The mesially impacted mandibular third molar: The incidence and consequences of distal cervical caries in the mandibular second molar.

AIMS: Distal Cervical Caries (DCC) of the mandibular second molar (Md2M) is primarily related to retained mesially impacted third molars (Md3M). Treatment of this condition indicates the removal of the Md3M and the restoration of the Md2M and, on occasions, the loss of the Md2M. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, treatment outcomes for patients, and calculate costs related to Md2M DCC. METHODS: A review of 121 patients who had Md3M removed due to Md2M DCC was undertaken to determine the treatment outcomes for patients. The number of patients affected by DCC of Md2M was calculated from the incidence of DCC (15%) in a cohort of patients requiring Md3M removal (1100) and the annual number of patients undergoing third molar surgery in England. Direct costs were calculated using NHS and independent treatment tariffs and indirect costs from Office of National Statistics (ONS). RESULTS: It is estimated that 152,000 patients in England undergo third molar removal on an annual basis. Approximately 27,000 Md3M are removed annually due to DCC of the Md2M; costing £27 m to treat with additional costs of £28 m if dental implant replacement of the Md2M is included. Total cost for treating Md2M DCC: £55 m/annum. CONCLUSIONS: Treating Md2M DCC and its consequences is expensive for healthcare funders such as the NHS and for patients. Md2M DCC is avoidable if patients who are at risk have prophylactic Md3M removal. This would offer potential and substantial savings in the financial cost of treating an otherwise avoidable disease.

Distal cervical caries in the mandibular second molar: an indication for the prophylactic removal of the third molar?

AIMS: Distal cervical caries (DCC) in mandibular second molar teeth are responsible for the removal of up to 5% of all mandibular third molars. Our aim was to identify the clinical features of these patients. METHODS: We evaluated the records of 100 patients who had 122 mandibular third molars removed because of distal cervical caries in the second molar. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of third molars had a mesial angulation of between 40 degrees and 80 degrees. The peak age for removal of third molars was 5 years later than in other studies and patients had better dental health than average. The incidence of distal cervical caries DCC has been shown to increase with age. CONCLUSION: Distal cervical caries is a late phenomenon and has been reported only in association with impacted third molars. The early or prophylactic removal of a partially erupted mesio-angular third molar could prevent distal cervical caries forming in the mandibular second molar.

Distal cervical caries in the mandibular second molar: an indication for the prophylactic removal of third molar teeth? Update.

In 2005 we reported the clinical findings of 100 patients who had mandibular third molars removed because of distal cervical caries in the mandibular second molar. The aim of this follow-up study was to find out whether the findings in a new group of patients corroborate those of our previous study. We report on the clinical features of 239 patients (mean (SD) age 32.1 (7.85) years, range 20-65) who had 288 mandibular third molars removed because of distal cervical caries in the second molar. Patients had better dental health than average, and 67% had a DMF (decayed, missing, or filled) score of 5 or less. In 89% of third molars the mesial angulation was between 40° and 80°. Distal cervical caries in second molars is a late complication of third molar retention. The prophylactic removal of a partially erupted mesioangular third molar will prevent distal cervical caries forming in the second molar tooth.