Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared With Cefoxitin as Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Despite improvements in perioperative mortality, the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) remains high after pancreatoduodenectomy. The effect of broad-spectrum antimicrobial surgical prophylaxis in reducing SSI is poorly understood. Objective: To define the effect of broad-spectrum perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis on postoperative SSI incidence compared with standard care antibiotics. Design, Setting, and Participants: Pragmatic, open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 clinical trial at 26 hospitals across the US and Canada. Participants were enrolled between November 2017 and August 2021, with follow-up through December 2021. Adults undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy for any indication were eligible. Individuals were excluded if they had allergies to study medications, active infections, chronic steroid use, significant kidney dysfunction, or were pregnant or breastfeeding. Participants were block randomized in a 1:1 ratio and stratified by the presence of a preoperative biliary stent. Participants, investigators, and statisticians analyzing trial data were unblinded to treatment assignment. Intervention: The intervention group received piperacillin-tazobactam (3.375 or 4 g intravenously) as perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, while the control group received cefoxitin (2 g intravenously; standard care). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was development of postoperative SSI within 30 days. Secondary end points included 30-day mortality, development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, and sepsis. All data were collected as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Results: The trial was terminated at an interim analysis on the basis of a predefined stopping rule. Of 778 participants (378 in the piperacillin-tazobactam group [median age, 66.8 y; 233 {61.6%} men] and 400 in the cefoxitin group [median age, 68.0 y; 223 {55.8%} men]), the percentage with SSI at 30 days was lower in the perioperative piperacillin-tazobactam vs cefoxitin group (19.8% vs 32.8%; absolute difference, -13.0% [95% CI, -19.1% to -6.9%]; P < .001). Participants treated with piperacillin-tazobactam, vs cefoxitin, had lower rates of postoperative sepsis (4.2% vs 7.5%; difference, -3.3% [95% CI, -6.6% to 0.0%]; P = .02) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (12.7% vs 19.0%; difference, -6.3% [95% CI, -11.4% to -1.2%]; P = .03). Mortality rates at 30 days were 1.3% (5/378) among participants treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and 2.5% (10/400) among those receiving cefoxitin (difference, -1.2% [95% CI, -3.1% to 0.7%]; P = .32). Conclusions and Relevance: In participants undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy, use of piperacillin-tazobactam as perioperative prophylaxis reduced postoperative SSI, pancreatic fistula, and multiple downstream sequelae of SSI. The findings support the use of piperacillin-tazobactam as standard care for open pancreatoduodenectomy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03269994.

Why a Propofol Infusion Should Be the Anesthetic of Choice for Auditory Brainstem Response Testing in Children.

BACKGROUND: Auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing is considered to be relatively resistant to effects of volatile anesthetics. The impact of newer anesthetics on interpretability of ABR testing is unknown. This study compared sevoflurane versus propofol anesthesia on qualitative interpretability of ABR click-testing in children. METHODS: This prospective double-blind crossover study enrolled children (≤18 years old) receiving general anesthesia for elective ABR testing. All subjects received both sevoflurane and propofol anesthesias in the same ABR testing session. Deidentified ABR data were reviewed by 5 audiologists (blinded to anesthetic and patient) to determine threshold levels for hearing loss. The primary outcome was qualitative interpretability (false positive) of ABR click-testing. RESULTS: Each patient was tested at 4 different intensities in each ear: generating 624 records under each anesthetic, for a total of 1248 records. A few patients were tested at 5 different intensities in a single ear accounting for the additional 11 records, yielding 1259 records. Under sevoflurane anesthesia, 21 of the same patients (37 ears) were identified with abnormal ABR levels consistent with hearing loss (one or both ears). The probability of a patient being diagnosed with hearing "loss" in one or both ears was significantly less with propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia (mid P =.0312). If patients with bilateral loss are compared, the mid P value is 0.0098. The effect size based on patients was medium to large, with a minimum value of Cohen w = 0.320. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane produced more false positives for hearing loss and suggested more severe hearing loss than propofol. False-positive ABR tests, produced by certain anesthetic agents, can have significant life-long impact and negative psychosocial and developmental implications. Use of the intravenous anesthetic propofol is superior to sevoflurane for ABR testing in children.

