Knowledge of neonatal brachial plexus palsy among medical professionals in North America.

PURPOSE: Early referral of neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) patients to multidisciplinary clinics is critical for timely diagnosis, treatment, and improved functional outcomes. In Saudi Arabia, inadequate knowledge regarding NBPP is a reason for delayed referral. We aimed to evaluate the knowledge of North American healthcare providers (HCPs) regarding the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of NBPP. METHODS: A 12-question survey regarding NBPP was distributed via electronic and paper formats to North American providers from various referring and treating specialties. NBPP knowledge was compared between Saudi Arabian vs. North American providers, referring vs. treating specialties, academic vs. community hospitals, and providers with self-reported confidence vs. nonconfidence in NBPP knowledge. RESULTS: Of the 273 surveys collected, 45% were from referring providers and 55% were from treating providers. Saudi Arabian and North American HCPs demonstrated similar NBPP knowledge except for potential etiologies for NBPP and surgery timing. In North America, referring and treating providers had similar overall knowledge of NBPP but lacked familiarity with its natural history. A knowledge gap existed between academic and community hospitals regarding timing of referral/initiation of physical/occupational therapy (PT/OT) and Horner's syndrome. Providers with self-reported confidence in treating NBPP had greater knowledge of types of NBPP and timing for PT/OT initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, North American providers demonstrated adequate knowledge of NBPP. However, both eastern and western physicians remain overly optimistic in believing that most infants recover spontaneously. This study revealed a unique and universal knowledge gap in NBPP diagnosis, referral, and management worldwide. Continuous efforts to increase NBPP knowledge are indicated.

G. Carl Huber (1865-1934): A Michigan Pioneer in Peripheral Nerve Injury and Regeneration.

The treatment of peripheral nerve injuries has seen tremendous innovations over the past century. Dr Gotthelf Carl Huber, an American immigrant and early experimental pioneer in the field of peripheral nerve injury, created a foundation of scientific knowledge for these advancements. At the beginning of his career, Huber published novel work in peripheral nerve injury, supporting the concept of Wallerian degeneration and demonstrating the use of nerve grafting for repair. As his scientific career evolved into other research areas at the University of Michigan, Huber's impact extended far beyond just the study of peripheral nerve injury. Because of the external forces of the First World War, Dr Huber's focus returned to translational projects concentrated on the treatment of neuromas and war time peripheral nerve injuries. Huber's scientific impact in the field of peripheral nerve injury and repair came as a result of his incredible work ethic, mentorship, and tremendous leadership qualities; through this, his work still influences clinical practice today, a century later.

Superficial peroneal nerve syndrome: an unusual nerve entrapment. Case report.

Lower-extremity pain and paresthesia have multiple origins. Early recognition of the symptoms of peripheral nerve entrapment leads to timely treatment and avoids the cost of unnecessary studies. The authors report on a case of superficial peroneal nerve syndrome resulting from nerve herniation through a fascial defect, which was responsive to surgical treatment. This 22-year-old man presented with pain and paresthesias over the lateral aspect of the right calf and the dorsum of the foot without motor weakness. Exercise led to the formation of a tender bulge approximately 12 cm above the lateral malleolus. Percussion of this site worsened his symptoms. Radiography and electromyography studies were nondiagnostic. The patient underwent surgical decompression that involved division of the fascia overlying the nerve and neurolysis of the superficial peroneal nerve. The operation resulted in symptom-free relief. Superficial peroneal nerve syndrome is an entrapment neuropathy that results from mechanical compression of the nerve at or near the point where the nerve pierces the fascia to travel within the subcutaneous tissue. Surgical decompression of the mechanical entrapment usually provides relief from pain and paresthesia.

Peripheral nerve injuries in weight training: sites, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Direct trauma, compression caused by muscle hypertrophy or other soft tissue changes, or excessive stretching of a peripheral nerve in the upper extremity may lead to uncommon-but potentially serious-complications. Clinicians are seeing more of these injuries as weight training, power lifting, bodybuilding, cross-training, and general physical conditioning with weights become more popular. Symptoms of pain, weakness, paresthesia, or palsy; physical exam findings; electromyography; and nerve conduction studies are used to make the diagnosis. Most conditions respond well to conservative measures, such as rest from the offending exercise and correction of poor technique, but surgery may be required for complete clinical resolution in severe cases.

Cervical radiculopathy, entrapment neuropathy, and thoracic outlet syndrome: how to differentiate? Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.

The common diagnoses of cervical radiculopathy and upper-extremity entrapment neuropathies can at times be difficult to differentiate. Additionally, thoracic outlet syndrome is often diagnosed when, in fact, the problem is radiculopathy or neuropathy. Another source of confusion, especially in older patients, is neuralgic amyotrophy, brachial plexitis, or the Parsonage-Turner syndrome. The differential diagnosis of unilateral arm pain, weakness, and/or sensory loss includes all of these problems. The clinical and electrodiagnostic features of each are discussed as an aid to distinguishing between these common and similar entities.

