Item Level Psychometrics of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory in Vestibular Migraine and Meniere's Disease.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the measurement properties of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) using item response theory in patients diagnosed with vestibular migraine (VM) and Meniere's disease (MD). DESIGN: One hundred twenty-five patients diagnosed with VM and 169 patients diagnosed with MD by a vestibular neurotologist according to the Bárány Society criteria in two tertiary multidisciplinary vestibular clinics and who completed the DHI at their initial visit, were included in the study. The DHI (total score and individual items) was analyzed using the Rasch Rating Scale model for patients in each subgroup, VM and MD, and as a whole group. The following categories were assessed: rating-scale structure, unidimensionality, item and person fit, item difficulty hierarchy, person-item match, and separation index, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change (MDC). RESULTS: Patients were predominantly female (80% of the VM subgroup and 68% of the MD subgroup) with a mean age of 49.9 ± 16.5 years and 54.1 ± 14.2 years, respectively. The mean total DHI score for the VM group was 51.9 ± 22.3 and for the MD group was 48.5 ± 26.6 ( p > 0.05). While neither all items nor the separate constructs met all criteria for unidimensionality (i.e., items measuring a single construct), post hoc analysis showed that the all-item analysis supported a single construct. All analyses met the criterion for showing a sound rating scale and acceptable Cronbach's alpha (≥0.69). The all-item analysis showed the most precision, separating the samples into three to four significant strata. The separate-construct analyses (physical, emotional, and functional) showed the least precision, separated the samples into less than three significant strata. Regarding MDC, the MDC remained consistent across the analyses of the different samples; approximately 18 points for the full analyses and approximately 10 points for the separate construct (physical, emotional, and functional). CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation of the DHI using item response theory shows that the instrument is psychometrically sound and reliable. The all-item instrument fulfills criteria for essential unidimensionality but does seem to measure multiple latent constructs in patients with VM and MD, which has been reported in other balance and mobility instruments. The current subscales did not show acceptable psychometrics, which is in line with multiple recent studies favoring the use of the total score. The study also shows that the DHI is adaptable to episodic recurrent vestibulopathies. The total score shows better precision and separation of subjects in up to four strata compared to the separate construct that separate subjects into less than three strata. The measurement error smallest detectable change was found in our analysis to be 18 points, which means any change in the DHI of less than 18 points is not likely to be clinically significant. The minimal clinically important difference remains indeterminate.

Computer-based Auditory Training by New Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Is Associated With Durable Improvements in Cochlear Implant Quality of Life.

OBJECTIVE: The process of adapting to communicate with a cochlear implant (CI) is complex. The use of auditory training after cochlear implantation may help to facilitate improvements in postoperative speech recognition and quality-of-life outcomes in new adult CI recipients. However, the effectiveness of auditory training remains uncertain and long-term effects have not been examined in a large sample of new adult CI users. As such, the objective of this study was to examine the influence of common forms of auditory training on speech recognition and CI-related quality-of-life (CI-related QOL) outcomes at 1 year after cochlear implantation. We hypothesized that patients who reported use of computer-based auditory training (CBAT) would show improved speech and CIQOL-35 Profile scores at 1 year after activation of their implant, compared with their peers. DESIGN: This study was designed as a prospective study and was undertaken at a tertiary academic CI center. Participants included 114 adults undergoing cochlear implantation for bilateral hearing loss. Patients serially self-reported use of the following types of post-CI auditory training over their first-year postactivation: (1) face-to-face training (e.g., speech-language pathologist), (2) passive home-based training (e.g., listening to audiobooks), and (3) CBAT (e.g., self-directed software). Outcomes measures for this study included change in Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant phoneme (CNCp), CNC word (CNCw), AzBio sentences in quiet, and CIQOL-35 Profile global and domain scores from pre-CI to 12-mo post-CI. RESULTS: Of 114 patients, 94 (82.5%) used one or more auditory training resources. Of these, 19.3% used face-to-face training, 67.5% passive home-based training, and 46.5% CBAT. Of 114 patients, 73 had complete CIQOL data. At 12 mo, only CBAT use was associated with significantly greater improvements in global and all domain-specific CIQOL scores ( d -range = 0.72-0.87), compared with those not using CBAT. Controlling for demographics and use of multiple training resources, CBAT remained the strongest positive predictor of CIQOL improvement, with significant associations with global score (ß = 12.019[4.127,19.9]) and all domain scores at 12-mo post-CI: communication (ß = 11.937[2.456,21.318), emotional (ß = 12.293[1.827,22.759), entertainment (ß = 17.014[5.434,28.774), environment (ß = 13.771[1.814,25.727]), listening effort (ß = 12.523[2.798,22.248]), and social (ß = 18.114[7.403,28.826]). No significant benefits were noted with use of CBAT or any other form of auditory training and speech recognition scores at 12-mo post-CI ( d -range = -0.12-0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Auditory training with CBAT was associated with improved CI-related QOL outcomes at 12-mo post-CI. Given its availability and low cost, this study provides evidence to support using CBAT to improve real-world functional abilities in new adult CI recipients.