Differences in Liver Parenchyma are Measurable with CT Radiomics at Initial Colon Resection in Patients that Develop Hepatic Metastases from Stage II/III Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no methods to identify patients with an increased risk of liver metastases to guide patient selection for liver-directed therapies. We tried to determine whether quantitative image features (radiomics) of the liver obtained from preoperative staging CT scans at the time of initial colon resection differ in patients that subsequently develop liver metastases, extrahepatic metastases, or demonstrate prolonged disease-free survival. METHODS: Patients who underwent resection of stage II/III colon cancer from 2004 to 2012 with available preoperative CT scans were included in this single-institution, retrospective case-control study. Patients were grouped by initial recurrence patterns: liver recurrence, extrahepatic recurrence, or no evidence of disease at 5 years. Radiomic features of the liver parenchyma extracted from CT images were compared across groups. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 120 patients divided evenly between three recurrence groups, with an equal number of stage II and III patients in each group. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, 44 of 254 (17%) imaging features displayed different distributions across the three patient groups (p < 0.05), with the clearest distinction between those with liver recurrence and no evidence of disease. Increased heterogeneity in the liver parenchyma by radiomic analysis was protective of liver metastases. CONCLUSIONS: CT radiomics is a promising tool to identify patients at high risk of developing liver metastases and is worthy of further investigation and validation.

Clinical Stage of Cancer Affects Perioperative Mortality for Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgeries.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the stage of cancer on perioperative mortality remains obscure. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether cancer stage influences 30-d mortality for gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers. METHODS: Data were collected from the National Cancer Database for patients undergoing resections for cancers of the stomach, pancreas, colon, or rectum between 2004 and 2015. The main analysis was conducted among patients with cancer stages 1-3. A sensitivity analysis also included cancer stage 4. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the patients' baseline characteristics. Generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate the relationship between stage and 30-d mortality, controlling for other disease-, patient- and hospital-level factors. Pseudo R2 statistics (%Δ pseudo R2) were used to quantify the relative explanatory capacity of the variables to the model for 30-d mortality. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.4. RESULTS: The cohort included 24,468, 28,078, 176,285, and 64,947 patients with stomach, pancreas, colon, and rectal cancers, respectively. After adjusting for other variables, 30-d mortality was different by stage for all cancer types examined. The factor most strongly associated with 30-d mortality was age (%Δ pseudo R2 range 14%-39%). The prognostic impact of cancer stage (Stages 1, 2, or 3) on 30-d mortality was comparable to that of the Charlson comorbidity index. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer stage contributes to explaining differences observed in short-term mortality for gastrointestinal cancers. Short-term mortality models would benefit by including more granular cancer stage, beyond disseminated status alone.

The Utility of Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy Scans in the Tokyo Guidelines Era for Acute Cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy (HIDA) aids the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis (AC) but has limitations. We sought to design a model based on the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) to predict HIDA results. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent a HIDA scan during the evaluation of AC was performed. Using logistic regression techniques incorporating the TG18 criterion and additional readily available patient characteristics, a prediction model was created to identify patients likely to test negative for acute cholecystitis by HIDA scan. RESULTS: In 235 patients with suspected AC, a HIDA scan was performed. Variables associated with positive HIDA results were male gender (RR 2.0 (CI 1.33-2.99), age (OR 1.02 (CI 1.01-1.04), right upper quadrant tenderness (RR 1.7 (CI 1.1-2.8)), clinical Murphy's sign (RR 2.2 (CI 1.5-3.4)), ultrasound findings suggestive of AC by any of its components (RR 3.2 (CI 1.6-6.5)), gallbladder wall thickening (RR 2.0 (CI 1.3-3.1)), and gallbladder distention (RR 1.9 (CI 1.3-2.9)). These variables allowed for creation of a model to predict HIDA results. The model predicted HIDA results in 36.9% of patients with an area under the curve of 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: In the era of TG18, HIDA is probably over utilized. We developed an accurate, simple model based on TG18 that identifies a group of patients for whom a HIDA scan is unnecessary to establish the diagnosis of AC.

