managed with and without enteral nutrition within 7 days from hospitalization. The results showed a significant decrease in the in-hospital mortality rate of 56% (odds ratio 0.444, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.358â¯-â¯0.551, Pâ¯<â¯0.001) and length of hospital stay by 8.6 days (95% CI -9.05â¯-â¯-8.13, Pâ¯<â¯0.001) when enteral nutrition was administered within 7 days. According to multivariate analysis, early enteral nutrition was independently associated with in-hospital mortality rate and length of hospitalization. Enteral nutrition is an important management method for the treatment of acute pancreatitis patients.
Asunto(s)
Nutrición Enteral , Pancreatitis , Enfermedad Aguda , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Pancreatitis/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) has a high mortality rate despite ongoing attempts to improve prognosis through a various therapeutic modalities. This study aimed to delineate etiology-based routes that may guide clinical decisions for the treatment of SAP. METHODS: Using data from a recent retrospective multicenter study in Japan, we analyzed the association between clinical outcomes, mainly in-hospital mortality and pancreatic infection, and various etiologies while considering confounding factors. We performed additional multivariate analyses and built decision tree models. RESULTS: The 1097 participating patients were classified into the following groups by etiology: alcohol (n = 436, 39.7%); cholelithiasis (n = 230, 21.0%); idiopathic (n = 227, 20.7%); and others (n = 204, 18.6%). Mortality at hospital discharge was 8.4%, 12.2%, 16.7%, and 16.2% in the alcohol, cholelithiasis, idiopathic, and others groups, respectively. According to multivariable analysis, early enteral nutrition (EN) was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality only in the cholelithiasis group. However, there was a consistent association between age and the need for mechanical ventilation and increased mortality, regardless of etiology. Our decision tree models presented different contributing factors depending on the etiology and patient background. Interaction analysis showed that EN and the use of prophylactic antibiotics may influence these results differently according to etiology. CONCLUSIONS: No study has yet used comprehensive models to investigate etiology-related prognostic factors for SAP; our results can, therefore, be used as a reference for improving clinical decisions.
Asunto(s)
Pancreatitis/etiología , Pancreatitis/mortalidad , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colelitiasis/complicaciones , Colelitiasis/mortalidad , Nutrición Enteral , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis Alcohólica/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Elderly patients have a blunted host response, which may influence vital signs and clinical outcomes of sepsis. This study was aimed to investigate whether the associations between the vital signs and mortality are different in elderly and non-elderly patients with sepsis. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study. A Japanese multicenter sepsis cohort (FORECAST, n = 1148) was used for the discovery analyses. Significant discovery results were tested for replication using two validation cohorts of sepsis (JAAMSR, Japan, n = 624; SPH, Canada, n = 1004). Patients were categorized into elderly and non-elderly groups (age ≥ 75 or < 75 years). We tested for association between vital signs (body temperature [BT], heart rate, mean arterial pressure, systolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate) and 90-day in-hospital mortality (primary outcome). RESULTS: In the discovery cohort, non-elderly patients with BT < 36.0 °C had significantly increased 90-day mortality (P = 0.025, adjusted hazard ratio 1.70, 95% CI 1.07-2.71). In the validation cohorts, non-elderly patients with BT < 36.0 °C had significantly increased mortality (JAAMSR, P = 0.0024, adjusted hazard ratio 2.05, 95% CI 1.29-3.26; SPH, P = 0.029, adjusted hazard ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.03-1.80). These differences were not observed in elderly patients in the three cohorts. Associations between the other four vital signs and mortality were not different in elderly and non-elderly patients. The interaction of age and hypothermia/fever was significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In septic patients, we found mortality in non-elderly sepsis patients was increased with hypothermia and decreased with fever. However, mortality in elderly patients was not associated with BT. These results illuminate the difference in the inflammatory response of the elderly compared to non-elderly sepsis patients.