Impact of auditory environments on language outcomes in children with a cochlear implant.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the effects of auditory environments on receptive and expressive language outcomes in children with a CI. DESIGN: A single-institution retrospective review was performed. The auditory environments included Speech-Noise, Speech-Quiet, Quiet, Music, and Noise. Hearing Hour Percentage (HHP) and percent total hours were calculated for each environment. Generalised Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) analyses were used to study the effects of auditory environments on PLS Receptive and Expressive scores. STUDY SAMPLE: Thirty-nine children with CI. RESULTS: On GLMM, an increase in Quiet HHP and Quiet percent total hours were positively associated with PLS Receptive scores. Speech-Quiet, Quiet, and Music HHP were positively associated with PLS Expressive scores, with only Quiet being significant for percent total hours. In contrast, percent total hours of Speech-Noise and Noise had a significant negative association with PLS Expressive scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that more time spent in a quiet auditory environment positively influences PLS Receptive and Expressive scores and that more time listening to speech in quiet and music positively influences PLS Expressive scores. Time spent in environments recognised as Speech-Noise and Noise might negatively impact a child's expressive language outcomes with a CI. Future research is needed to better understand this association.

Using Clinical Audiologic Measures to Determine Cochlear Implant Candidacy.

INTRODUCTION: Only a small percentage (6-10%) of patients who are candidates receive cochlear implants (CIs). One potential reason contributing to low usage rates may be confusion regarding which patients to refer for CI evaluation. The extent to which information provided by standard clinical audiologic assessments is sufficient for selecting appropriate CI evaluation referrals is uncertain. The objective of this study is to evaluate the capacity of standard clinical audiologic measures to differentiate CI candidates from noncandidates. METHOD: The study design is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained CI database from a university-based tertiary medical center of 518 patients undergoing CI evaluations from 2012 to 2020. Each ear of each patient was treated as an independent value. Receiver operating characteristic (ROCs) curves were constructed using aided AzBio sentence recognition scores in quiet and aided AzBio +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio scores <60% as binary classifiers for CI candidacy. For each ROC, we examined the capacity of multiple pure-tone thresholds, pure-tone average (PTA), and CNC word recognition scores (WRSs) measured under earphones to determine CI candidacy. Area under the curve ROC (AUC-ROC) values were calculated to demonstrate the capacity of each model to differentiate CI candidates from noncandidates. RESULTS: Variables with the greatest capacity to accurately differentiate CI candidates from noncandidates using aided AzBio in quiet scores were earphone CNC WRS, earphone pure-tone threshold at 1,000 Hz, and earphone PTA (AUC-ROC values = 0.86-0.88). Using aided AzBio +10 scores as the measure for candidacy, only CNC word recognition had a fair capacity to identify candidates (AUC-ROC value = 0.73). Based on the ROCs, a 1,000 Hz pure-tone threshold >50 dB HL, PTA >57 dB HL, and a monosyllabic WRS <60% can each serve as individual indicators for referral for CI evaluations. CONCLUSION: The current study provides initial indicators for referral and a first step at developing evidence-based criteria for CI evaluation referral using standard audiologic assessments.

The Effects of Paired versus Sequential Stimulation on Speech Recognition Outcomes of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.