Outcomes of Adrenalectomy and the Aldosteronoma Resolution Score in the Black and Hispanic Population.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) are variable. The aldosteronoma resolution score (ARS) uses preoperative variables to calculate a score that identifies those patients that are more likely to have resolution of hypertension after adrenalectomy. We aim to determine the efficacy of adrenalectomy and whether the ARS accurately predicts clinical success in a Black and Hispanic population. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent adrenalectomy for PA from 2004 to 2018 at two academic centers treating primarily Hispanic and Black patients. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated based on the primary aldosteronism surgical outcome consensus criterion. Retrospectively, the accuracy of ARS was determined by a receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Forty-three Hispanic and 10 Black patients underwent adrenalectomy for PA. Twenty-two patients (41.5%) had complete clinical success. Variables associated with complete clinical success in the univariate analysis were female gender (p = 0.026), younger age (p = 0.001), lower preoperative aldosterone (p = 0.035), lower preoperative systolic blood pressure (p = 0.001), fewer number of preoperative antihypertensive medications (p = 0.007) and a higher ARS (p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, only fewer number of preoperative antihypertensive medications was independently associated with complete clinical success (p = 0.026). The AUC of the ARS was 0.746. CONCLUSION: The rate of clinical success from adrenalectomy is good for Hispanic and Black patients with PA. Our analysis shows that the ARS is an accurate test of clinical success in Hispanic and Black patients. The ARS may be utilized preoperatively to frame expectations after adrenalectomy in these populations.

Evaluation of Adrenal Vein Sampling Use and Outcomes in Patients With Primary Aldosteronism.

BACKGROUND: Primary aldosteronism (PA) occurs in 10%-20% of patients with resistant hypertension. Guidelines recommend adrenal vein sampling (AVS) to identify patients for surgical management. We evaluate the use of AVS in managing PA to better understand the selection and outcomes of medical versus surgical treatment. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed, and patients were divided into those who did (AVS) and did not have AVS (non-AVS). Demographics, aldosterone and renin levels, blood pressure, comorbidities, and antihypertensive medications were recorded. Reasons to defer AVS and medical versus surgical decision-making were examined and groups were compared. RESULTS: We included 113 patients; 39.8% (45/113) had AVS, whereas 60.2% (68/113) did not. Groups were similar in age, body mass index, and initial systolic blood pressure (SBP). In patients who underwent AVS, 31 of 45 (68.9%) had unilateral secretion and were referred for surgery, whereas 13 of 45 (28.9%) had bilateral secretion. Of the 31 referred for surgery, 26 underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy, all cured; four refused surgery; and one counseled toward medical management by their physician. In 68 non-AVS patients, 6 (8.8%) underwent adrenalectomy without sampling and 2 with no clinical improvement. The remaining deferrals were because of normal or bilateral adrenal nodules on imaging (8/68, 11.8%); medical management due to poor surgical candidacy (12/68, 17.6%); patient refusal of intervention (13/68, 19.1%); or reasons not stated (28/68, 41.1%). At the follow-up, patients who underwent AVS had lower median SBP (135.4 mmHg versus 144.7 mmHg, P = 0.0241) and shorter follow-up (17.7 mo versus 54.0 mo, P < 0.0001). Surgically managed patients had biochemical resolution of PA with normalization of potassium levels (3.6 to 4.7mEq/L, P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: AVS correctly selects patients for surgical management avoiding unnecessary surgery. However, despite guidelines, AVS is not always pursued as part of PA treatment, potentially excluding surgical candidates.

