Development of a LAG-3 immunohistochemistry assay for melanoma.

AIMS: A robust immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay was developed to detect lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) expression by immune cells (ICs) in tumour tissues. LAG-3 is an immuno-oncology target with demonstrable clinical benefit, and there is a need for a standardised, well-characterised assay to measure its expression. This study aims to describe LAG-3 scoring criteria and present the specificity, sensitivity, analytical precision and reproducibility of this assay. METHODS: The specificity of the assay was investigated by antigen competition and with LAG3 knockout cell lines. A melanin pigment removal procedure was implemented to prevent melanin interference in IHC interpretation. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) human melanoma samples with a range of LAG-3 expression levels were used to assess the sensitivity and analytical precision of the assay with a ≥1% cut-off to determine LAG-3 positivity. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility were evaluated with 60 samples in intralaboratory studies and 70 samples in interlaboratory studies. RESULTS: The LAG-3 IHC method demonstrated performance suitable for analysis of LAG-3 IC expression in clinical melanoma samples. The pretreatment step effectively removed melanin pigment that could interfere with interpretation. LAG-3 antigen competition and analysis of LAG3 knockout cell lines indicated that the 17B4 antibody clone binds specifically to LAG-3. The intrarun repeatability, interday, interinstrument, interoperator and inter-reagent lot reproducibility demonstrated a high scoring concordance (>95%). The interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility and overall interlaboratory and intralaboratory reproducibility also showed high scoring concordance (>90%). CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that the assay reliably assesses LAG-3 expression in FFPE human melanoma samples by IHC.

Determination of HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and concordance with the clinical trials immunohistochemical assay in women with metastatic breast cancer evaluated for treatment with trastuzumab.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the concordance between HER2 gene amplification, determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and HER2 protein overexpression assessed by an immunohistochemical (IHC) assay. The IHC protocol used was a research assay, known as the Clinical Trial Assay (CTA), developed to select women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) for three pivotal clinical trials of trastuzumab therapy. METHODS: A direct-labeled, dual-probe FISH assay was used to determine HER2 amplification in 623 fixed breast cancer tissue specimens. These specimens had been stored as paraffin-embedded sections for 25 years. All specimens had been analyzed for HER2 protein expression by the CTA. To assess the reproducibility of FISH results in archived material, we evaluated a separate group of 617 breast cancer tissue specimens at two different laboratories. RESULTS: Informative FISH results were available for 529 (85%) of the 623 specimens. Overall concordance between FISH and IHC results was 82% (95% CI; 7885%). Assay agreement between FISH results and specimens with immunostaining scores of 0, 1+, and 3+ were 97, 93 and 89%, respectively. However, only 24% of specimens with 2+ immunostaining scores had HER2 amplification by FISH; there was assay disagreement in 76% of specimens in this IHC subgroup. Interlaboratory FISH concordance was 92% (95% CI; 8994%), indicating very good assay reproducibility in these archived specimens. CONCLUSION: HER2 status determined by CTA-IHC and FISH are significantly correlated; however, differences between these two assays can a ect patient selection for trastuzumab therapy.