PURPOSE: Cochlear implant (CI) sound-processing strategies are important to the overall success of a CI recipient. This study aimed to determine the effects of 2 Advanced Bionics (AB) CI-processing strategies, Optima-S and Optima-P, on speech recognition outcomes in adult CI users. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed at a tertiary academic medical center. Seventeen post-lingually deafened adult CI users (median age = 58.6 years; age range: 23.5-78.9 years) with long-term use of a paired sound-processing strategy (Optima-P) were reprogrammed with a sequential strategy (Optima-S). Demographic data and speech recognition scores with pre- and post-intervention analyses were collected and compared with respect to the 95% confidence interval for common CI word and sentence recognition tests. RESULTS: Using Optima-S sound-processing strategy, all patients (100%) performed equivalent or better on word and sentence testing than with Optima-P. More specifically, 17.6, 41.2, and 58.8% of the patients performed above the 95% confidence interval for speech recognition conditions of monosyllabic words, sentences in quiet, and sentences in noise, respectively. All patients (100%) selected Optima-S as their preferred strategy for future CI use. CONCLUSION: Speech recognition performance with Optima-S processing strategy was stable or improved compared to results with Optima-P in all tested conditions, and subjective preference of Optima-S was selected by all patients. Given these results, CI clinicians should consider programming AB CI users with Optima-S sound-processing strategy to optimize overall speech recognition performance.

Validity and reliability of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments in comparison to legacy instruments.

OBJECTIVE: Validated and reliable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may provide a comprehensive and accurate assessment of the real-world experiences of cochlear implant (CI) users and complement information obtained from speech recognition outcomes. To address this unmet clinical need, the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile instrument and CIQOL-10 Global measure were developed according to the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) and COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. The CIQOL-35 Profile consists of 35 items in six domain constructs (communication, emotional, entertainment, environment, listening effort, and social) and the CIQOL-10 Global contains 10 items that provide an overall CIQOL score. The present study compares psychometric properties of the newly developed CIQOL instruments to two legacy PROMs commonly used in adult CI users. DESIGN: Using a prospective cohort design, a sample of 334 adult CI users recruited from across the United States provided responses to (1) the CIQOL instruments; (2) a CI-specific PROM (Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, NCIQ); and (3) a general-health PROM (Health Utilities Index 3 [HUI-3]). Responses were obtained again after 1 mo. The reliability and validity of the CIQOL-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments were compared with the legacy PROMs (NCIQ and HUI-3). Psychometric properties and construct validity of each instrument were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, item response theory (IRT), and test-retest reliability (using Pearson's correlations), where appropriate. RESULTS: All six CIQOL-35 Profile domains and the CIQOL-10 Global instrument demonstrated adequate to strong construct validity. The majority of the NCIQ subdomains and NCIQ total score had substantial confirmatory factor analysis model misfit, representing poor construct validity. Therefore, IRT analysis could only be applied to the basic sound performance and activity limitation subdomains of the NCIQ. IRT results showed strong psychometric properties for all CIQOL-35 Profile domains, the CIQOL-10 Global instrument, and the basic sound performance and activity limitation subdomains of the NCIQ. Test-retest reliability was strong for the CIQOL-35 Profile, CIQOL-10 Global, and NCIQ, but moderate to weak for the HUI-3; the hearing score of the HUI-3 demonstrated the weakest reliability. CONCLUSION: The CIQOL-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global are more psychometrically sound and comprehensive than the NCIQ and the HUI-3 for assessing QOL in adult CI users. Due to poor reliability, we do not recommend using the HUI-3 to measure QOL in this population. With validation and psychometric analyses complete, the CIQOL-35 Profile measure and CIQOL-10 Global instrument are now ready for use in clinical and research settings to measure QOL and real-world functional abilities of adult CI users.

Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures.