Tertiary Pediatric Academic Institution's Experience With Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Nonspinal Surgery in Children With Mucopolysaccharidosis, Based on a Novel Evidence-Based Care Algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal deformities in mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs) patients pose unique challenges when patients present for surgery, especially nonspinal surgery. MPS patients have developed postsurgical neurological deficits after nonspinal surgery. While the incidence of neurological deficits after nonspinal surgery under anesthesia is unknown, accumulating evidence provides impetus to change current practice and increased neurological monitoring in these patients. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) with somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) has been implemented at select institutions with varying degree of success. This report describes our experience with IONM in the context of a multidisciplinary evidence-based care algorithm we developed at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of the electronic medical record (EPIC), for data from all MPS patients at our institution undergoing nonspinal surgery between September 2016 and March 2018. Patients were identified from IONM logs, which include procedure and patient comorbidities. Data concerning demographics, morbidities, degree of kyphoscoliosis, intraoperative administered medications and vital signs, surgical procedure, the IONM data, duration of surgery, and blood loss were extracted. Descriptive analyses were generated for all variables in the data collected. In addition, any IONM changes noted during the surgeries were identified and factors contributing to the changes described. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with a diagnosis of MPS underwent nonspinal surgery, and of those 38, 21 received IONM based on preoperative decision-making according to our care algorithm. Of the 21 patients who received IONM, we were able to get reliable baseline potentials on all patients. Of the 21 patients, 3 had significant neurophysiologic changes necessitating surgical/anesthetic intervention. All of these changes lasted several minutes, and the real-time IONM monitoring was able to capture them as they arose. None of the patients sustained residual neurological deficits. Thus, children who did not fit the criteria for IONM (n = 13) based on our algorithm had 0% incidence of any untoward neurological deficits after surgery (97.5% confidence interval [CI], 00%-25.5%), while 14% (95% CI, 11.5%-30.1%) of children who did fit criteria for IONM and had IONM had significant IONM changes. CONCLUSIONS: Through this case series, we describe our experience with the use of IONM and a novel care algorithm for guiding the anesthetic management of MPS patients undergoing nonspinal surgery. We conclude that they can be useful tools for provision of safe anesthetic care in this high-risk cohort.

Neuroanesthesiologists as interoperative neurophysiologists: a collaborative cognitive apprenticeship model of training in a community of clinical practice.

Directing intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) is a patient care activity for which no formal training programs exist, even though the need for well-trained practitioners is readily evident while caring for patients with diseases of the brain, spinal cord, spinal column, or nervous system. Here, we present the theoretical basis and institutional experience for a successful model of learning a new and complex set of skills: the medical direction of IONM. In a major academic institution, a clinical community of practice absorbed new members with professional backgrounds ranging from a recent neuroanesthesia fellowship to several decades of neuroanesthesia practice and trained them in a collaborative cognitive apprenticeship model to medically direct IONM. Our community of practice comprises experienced technicians, a diplomate of the American Board of Neurophysiologic Monitoring (DABNM), and six neuroanesthesiologists. This group forms the base of the scaffolding or structure where the apprenticeship and learning take place. The clinical community of practice has trained eight new members in the medical direction of IONM. The group has also trained four outside anesthesiologists-one of whom went on to become certified as a DABNM-who went on to develop the IONM program at a major children's hospital. This collaborative cognitive apprenticeship in anesthesiology to learn the medical direction of IONM is quite innovative as it integrates new members and expands the range of existing ones. In our model, the entire community is elevated by the reciprocal interactions of master clinicians, novice apprentices, and the community of practice.

Correction to: Is the new ASNM intraoperative neuromonitoring supervision "guideline" a trustworthy guideline? A commentary.

The article Is the new ASNM intraoperative neuromonitoring supervision "guideline" a trustworthy guideline? A commentary, written by Stanley A. Skinner, Elif Ilgaz Aydinlar, Lawrence F. Borges, Bob S. Carter, Bradford L. Currier, Vedran Deletis, Charles Dong, John Paul Dormans, Gea Drost, Isabel Fernandez­Conejero, E. Matthew Hoffman, Robert N. Holdefer, Paulo Andre Teixeira Kimaid, Antoun Koht, Karl F. Kothbauer, David B. MacDonald, John J. McAuliffe III, David E. Morledge, Susan H. Morris, Jonathan Norton, Klaus Novak, Kyung Seok Park, Joseph H. Perra, Julian Prell, David M. Rippe, Francesco Sala, Daniel M. Schwartz, Martín J. Segura, Kathleen Seidel, Christoph Seubert, Mirela V. Simon, Francisco Soto, Jeffrey A. Strommen, Andrea Szelenyi, Armando Tello, Sedat Ulkatan, Javier Urriza and Marshall Wilkinson, was originally published electronically on the publisher's internet portal (currently SpringerLink) on 05 January 2019 without open access. With the author(s)' decision to opt for Open Choice the copyright of the article changed on 30 January 2019 to © The Author(s) 2019 and the article is forthwith distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The original article has been corrected.

Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials Are More Readily Acquired Than Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials in Children Younger Than 6 Years.

BACKGROUND: There is a general belief that somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) are more easily obtained than transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) in children younger than 6 years. We tested this assumption and the assumption that motor-evoked potentials are rarely obtained in children younger than 2 years. METHODS: The records of all patients who were monitored during surgical procedures between April 1, 2010, and June 30, 2013, were reviewed and those who were younger than 72 months at the time of surgery were identified and analyzed for the rate of obtaining clinically useful SSEPs and motor-evoked potentials. Subgroup analysis was performed by age. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were identified, 9 had SSEPs without TcMEPs monitored, 117 had both TcMEPs and SSEPs monitored, and the remainder had only electromyographic monitoring. All patients who were to have TcMEPs recorded received a total IV anesthetic. Among the 117 patients who had both SSEPs and TcMEPs monitored, clinically relevant TcMEPs were obtained more frequently than SSEPs (110/117 vs 89/117; χ = 14.82; P = 0.00012). There were significant differences between the rates of obtaining SSEPs and TcMEPs in the 0- to 23-month (P = 0.0038) and 24- to 47-month (P = 0.0056) age groups. Utilization of a double-train stimulation technique facilitated obtaining TcMEPs in the youngest patients. CONCLUSIONS: TcMEPs can be obtained more easily than SSEPs in patients younger than 72 months if a permissive anesthetic technique is used. The success rate for obtaining TcMEPs can be further enhanced by the use of a temporal facilitation (double-train) stimulation technique.

To Pretreat or Not to Pretreat: Prophylactic Anticholinergic Administration Before Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (Dex) appears to be very effective as a sole sedative for pediatric imaging when used at high doses, but at an increased risk of transient hypertension, hypotension, and bradycardia. There are no clinical evidence/guidelines to guide anesthesia providers as to whether patients should be pretreated with an anticholinergic. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the changes in hemodynamic parameters after Dex sedation attributed to receiving or not receiving an anticholinergic pretreatment and compare for any differences or similarities. A subgroups analysis was performed in children with Down syndrome (DS). METHODS: In this retrospective descriptive study, we reviewed the records of 163 children receiving Dex anesthesia during MRI studies. Data analyzed included demographics, history of DS, and hemodynamics (heart rate [HR], systolic blood pressure [SBP], and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) following Dex loading and infusion and the administration of an anticholinergic (atropine or glycopyrrolate). RESULTS: The mean age was 94.5 months, and 52 (32%) patients had DS. The generalized linear mixed-effects regression model showed a significant reduction in HR and SBP in all patients when no anticholinergic was administered compared with when it was administered. There was no significant change with DBP. During the scan period, the HR of the no-anticholinergic group decreased 26.6%, whereas that of the anticholinergic group decreased by only 16.7% from baseline (P < 0.01). The maximal SBP increased by a significantly greater percentage, compared with baseline, in the anticholinergic group in comparison with the no-anticholinergic group (20.2% vs 10.4%, respectively; P = 0.02). In the DS group, the difference in the maximal SBP change during the scan period was exaggerated, with a percentage increase that was 36 times larger in the anticholinergic group compared with the no-anticholinergic group (22% vs 0.6%, respectively; P< 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of a prophylactic anticholinergic with Dex shows no advantage other than a transient clinically insignificant increase in HR and SBP, and it may precipitate transient exaggerated SBP in more patients compared with not using a prophylactic anticholinergic.