Asunto(s)
Temperatura Corporal/fisiología , Sepsis/clasificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fiebre/complicaciones , Fiebre/epidemiología , Fiebre/mortalidad , Geriatría/métodos , Humanos , Hipotermia/complicaciones , Hipotermia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sepsis/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) has been recommended for identifying patients at higher risk of hospital death, it has only a 60% sensitivity for in-hospital mortality. On the other hand, hypothermia associates with increased mortality and organ failure in patients with sepsis. This study aimed to assess the predictive validity of qSOFA for identifying patients with sepsis at higher risk of multiple organ dysfunction or death and the complementary effect of hypothermia. METHODS: Patients with severe sepsis admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) were retrospectively analyzed. The predictive validities of qSOFA (≥2, positive) and the complementary effect of hypothermia (body temperature ≤36.5°C) for the identification of death or multiorgan dysfunction were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 624 patients, 230 (36.9%) developed multiorgan dysfunction and 144 (23.1%) died within 28 days; 527 (84.5%) had a positive qSOFA. The 28-day mortality rates of patients with positive and negative qSOFA were 25.4% and 10.3%, respectively (P = .001). The rate of positive qSOFA was higher in patients with multiorgan dysfunction (sensitivity, 0.896; specificity, 0.185) and among patients who died within 28 days (sensitivity, 0.931; specificity, 0.181); 10 (6.9%) of 144 deaths were not identified. In cases of positive qSOFA without hypothermia, positive qSOFA + hypothermia, or negative qSOFA with hypothermia, the predictive value for 28-day mortality improved (sensitivity, 0.979). Among the 144 patients who died, only 3 were not identified. CONCLUSION: A qSOFA score ≥2 may identify >90% of 28-day deaths among patients with severe sepsis; hypothermia may complement the predictive ability of qSOFA.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hipotermia/mortalidad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Sepsis/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Because exclusive use of echinocandins can induce the drug-resistant strains, appropriate use of azoles and polyenes is still necessary in the treatment of candidemia. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials regarding the efficacy and safety of azole and polyene antifungals in the treatment of candidemia. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were used as reference databases, and papers published up to June 10, 2019 were searched. The search results were carefully scrutinized, duplicate references were removed, and the study was ultimately carried out using three reports. Among azole antifungals, fluconazole and voriconazole were extracted, however; only conventional amphotericin B (AMPH-B) was extracted among polyene antifungals. Treatment successes with the use of azoles and AMPH-B were compared, and findings showed that AMPH-B was significantly superior (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-1.00, p = 0.04). However, there was no significant difference in mortality (RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.72-1.07, p = 0.19). Analysis of adverse events showed that renal disorders were significantly less common with azoles than with AMPH-B (RR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.68, p = 0.006). In conclusion, AMPH-B were superior to azoles in terms of efficacy, but had a risk of causing renal disorders.
Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B , Candidemia , Anfotericina B/efectos adversos , Antifúngicos/efectos adversos , Azoles/efectos adversos , Candidemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Equinocandinas , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Echinocandins are frequent use antifungals in the treatment of invasive candidiasis, and it is important to update information on their efficacy and safety for optimal antifungal drug treatment. The aim of this study is to clarify whether echinocandins are superior to non-echinocandins for the treatment of invasive candidiasis. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of RCTs of echinocandins and non-echinocandins for adult invasive candidiasis. The MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases before June 2019 were used. The risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method random-effects model. RESULTS: We identified 14,846 articles and screened, and five studies were included meta-analysis. The treatment success ratio for echinocandins was significantly higher than that for non-echinocandins (RR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.22, p = 0.0003). In regard to adverse events, there was no significant difference between the two treatment groups. A subgroup analysis showed that the treatment success ratio for echinocandins was significantly higher than that for azoles (RR = 1.20, 1.08-1.34, p = 0.001), whereas no significant differences were observed between echinocandins and polyenes. In safety analysis, the incidence ratio of electrolyte disorder (RR = 0.50, 0.33-0.76, p = 0.001), renal disorder (RR = 0.19, 0.09-0.40, p < 0.0001), and fever (RR = 0.46, 0.23-0.93, p = 0.03) were significantly lower in patients receiving echinocandins than in those receiving polyenes. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis based on RCTs was first to show that use of echinocandins was associated with improved clinical success. Echinocandins may be useful as a first-line drug for invasive candidiasis.
Asunto(s)
Candidiasis Invasiva , Equinocandinas , Adulto , Antifúngicos/efectos adversos , Azoles , Candidiasis Invasiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Equinocandinas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Empirical antifungal therapy is recommended in high-risk patients who have persistent febrile neutropenia (FN) despite broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Based on high-quality evidence, most guidelines recommend caspofungin. The aim of this study was to clarify whether echinocandins, including micafungin, are associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with persistent FN. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of empirical therapy with echinocandins and non-echinocandins for FN in patients with hematological disease. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 7 days after completion of therapy. Secondary outcomes included treatment success, and discontinuation of therapy because of adverse events. For subgroup analysis, we compared RCTs of echinocandins with liposomal amphotericin B. Six RCTs (four that evaluated caspofungin and two that evaluated micafungin) were included in the meta-analysis. Mortality and adverse events in echinocandin-treated patients were significantly lower than in those treated with non-echinocandins [risk ratio (RR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.99; RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.71, respectively]. There was no significant difference in treatment success (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.87-1.36). Mortality and adverse events in echinocandin-treated patients were significantly lower than in those treated with liposomal amphotericin B (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46-0.99; RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.74, respectively). In conclusion, patients with persistent FN treated with echinocandins had decreased risk of death and adverse events. Both caspofungin and micafungin may be recommended as first-line empirical antifungal therapy in these patients. However, the small number of enrolled patients and the lack of RCTs involving pediatric patients should be considered when using micafungin.
Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Equinocandinas/uso terapéutico , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/mortalidad , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Voriconazol/uso terapéutico , Neutropenia Febril/complicaciones , Humanos , Micosis/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of body temperature on disease severity, implementation of sepsis bundles, and outcomes in severe sepsis patients. DESIGN: Retrospective sub-analysis. SETTING: Fifty-nine ICUs in Japan, from January 2016 to March 2017. PATIENTS: Adult patients with severe sepsis based on Sepsis-2 were enrolled and divided into three categories (body temperature < 36°C, 36-38°C, > 38°C), using the core body temperature at ICU admission. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Compliance with the bundles proposed in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2012, in-hospital mortality, disposition after discharge, and the number of ICU and ventilator-free days were evaluated. Of 1,143 enrolled patients, 127, 565, and 451 were categorized as having body temperature less than 36°C, 36-38°C, and greater than 38°C, respectively. Hypothermia-body temperature less than 36°C-was observed in 11.1% of patients. Patients with hypothermia were significantly older than those with a body temperature of 36-38°C or greater than 38°C and had a lower body mass index and higher prevalence of septic shock than those with body temperature greater than 38°C. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores on the day of enrollment were also significantly higher in hypothermia patients. Implementation rates of the entire 3-hour bundle and administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics significantly differed across categories; implementation rates were significantly lower in patients with body temperature less than 36°C than in those with body temperature greater than 38°C. Implementation rate of the entire 3-hour resuscitation bundle + vasopressor use + remeasured lactate significantly differed across categories, as did the in-hospital and 28-day mortality. The odds ratio for in-hospital mortality relative to the reference range of body temperature greater than 38°C was 1.760 (95% CI, 1.134-2.732) in the group with hypothermia. The proportions of ICU-free and ventilator-free days also significantly differed between categories and were significantly smaller in patients with hypothermia. CONCLUSIONS: Hypothermia was associated with a significantly higher disease severity, mortality risk, and lower implementation of sepsis bundles.
Asunto(s)
Temperatura Corporal , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/fisiopatología , Sepsis/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Choque Séptico/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although fluid resuscitation is critical in acute pancreatitis, the optimal fluid volume is unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between the volume of fluid administered and clinical outcomes in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study at 44 institutions in Japan. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, and diagnosed with SAP from 2009 to 2013. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: administered fluid volume <6000 and ≥6000 mL in the first 24 hours. We evaluated the association between the 2 groups and clinical outcomes using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of pancreatic infection and the need for surgical intervention. RESULTS: We analyzed 1097 patients, and the mean fluid volume administered was 5618±3018 mL (mean±SD), with 708 and 389 patients stratified into the fluid <6000 mL and fluid ≥6000 mL groups, respectively. Overall in-hospital mortality was 12.3%. The fluid ≥6000 mL group had significantly higher mortality than the fluid <6000 mL group (univariable analysis, 15.9% vs. 10.3%; P<0.05). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, administration of ≥6000 mL of fluid within the first 24 hours was significantly associated with reduced mortality (odds ratio, 0.58; P<0.05). No significant association was found between the administered fluid volume and pancreatic infection, or between the volume administered and the need for surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SAP, administration of a large fluid volume within the first 24 hours is associated with decreased mortality.
Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia , Pancreatitis/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rapid detection, early resuscitation, and appropriate antibiotic use are crucial for sepsis care. Accurate identification of the site of infection may facilitate a timely provision of appropriate care. We aimed to investigate the relationship between misdiagnosis of the site of infection at initial examination and in-hospital mortality. METHODS: This was a secondary-multicenter prospective cohort study involving 37 emergency departments. Consecutive adult patients with infection from December 2017 to February 2018 were included. Misdiagnosis of the site of infection was defined as a discrepancy between the suspected site of infection at initial examination and that at final diagnosis, including those infections remaining unidentified during hospital admission, whereas correct diagnosis was defined as site concordance. In-hospital mortality was compared between those misdiagnosed and those correctly diagnosed. RESULTS: Of 974 patients included in the analysis, 11.6% were misdiagnosed. Patients diagnosed with lung, intra-abdominal, urinary, soft tissue, and CNS infection at the initial examination, 4.2%, 3.8%, 13.6%, 10.9%, and 58.3% respectively, turned out to have an infection at a different site. In-hospital mortality occurred in 15%. In both generalized estimating equation (GEE) and propensity score-matched models, misdiagnosed patients exhibited higher mortality despite adjustment for patient background, site infection, and severity. The adjusted odds ratios (misdiagnosis vs. correct diagnosis) for in-hospital mortality were 2.66 (95% CI, 1.45-4.89) in the GEE model and 3.03 (95% CI, 1.24-7.38) in the propensity score-matched model. The difference in the absolute risk in the GEE model was 0.11 (0.04-0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with infection, misdiagnosed site of infection is associated with a > 10% increase in in-hospital mortality.