PURPOSE: To determine the contributions to hearing aid benefit of patient-reported outcomes and audiologic measures. METHODS: Independent review was conducted on audiologic and patient-reported outcomes of hearing aid benefit collected in the course of a middle ear implant FDA clinical trial. Unaided and aided data were extracted from the preoperative profiles of 95 experienced hearing aid users, and the relationships between a patient-reported outcome and audiologic measures were assessed. The following data were extracted: unaided and aided pure-tone or warble-tone thresholds (PTA), word recognition in quiet (NU-6), Speech Perception in Noise (low-/high-context SPIN), and patient-reported benefit (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, APHAB). Hearing aid benefit was defined as the difference in thresholds or scores between unaided and aided conditions, as measured in the sound field. Correlations were computed among audiologic measures and global APHAB and subscale scores of hearing aid benefit. RESULTS: Significant improvements in all audiologic measures and APHAB scores were observed comparing unaided to aided listening (all p < 0.001). However, correlations between audiologic and patient-reported measures of aided performance or hearing aid benefit were low-to-weak or absent. No significant correlations were found between aided audiologic measures (PTA, NU-6, SPIN) and any aided APHAB scores (all p > 0.0125), and significant relationships for hearing aid benefit were absent with only few exceptions. Hearing aid benefit defined by global APHAB using NU-6 and SPIN scores showed significant but weak positive correlations (r = 0.37, p < 0.001; r = 0.28, p = 0.005, respectively) and ease of communication APHAB subscale scores (r = 0.32, p < 0.001; r = 0.33, p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Hearing aid benefit assessed with audiologic measures were poor predictors of patient-reported benefit. Thus, patient-reported outcomes may provide a unique assessment of patient-perceived benefit from hearing aids, which can be used to direct hearing aid programming, training, or recommendations of alternative hearing services.

Development of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Item Bank.

OBJECTIVES: Functional outcomes following cochlear implantation have traditionally been focused on word and sentence recognition, which, although important, do not capture the varied communication and other experiences of adult cochlear implant (CI) users. Although the inadequacies of speech recognition to quantify CI user benefits are widely acknowledged, rarely have adult CI user outcomes been comprehensively assessed beyond these conventional measures. An important limitation in addressing this knowledge gap is that patient-reported outcome measures have not been developed and validated in adult CI patients using rigorous scientific methods. The purpose of the present study is to build on our previous work and create an item bank that can be used to develop new patient-reported outcome measures that assess CI quality of life (QOL) in the adult CI population. DESIGN: An online questionnaire was made available to 500 adult CI users who represented the adult CI population and were recruited through a consortium of 20 CI centers in the United States. The questionnaire included the 101 question CIQOL item pool and additional questions related to demographics, hearing and CI history, and speech recognition scores. In accordance with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, responses were psychometrically analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. RESULTS: Of the 500 questionnaires sent, 371 (74.2%) subjects completed the questionnaire. Subjects represented the full range of age, durations of CI use, speech recognition abilities, and listening modalities of the adult CI population; subjects were implanted with each of the three CI manufacturers' devices. The initial item pool consisted of the following domain constructs: communication, emotional, entertainment, environment, independence, listening effort, and social. Through psychometric analysis, after removing locally dependent and misfitting items, all of the domains were found to have sound psychometric properties, with the exception of the independence domain. This resulted in a final CIQOL item bank of 81 items in 6 domains with good psychometric properties. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal that hypothesis-driven quantitative analyses result in a psychometrically sound CIQOL item bank, organized into unique domains comprised of independent items which measure the full ability range of the adult CI population. The final item bank will now be used to develop new instruments that evaluate and differentiate adult CIQOL across the patient ability spectrum.

Factors associated with recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma involving the temporal bone.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to better identify factors associated with recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) involving the temporal bone. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital. Sixty patients who were diagnosed over a 10-year period with SCC involving the temporal bone and underwent surgical resection were analyzed. All patients were staged based on the University of Pittsburgh staging system. Demographic, intraoperative, and pathologic data were analyzed with respect to recurrence. RESULTS: Thirteen (21.7%) patients were T1, 8 (13.3%) T2, 7 (11.7%) T3, and 32 (53.3%) T4. Eighteen patients (30.0%) recurred in the study period. The mean time to recurrence was 5.8 months. Tumors originating in the skin overlying the parotid gland and the external auditory canal had higher recurrence rates than those from the auricle/postauricular skin and temporal bone (P = .05). Direct parotid and perineural spread accounted for 15.0% of all routes of temporal invasion but resulted in 22.2% of all recurrences (P = .04). Increased N stage was statistically associated with increased risk of recurrence (P = .01). Cervical, as compared to perifacial and parotid, lymph node involvement was associated with increased risk of recurrence (odds ratio = 6.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-42.87). CONCLUSION: We have identified multiple factors that are associated with increased recurrence of SCC involving the temporal bone.