A combination of mild hypothermia and sevoflurane affords long-term protection in a modified neonatal mouse model of cerebral hypoxia-ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Infant brain injury from hypoxia-ischemia (HI) can lead to life-long impairment, but protective strategies are lacking. Short-term but not long-term protection has been demonstrated in the Rice-Vannucci neonatal brain ischemia model (RVM) by volatile anesthetic administration before HI, while exposure during HI has not been tested. In the current study, we evaluated a combination of sevoflurane and mild hypothermia as a protective approach during HI, both short- and long-term, by introducing intubation and mechanical ventilation to the RVM. METHODS: The right common carotid artery was ligated in 10-day-old mice during brief sevoflurane anesthesia, followed by a 2-hour recovery with the dam. Littermates were then randomized to either: HI spontaneously breathing 10% oxygen for 60 minutes (the classical RVM); HI-Protect mild hypothermia and orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation with 3.5% sevoflurane in 10% oxygen for 60 minutes; or Room Air spontaneously breathing room air for 60 minutes. In a nonsurviving cohort, cerebral oxygenation was monitored in the area at risk and the contralateral hemisphere during HI or HI-Protect using visible-light spectroscopy (Spectros Corp). Mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were measured. Arterial blood gases were obtained. Right/left brain hemispheric weight ratios and brain damage scores were determined 1 week after HI. In another group, learning and behavior were assessed in young adulthood (9 weeks) using spontaneous locomotion, Morris water maze, and apomorphine injection. RESULTS: During HI, ipsilateral and contralateral brain oxygenation, arterial blood pressures, blood gases, and glucose levels were similar in both ischemic groups, while heart rate was slower in the HI-Protect group. One week after ischemia, brain hemispheric weight ratios and injury scores in several brain regions were significantly worse after HI, compared with HI-Protect. Nine weeks after HI, Morris water maze hidden platform and reversal platform escape latencies, measures of spatial memory function, were superior after HI-Protect, compared with HI (P < 0.0001). HI-Protect animals demonstrated significantly less circling behavior after an apomorphine challenge (P < 0.0001), a measure of striatal integrity. CONCLUSIONS: To test the neuroprotective effects of volatile anesthetics during neonatal brain ischemia, we developed a modification of the RVM. By using mechanical ventilation and endotracheal intubation, sevoflurane administration during HI was survivable. The combination of sevoflurane administration and mild hypothermia during HI conferred not only short-term structural, but also long-term functional protection, compared with littermates treated according to the RVM. These findings warrant further studies to improve neurological outcome in critically ill infants.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in pediatric neurosurgery.

The use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in pediatric neurosurgery is not new; however, its application to a wider range of procedures is a relatively new development. The purpose of this article is to review the physiology underlying the commonly employed IONM modalities and to describe their application to a subset of pediatric neurosurgical procedures.

Practice guidelines for the supervising professional: intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

The American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM) was founded in 1988 as the American Society of Evoked Potential Monitoring. From the beginning, the Society has been made up of physicians, doctoral degree holders, technologists, and all those interested in furthering the profession. The Society changed its name to the ASNM and held its first Annual Meeting in 1990. It remains the largest worldwide organization dedicated solely to the scientifically based advancement of intraoperative neurophysiology. The primary goal of the ASNM is to assure the quality of patient care during monitored procedures along the neuraxis. This goal is accomplished through programs in education, advocacy of basic and clinical research, and publication of guidelines. The ASNM is committed to the development of medically sound and clinically relevant guidelines for intraoperative neurophysiology. Guidelines are formulated based on exhaustive literature review, recruitment of expert opinion, and broad consensus among ASNM membership. Input is likewise sought from sister societies and related constituencies. Adherence to a literature-based, formalized process characterizes the construction of all ASNM guidelines. The guidelines covering the Professional Practice of intraoperative monitoring were established by a committee of nearly 30 total participants and ultimately endorsed by the Board of Directors of ASNM on January 24th 2013. That document follows.

Rosai-Dorfman Disease of pancreas: rare aetiology mimicking malignancy.

Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) is a non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis which usually presents as painless lymphadenopathy. Extranodal involvement is known to occur in various organs, and less than ten cases with primary pancreatic involvement have been reported previously. This case report details the clinical course of an elderly female, presenting with upper abdominal discomfort and imaging suggestive of malignancy. Multiple non-diagnostic fine-needle aspirations were followed by surgical intervention. Histopathological evaluation revealed a pancreatic mass with characteristic features of RDD. The large hallmark RDD histiocytes showed pale, watery-clear cytoplasm, central round nucleus, and prominent nucleolus, with and without lymphocyte emperipolesis. The RDD histiocytes showed positive immunostaining for CD68, CD163, S100 (nuclear and cytoplasmic), OCT-2, Cyclin D1 and are negative for CD1a, Factor XIIIa, fascin and langerin. This case underscores the importance of considering RDD in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic masses alongwith comprehensive evaluation, multidisciplinary approach and pancreatic core needle biopsy evaluation.

Cecal volvulus after robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in a gynecologic oncology patient: A case report.

Cecal volvulus is a rare and life-threatening cause of intestinal obstruction with multiple risk factors including prior abdominal surgery and cecal hypermobility. Although its incidence has been reported after common procedures such as cholecystectomy and appendectomy, it has not been well studied after laparoscopy, especially in gynecological surgeries. If untreated, a cecal volvulus can result in serious complications such as intestinal strangulation, necrosis, or perforation. Therefore, early identification of risk factors and intervention is important in prevention of these sequelae. Here, we report a case of cecal volvulus in a patient with endometrial carcinoma after a staging robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and the risk factors that may have led to her complication.

Complications related to thyroidectomy among patients with hyperthyroidism: Exploring the potential for ambulatory surgery.

BACKGROUND: Total thyroidectomy for hyperthyroidism is typically followed by overnight admission to monitor for complications including thyrotoxicosis. Outpatient thyroid surgery is increasingly common, but its safety in patients with hyperthyroidism has not been well studied. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed 183 patients with hyperthyroidism who underwent total thyroidectomy from 2015 to 2022 at one urban, academic center. The main outcomes were rates of thyroid storm, surgical complications, and 30-day ED visits and readmissions. RESULTS: Among 183 patients with hyperthyroidism (mean age, 45 ± 14.5 years; 82.5% female), there were no cases of thyroid storm and complications included recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy (7.0%), symptomatic hypocalcemia (4.4%), and hematoma (1.6%). ED visits were present in 1.1% and no patients were readmitted. CONCLUSION: Total thyroidectomy was not associated with thyroid storm and <6% of patients required inpatient management. Ambulatory total thyroidectomy for hyperthyroidism warrants further consideration through identification of predictive factors for postoperative complications.

Signaling events at TMEM doorways provide potential targets for inhibiting breast cancer dissemination.

Tumor cell intravasation is essential for metastatic dissemination, but its exact mechanism is incompletely understood. We have previously shown that in breast cancer, the direct and stable association of a tumor cell expressing Mena, a Tie2hi/VEGFhi macrophage, and a vascular endothelial cell, creates an intravasation portal, called a "tumor microenvironment of metastasis" (TMEM) doorway, for tumor cell intravasation, leading to dissemination to distant sites. The density of TMEM doorways, also called TMEM doorway score, is a clinically validated prognostic marker of distant metastasis in breast cancer patients. Although we know that tumor cells utilize TMEM doorway-associated transient vascular openings to intravasate, the precise signaling mechanisms involved in TMEM doorway function are only partially understood. Using two mouse models of breast cancer and an in vitro assay of intravasation, we report that CSF-1 secreted by the TMEM doorway tumor cell stimulates local secretion of VEGF-A from the Tie2hi TMEM doorway macrophage, leading to the dissociation of endothelial junctions between TMEM doorway associated endothelial cells, supporting tumor cell intravasation. Acute blockade of CSF-1R signaling decreases macrophage VEGF-A secretion as well as TMEM doorway-associated vascular opening, tumor cell trans-endothelial migration, and dissemination. These new insights into signaling events regulating TMEM doorway function should be explored further as treatment strategies for metastatic disease.