First impressions: A prospective evaluation of patient-physician concordance and satisfaction following the initial medical oncology consultation.

BACKGROUND: An especially significant event in the patient-oncologist relationship is the initial consultation, where many complex topics-diagnosis, treatment intent, and often, prognosis-are discussed in a relatively short period of time. This study aimed to measure patients' understanding of the information discussed during their first medical oncology visit and their satisfaction with the communication from medical oncologists. METHODS: Between January and August 2021, patients without prior systemic treatment of their gastrointestinal malignancy (GI) attending the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PMCC) were approached within 24 h of their initial consultation to complete a paper-based questionnaire assessing understanding of their disease (diagnosis, treatment plan/intent, and prognosis) and satisfaction with the consultation. Medical oncology physicians simultaneously completed a similar questionnaire about the information discussed at the initial visit. Matched patient-physician responses were compared to assess the degree of concordance. RESULTS: A total of 184 matched patient-physician surveys were completed. The concordance rates for understanding of diagnosis, treatment plan, treatment intent, and prognosis were 92.9%, 59.2%, 66.8%, and 59.8%, respectively. After adjusting for patient and physician variables, patients who reported treatment intent to be unclear at the time of the consultation were independently associated with lower satisfaction scores (global p = 0.014). There was no statistically significant association between patient satisfaction and whether prognosis was disclosed (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: An in-depth conversation as to what treatment intent and prognosis means is reasonable during the initial medical oncology consultation to ensure patients and caregivers have a better understanding about their cancer.

Double heterozygous pathogenic variants prevalence in a cohort of patients with hereditary breast cancer.

Hereditary breast cancer (BC) corresponds to 5% of all BC and a larger parcel of early-onset disease. The incorporation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques reduced the cost of molecular testing and allowed the inclusion of additional cancer predisposition genes in panels that are more comprehensive. This enabled the identification of germline pathogenic variants in carriers and the introduction of risk-reducing strategies. It also resulted in the identification of the co-occurrence of more than one germline pathogenic variant in BC genes in some families. This is a rare event, and there are few reports on its impact on cancer risk. We conducted a single-institution retrospective study in which 1,156 women with early onset BC and/or a family history of cancer were tested by a germline multi-gene hereditary cancer panel. Germline pathogenic variants in high- and/or moderate-penetrance BC genes were identified in 19.5% of the individuals (n = 226). The most frequent variants were found in TP53 (69 of 226; 55 of them represented by p.R337H), BRCA1 (47 of 226), and BRCA2 (41 of 226). Double heterozygous (DH) variants were detected in 14 cases, representing 1.2% of all individuals assessed. There were no significant differences in age of BC onset and risk for bilateral BC in DH carriers when compared with those with one germline variant.

Gene expression signatures in early breast cancer: Better together with clinicopathological features.

Breast cancer (BC) is a highly heterogeneous disease, characterized by a variety of subtypes with distinct biological, molecular, and clinical behavior. Standard clinicopathological and tumor biology information (as assessed by gene expression signatures-GES), have provided enhanced prognostic and predictive information in both node-negative(N0) and positive(N +), hormonal receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC). Herein, we comprehensively review the clinical data of 5 commonly used GES, namely, Oncotype DX(ODX)®; MammaPrint (MP)®; Prosigna®; Breast Cancer Index (BCI)® and Endopredict® - with sections specifically addressing the role of GES in special histologic subtypes, premenopausal women, late recurrence and adjuvant treatment de-escalation.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of Oncotype DX from a Brazilian private medicine perspective: a GBECAM multicenter retrospective study.

Background: Oncotype DX (ODX) is a validated assay for the prediction of risk of recurrence and benefit of chemotherapy (CT) in both node negative (N0) and 1-3 positive nodes (N1), hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (eBC). Due to limited access to genomic assays in Brazil, treatment decisions remain largely driven by traditional clinicopathologic risk factors. ODX has been reported to be cost-effective in different health system, but limited data are available considering the reality of middle-income countries such as Brazil. We aim to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ODX across strata of clinical risk groups using data from a dataset of patients from Brazilian institutions. Methods: Clinicopathologic and ODX information were analyzed for patients with T1-T3, N0-N1, HR+/HER2- eBC who had an ODX performed between 2005 and 2020. Projections of CT indication by clinicopathologic criteria were based on binary clinical risk categorization based on the Adjuvant! Algorithm. The ODX score was correlated with the indication of CT according to TAILORx and RxPONDER data. Two decision-tree models were developed. In the first model, low and high clinical risk patients were included while in the second, only high clinical risk patients were included. The cost for ODX and CT was based on the Brazilian private medicine perspective. Results: In all, 645 patients were analyzed; 411 patients (63.7%) had low clinical risk and 234 patients (36.3%) had high clinical risk disease. The ODX indicated low (<11), intermediate (11-25), and high (>25) risk in 119 (18.4%), 415 (64.3%), and 111 (17.2%) patients, respectively. Among 645 patients analyzed in the first model, ODX was effective (5.6% reduction in CT indication) though with an incremental cost of United States Dollar (US$) 2288.87 per patient. Among 234 patients analyzed in the second model (high clinical risk only), ODX led to a 57.7% reduction in CT indication and reduced costs by US$ 4350.66 per patient. Conclusions: Our study suggests that ODX is cost-saving for patients with high clinical risk HR+/HER2- eBC and cost-attractive for the overall population in the Brazilian private medicine perspective. Its incorporation into routine practice should be strongly considered by healthcare providers.

Response to anti-PD1 immunotherapy in patients with metastatic cutaneous sarcoma: case reports and literature review.

Dermal sarcomas represent a group or rare malignancies of mesenchymal origin. Although surgical excision with wide margins can be curative, in the advanced/metastatic setting, treatment options are limited and the benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy or targeted agents is usually short-lived. Tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 expression scores can be used as predictive biomarker for response to immunotherapy in some metastatic cancers. The role of immune-checkpoint blockade for sarcoma patients remains investigational. Here we present three cases of dermal sarcomas with high TMB and PD-L1 expression and responses to anti-PD1 agents in two of them.