Acute pediatric facial nerve paralysis as the first indication for familial cerebral cavernoma: case presentation and literature review.

Familial cerebral cavernoma is an autosomal dominant phenotype with incomplete clinical and neuroimaging penetrance. The most common clinical manifestations include seizures and cerebral hemorrhage. We present the case of a 7-year-old boy who developed acute onset facial nerve paralysis secondary to previously unknown familial cerebral cavernoma. Genetic workup revealed a KRIT1 gene deletion which was later confirmed in the patient's asymptomatic father and younger brother.

Impedance testing on cochlear implants after electroconvulsive therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implants (CI) are neural prostheses that restore hearing to individuals with profound sensorineural hearing loss. The surgically implanted component consists of an electrode array, which is threaded into the cochlea, and an electronic processor, which is buried under the skin behind the ear. The Food and Drug Administration and CI manufacturers contend that electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is contraindicated in CI recipients owing to risk of damage to the implant and/or the patient. We hypothesized that ECT does no electrical damage to CIs. METHODS: Ten functional CIs were implanted in 5 fresh cadaveric human heads. Each head then received a consecutive series of 12 unilateral ECT sessions applying maximum full pulse-width energy settings. Electroconvulsive therapy was delivered contralaterally to 5 CIs and ipsilaterally to 5 CIs. Electrical integrity testing (impedance testing) of the electrode array was performed before and after CI insertion, and after the first, third, fifth, seventh, ninth, and 12th ECT sessions. Electroconvulsive therapy was performed by a staff psychiatrist experienced with the technique. Explanted CIs were sent back to the manufacturer for further integrity testing. RESULTS: No electrical damage was identified during impedance testing. Overall, there were statistically significant decreases in impedances (consistent with no electrical damage) when comparing pre-ECT impedance values to those after 12 sessions. There was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in impedance values comparing ipsilateral to contralateral ECT. Manufacturer testing revealed no other electrical damage to the CIs. CONCLUSION: Electroconvulsive therapy does not seem to cause any detectable electrical injury to CIs.

Adaptation of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 Profile Into German.

PURPOSE: The adaptation of existing questionnaires is a valuable method to make instruments available in multiple languages. It is necessary to assure the quality of an adaptation by following adaptation guidelines. The Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 Profile (CIQOL-35 Profile) was developed and validated to measure the functional abilities in English-speaking adult CI users but is not yet available in German. In this study, we performed a cross-cultural adaptation of this instrument to make it applicable in research and rehabilitation with German-speaking patients. METHOD: This study followed established practice guidelines for translating and adapting hearing-related questionnaires. Professional translators and health care professionals with experience with patients with hearing loss translated all items forward and backward multiple times. A committee reviewed the process and decided when a satisfactory consensus was achieved. Next, we examined the intelligibility of the German version using cognitive interviews with 15 adult CI users. RESULTS: For most items, there was no difficulty with direct translation. In items that turned out to be more difficult to translate, it proved to be very helpful to compare the back translation to the original version, discuss the wording in the committee, and ask the source-language questionnaire developer. During the interviews, issues of comprehension for some phrases were identified. These phrases were changed according to the participant's questions and suggestions. CONCLUSIONS: The CIQOL-35 Profile was successfully adapted into German. The German version of the questionnaire is now available for research and clinical practice. Further validation of the German CIQOL-35 Profile is in progress. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25386571.