Laparoscopic triple neurectomy for intractable groin pain: technical report of 3 cases.

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic groin pain can be a severely debilitating condition. Triple neurectomy of the ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral nerves is a viable treatment option. OBJECTIVE: To present our initial experience with the laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach to triple neurectomy. METHODS: Three patients (33 to 48 years of age) presented with chronic groin pain of 3 to 7 years' duration. The discomfort manifested in the ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral nerve distributions and severely affected their lifestyles, resulting in multiple unsuccessful medical and surgical treatments without symptomatic relief. Because the patients failed other modes of treatment, they underwent a laparoscopic retroperitoneal triple neurectomy. RESULTS: Three patients underwent a triple neurectomy from November 2006 to May 2009. All patients reported debilitating chronic groin pain and underwent prior treatments ranging from anesthetic blocks to orchiectomy without lasting relief. The first case illustrates the anatomic variation of the genitofemoral nerve and the importance of transecting both branches for adequate symptomatic relief. The remaining cases demonstrate successful transection of all 3 nerves with significant pain relief at 10 months to 3 years of follow-up. No major complications were encountered. CONCLUSION: This technique provides several advantages in the treatment of chronic groin pain. The retroperitoneal approach provides a facile method to reach the nerves in 1 stage and provides a dissection field free of previous scars. As a laparoscopic technique, benefits include small incision sites with small scars, less postoperative pain, and shorter hospitalizations and/or same-day discharges with effective relief of groin pain.

Dysphagia due to anterior cervical hyperosteophytosis.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical hyperosteophytosis describes the excessive formation of osteophytes along the ventral spine. Dysphagia due to ACH is considered an uncommon entity described mainly in case reports. Symptomatic ACH has been attributed to multiple etiologies including DISH, trauma, postlaminectomy syndromes, and cervical spondylosis. We report one of the largest series of patients with ACH-induced dysphagia requiring surgery. METHODS: After IRB approval, a retrospective chart review was completed. From 2001 to 2006, 9 patients presented with dysphagia due to ACH requiring surgical treatment. RESULTS: Eight patients were male, and the mean age was 65.1 years. Cervical spine x-rays and CT clearly demonstrated ACH in each case. Esophagram or a video fluoroscopic swallowing study was used to verify that dysphagia was caused by osteophytic overgrowth in all instances but one. In 2 patients, a focal osteophyte had formed adjacent to a previously fused segment. Of the remaining 7 patients, osteophytic formation was attributed to cervical spondylosis in 2 patients and DISH in 5 patients. All patients underwent osteophytectomy without spinal fusion. Average follow-up was 9.8 months. Although all 9 patients experienced resolution of dysphagia, improvement was delayed in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis and spondylosis are the most common etiologies accounting for ACH-induced dysphagia. Adjacent segment disease may also be a potential cause of symptomatic ACH and has not been previously reported. Regardless of etiology, surgical resection is highly successful if conservative measures fail.

Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature.

STUDY DESIGN: Review of the literature. OBJECTIVES: Review the definition, etiology, incidence, and risk factors associated with as well as potential treatment options. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The development of pathology at the mobile segment next to a lumbar or lumbosacral spinal fusion has been termed adjacent segment disease. Initially reported to occur rarely, it is now considered a potential late complication of spinal fusion that can necessitate further surgical intervention and adversely affect outcomes. METHODS: MEDLINE literature search. RESULTS: The most common abnormal finding at the adjacent segment is disc degeneration. Biomechanical changes consisting of increased intradiscal pressure, increased facet loading, and increased mobility occur after fusion and have been implicated in causing adjacent segment disease. Progressive spinal degeneration with age is also thought to be a major contributor. From a radiographic standpoint, reported incidence during average postoperative follow-up observation ranging from 36 to 369 months varies substantially from 5.2 to 100%. Incidence of symptomatic adjacent segment disease is lower, however, ranging from 5.2 to 18.5% during 44.8 to 164 months of follow-up observation. The rate of symptomatic adjacent segment disease is higher in patients with transpedicular instrumentation (12.2-18.5%) compared with patients fused with other forms of instrumentation or with no instrumentation (5.2-5.6%). Potential risk factors include instrumentation, fusion length, sagittal malalignment, facet injury, age, and pre-existing degenerative changes. CONCLUSION: Biomechanical alterations likely play a primary role in causing adjacent segment disease. Radiographically apparent, asymptomatic adjacent segment disease is common but does not correlate with functional outcomes. Potentially modifiable risk factors for the development of adjacent segment disease include fusion without instrumentation, protecting the facet joint of the adjacent segment during placement of pedicle screws,fusion length, and sagittal balance. Surgical management, when indicated, consists of decompression of neural elements and extension of fusion. Outcomes after surgery, however, are modest.