Transoral robotic styloidectomy for Eagle syndrome: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to conduct a systematic review of the existing literature on styloidectomy performed through transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in Eagle syndrome (ES). DESIGN AND SETTING: Two independent reviewers (RC and AC) conducted a systematic review of PubMed and Embase databases, seeking articles on TORS performed for ES treatment. The search was conducted in July 2023. The review was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PARTICIPANTS: The review included a total of 17 adult patients, comprising 12 females and 5 males, with an average age of 52.2 years, all diagnosed with ES. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For each patient, we assessed the overall length of the styloid process, the affected side, total intervention duration, hospitalization duration, pre and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and the presence of minor and major complications. RESULTS: We identified 4 articles describing 17 instances of TORS as a surgical treatment for ES in the literature, totaling 18 styloidectomies. The mean age of the patients was 52.2 years, with 12 females and 5 males. The average operation time, inclusive of the docking phase, was 68.8 minutes. Sixteen patients (94.1% of the total) experienced complete symptom disappearance or near-complete resolution after surgery. One patient (5.9%) showed improvement categorized as 'non-meaningful.' Only one case of minor complication was reported among the 17 procedures (5.9%).

Barbed Repositioning Pharyngoplasty: Tips and Tricks.

The barbed repositioning pharyngoplasty surgical technique is becoming more widely used for patients with obstructive sleep apnea due to its safety, effectiveness, and rapidity, as evidenced by multicenter studies and Meta-analyses. In order to achieve uniform surgical outcomes, avoid errors that could worsen outcomes, and enable adequate data comparison, a standardized procedure is required to overcome surgeon-related variability. The aim of this paper is to provide practical tips and tricks based on our surgical practice that can make the surgeon's work easier and aid in achieving desired outcomes.

Oncological features and outcomes of laryngeal cancer surgery: a multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: Laryngeal cancer (LC) is among of the most frequent head and neck cancers, associated to a high social impact and mortality. Unfortunately, the current treatment outcomes of LC are often scant, with different factors affecting patient's prognosis (i.e., advanced age, advanced disease stage, lymph node involvement, tumor pathological features, type of intervention). The aims of the present study were: 1) to evaluate the epidemiological and clinical features of patients affected by LC; and 2) to focus on tumor risk factors affecting patient's overall survival (OS) and recurrences. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients affected by LC and surgically treated at two different hospital settings has been performed. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-five patients were enrolled in the present study; of these 189 were males (84%) and 36 (16%) were females. The most frequently performed surgery was total laryngectomy. Thirty-two (14.2%) patients experienced local recurrence, while 15 patients (6.6%) had regional recurrence and 15 distant metastases. Multivariate analysis showed that locoregional recurrence was associated to the occurrence of distant metastases (P=0.002, HR=25,35). Analyzing OS, the only statistically significant factor that correlated with an increased risk of mortality (P<0.015, HR=2,45) was locoregional recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms the literature data about age and sex distribution of LC, about tumors localization, lymph nodes metastasis and distant metastasis incidence and OS rate, based on T and N stage. Interestingly, within this series, the presence of locoregional recurrence or distant metastasis is related to a worst prognosis and a lower overall survival rate.

Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review on the role of margin status.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, robotic surgery finds application in the field of head and neck in the treatment of oropharyngeal tumors. The aim of this work is to examine the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in performing safe oncological resections of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with particular attention to the status of margins. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Literature search of English-language studies focused on TORS through PubMed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases. A total of 431 papers returned to search, but only 24 met the inclusion criteria. The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Guidelines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Within the selected studies, the overall rate of OPSCC positive margins following TORS is minimal, especially when patient selection is adequate and when TORS is used by high volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: TORS is a very precise and viable therapeutic tool that provides good results in terms of surgical radicality with low positive margin rates and good results in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival; however, there is still a great heterogeneity in margins definition within the available literature. Consequently, even if this surgical approach is very promising, it is still challenging to draw firm conclusions nowadays.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by transoral robotic surgery versus upfront surgery for locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising treatment for advanced-stage oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) able to reduce the adjuvant therapy administration rate. METHODS: A retrospective bi-centric study was conducted to analyze NAC + TORS versus upfront TORS patients. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to compare the two groups. RESULTS: Among the 300 patients with stage III-IV OPSCC, 204 patients were matched for comparing NAC + TORS versus upfront TORS. Between the two groups, no significant difference was observed in recurrences and in survival for RFS, OS, and DSS. In the NAC + TORS p16-positive population, adjuvant therapy could be spared in 51% versus 16% in the upfront surgery cohort (p < 0.001) due to the lower frequency of pathological risk factors after NAC. CONCLUSIONS: NAC followed by TORS for locoregionally advanced OPSCC demonstrated to achieve non-inferior survival outcomes to upfront surgery, while in the p16-positive population allowed to significantly spare adjuvant therapy.