Frequency-to-Place Mismatch Impacts Cochlear Implant Quality of Life, But Not Speech Recognition.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively compare frequency-place mismatch among adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients with lateral wall (LW) and perimodiolar/Mid Scala (PM/MS) arrays, and to quantify the impact of these factors on early post-activation (3 months) speech recognition abilities and CI-specific quality of life. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six adult participants were separated into two groups: (1) 83 participants who underwent CI with a PM/MS array and 43 patients who underwent CI with a LW array. All participants completed the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Profile (CIQOL-35 Profile) instrument. Angular insertion depth and semitone mismatch, which contribute to frequency-place mismatch, were assessed using post-operative CT scans. Word and speech recognition in quiet were determined using the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) and the AzBio tests, respectively (n = 82 patients). RESULTS: LW arrays were more deeply inserted and exhibited less semitone mismatch compared to PM/MS arrays. No significant relationship was found between semitone mismatch and early post-operative speech perception scores for either PM/MS or LW arrays. However, greater degrees of semitone mismatch were associated with lower CIQOL-35 profile scores for PM/MS arrays. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this study indicate that both the degree of frequency-place mismatch, and its impact on CI-specific quality of life, vary by CI array design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:2898-2905, 2024.

Short Postoperative Length of Stay After Lateral Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Repair.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing surgical repair of lateral skull base cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks followed by a shortened length of stay (LOS) protocol. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary medical center. METHODS: A total of 156 adult patients from July 2016 to December 2022 who underwent repair of CSF leaks via transmastoid (TM), middle cranial fossa (MCF), or combined (TM/MCF) approaches were included. Data collected included: LOS, presentation to the emergency department (ED), need for readmission, major neurologic complications (stroke, seizure, and meningitis), and CSF leak recurrence. RESULTS: Approximately half of patients underwent a TM repair (49.4%), whereas the other half underwent either an MCF (3.8%) or combined TM/MCF repair (46.8%). No peri-/postoperative lumbar drains were used and only 2 (1.3%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit after surgery. Mean LOS for the cohort was 1.1 ± 0.7 days and was longer for surgeries involving MCF (1.3 ± 0.6) compared to TM (0.8 ± 0.7). Ninety-two percent of TM cases were discharged within 24 hours (32% on the same day) while for cases involving an MCF approach, 72.2% of patients were discharged within 24 hours. Of the patients in the study, 6 (3.8%) presented to an ED for minor complications and no patient required readmission. Revision surgery was required for 3 (1.9%) patients for recurrent CSF leak. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that short LOS after surgical repair of lateral skull base defects in the treatment of CSF leak is safe and effective.

Derivation and Initial Validation of the Utility Function for the Hearing Utility Measure (HUM).

OBJECTIVE: The Hearing Utility Measure (HUM) is a replacement hearing attribute for the Health Utilities Index, Mark 3 (HUI-3) designed to improve the responsiveness of utility estimates to changes in hearing-related quality of life. The final development step is to derive the instrument's utility scoring function. METHODS: Residents of Ontario, Canada, aged ≥18 years participated in standard gamble and visual analogue scale exercises. Valuations for levels (response options) within each domain, and for each domain relative to the other domains were elicited and used to generate a hearing utility function. The function outputs hearing utility ranging from 0 = 'unable to hear at all' to 1 = 'perfect hearing' for each of the 25,920 hearing states classifiable by the HUM. Performance was assessed relative to the criterion standard: directly elicited standard gamble utility. Distributions of HUM-derived hearing utility were compared with legacy HUI-3 derived estimates. RESULTS: A total of 126 respondents participated (mean age 39.2, range 18-85 years, 53% female [67/126]). The utility function performed well in the estimation of directly elicited utilities (mean difference 0.03, RMSE 0.06). Using the legacy HUI-3, estimated hearing utility was 1.0 for 118/126 respondents (93.6%) compared with just 66/126 (52.4%) using the HUM. CONCLUSION: The new hearing attribute is capable of measuring variations in hearing utility not captured by the legacy HUI-3, especially near the ceiling of hearing function. These findings justify its application and further work to study its measurement properties in hearing loss populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Systematic Review of Auditory Training Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.

Objective: to review evidence on the efficacy of auditory training in adult cochlear implant recipients. Data Sources: PRISMA guidelines for a systematic review of the literature were followed. PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were queried on 29 June 2023 for terms involving cochlear implantation and auditory training. Studies were limited to the English language and adult patient populations. Study Selection: Three authors independently reviewed publications for inclusion in the review based on a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria encompassed adult cochlear implant populations, an analysis of clinician- or patient-directed auditory training, and an analysis of one or more measures of speech recognition and/or patient-reported outcome. Exclusion criteria included studies with only pediatric implant populations, music or localization training in isolation, and single-sample case studies. Data Extraction: The data were collected regarding study design, patient population, auditory training modality, auditory training timing, speech outcomes, and data on the durability of outcomes. A quality assessment of the literature was performed using a quality metric adapted from the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group guidelines. Data Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: Data were qualitatively summarized for 23 studies. All but four studies demonstrated significant improvement in at least one measured or patient-reported outcome measure with training. For 11 studies with sufficient data reporting, pre-intervention and post-intervention pooled means of different outcome measures were compared for 132 patients using meta-analysis. Patient-direct training was associated with significant improvement in vowel-phoneme recognition and speech recognition in noise (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively), and clinician-directed training showed significant improvement in sentence recognition in noise (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The literature on auditory training for adult cochlear implant recipients is limited and heterogeneous, including a small number of studies with limited levels of evidence and external validity. However, the current evidence suggests that auditory training can improve speech recognition in adult cochlear implant recipients.

Impact of Patient Frailty on Speech Recognition and Quality of Life Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

OBJECTIVE: The process of cochlear implantation (CI) and subsequent post-cochlear implant care is extensive and can be difficult to navigate for patients considered medically frail. This study investigates potential impact of patient frailty on speech recognition and quality of life outcomes after CI. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. SETTING: Tertiary cochlear implant center. PATIENTS: Three hundred seventy adults undergoing CI for traditional bilateral hearing loss indication. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of pre-CI to 12-month post-CI change in consonant-nucleus-consonant phoneme/words, AzBio sentences in quiet/+10SNR, and Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile domain and global scores based on degree of patient frailty as assessed using the five-factor modified frailty index and Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: The average age at implantation was 65.4 years (±SD, 15.7; 19-94 years). Overall, there were minimal to absent and nonsignificant differences in speech recognition outcomes (consonant-nucleus-consonant phoneme/words, and AzBio sentences +10SNR) based on pre-CI patient frailty. The exception was less improvement in AzBio quiet sentence score in patients noted to be severely frail based on Charlson Comorbidity Index (57.1% vs. 35.2%, d = 0.7 [0.3, 1]). Similar findings were observed for CIQOL-35 Profile domain and global scores where no associations were found other than decreased improvement in the social domain in patients noted to be severely frail (21.7 vs. -0.3, d = 1 [0.4, 1.7]). CONCLUSIONS: Although some differences in outcomes were noted based on cochlear implant user frailty, these were small and isolated to only a few outcome measures. Therefore, assuming the patient is medically safe for surgery, preoperative frailty should not dissuade clinicians from recommending CI.

Discrepancies Between Expected and Actual Cochlear Implant-Related Functional Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research has demonstrated that realistic patient expectations are a critical factor in determining cochlear implant (CI) candidacy. The current study uses the validated Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-Expectations (CIQOL-Expectations) instrument to determine expectations of potential CI users and the degree to which their pre-CI expectations are met after implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Sixty adult CI patients. INTERVENTIONS/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pre-CI aided and post-CI consonant-nucleus-consonant word and AzBio sentence scores, pre-CI CIQOL-Expectations, and pre-CI and 3/6/12-month post-CI CIQOL-35 Profile scores. RESULTS: Mean pre-CI CIQOL-Expectations exceeded 12-month mean CIQOL-35 Profile scores for the global measure and the communication, environment, and listening effort domains ( d = 0.65-0.97). The communication and listening effort domain scores had the largest discrepancy between expected and actual post-CI improvement (actual scores, 15.1 and 16.3 points lower than expected [ d = 0.93-0.97], respectively). For 42% of patients, pre-CI global expectations exceeded 12-month post-CI CIQOL-35 Profile global scores, 49% met their expectations, and actual scores exceeded expectations for only 10% of patients. Similar patterns were seen for all CIQOL domains except emotional. CONCLUSIONS: Post-CI functional abilities seem to fall short of pre-CI expectations for a substantial percentage of CI users, which was most apparent for the communication and listening effort CIQOL domains. These results may help clinicians direct personalized counseling toward common misconceptions, which can aid shared decision making and potentially minimize the mismatch between expected and realized outcomes.Level of Evidence: III.IRB Pro00073019, approved December 20, 2017 (Medical University of South Carolina).

Determinants of Cochlear Implant Satisfaction and Decisional Regret in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

OBJECTIVE: Determine associations expected and actual cochlear implant (CI) outcomes, decisional regret, and satisfaction in experienced adult CI users. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Thirty-nine adult CI users meeting traditional bilateral hearing loss indications with ≥12 months CI experience. INTERVENTIONS/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients completed the validated Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Living and Decisional Regret instruments. Pre- and post-CI outcomes (CI Quality of Life [CIQOL]-Expectations; CIQOL-35 Profile; CNC words, AzBio Sentences) were obtained from a prospectively maintained clinical database. RESULTS: Using established cutoff scores, 29% of patients reported a substantial degree of post-CI decisional regret. For each CIQOL domain, patients without decisional regret obtained post-CI outcome scores closer to pre-CI expectations compared with patients with decisional regret ( d = 0.34 to 0.91); similar results were observed with higher CI user satisfaction ( d = 0.17-0.83). Notably, the degree of pre- to post-CI improvement in CNC or AzBio scores did not differ between patients with and without decisional regret or with lower and higher satisfaction. Finally, greater pre-/postimprovement in CIQOL-35 Profile domain scores demonstrated far stronger associations with lower decisional regret and higher satisfaction than changes in speech recognition scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with better alignment of their pre-CI expectations and post-CI outcomes and greater pre-/post-CIQOL improvement had lower decisional regret and higher satisfaction. This emphasizes the importance of evidence-based pre-CI counseling regarding real-world CI benefits and caution against assuming that improvements in speech recognition are related to patient satisfaction.

Association of Cognitive Impairment Screening Scores With Improvements in Speech Recognition and Quality of Life After Cochlear Implantation.

Importance: Many cochlear implant centers screen patients for cognitive impairment as part of the evaluation process, but the utility of these scores in predicting cochlear implant outcomes is unknown. Objective: To determine whether there is an association between cognitive impairment screening scores and cochlear implant outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective case series of adult cochlear implant recipients who underwent preoperative cognitive impairment screening with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) from 2018 to 2020 with 1-year follow-up at a single tertiary cochlear implant center. Data analysis was performed on data from January 2018 through December 2021. Exposures: Cochlear implantation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Preoperative MoCA scores and mean (SD) improvement (aided preoperative to 12-month postoperative) in Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant phonemes (CNCp) and words (CNCw), AzBio sentences in quiet (AzBio Quiet), and Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 (CIQOL-35) Profile domain and global scores. Results: A total of 52 patients were included, 27 (52%) of whom were male and 46 (88%) were White; mean (SD) age at implantation was 68.2 (13.3) years. Twenty-three (44%) had MoCA scores suggesting mild and 1 (2%) had scores suggesting moderate cognitive impairment. None had been previously diagnosed with cognitive impairment. There were small to medium effects of the association between 12-month postoperative improvement in speech recognition measures and screening positive or not for cognitive impairment (CNCw mean [SD]: 48.4 [21.9] vs 38.5 [26.6] [d = -0.43 (95% CI, -1.02 to 0.16)]; AzBio Quiet mean [SD]: 47.5 [34.3] vs 44.7 [33.1] [d = -0.08 (95% CI, -0.64 to 0.47)]). Similarly, small to large effects of the associations between 12-month postoperative change in CIQOL-35 scores and screening positive or not for cognitive impairment were found (global: d = 0.32 [95% CI, -0.59 to 1.23]; communication: d = 0.62 [95% CI, -0.31 to 1.54]; emotional: d = 0.26 [95% CI, -0.66 to 1.16]; entertainment: d = -0.005 [95% CI, -0.91 to 0.9]; environmental: d = -0.92 [95% CI, -1.86 to 0.46]; listening effort: d = -0.79 [95% CI, -1.65 to 0.22]; social: d = -0.51 [95% CI, -1.43 to 0.42]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series, screening scores were not associated with the degree of improvement of speech recognition or patient-reported outcome measures after cochlear implantation. Given the prevalence of screening positive for cognitive impairment before cochlear implantation, preoperative screening can be useful for early identification of potential cognitive decline. These findings support that screening scores may have a limited role in preoperative counseling of outcomes and should not be used to limit candidacy.